National Project Implementation Plan - NVBDCP
National Project Implementation Plan - NVBDCP
National Project Implementation Plan - NVBDCP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 14<br />
Economic and Financial Analysis<br />
14.1 Economic Analysis<br />
The project seeks to reduce malaria burden in selected, highly endemic areas<br />
as well as eliminate kala-azar. This project supports certain very important<br />
interventions such as the introduction of a new diagnosis and treatment<br />
protocol, strengthening service delivery mechanisms which are necessary for<br />
the effective implementation of the new protocol, a different strategy for<br />
effective surveillance, strong emphasis on the availability and use of long<br />
lasting insecticidal nets for vector control and so forth. The known interventions<br />
in both these diseases are highly cost-effective.<br />
Available evidence suggests that all malaria interventions are highly attractive<br />
(cost-effective) using a cutoff of US$150 per DALY averted.18 There are two<br />
broad types of interventions in Malaria control: case management and<br />
prevention. On the prevention side, the review of worldwide trials of ITNs and<br />
IRS by Curtis and Mnzava’s suggests that ITNs and IRS have equivalent<br />
effectiveness. Similar conclusion is reached also by Lengeler and Sharp (2003)<br />
who notes that choosing between IRS and ITNs is “largely a matter of<br />
operational feasibility and availability of local resources than one of malaria<br />
epidemiology or cost-effectiveness.” Given cost-effectiveness of both the<br />
strategies, choice between ITNs and IRS then essentially reduces to operational<br />
and logistical challenges in a given context.<br />
A number of studies from Sub-Sahara Africa, particularly, in the Gambia,<br />
Ghana, and Kenya have shown the provision and insecticide treatment of bed<br />
nets to be highly cost-effective under varying conditions.19 A study by<br />
Goodman et al. (2001) compared the cost and cost-effectiveness of insecticidetreated<br />
bednets and IRS KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa. The study concludes,<br />
“In view of the greater effectiveness of ITBN, policy makers may view ITBN as<br />
a cost-effective use of resources, even if the economic costs are higher.”20<br />
18 Breman, J.G. et al, Conquering malaria, Chapter 21 in Disease Control Priorities in Developing<br />
Countries 2006, pages 413-432.<br />
19 Goodman CA., and Mills AJ, (1999), The evidence base on the cost-effectiveness of malaria<br />
control measures in Africa, Health Policy and <strong>Plan</strong>ning, Review Article, 14(4): 301–312.<br />
20 Goodman CA., et al. (2001), Comparison of the cost and cost-effectiveness<br />
of insecticide-treated bednets and residual house-spraying in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa Tropical<br />
Medicine and International Health, Volume 6, No. 4, pp 280-295 April 2001.<br />
149