National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - W2agz.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Ellen Lutz, U.S. Department of Energy Paul McCoy, Trans-Elect, Inc. Michael McDiarmid, NM Energy Office Robert McKee, American Transmission Company M. Andrew McLain, U.S. Department of Energy Will McNamara, Sempra Energy David Meyer, U.S. Department of Energy Joe Miller, JAM Enterprises Pamela Mills, San Diego Gas & Electric Jeffrey Mitchell, ReliabilityFirst Corp. Eric Mortenson, Exelon Jodi Moskowitz, PSEG Jim Musial, DTE Energy Steven Naumann, Exelon David Neumayer, Western Area Power Administration Roberto Paliza, Paliza Consulting, LLC. Mary Ellen Paravalos, National Grid Carl Patka, New York Independent System Operator Jerry Pell, U.S. Department of Energy Les Pereira, Northern California Power Agency Jay Porter, American Transmission Company Kathleen Quasey, Chicago Solar Partnership Raj Rana, American Electric Power Marion Rawson, Energetics Incorporated Robert Reynolds, Peabody Energy Randy Rismiller, Illinois Commerce Commission Michael Robinson, Southern Company Jay Ruberto, Allegheny Power Lawrence Salomone, Washington Savannah River Company David Sapper, Public Service Commission of Wisconsin Allen Schindler, Northeast Utilities Service Co. Robert Schlueter, Intellcon John Schnagl, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Richard Schultz, ITC Transmission Russell Schussler, Georgia Transmission Corporation Alison Silverstein, Alison Silverstein Consulting William Smith, Organization of MISO States Wayne Snowdon, Canadian Electricity Association Transmission Council Julia Souder, U.S. Department of Energy Jennifer Sterling, Exelon Mark Stout, Tri-State G&T Edward Tatum, Old Dominion Electric Cooperative Christine Tezak, Stanford WRG Robert Thomas, Cornell University David Till, Tennessee Valley Authority Dale Trott, Burns & McDonnell Charles Tyson, Midwest ISO Julie Voeck, American Transmission Company Steve Waddington, Wyoming Infrastructure Authority Wayne Walker, Horizon Wind Energy Kim Warren, Independent Electricity System Operator Stephen Waslo, U.S. Department of Energy Keith White, Calif. Public Utilities Comm. Bill Whitehead, PJM James Whitehead, Tennessee Valley Authority Greg Williams, Bracewell & Giuliani LLP Lawrence Willick, LS Power Development, LLC Jeffrey Wilson, Midwest ISO Kevin Wright, Illinois Commerce Commission Robert Young, PA Public Utility Commission 84 U.S. Department of Energy / National Electric Transmission Congestion Study / 2006
Appendix E On-Line Participants in DOE’s March 29, 2006 Technical Conference on National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors Ram Adapa, EPRI Rahul Advani, Energy Capital Partners Syed Ahmad, FERC John Ahr, Allegheny Power Lauren Andersen, PJM Grace Anderson, California Energy Commission Christy Appleby, PA Office of Consumer Advocate Paul Bautista, Discovery Insights LLC Alan Bax, MO Public Service Commission David Beam, North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation Joel Bearden, Cargill Power Markets, LLC Candace Beery, MT PSC William Bokram, Michigan Public Service Commission Rich Bonnifield, PSEG Donald Brookhyser, Alcantar & Kahl Kenneth Brown, (organization not provided) Brenda Buchan, Florida Public Service Commission Jack Cadogan, Department of Energy - Wind Greg Cagle, Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. Mary Cain, FERC Richard Campbell, PPL James Carnahan, Southwestern Power Administration Janice Carney, ElectriCities Thomas Carr, Western Interstate Energy Board Phillip Cave, KY Public Service Commission Ed Chang, Flynn Resource Consultants Inc. Carol Chinn, FERC Raj Chintapalli, Customized Energy Solutions Amy Christensen, Iowa Utilities Board Paul Ciampoli, NGI Marcus Cole, Energy Capital Partners Perry Cole, Energy Capital Partners Anthony Como, Department of Energy Stephen Conant, Anbaric Power Jeffrey Conopask, D.C. Public Service Commission Harold Cook, Booth & Associates, Inc. Duane Dahlquist, Blue Ridge Power Agency Edward Davis, Entergy Services, Inc George Dawe, Duke Energy Corporation Michael Delaney, City of New York Christian DeLuca, IM-43 Rachel Dibble, Salt River Project Sedina Eric, FERC Bryce Freeman, Wyoming Infrastructure Authority Roger Fujihara, DC Public Service Commission Mark Futrell, Florida Public Service Commission David Gaige, Burns & McDonnell Alan Gale, City of Tallahassee Judy Grau, California Energy Commission Jack Halpern, Louis Berger Group, Inc Damase Hebert, New Jersey Board of Public Utilities James Hebson, PSEG Donna Heimiller, National Renewable Energy Lab U.S. Department of Energy / National Electric Transmission Congestion Study / 2006 85
Page 1:
NATIONAL ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION CONG
Page 5 and 6:
Contents Executive Summary ........
Page 7:
List of Figures (continued) 4-1. Co
Page 10 and 11:
transmission constraint is loaded t
Page 12 and 13:
Next Steps Notice of Intent to Cons
Page 14 and 15:
RRO RTO SCOPF SERC SPP SSG-WI STEP
Page 16 and 17:
Figure 1-1. Map of North American E
Page 18 and 19:
constraints. 4 Similarly, ISOs and
Page 20 and 21:
Transmission Constraints, Paths, an
Page 23 and 24:
2. Study Approach and Methods This
Page 25 and 26:
November 3, 2005, for Henry Hub gas
Page 27 and 28:
Wyoming, Montana, Nevada and Utah.
Page 29 and 30:
Loading Relief (TLR) actions and co
Page 31 and 32:
these zones. An exception is NYISO
Page 33:
production by dispatching a fixed f
Page 36 and 37:
4. Southern New England East-West F
Page 38 and 39:
Several of MISO’s transmission co
Page 40 and 41:
years modeled. Future electricity p
Page 42 and 43:
Other observations based on the con
Page 45 and 46:
4. Congestion and Constraints in th
Page 47 and 48: Figure 4-2. Actual Transmission Con
Page 49 and 50: most likely to be the most heavily
Page 51 and 52: Figure 4-7. Existing and Projected
Page 53 and 54: 5. Critical Congestion Areas, Conge
Page 55 and 56: 5.2. Congestion Areas in the Easter
Page 57 and 58: Baltimore area will face numerous v
Page 59 and 60: new generation resources. Figure 5-
Page 61 and 62: Interconnection, and a strong commi
Page 63 and 64: prices during binding hours in 2008
Page 65 and 66: 2. Is there strong commercial inter
Page 67 and 68: Reference Transmission Case, which
Page 69 and 70: Figure 5-9. Potential Wind Developm
Page 71 and 72: moderate cost renewable energy to M
Page 73 and 74: 6. Request for Comments on Designat
Page 75 and 76: might be resolved. Accordingly, the
Page 77 and 78: 7. Next Steps Regarding Congestion
Page 79: Refining congestion metrics As indi
Page 82 and 83: Flowgate: An individual or a group
Page 84 and 85: Transfer capability: The measure of
Page 87 and 88: Appendix A Sections 368 and 1221(a)
Page 89: `(B) the applicant for a permit is
Page 92 and 93: Ohio Consumers’ Counsel Oklahoma
Page 94 and 95: March 29, 2006 — 8:30 am - 3:00 p
Page 97: Appendix D On-Site Participants in
Page 101: Grace Soderberg, NARUC Ryan Stanley
Page 105 and 106: Appendix G Outreach Meetings Held R
Page 107: Organization/Event Outreach Type Lo
Page 111 and 112: Appendix I Documents or Data Review
Page 113: 60. VASTE 2005-06 Winter Study Repo
Page 116 and 117: 16. Montana Department of Environme
Page 119: Appendix K List of WECC Paths 74 Pa
show all

National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - W2agz.com

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?