National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - W2agz.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix D On-Site Participants in DOE’s March 29, 2006 Technical Conference on National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors Poonum Agrawal, U.S. Department of Energy Parveen Baig, Iowa Utilities Board Derek Bandera, Reliant Energy, Inc. Diane Barney, New York Dept. of Public Service Joel Bearden, Cargill Power Markets, LLC Michael Bednarz, US Department of Energy - Midwest Regional Office Mark Bennett, Electric Power Supply Association Bradley Bentley, Sempra Energy Utility Heather Bergman, The Keystone Center Ricky Bittle, Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation Grant Brummels, Sustainable Energy Solutions John Buechler, NYISO Shelton Cannon, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Henry Chao, ABB Inc. Laurence Chaset, California Public Utilities Commission Kevin Coates, Composite Technology Corp. Kurt Conger, EXS Inc. Lot Cooke, U.S. Department of Energy Randell Corbin, Ohio Consumers’ Counsel Robert Cupina, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Keith Daniel, Georgia Transmission Corporation Lex Davidson, Areva T&D Inc. Joe Desmond, California Energy Commission Michael Desselle, AEP David Dworzak, Edison Electric Institute Sherman Elliott, Midwest ISO Kimberly Erickson, Xcel Energy Christine Ericson, Illinois Commerce Commission Jody Erikson, The Keystone Center Joseph Eto, Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab Tim Fagan, PSEG Philip Fedora, Northeast Power Coordinating Council Lynn Ferry, Southern California Edison Betty Gallagher, ComEd Kenneth Gates, PHI Lauren Giles, Energetics Incorporated Craig Glazer, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. Kenneth Glick, California Energy Commission Matthew Goldberg, ISO New England Inc. Rob Gramlich, American Wind Energy Association John Guidinger, Commonwealth Associates Inc. James Haney, Allegheny Power Steve Henderson, CRA Scott Henry, Duke Power Michael Heyeck, American Electric Power Sandra Hochstetter, Arkansas Public Service Commission Raymond Kershaw, International Transmission Company Mohan Kondragunta, SCE Robert Kondziolka, SRP Klaus Lembeck, PUCO Doug Larson, Western Interstate Energy Board Jay Loock, WECC King Look, Consolidated Edison U.S. Department of Energy / National Electric Transmission Congestion Study / 2006 83
Page 1:
NATIONAL ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION CONG
Page 5 and 6:
Contents Executive Summary ........
Page 7:
List of Figures (continued) 4-1. Co
Page 10 and 11:
transmission constraint is loaded t
Page 12 and 13:
Next Steps Notice of Intent to Cons
Page 14 and 15:
RRO RTO SCOPF SERC SPP SSG-WI STEP
Page 16 and 17:
Figure 1-1. Map of North American E
Page 18 and 19:
constraints. 4 Similarly, ISOs and
Page 20 and 21:
Transmission Constraints, Paths, an
Page 23 and 24:
2. Study Approach and Methods This
Page 25 and 26:
November 3, 2005, for Henry Hub gas
Page 27 and 28:
Wyoming, Montana, Nevada and Utah.
Page 29 and 30:
Loading Relief (TLR) actions and co
Page 31 and 32:
these zones. An exception is NYISO
Page 33:
production by dispatching a fixed f
Page 36 and 37:
4. Southern New England East-West F
Page 38 and 39:
Several of MISO’s transmission co
Page 40 and 41:
years modeled. Future electricity p
Page 42 and 43:
Other observations based on the con
Page 45 and 46: 4. Congestion and Constraints in th
Page 47 and 48: Figure 4-2. Actual Transmission Con
Page 49 and 50: most likely to be the most heavily
Page 51 and 52: Figure 4-7. Existing and Projected
Page 53 and 54: 5. Critical Congestion Areas, Conge
Page 55 and 56: 5.2. Congestion Areas in the Easter
Page 57 and 58: Baltimore area will face numerous v
Page 59 and 60: new generation resources. Figure 5-
Page 61 and 62: Interconnection, and a strong commi
Page 63 and 64: prices during binding hours in 2008
Page 65 and 66: 2. Is there strong commercial inter
Page 67 and 68: Reference Transmission Case, which
Page 69 and 70: Figure 5-9. Potential Wind Developm
Page 71 and 72: moderate cost renewable energy to M
Page 73 and 74: 6. Request for Comments on Designat
Page 75 and 76: might be resolved. Accordingly, the
Page 77 and 78: 7. Next Steps Regarding Congestion
Page 79: Refining congestion metrics As indi
Page 82 and 83: Flowgate: An individual or a group
Page 84 and 85: Transfer capability: The measure of
Page 87 and 88: Appendix A Sections 368 and 1221(a)
Page 89: `(B) the applicant for a permit is
Page 92 and 93: Ohio Consumers’ Counsel Oklahoma
Page 94 and 95: March 29, 2006 — 8:30 am - 3:00 p
Page 98 and 99: Ellen Lutz, U.S. Department of Ener
Page 100 and 101: Michael Held, MidAmerican Energy Pa
Page 103: Appendix F Organizations Providing
Page 106 and 107: Organization/Event Outreach Type Lo
Page 109: Appendix H General Documents or Dat
Page 112 and 113: 29. NPCC 2004 Report of the CP-10 W
Page 115 and 116: Appendix J Documents or Data Review
Page 117: 35. U.S. Department of Energy 1982.
show all

National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - W2agz.com

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?