National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - W2agz.com
National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - W2agz.com National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - W2agz.com
Appendix F Organizations Providing Formal Comments to DOE’s March 29, 2006 Technical Conference on National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors The following 13 organizations provided formal comments to the U.S. Department of Energy on the plan presented at the March 29, 2006, Technical Conference: Allegheny Power American Electric Power American Transmission Company California Public Utilities Commission Committee on Regional Electric Power Cooperation Edison Electric Institute ISO/RTO Council National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Northeast Power Coordinating Council Northern California Power Agency Old Dominion Electric Cooperative PSEG Services Corporation Xcel Energy U.S. Department of Energy / National Electric Transmission Congestion Study / 2006 89
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 4-7. Existing and Projected
- Page 53 and 54: 5. Critical Congestion Areas, Conge
- Page 55 and 56: 5.2. Congestion Areas in the Easter
- Page 57 and 58: Baltimore area will face numerous v
- Page 59 and 60: new generation resources. Figure 5-
- Page 61 and 62: Interconnection, and a strong commi
- Page 63 and 64: prices during binding hours in 2008
- Page 65 and 66: 2. Is there strong commercial inter
- Page 67 and 68: Reference Transmission Case, which
- Page 69 and 70: Figure 5-9. Potential Wind Developm
- Page 71 and 72: moderate cost renewable energy to M
- Page 73 and 74: 6. Request for Comments on Designat
- Page 75 and 76: might be resolved. Accordingly, the
- Page 77 and 78: 7. Next Steps Regarding Congestion
- Page 79: Refining congestion metrics As indi
- Page 82 and 83: Flowgate: An individual or a group
- Page 84 and 85: Transfer capability: The measure of
- Page 87 and 88: Appendix A Sections 368 and 1221(a)
- Page 89: `(B) the applicant for a permit is
- Page 92 and 93: Ohio Consumers’ Counsel Oklahoma
- Page 94 and 95: March 29, 2006 — 8:30 am - 3:00 p
- Page 97 and 98: Appendix D On-Site Participants in
- Page 99 and 100: Appendix E On-Line Participants in
- Page 101: Grace Soderberg, NARUC Ryan Stanley
- Page 106 and 107: Organization/Event Outreach Type Lo
- Page 109: Appendix H General Documents or Dat
- Page 112 and 113: 29. NPCC 2004 Report of the CP-10 W
- Page 115 and 116: Appendix J Documents or Data Review
- Page 117: 35. U.S. Department of Energy 1982.
Appendix F<br />
Organizations Providing Formal Comments<br />
to DOE’s March 29, 2006 Technical Conference on<br />
<strong>National</strong> Interest <strong>Electric</strong> <strong>Transmission</strong> Corridors<br />
The following 13 organizations provided formal <strong>com</strong>ments to the U.S. Department of Energy on the plan<br />
presented at the March 29, 2006, Technical Conference:<br />
Allegheny Power<br />
American <strong>Electric</strong> Power<br />
American <strong>Transmission</strong> Company<br />
California Public Utilities Commission<br />
Committee on Regional <strong>Electric</strong> Power<br />
Cooperation<br />
Edison <strong>Electric</strong> Institute<br />
ISO/RTO Council<br />
<strong>National</strong> Association of Regulatory Utility<br />
Commissioners<br />
Northeast Power Coordinating Council<br />
Northern California Power Agency<br />
Old Dominion <strong>Electric</strong> Cooperative<br />
PSEG Services Corporation<br />
Xcel Energy<br />
U.S. Department of Energy / <strong>National</strong> <strong>Electric</strong> <strong>Transmission</strong> <strong>Congestion</strong> <strong>Study</strong> / 2006 89
Change language