National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - W2agz.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Michael Held, MidAmerican Energy Paul Herndon, APS Terron Hill, National Grid Raymond Hinkle, URS Corp. Carolyn Holmes, 3M Larre Hozempa, Allegheny Power Margaret Hunt, Edison Electric Institute Verne Ingersoll, Progress Energy Eve Jasmin, Natural Resources Canada Jeff Johnson, KY Public Service Commission Margarett Jolly, Consolidated Edison of New York, Inc. Sean Jones, Investor Ahmad Khan, IIT Neil Kirby, AREVA T&D Inc Brendan Kirby, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Ed Kirschner, Cinergy Paul Klebe, ND Public Service Commission Michael Kormos, PJM Interconnection Rich Kosch, Lincoln Electric System Bob Lawrence, Bob Lawrence & Associates, Inc. Barry Lawson, NRECA Michael Lee, Exeter Associates Kathryn Lewis, Florida Public Service Commission River Luo, ISO New England Thomas Lyle, Vermont Public Service Board Bill Malcolm, MISO Marsha Manning, Progress Energy Larry Mansueti, Department of Energy Richard Marinelli, PSE&G Jayme Martin, Cargill Power & Gas Markets CV Mathai, Arizona Public Service Company Joel McAllister, California Energy Commission Richard McCain, Frederick County Government Nina McLaurin, Progress Energy Israel Melendez, Constellation Energy Commodities Eileen Merrigan, FERC Mary Meyers, Pepco Holdings, Inc. Don Morrow, American Transmission Company Jeff Mueller, PSEG Services Corp. David Nick, DTE Energy Christopher Norton, American Municipal Power - Ohio, Inc. Beth O’Donnell, KY Public Service Commission Gloria Ogenyi, Conectiv Matthew Olearczyk, EPRI Steve Oxley, Wyoming Public Svc Commission Lee Paden, Law Offices of Lee W. Paden, P.C. Anantha Pai, University of Illinois Randall Palmer, Allegheny Power Lopa Parikh, DC Office of the People’s Counsel Greta Paulsen, Montana-Dakota Utilities Sheila Pendleton, VCALL Marjorie Perlman, Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation Denise Phipps, Self Mark Plank, USDA Kevin Porter, Exeter Associates Nick Pratley, National Grid USA Tom Pruitt, Duke Energy Dennis Ray, PSERC Charles Redell, Energy Prospects Mark Ringhausen, Old Dominion Electric Cooperative Dean Robinson, Tennessee Valley Authority Hal Romanowitz, Oak Creek Energy Systems Elliot Roseman, ICF Consulting Gregory Rowland, Duke Energy Morteza Sabet, WAPA/SNR Bruce Sailers, Cinergy James Salo, Colorado River Commission of Nevada Antonio Sammut, International Transmission Jeffrey Sanders, FERC Michael Schmidt, Platts Inside Energy Marsha Smith, Idaho Public Utilities Commission 86 U.S. Department of Energy / National Electric Transmission Congestion Study / 2006
Grace Soderberg, NARUC Ryan Stanley, Pacific Gas and Electric Company David Steele, WEST Associates William Steeley, EPRI Edward Stein, FirstEnergy Solutions Curtis Stepanek, Ameren Services John Sterling, Arizona Public Service Company Tracey Stewart, Southwestern Power Administration Pam Stonier, VT PSB Jeff Taylor, New Mexico Attorney General Dina Thompson, PacifiCorp Michael Thompson, Wright & Talisman, P.C. Sebastian Tiger, FERC William VanderLaan, Illinois Commerce Commission Jack VanKuiken, Argonne National Laboratory Pat vanMidde, vanMidde Consulting James Viikinsalo, Southern Company Services, Inc. Sandra Waldstein, Vermont Public Service Board Carol White, FERC Patsy White, FPSC Robert Williams, Florida Municipal Power Agency Rick Woodlee, Tennessee Valley Authority Jeff Wright, FERC Ellen Young, Stuntz, Davis & Staffier, PC Joni Zenger, Utah Division of Public Utilities Darrell Zlomke, Wyoming Public Service Commission U.S. Department of Energy / National Electric Transmission Congestion Study / 2006 87
Page 1:
NATIONAL ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION CONG
Page 5 and 6:
Contents Executive Summary ........
Page 7:
List of Figures (continued) 4-1. Co
Page 10 and 11:
transmission constraint is loaded t
Page 12 and 13:
Next Steps Notice of Intent to Cons
Page 14 and 15:
RRO RTO SCOPF SERC SPP SSG-WI STEP
Page 16 and 17:
Figure 1-1. Map of North American E
Page 18 and 19:
constraints. 4 Similarly, ISOs and
Page 20 and 21:
Transmission Constraints, Paths, an
Page 23 and 24:
2. Study Approach and Methods This
Page 25 and 26:
November 3, 2005, for Henry Hub gas
Page 27 and 28:
Wyoming, Montana, Nevada and Utah.
Page 29 and 30:
Loading Relief (TLR) actions and co
Page 31 and 32:
these zones. An exception is NYISO
Page 33:
production by dispatching a fixed f
Page 36 and 37:
4. Southern New England East-West F
Page 38 and 39:
Several of MISO’s transmission co
Page 40 and 41:
years modeled. Future electricity p
Page 42 and 43:
Other observations based on the con
Page 45 and 46:
4. Congestion and Constraints in th
Page 47 and 48:
Figure 4-2. Actual Transmission Con
Page 49 and 50: most likely to be the most heavily
Page 51 and 52: Figure 4-7. Existing and Projected
Page 53 and 54: 5. Critical Congestion Areas, Conge
Page 55 and 56: 5.2. Congestion Areas in the Easter
Page 57 and 58: Baltimore area will face numerous v
Page 59 and 60: new generation resources. Figure 5-
Page 61 and 62: Interconnection, and a strong commi
Page 63 and 64: prices during binding hours in 2008
Page 65 and 66: 2. Is there strong commercial inter
Page 67 and 68: Reference Transmission Case, which
Page 69 and 70: Figure 5-9. Potential Wind Developm
Page 71 and 72: moderate cost renewable energy to M
Page 73 and 74: 6. Request for Comments on Designat
Page 75 and 76: might be resolved. Accordingly, the
Page 77 and 78: 7. Next Steps Regarding Congestion
Page 79: Refining congestion metrics As indi
Page 82 and 83: Flowgate: An individual or a group
Page 84 and 85: Transfer capability: The measure of
Page 87 and 88: Appendix A Sections 368 and 1221(a)
Page 89: `(B) the applicant for a permit is
Page 92 and 93: Ohio Consumers’ Counsel Oklahoma
Page 94 and 95: March 29, 2006 — 8:30 am - 3:00 p
Page 97 and 98: Appendix D On-Site Participants in
Page 99: Appendix E On-Line Participants in
Page 105 and 106: Appendix G Outreach Meetings Held R
Page 107: Organization/Event Outreach Type Lo
Page 111 and 112: Appendix I Documents or Data Review
Page 113: 60. VASTE 2005-06 Winter Study Repo
Page 116 and 117: 16. Montana Department of Environme
Page 119: Appendix K List of WECC Paths 74 Pa
show all

National Electric Transmission Congestion Study - W2agz.com

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?