18.01.2015 Views

PCAOB Inspection Report of Plante & Moran, PLLC - Public ...

PCAOB Inspection Report of Plante & Moran, PLLC - Public ...

PCAOB Inspection Report of Plante & Moran, PLLC - Public ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1666 K Street, N.W.<br />

Washington, DC 20006<br />

Telephone: (202) 207-9100<br />

Facsimile: (202) 862-8430<br />

www.pcaobus.org<br />

<strong>Inspection</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Plante</strong> & <strong>Moran</strong>, <strong>PLLC</strong><br />

Issued by the<br />

<strong>Public</strong> Company Accounting Oversight Board<br />

March 14, 2007<br />

THIS IS A PUBLIC VERSION OF A <strong>PCAOB</strong> INSPECTION REPORT<br />

PORTIONS OF THE COMPLETE REPORT ARE OMITTED<br />

FROM THIS DOCUMENT IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH<br />

SECTIONS 104(g)(2) AND 105(b)(5)(A)<br />

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002<br />

<strong>PCAOB</strong> RELEASE NO. 104-2007-033


<strong>PCAOB</strong> Release No. 104-2007-033<br />

Notes Concerning this <strong>Report</strong><br />

1. Portions <strong>of</strong> this report may describe deficiencies or potential deficiencies in the systems,<br />

policies, procedures, practices, or conduct <strong>of</strong> the firm that is the subject <strong>of</strong> this report.<br />

The express inclusion <strong>of</strong> certain deficiencies and potential deficiencies, however, should<br />

not be construed to support any negative inference that any other aspect <strong>of</strong> the firm's<br />

systems, policies, procedures, practices, or conduct is approved or condoned by the<br />

Board or judged by the Board to comply with laws, rules, and pr<strong>of</strong>essional standards.<br />

2. Any references in this report to violations or potential violations <strong>of</strong> law, rules, or<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional standards should be understood in the supervisory context in which this<br />

report was prepared. Any such references are not a result <strong>of</strong> an adversarial adjudicative<br />

process and do not constitute conclusive findings <strong>of</strong> fact or <strong>of</strong> violations for purposes <strong>of</strong><br />

imposing legal liability. Similarly, any description herein <strong>of</strong> a firm's cooperation in<br />

addressing issues constructively should not be construed, and is not construed by the<br />

Board, as an admission, for purposes <strong>of</strong> potential legal liability, <strong>of</strong> any violation.<br />

3. Board inspections encompass, among other things, whether the firm has failed to<br />

identify departures from Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") in its audits<br />

<strong>of</strong> financial statements. This report's descriptions <strong>of</strong> any such auditing failures<br />

necessarily involve descriptions <strong>of</strong> the related GAAP departures. The Board, however,<br />

has no authority to prescribe the form or content <strong>of</strong> an issuer's financial statements.<br />

That authority, and the authority to make binding determinations concerning an issuer's<br />

compliance with GAAP, rests with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or<br />

"Commission"). Any description, in this report, <strong>of</strong> perceived departures from GAAP<br />

should not be understood as an indication that the Commission has considered or made<br />

any determination regarding these GAAP issues unless otherwise expressly stated.


<strong>PCAOB</strong> Release No. 104-2007-033<br />

INSPECTION OF PLANTE & MORAN, <strong>PLLC</strong><br />

The <strong>Public</strong> Company Accounting Oversight Board ("<strong>PCAOB</strong>" or "the Board") has<br />

conducted an inspection <strong>of</strong> the registered public accounting firm <strong>Plante</strong> & <strong>Moran</strong>, <strong>PLLC</strong><br />

("the Firm"). The Board is issuing this report <strong>of</strong> that inspection in accordance with the<br />

requirements <strong>of</strong> the Sarbanes-Oxley Act <strong>of</strong> 2002 ("the Act").<br />

The Board is making portions <strong>of</strong> the report publicly available. Specifically, the<br />

Board is releasing to the public Part I <strong>of</strong> the report and portions <strong>of</strong> Part IV <strong>of</strong> the report.<br />

Part IV <strong>of</strong> the report consists <strong>of</strong> the Firm's comments, if any, on a draft <strong>of</strong> the report. 1/<br />

The Board has elsewhere described in detail its approach to making inspectionrelated<br />

information publicly available consistent with legal restrictions. 2/ A substantial<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> the Board's criticisms <strong>of</strong> a firm (specifically criticisms <strong>of</strong> the firm's quality<br />

control system), and the Board's dialogue with the firm about those criticisms, occurs<br />

out <strong>of</strong> public view, unless the firm fails to make progress to the Board's satisfaction in<br />

addressing those criticisms. In addition, the Board generally does not disclose<br />

otherwise nonpublic information, learned through inspections, about the firm or its<br />

clients. Accordingly, information in those categories generally does not appear in the<br />

publicly available portion <strong>of</strong> an inspection report.<br />

1/<br />

The Board does not make public any <strong>of</strong> a firm's comments that address a<br />

nonpublic portion <strong>of</strong> the report. In addition, pursuant to section 104(f) <strong>of</strong> the Act, 15<br />

U.S.C. § 7214(f), and <strong>PCAOB</strong> Rule 4007(b), if a firm requests, and the Board grants,<br />

confidential treatment for any <strong>of</strong> the firm's comments on a draft report, the Board does<br />

not include those comments in the final report at all. The Board notes that it routinely<br />

grants confidential treatment, if requested, for any <strong>of</strong> a firm's comments that identify<br />

factually inaccurate statements in the draft that the Board corrects in the final report.<br />

2/<br />

See Statement Concerning the Issuance <strong>of</strong> <strong>Inspection</strong> <strong>Report</strong>s, <strong>PCAOB</strong><br />

Release No. 104-2004-001 (August 26, 2004).


<strong>PCAOB</strong> Release No. 104-2007-033<br />

<strong>Inspection</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plante</strong> & <strong>Moran</strong>, <strong>PLLC</strong><br />

March 14, 2007<br />

Page 2<br />

PART I<br />

INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND CERTAIN OBSERVATIONS<br />

Members <strong>of</strong> the Board's inspection staff ("the inspection team") conducted<br />

fieldwork for the inspection from November 7, 2005 to November 18, 2005. The<br />

fieldwork included procedures tailored to the nature <strong>of</strong> the Firm, certain aspects <strong>of</strong> which<br />

the inspection team understood at the outset <strong>of</strong> the inspection to be as follows:<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fices 18 3/<br />

Ownership structure<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional limited liability<br />

company<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> partners 201<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional staff 4/ 928<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> issuer audit clients 5/ 33<br />

Board inspections are designed to identify and address weaknesses and<br />

deficiencies related to how a firm conducts audits. To achieve that goal, Board<br />

3/<br />

The Firm's <strong>of</strong>fices are located in Chicago and Elgin, Illinois; Ann Arbor,<br />

Auburn Hills, East Lansing, Flint, Gaylord, Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo, Mount Clemens,<br />

St. Joseph, Southfield and Traverse City, Michigan; Cleveland, Columbus and Toledo,<br />

Ohio; Nashville, Tennessee; and Shanghai, People's Republic <strong>of</strong> China.<br />

4/<br />

"Pr<strong>of</strong>essional staff" includes all personnel <strong>of</strong> the Firm, except partners or<br />

shareholders and administrative support personnel. The number <strong>of</strong> partners and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional staff is provided here as an indication <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> the Firm, and does not<br />

necessarily represent the number <strong>of</strong> the Firm's pr<strong>of</strong>essionals who participate in audits <strong>of</strong><br />

issuers or are "associated persons" (as defined in the Act) <strong>of</strong> the Firm.<br />

5/<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> issuer audit clients shown here is based on the Firm's selfreporting<br />

and the inspection team's review <strong>of</strong> certain information for inspection planning<br />

purposes. It does not reflect any Board determination concerning which, or how many,<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Firm's audit clients are "issuers" as defined in the Act.


<strong>PCAOB</strong> Release No. 104-2007-033<br />

<strong>Inspection</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plante</strong> & <strong>Moran</strong>, <strong>PLLC</strong><br />

March 14, 2007<br />

Page 3<br />

inspections include reviews <strong>of</strong> certain aspects <strong>of</strong> selected audits performed by the firm<br />

and reviews <strong>of</strong> other matters related to the firm's quality control system.<br />

In the course <strong>of</strong> reviewing aspects <strong>of</strong> selected audits, an inspection may identify<br />

ways in which a particular audit is deficient, including failures by the firm to identify, or to<br />

address appropriately, respects in which an issuer's financial statements do not present<br />

fairly the financial position, results <strong>of</strong> operations, or cash flows <strong>of</strong> the issuer in<br />

conformity with GAAP. 6/ It is not the purpose <strong>of</strong> an inspection, however, to review all <strong>of</strong><br />

a firm's audits or to identify every respect in which a reviewed audit is deficient.<br />

Accordingly, a Board inspection report should not be understood to provide any<br />

assurance that the firm's audits, or its issuer clients' financial statements, are free <strong>of</strong> any<br />

deficiencies not specifically described in an inspection report.<br />

A. Review <strong>of</strong> Audit Engagements<br />

The scope <strong>of</strong> the inspection procedures performed included reviews <strong>of</strong> aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

the performance <strong>of</strong> eight <strong>of</strong> the Firm's audits <strong>of</strong> the financial statements <strong>of</strong> issuers.<br />

Those audits and aspects were selected according to the Board's criteria, and the Firm<br />

was not allowed an opportunity to limit or influence the selection process.<br />

The inspection team identified matters that it considered to be audit<br />

deficiencies. 7/ The deficiencies identified in four <strong>of</strong> the audits reviewed included<br />

deficiencies <strong>of</strong> such significance that it appeared to the inspection team that the Firm<br />

6/<br />

When it comes to the Board's attention that an issuer's financial<br />

statements appear not to present fairly, in a material respect, the financial position,<br />

results <strong>of</strong> operations or cash flows <strong>of</strong> the issuer in conformity with GAAP, the Board<br />

reports that information to the SEC, which has jurisdiction to determine proper<br />

accounting in issuers' financial statements.<br />

7/<br />

<strong>PCAOB</strong> standards require a firm to take appropriate actions to assess the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> audit deficiencies identified after the date <strong>of</strong> the audit report to the firm's<br />

present ability to support its previously expressed opinions. See AU 390, Consideration<br />

<strong>of</strong> Omitted Procedures After the <strong>Report</strong> Date, and AU 561, Subsequent Discovery <strong>of</strong><br />

Facts Existing at the Date <strong>of</strong> the Auditor's <strong>Report</strong> (both included among the <strong>PCAOB</strong>'s<br />

interim auditing standards, pursuant to <strong>PCAOB</strong> Rule 3200T). Failure to comply with<br />

these <strong>PCAOB</strong> standards could be a basis for Board disciplinary sanctions.


<strong>PCAOB</strong> Release No. 104-2007-033<br />

<strong>Inspection</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plante</strong> & <strong>Moran</strong>, <strong>PLLC</strong><br />

March 14, 2007<br />

Page 4<br />

did not obtain sufficient competent evidential matter to support its opinion on the issuer's<br />

financial statements. In each case, that deficiency was the failure to perform and<br />

document sufficient audit procedures regarding the allowance for loan losses.<br />

B. Review <strong>of</strong> Quality Control System<br />

In addition to evaluating the quality <strong>of</strong> the audit work performed on specific<br />

audits, the inspection included review <strong>of</strong> certain <strong>of</strong> the Firm's practices, policies and<br />

procedures related to audit quality. This review addressed practices, policies and<br />

procedures concerning audit performance, training, compliance with independence<br />

standards, client acceptance and retention, and the establishment <strong>of</strong> policies and<br />

procedures. As described above, any defects in, or criticisms <strong>of</strong>, the Firm's quality<br />

control system are discussed in the nonpublic portion <strong>of</strong> this report and will remain<br />

nonpublic unless the Firm fails to address them to the Board's satisfaction within 12<br />

months <strong>of</strong> the date <strong>of</strong> this report.<br />

END OF PART I


<strong>PCAOB</strong> Release No. 104-2007-033<br />

<strong>Inspection</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plante</strong> & <strong>Moran</strong>, <strong>PLLC</strong><br />

March 14, 2007<br />

Page 5<br />

PARTS II AND III OF THIS REPORT ARE NONPUBLIC<br />

AND ARE OMITTED FROM THIS PUBLIC DOCUMENT


<strong>PCAOB</strong> Release No. 104-2007-033<br />

<strong>Inspection</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plante</strong> & <strong>Moran</strong>, <strong>PLLC</strong><br />

March 14, 2007<br />

Page 6<br />

PART IV<br />

RESPONSE OF THE FIRM TO DRAFT INSPECTION REPORT<br />

Pursuant to section 104(f) <strong>of</strong> the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7214(f), and <strong>PCAOB</strong> Rule<br />

4007(a), the Board provided the Firm an opportunity to review and comment on a draft<br />

<strong>of</strong> this report. The Firm provided a written response.<br />

Pursuant to section 104(f) <strong>of</strong> the Act and <strong>PCAOB</strong> Rule 4007(b), if a firm requests,<br />

and the Board grants, confidential treatment for any <strong>of</strong> the firm's comments on a draft<br />

report, the Board does not include those comments in the final report. The Board<br />

routinely grants confidential treatment, if requested, for any <strong>of</strong> a firm's comments that<br />

identify factually inaccurate statements in the draft that the Board corrects in the final<br />

report.<br />

Pursuant to section 104(f) <strong>of</strong> the Act and <strong>PCAOB</strong> Rule 4007(b), the Firm's<br />

response, minus any portion granted confidential treatment, is attached hereto and<br />

made part <strong>of</strong> this final inspection report. In any version <strong>of</strong> this report that the Board<br />

makes publicly available, any portions <strong>of</strong> the Firm's response that address nonpublic<br />

portions <strong>of</strong> the report are omitted.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!