18.01.2015 Views

LITIGATIONRESULTS - Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek SC

LITIGATIONRESULTS - Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek SC

LITIGATIONRESULTS - Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek SC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WHD Successfully Obtains and<br />

Defends Grant of Summary<br />

Judgment on Grounds That<br />

Plaintiff Offers No Credible<br />

Exposure Evidence<br />

laffey<br />

WHD convinced the appellate court to uphold the dismissal of its client, a<br />

pass-through supplier of asbestos-containing pipe insulation, on summary<br />

judgment. The plaintiff alleged that her deceased husband, a carpenter, was<br />

exposed to asbestos-containing products while performing construction<br />

work at more than 50 job sites in Milwaukee. WHD successfully argued that<br />

the plaintiff’s evidence that the decedent was exposed to any asbestoscontaining<br />

products supplied by its client was speculative, and the trial court<br />

granted summary judgment. The plaintiff appealed. The appellate court<br />

affirmed the grant of summary judgment, agreeing with WHD that the plaintiff<br />

had no credible exposure evidence.<br />

Litigation Type: Toxic tort litigation, product liability litigation<br />

Court: Milwaukee County Circuit Court, District I Court of Appeals<br />

Lead WHD Counsel: Jack Laffey<br />

Principal WHD Team Members: Jack Laffey, Sarah Thomas Pagels,<br />

Kristina Lemanski, Tammy Klein (paralegal)<br />

Practice Areas Involved: Toxic Tort Litigation & Consultation<br />

LITIGATION RESULTS 41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!