18.01.2015 Views

LITIGATIONRESULTS - Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek SC

LITIGATIONRESULTS - Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek SC

LITIGATIONRESULTS - Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek SC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WHD Obtains Summary<br />

Judgment for Local Festival:<br />

Court Applies Wisconsin’s<br />

Recreational Immunity Statute<br />

to Public Sidewalk<br />

schmidt<br />

WHD obtained summary judgment in favor of its client, a local ethnic festival.<br />

The plaintiffs, a married couple, had attended mass at the festival and<br />

departed shortly thereafter. They exited the festival and, in returning to their<br />

car, walked on a public sidewalk along the perimeter of the Maier Festival<br />

Grounds. About 10-15 minutes after leaving the festival and while walking<br />

on the sidewalk, an unexpected gust of wind blew over a large A-frame sign,<br />

which was owned and placed on the sidewalk by the festival to identify the<br />

entrance to the festival’s parking lot. The sign knocked the wife to the ground.<br />

She sustained severe injuries, incurring $155,000 in medical expenses and<br />

likely needing a knee replacement in the future as a result of the injuries.<br />

Under Wisconsin’s recreational immunity statute, a nonprofit organization (like<br />

the festival) that “owns, leases or occupies property” or has a recreational<br />

agreement with another owner of property does not owe a duty to keep the<br />

property safe for recreational activities; inspect the property; or warn of an<br />

unsafe condition, use, or activity on the property to persons entering the<br />

property to engage in a recreational activity. A person who is injured while<br />

engaging in a “recreational activity” on the owner’s property cannot hold<br />

the owner liable for the injury. WHD convinced the court that although the<br />

festival did not “own or lease” the public sidewalk, it “occupied” the sidewalk<br />

by virtue of placing the sign on it. Additionally, WHD persuaded the court<br />

that the couple was still engaged in a recreational activity at the time of the<br />

accident despite the fact that they had departed the festival because the act<br />

of returning to their vehicle was inextricably linked to the recreational activity of<br />

attending the festival.<br />

Litigation Type: Premises liability/personal injury<br />

Court: Milwaukee County Circuit Court<br />

Lead WHD Counsel: Pamela Schmidt<br />

Principal WHD Team Members: Pamela Schmidt, Barbara Zabawa,<br />

Nida Shakir (summer associate), Pamela Price (paralegal)<br />

Practice Areas Involved: Personal Injury Defense<br />

LITIGATION RESULTS 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!