LITIGATIONRESULTS - Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek SC
LITIGATIONRESULTS - Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek SC
LITIGATIONRESULTS - Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek SC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WHD Obtains Summary<br />
Judgment for Local Festival:<br />
Court Applies Wisconsin’s<br />
Recreational Immunity Statute<br />
to Public Sidewalk<br />
schmidt<br />
WHD obtained summary judgment in favor of its client, a local ethnic festival.<br />
The plaintiffs, a married couple, had attended mass at the festival and<br />
departed shortly thereafter. They exited the festival and, in returning to their<br />
car, walked on a public sidewalk along the perimeter of the Maier Festival<br />
Grounds. About 10-15 minutes after leaving the festival and while walking<br />
on the sidewalk, an unexpected gust of wind blew over a large A-frame sign,<br />
which was owned and placed on the sidewalk by the festival to identify the<br />
entrance to the festival’s parking lot. The sign knocked the wife to the ground.<br />
She sustained severe injuries, incurring $155,000 in medical expenses and<br />
likely needing a knee replacement in the future as a result of the injuries.<br />
Under Wisconsin’s recreational immunity statute, a nonprofit organization (like<br />
the festival) that “owns, leases or occupies property” or has a recreational<br />
agreement with another owner of property does not owe a duty to keep the<br />
property safe for recreational activities; inspect the property; or warn of an<br />
unsafe condition, use, or activity on the property to persons entering the<br />
property to engage in a recreational activity. A person who is injured while<br />
engaging in a “recreational activity” on the owner’s property cannot hold<br />
the owner liable for the injury. WHD convinced the court that although the<br />
festival did not “own or lease” the public sidewalk, it “occupied” the sidewalk<br />
by virtue of placing the sign on it. Additionally, WHD persuaded the court<br />
that the couple was still engaged in a recreational activity at the time of the<br />
accident despite the fact that they had departed the festival because the act<br />
of returning to their vehicle was inextricably linked to the recreational activity of<br />
attending the festival.<br />
Litigation Type: Premises liability/personal injury<br />
Court: Milwaukee County Circuit Court<br />
Lead WHD Counsel: Pamela Schmidt<br />
Principal WHD Team Members: Pamela Schmidt, Barbara Zabawa,<br />
Nida Shakir (summer associate), Pamela Price (paralegal)<br />
Practice Areas Involved: Personal Injury Defense<br />
LITIGATION RESULTS 33