LITIGATIONRESULTS - Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek SC
LITIGATIONRESULTS - Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek SC
LITIGATIONRESULTS - Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek SC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WHD Wins Summary Judgment<br />
for its Client – Twice!<br />
mcintyre<br />
godar<br />
In December 2006, WHD client Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.<br />
(Saint-Gobain) terminated an employee, Kevin Kasten, under the company’s<br />
progressive discipline policy for time clock violations. Nearly a year later,<br />
Mr. Kasten filed a retaliation complaint under the Fair Labor Standards Act<br />
(FLSA), asserting he was fired for his complaints about alleged underpayment<br />
of wages due to time clock locations. The district court dismissed Kasten’s<br />
complaint on Saint-Gobain’s motion for summary judgment, holding an<br />
employee’s oral complaint was not protected conduct under the FLSA.<br />
Mr. Kasten appealed. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed<br />
Judge Barbara Crabb’s ruling that the anti-retaliation provision of the FLSA was<br />
not triggered by the oral complaint of an employee and that the FLSA required<br />
a written complaint. Mr. Kasten petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court and asked<br />
the court to consider the issue of whether a wage-related oral complaint by an<br />
employee is sufficient to trigger the anti-retaliation provision of the FLSA. The<br />
U.S. Supreme Court, by a 6-2 vote, reversed the Seventh Circuit and held that<br />
a reasonably clear oral complaint is sufficient to give an employer notice of a<br />
wage-related grievance and trigger the anti-retaliation provision of the FLSA.<br />
The case was then remanded to the U.S. District Court for the Western District<br />
of Wisconsin. WHD again filed a motion for summary judgment on a new<br />
issue created by the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision, and re-asserted the “no<br />
retaliation as a matter of law” argument since Mr. Kasten was terminated for<br />
policy violations, not his alleged wage-related complaints. Judge Crabb granted<br />
WHD’s second motion for summary judgment and held that the plaintiff failed to<br />
make a prima facie case of retaliation and dismissed the case.<br />
The victory nullified the risk of a potential $1 million verdict at trial, much of<br />
which would have been the plaintiff’s attorney fees had WHD lost on liability.<br />
Litigation Type: Employment litigation<br />
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin (remanded<br />
by U.S. Supreme Court)<br />
Lead WHD Counsel: Jeffrey McIntyre and Thomas Godar<br />
Principal WHD Team Members: Jeffrey McIntyre, Thomas Godar,<br />
Barbara Zabawa, Erin Keesecker, Cindi Wittlinger (paralegal – litigation<br />
support specialist), Cheryl Louis (paralegal)<br />
Practice Area Involved: Labor & Employment, Litigation<br />
LITIGATION RESULTS 21