17.01.2015 Views

Track Record 34, January to March 2008 - Public Transport Victoria

Track Record 34, January to March 2008 - Public Transport Victoria

Track Record 34, January to March 2008 - Public Transport Victoria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

Quarterly<br />

Performance Bulletin:<br />

<strong>January</strong> – <strong>March</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />

<strong>34</strong><br />

June <strong>2008</strong><br />

The Department of <strong>Transport</strong>


<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

CONTENTS<br />

PAGE<br />

SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY<br />

1.1 Introduction 3<br />

1.2 Summary 3<br />

SECTION 2. PUNCTUALITY AND RELIABILITY<br />

2.1 Punctuality 4<br />

2.2 Reliability (Cancellations) 5<br />

2.3 Passenger compensation 6<br />

SECTION 3. PAYMENTS<br />

3.1 Metropolitan trains and trams 7<br />

3.2 Regional trains 8<br />

3.3 Metropolitan and regional buses 9<br />

3.4 Metlink and OneLink 9<br />

SECTION 4. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION<br />

4.1 Overall satisfaction with metropolitan services 10<br />

4.2 Overall satisfaction with regional services 11<br />

4.3 Key aspects of service quality for trains, trams, taxis, buses and coaches 11<br />

SECTION 5. PERFORMANCE OF AUTOMATIC<br />

TICKETING SYSTEM (ATS) EQUIPMENT<br />

5.1 Railway station ticketing equipment 15<br />

5.2 Tram and bus ticketing equipment 15<br />

5.3 Long term trends 16<br />

5.4 Vandalism of ATS equipment 16<br />

SECTION 6. GLOSSARY OF TERMINOLOGY<br />

6.1 Contracts and partnership agreements 17<br />

6.2 Punctuality and reliability measurements 17<br />

6.3 Payments 18<br />

6.4 Passenger compensation 18<br />

6.5 Cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction 19<br />

6.6 Ticketing and Cus<strong>to</strong>mer-defined Availability (CDA) 19<br />

To return <strong>to</strong> the contents page click on the page number at the bot<strong>to</strong>m right corner of any page.<br />

2


<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

SECTION 1.<br />

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY<br />

1.1 Introduction<br />

This edition of <strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong> provides details on the performance of public transport services in Vic<strong>to</strong>ria for the period from<br />

<strong>January</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>March</strong> <strong>2008</strong> (referred <strong>to</strong> as the <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong>).<br />

Please note:<br />

Connex = Metropolitan trains<br />

Yarra Trams = Metropolitan trams<br />

V/Line Passenger = Regional trains<br />

A Glossary has been added at the back of this report <strong>to</strong> provide explanations of other various terms and processes<br />

described in the body of the bulletin.<br />

1.2 Summary<br />

Punctuality<br />

• Connex<br />

92.4 per cent<br />

• Yarra Trams<br />

81.2 per cent (average over the route)<br />

• V/Line Passenger 84.2 per cent<br />

Reliability (percentage of services cancelled)<br />

• Connex<br />

1.2 per cent<br />

• Yarra Trams<br />

0.3 per cent<br />

• V/Line Passenger 1.4 per cent<br />

Payments<br />

As performance levels did not meet contractual standards, all train and tram opera<strong>to</strong>rs incurred penalty payments for the<br />

<strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong>.<br />

Connex<br />

$9.782 million<br />

Yarra Trams<br />

$1.671 million<br />

V/Line Passenger $1.147 million<br />

Cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction<br />

• Metropolitan modes<br />

(Trains, trams and buses) 58.9 index points<br />

• Metropolitan taxis 55.9<br />

• Regional trains 75.7<br />

• Regional coach 81.5<br />

Availability of ticketing equipment<br />

• Railway vending machines 98.<strong>34</strong> per cent<br />

• Railway valida<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

99.44 per cent<br />

• Tram vending machines 96.1per cent<br />

• Tram valida<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

97.4 per cent<br />

• Bus ticket issuing machines 99.4 per cent<br />

• Bus valida<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

99.2 per cent<br />

3


<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

SECTION 2.<br />

PUNCTUALITY AND RELIABILITY<br />

For an explanation of how punctuality and reliability is determined, please refer <strong>to</strong> the Glossary on page 17.<br />

2.1 Punctuality<br />

Connex<br />

• Punctuality slightly improved compared <strong>to</strong> the previous quarter and <strong>to</strong> the <strong>March</strong> quarter 2007.<br />

Yarra Trams<br />

• Punctuality recorded a small improvement in comparison <strong>to</strong> the previous quarter and was comparable with the result<br />

in the <strong>March</strong> quarter 2007.<br />

V/Line Passenger trains<br />

• Punctuality continued <strong>to</strong> decline in comparison <strong>to</strong> the previous quarter but was slightly better than that recorded for<br />

the <strong>March</strong> quarter 2007.<br />

Metropolitan buses<br />

• Punctuality slightly declined in comparison <strong>to</strong> the December quarter 2007 but was comparable <strong>to</strong> the result recorded<br />

in the <strong>March</strong> quarter 2007.<br />

Table 1 On-time performance for trains, trams and buses as a percentage of services run,<br />

<strong>March</strong> quarter 2007 <strong>to</strong> <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong><br />

Jan–Mar Apr–Jun Jul–Sept Oct–Dec Jan-Mar<br />

2007 2007 2007 2007 <strong>2008</strong><br />

Connex 91.0 91.1 92.3 92.0 92.4<br />

Yarra Trams – at destination 70.9 72.4 73.1 70.1 70.9<br />

Yarra Trams – average over route 81.4 82.5 83.0 80.6 81.2<br />

V/Line Passenger trains 83.7 86.9 89.3 87.1 84.2<br />

Metropolitan buses 94.9 95.7 95.6 95.1 94.8<br />

Figure 1 On-time performance for trains, trams and buses, <strong>March</strong> quarter 2007 <strong>to</strong> <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong><br />

Percentage of services running on time<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

Metropolitan trains<br />

V/Line Passenger<br />

trains<br />

Metropolitan trams –<br />

average over route<br />

Metropolitan trams –<br />

at destination<br />

Metropolitan buses<br />

50<br />

Jan–Mar 2007 Apr–Jun 2007 Jul–Sept 2007 Oct–Dec 2007 Jan–Mar <strong>2008</strong><br />

4


<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

2.2 Reliability (Cancellations)<br />

Connex<br />

• Reliability marginally improved in comparison <strong>to</strong> the previous quarter and was significantly better than that recorded<br />

in the <strong>March</strong> quarter 2007.<br />

Yarra Trams<br />

• Reliability was consistent with the previous quarter and with the <strong>March</strong> quarter 2007.<br />

V/Line Passenger trains<br />

• Reliability fell slightly in comparison <strong>to</strong> the December quarter 2007 and was also lower than that recorded in the<br />

<strong>March</strong> quarter 2007.<br />

Metropolitan buses<br />

• Reliability has remained steady over the past five quarters.<br />

Table 2 Cancellations of trains, trams and buses as a percentage of services scheduled,<br />

<strong>March</strong> quarter 2007 <strong>to</strong> <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong><br />

Jan–Mar Apr–Jun Jul–Sept Oct–Dec Jan-Mar<br />

2007 2007 2007 2007 <strong>2008</strong><br />

Connex 2.1 0.7 0.6 1.3 1.2<br />

Yarra Trams 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3<br />

V/Line Passenger trains 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.3 1.4<br />

Metropolitan buses 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1<br />

Figure 2 Cancellation of trains, trams and buses, <strong>March</strong> quarter 2007 <strong>to</strong> <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong><br />

Percentage of services cancelled<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

Metropolitan trains<br />

V/Line Passenger trains<br />

Metropolitan trams<br />

Metropolitan buses<br />

0.0<br />

Jan–Mar 2007 Apr–Jun 2007 Jul–Sept 2007 Oct–Dec 2007 Jan–Mar <strong>2008</strong><br />

5


<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

2.3 Passenger Compensation<br />

For details of thresholds for passenger compensation, please refer <strong>to</strong> the Glossary on page 18.<br />

Connex<br />

• No passenger compensation was payable during the quarter.<br />

Yarra Trams<br />

• Passenger compensation was payable in <strong>March</strong> due <strong>to</strong> punctuality not reaching the threshold.<br />

V/Line Passenger trains<br />

• <strong>January</strong> – punctuality did not meet the threshold and passenger compensation was payable on all short and long<br />

distance corridors.<br />

• February – punctuality did not meet the threshold and passenger compensation was payable on the following<br />

corridors:<br />

• Short distance: Ballarat, Bendigo, Geelong, Seymour, Traralgon<br />

• Long distance: Albury / Wodonga, Bairnsdale / Sale, Swan Hill / Echuca.<br />

• <strong>March</strong> – punctuality did not meet the threshold and passenger compensation was payable on all short and long<br />

distance corridors.<br />

6


<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

SECTION 3.<br />

PAYMENTS<br />

See the Glossary on Page 18 for an explanation relating <strong>to</strong> the payment details in this section.<br />

3.1 Metropolitan trains and trams<br />

The payment information provided in Tables 3 and 4 relates <strong>to</strong> the current metropolitan rail franchise partnerships which<br />

commenced on 18 April 2004. The farebox figures in each table represent an agreed payment of 40 per cent of the<br />

metropolitan farebox <strong>to</strong> each of the rail franchisees. The remaining 20 per cent is remitted <strong>to</strong> the State.<br />

Operational performance regime penalty payments for below-target performance in the <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong>:<br />

• Connex - $9.782 million<br />

• Yarra Trams - $1.671 million.<br />

The related service delivery performance <strong>to</strong> which these payments apply is presented in Section 2.<br />

Other payments in Tables 3 and 4 are State contract payments <strong>to</strong> the rail franchisees under the categories noted.<br />

Maintenance payments include those for maintenance of all fixed infrastructure, including track, overhead systems and<br />

signals. The maintenance or refurbishment of rolling s<strong>to</strong>ck is included in base contract sums. Capital payments include<br />

payments for metropolitan train or tram network extensions, and works on track, stations or s<strong>to</strong>ps which are not of a<br />

maintenance nature.<br />

Table 3 Connex payments ($ ,000)<br />

Jan–Mar Apr–Jun Jul–Sept Oct–Dec Jan–Mar<br />

Payment type 2007 2007 2007 2007 <strong>2008</strong><br />

Base contract 36,628 35,378 39,201 42,127 39,173<br />

Farebox 52,885 51,075 48,016 47,998 53,753<br />

Concession <strong>to</strong>p-up 4,926 7,373 6,333 6,423 5,679<br />

Maintenance 19,127 24,451 20,609 23,004 20,843<br />

Rolling s<strong>to</strong>ck adjustment 23,576 23,485 23,290 23,185 23,061<br />

Incentive and penalty –8,022 –4,849 -2,807 -8,254 -9,782<br />

Capital projects 6,539 11,477 6,046 7,980 8,981<br />

Other 1,260 4,382 2,877 -6,188 8,078<br />

TOTAL 136,919 152,772 143,565 136,275 149,786<br />

7


<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

Table 4 Yarra Trams payments ($ ,000)<br />

Jan–Mar Apr–Jun Jul–Sept Oct–Dec Jan–Mar<br />

Payment type 2007 2007 2007 2007 <strong>2008</strong><br />

Base contract 1,513 1,233 1,185 1,018 1,0<strong>34</strong><br />

Farebox 52,885 51,075 48,016 47,998 53,753<br />

Concession <strong>to</strong>p-up 4,921 7,365 6,563 6,609 5,992<br />

Maintenance 14,167 9,776 14,176 9,424 6,881<br />

Rolling s<strong>to</strong>ck adjustment 8,679 8,679 8,679 8,679 8,679<br />

Incentive and penalty –1,025 –1,225 -144 -2,855 -1,671<br />

Capital projects 1,847 391 2,877 531 2,528<br />

Other 931 1,911 2,189 -8,178 2,315<br />

TOTAL 83,918 79,205 83,541 63,226 79,511<br />

3.2 Regional trains<br />

Payments by the State <strong>to</strong> the regional rail opera<strong>to</strong>r (V/Line Passenger)—including payments for coach services directly<br />

contracted by V/Line—are summarised in Table 5. Farebox revenue is retained by V/Line and is included <strong>to</strong> provide an<br />

overall indication of the cost of the services. State contract payments represent the net payments required for V/Line<br />

Passenger <strong>to</strong> run the services.<br />

On 3 September 2006, V/Line started operating numerous new and extended weekly services on rail infrastructure that<br />

was significantly altered under the Regional Fast Rail project. In recognition of these changed operating conditions,<br />

operational performance regime incentive payments for V/Line Passenger are being determined at a reduced payment rate<br />

in the medium term. This reduced rate currently stands at around 25 per cent of the previous rate and will be periodically<br />

increased until it returns <strong>to</strong> around the previous level.<br />

Under these incentive arrangements, V/Line Passenger paid a penalty <strong>to</strong> the State of $1.147 million for below-target<br />

performance in the <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong>.<br />

Table 5 Payment for V/Line Passenger train services ($ ,000)<br />

Jan–Mar Apr–Jun Jul–Sept Oct–Dec Jan–Mar<br />

Payment type 2007 2007 2007 2007 <strong>2008</strong><br />

Base contract 47,675 53,675 58,640 52,664 52,<strong>34</strong>5<br />

Farebox 14,8<strong>34</strong> 12,604 13,985 13,682 15,413<br />

Rolling s<strong>to</strong>ck 8,953 8,953 8,953 8,953 8,953<br />

Incentive and penalty –1,248 –1,140 -788 -1,183 -1,147<br />

Capital projects 3,152 2,997 1,010 1,685 2,291<br />

Other 78 958 871 1,853 862<br />

TOTAL 73,444 78,047 82,671 77,654 78,717<br />

8


<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

3.3 Metropolitan and regional buses<br />

Payments <strong>to</strong> metropolitan, regional and school bus opera<strong>to</strong>rs are presented in Table 6. Farebox revenue collected on these<br />

services is returned <strong>to</strong> the State and, therefore, is not included.<br />

Table 6 Payment for metropolitan and regional bus services ($ ,000)<br />

Jan–Mar Apr–Jun Jul–Sept Oct–Dec Jan–Mar<br />

Payment type 2007 2007 2007 2007 <strong>2008</strong><br />

Metropolitan bus 83,448 84,294 86,716 89,099 89,166<br />

Regional bus 19,941 20,286 21,014 20,928 21,892<br />

School bus 28,354 42,802 43,179 43,637 44,761<br />

TOTAL 131,743 147,382 150,909 153,664 155,819<br />

3.4 Metlink and OneLink<br />

Current metropolitan rail franchises establish Metlink as a provider of system-wide services. Metlink and OneLink (which<br />

supplies the current au<strong>to</strong>matic ticketing services for the metropolitan network) are paid for services supplied under<br />

contracts with the State.<br />

Payments for services provided by these two organisations are presented in Table 7. ‘Capital projects’ for the current<br />

quarter refers <strong>to</strong> payments for Metlink signage.<br />

Table 7 Payment for Metlink and OneLink 1 services ($ ,000)<br />

Jan–Mar Apr–Jun Jul–Sept Oct–Dec Jan–Mar<br />

Payment type 2007 2007 2007 2007 <strong>2008</strong><br />

Metlink 3,648 4,148 3,816 3,816 3,816<br />

Capital projects 762 1,952 1,073 167 574<br />

OneLink ticketing 24,676 - - - -<br />

TOTAL 29,086 6,100 4,889 3,983 4,390<br />

1 The <strong>Transport</strong> Ticketing Authority (TTA) assumed responsibility for the OneLink contract and payments from 1 <strong>March</strong> 2007. The last payment by the former<br />

Department of Infrastructure (now the Department of <strong>Transport</strong>) <strong>to</strong> Onelink was made on 9 <strong>March</strong> 2007.<br />

9


<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

SECTION 4.<br />

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION<br />

For an explanation of how cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction is determined, please refer <strong>to</strong> the Glossary on page 19.<br />

4.1 Overall satisfaction with metropolitan services<br />

• There was a slight increase in the overall satisfaction with metropolitan public transport (trains, trams and buses)<br />

in the <strong>March</strong> quarter which rose <strong>to</strong> 58.9 compared <strong>to</strong> 58.6 in the December quarter with satisfaction remaining, on<br />

average, at the ‘Somewhat satisfied’ range.<br />

Figure 3 Overall satisfaction with metropolitan public transport services (trains, trams and buses), <strong>March</strong> quarter<br />

2006 <strong>to</strong> <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong><br />

85<br />

Cus<strong>to</strong>mer Satisfaction Index<br />

Very<br />

satisfied<br />

Somewhat<br />

satisfied<br />

80<br />

75<br />

70<br />

65<br />

60<br />

55<br />

50<br />

Jan–Mar<br />

2006<br />

Apr–Jun<br />

2006<br />

Jul–Sept<br />

2006<br />

Oct–Dec<br />

2006<br />

Jan–Mar<br />

2007<br />

Apr–Jun<br />

2007<br />

Jul–Sept<br />

2007<br />

Oct–Dec<br />

2007<br />

Jan–Mar<br />

<strong>2008</strong><br />

Figure 4 Overall satisfaction with metropolitan train, tram, bus and taxi services, <strong>March</strong> quarter 2006 <strong>to</strong> <strong>March</strong><br />

quarter <strong>2008</strong><br />

Very<br />

satisfied<br />

85<br />

80<br />

Metropolitan trains<br />

Metropolitan trams<br />

Cus<strong>to</strong>mer Satisfaction Index<br />

Somewhat<br />

satisfied<br />

75<br />

70<br />

65<br />

60<br />

Metropolitan buses<br />

Metropolitan taxis<br />

55<br />

50<br />

Oct–Dec<br />

2005<br />

Jan–Mar<br />

2006<br />

Apr–Jun<br />

2006<br />

Jul–Sept<br />

2006<br />

Oct–Dec<br />

2006<br />

Jan–Mar<br />

2007<br />

Apr–Jun<br />

2007<br />

Jul–Sept<br />

2007<br />

Oct–Dec<br />

2007<br />

Jan–Mar<br />

<strong>2008</strong><br />

Overall cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction indices for each of the metropolitan modes during the <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong> were:<br />

• Connex<br />

• Yarra Trams<br />

• Metropolitan buses<br />

• Metropolitan taxis<br />

60.5 (comparable <strong>to</strong> the December quarter)<br />

67.6 (comparable <strong>to</strong> the December quarter)<br />

66.4 (slight decrease)<br />

55.9 (slight decrease)<br />

10


<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

4.2 Overall satisfaction with regional services<br />

Overall cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction indices for each of the regional modes during the <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong> were:<br />

• V/Line Passenger trains<br />

• V/Line Passenger coaches<br />

75.7 (comparable <strong>to</strong> the December quarter)<br />

81.5 (comparable <strong>to</strong> the December quarter)<br />

Figure 5 Overall satisfaction with V/Line Passenger trains and coaches, <strong>March</strong> quarter 2006 <strong>to</strong> <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong><br />

Very<br />

satisfied<br />

85<br />

80<br />

V/Line<br />

Passenger<br />

trains<br />

Cus<strong>to</strong>mer Satisfaction Index<br />

Somewhat<br />

satisfied<br />

75<br />

70<br />

65<br />

60<br />

V/Line<br />

Passenger<br />

coaches<br />

55<br />

50<br />

Oct–Dec<br />

2005<br />

Jan–Mar<br />

2006<br />

Apr–Jun<br />

2006<br />

Jul–Sept<br />

2006<br />

Oct–Dec<br />

2006<br />

Jan–Mar<br />

2007<br />

Apr–Jun<br />

2007<br />

Jul–Sept<br />

2007<br />

Oct–Dec<br />

2007<br />

Jan–Mar<br />

<strong>2008</strong><br />

4.3 Key aspects of service quality for trains, trams, taxis, buses and coaches<br />

The following graphs summarise cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction with specific aspects of service. Each graph presents an overall<br />

cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction index as well as separate measurements for major aspects of service, such as ‘passenger comfort’.<br />

The overall cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction index is produced from a specific question in the survey and is not an average of other<br />

results.<br />

All graphs are for the <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong>. A statistically significant increase or decrease in the cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction index<br />

from the December quarter 2007 is respectively indicated by a green ‘up’ or red ‘down’ arrow. Where there is no arrow, no<br />

statistically significant change has occurred. Minor shifts in the index can be due <strong>to</strong> the nature of the survey, rather than<br />

reflecting a genuine change in cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction.<br />

Connex<br />

• There was little change in satisfaction with metropolitan train services in the <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong> with overall<br />

cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction at 60.5 compared <strong>to</strong> 60.6 in the December quarter 2007.<br />

Figure 6 Cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction with metropolitan trains, <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong><br />

No significant change<br />

from Dec. qr 2007 <strong>to</strong><br />

Mar. qr <strong>2008</strong><br />

Cus<strong>to</strong>mer Satisfaction Index<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

OVERALL SATISFACTION<br />

Service aspects ranked highest <strong>to</strong> lowest<br />

Stations/s<strong>to</strong>ps<br />

Information services<br />

Staff service<br />

Ticketing<br />

Passenger comfort<br />

Value for money<br />

Service delivery<br />

Personal safety<br />

11


<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

V/Line Passenger trains<br />

• Regional train services recorded a cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction rate of 75.7 in the <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong> compared <strong>to</strong> 75.6 in<br />

the December quarter 2007. There were no significant changes in satisfaction with any service aspects.<br />

Figure 7 Cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction with V/Line Passenger trains, <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong><br />

No significant change<br />

from Dec. qr 2007 <strong>to</strong><br />

Mar. qr <strong>2008</strong><br />

Cus<strong>to</strong>mer Satisfaction Index<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

OVERALL SATISFACTION<br />

Service aspects ranked highest <strong>to</strong> lowest<br />

Value for money<br />

Staff service<br />

Ticketing<br />

Information services<br />

Passenger comfort<br />

Service delivery<br />

Stations/s<strong>to</strong>ps<br />

Personal safety<br />

Yarra Trams<br />

• Overall cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction with metropolitan trams remained steady at 67.6 in the <strong>March</strong> quarter compared <strong>to</strong><br />

67.5 in the December quarter.<br />

• There was a statistically significant increase in satisfaction with personal safety at 61.5 compared <strong>to</strong> 59.3 in the<br />

December quarter.<br />

Figure 8 Cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction with metropolitan trams, <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong><br />

Statistically significant<br />

increase from Dec. qr<br />

2007 <strong>to</strong> Mar. qr <strong>2008</strong><br />

Cus<strong>to</strong>mer Satisfaction Index<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

OVERALL SATISFACTION<br />

Service aspects ranked highest <strong>to</strong> lowest<br />

Service delivery<br />

Stations/s<strong>to</strong>ps<br />

Passenger comfort<br />

Staff service<br />

Value for money<br />

Information services<br />

Personal safety<br />

Ticketing<br />

12


<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

V/Line Passenger coaches<br />

• There was little change in satisfaction with V/Line Passenger coaches in the <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong> with overall<br />

satisfaction at 81.5 compared <strong>to</strong> 82 in the December quarter.<br />

Figure 9 Cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction with V/Line Passenger coaches, <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong><br />

No significant change<br />

from Dec. qr 2007 <strong>to</strong><br />

Mar. qr <strong>2008</strong><br />

Cus<strong>to</strong>mer Satisfaction Index<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

OVERALL SATISFACTION<br />

Service aspects ranked highest <strong>to</strong> lowest<br />

Staff service<br />

Passenger comfort<br />

Value for money<br />

Service delivery<br />

Ticketing<br />

Personal safety<br />

Information services<br />

Stations/s<strong>to</strong>ps<br />

Metropolitan buses<br />

• Cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction with metropolitan buses decreased from 67.5 <strong>to</strong> 66.4 between the December and <strong>March</strong><br />

quarters.<br />

• There were significant increases in satisfaction with the service aspects of staff service and passenger comfort.<br />

• The service aspect of value for money, however, recorded a significant decrease.<br />

Figure 10 Cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction with metropolitan buses, <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong><br />

Statistically significant<br />

decrease from Dec. qr<br />

2007 <strong>to</strong> Mar. qr <strong>2008</strong><br />

OVERALL SATISFACTION<br />

Statistically significant<br />

increase from Dec. qr<br />

2007 <strong>to</strong> Mar. qr <strong>2008</strong><br />

Cus<strong>to</strong>mer Satisfaction Index<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

Service aspects ranked highest <strong>to</strong> lowest<br />

Staff service<br />

Passenger comfort<br />

Personal safety<br />

Value for money<br />

Ticketing<br />

Service delivery<br />

Stations/s<strong>to</strong>ps<br />

Information services<br />

13


<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

Metropolitan taxis<br />

• Overall cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction with metropolitan taxis decreased <strong>to</strong> 55.9 in the <strong>March</strong> quarter, down from 57.6 in the<br />

December quarter.<br />

Figure 11 Cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction with metropolitan taxis, <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong><br />

Cus<strong>to</strong>mer Satisfaction Index<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

OVERALL SATISFACTION<br />

Service aspects ranked highest <strong>to</strong> lowest<br />

Booking<br />

Drivers<br />

Passenger comfort<br />

Service delivery<br />

Information services<br />

Personal safety<br />

Ranks<br />

Fares<br />

Value for money<br />

14


<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

SECTION 5<br />

PERFORMANCE OF AUTOMATIC TICKETING<br />

SYSTEM (ATS) EQUIPMENT<br />

See the Glossary on page 19 for details on Cus<strong>to</strong>mer-defined Availability (CDA) reporting and a background on the ticketing<br />

contracts.<br />

5.1 Railway station ticketing equipment<br />

Table 8 ATS CDA for ticketing equipment at railway stations (%)<br />

Jan–Mar Apr–Jun Jul–Sept Oct–Dec Jan–Mar<br />

Device Target 2007 2007 2007 2007 <strong>2008</strong><br />

Vending machines 98.26 98.46 98.53 98.59 98.55 98.<strong>34</strong><br />

Valida<strong>to</strong>rs 99.47 99.40 99.42 99.49 99.49 99.44<br />

5.2 Tram and bus ticketing equipment<br />

• Availability remains high for ticketing machines and valida<strong>to</strong>rs on trams and buses with only marginal decreases in the<br />

availability of valida<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />

Table 9 ATS availability for mobile equipment (%)<br />

Jan–Mar Apr–Jun Jul–Sept Oct–Dec Jan–Mar<br />

Mode Device 2007 2007 2007 2007 <strong>2008</strong><br />

Tram Vending machines 91.2 90.0 91.1 96.1 96.1<br />

Valida<strong>to</strong>rs 97.8 97.8 97.7 98.0 97.4<br />

Bus Issuing machines 99.6 99.5 99.6 99.4 99.4<br />

Valida<strong>to</strong>rs 99.8 99.8 99.8 99.7 99.2<br />

15


<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

5.3 Long term trends<br />

• The availability of ticketing equipment on metropolitan trains and buses has been very high over the past four years.<br />

• Ticketing availability on trams has been his<strong>to</strong>rically lower due <strong>to</strong> delays in detecting equipment faults. This is because<br />

the equipment on trams is not in permanent communication with the OneLink control centre and technicians can only<br />

meet the tram at a terminating point <strong>to</strong> fix any problems with the ticketing equipment. Yarra Trams and OneLink are<br />

working on programs that will improve the availability of ticketing equipment on trams.<br />

Figure 12 Quarterly availability of ATS equipment from <strong>January</strong> 2004 <strong>to</strong> <strong>March</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />

Availability of ticketing equipment (%)<br />

100<br />

95<br />

90<br />

Train vending<br />

machines<br />

Train<br />

valida<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

Tram vending<br />

machines<br />

Tram<br />

valida<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

Bus vending<br />

machines<br />

Bus valida<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

85<br />

Jan–Mar<br />

2004<br />

Jul–Sept<br />

2004<br />

Jan–Mar<br />

2005<br />

Jul–Sept<br />

2005<br />

Jan–Mar<br />

2006<br />

Jul–Sept<br />

2006<br />

Jan–Mar<br />

2007<br />

Jul–Sept<br />

2007<br />

Jan–Mar<br />

<strong>2008</strong><br />

5.4 Vandalism of ATS equipment<br />

• There were 1,408 reported incidents of vandalism on ATS equipment in the <strong>March</strong> quarter <strong>2008</strong>.<br />

Figure 13 Incidents of vandalism <strong>to</strong> ATS equipment by quarter, <strong>March</strong> 2001 <strong>to</strong> <strong>March</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />

8,000<br />

7,000<br />

Vandalism incidents per quarter<br />

6,000<br />

5,000<br />

4,000<br />

3,000<br />

2,000<br />

1,000<br />

0<br />

Mar<br />

2001<br />

Sept<br />

2001<br />

Mar<br />

2002<br />

Sept<br />

2002<br />

Mar<br />

2003<br />

Sept<br />

2003<br />

Mar<br />

2004<br />

Sept<br />

2004<br />

Mar<br />

2005<br />

Sept<br />

2005<br />

Mar<br />

2006<br />

Sept<br />

2006<br />

Mar<br />

2007<br />

Sept<br />

2007<br />

Mar<br />

<strong>2008</strong><br />

16


<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

SECTION 6<br />

GLOSSARY OF TERMINOLOGY<br />

6.1 Contracts and partnership agreements<br />

Bus, train and tram public transport in Vic<strong>to</strong>ria is operated by the private sec<strong>to</strong>r under contracts or franchise arrangements<br />

(referred <strong>to</strong> as Partnership Agreements) with the State.<br />

The Direc<strong>to</strong>r of <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> manages the train and tram partnership agreements and bus contracts. The agreements<br />

and contracts specify:<br />

• Levels of service opera<strong>to</strong>rs are required <strong>to</strong> provide;<br />

• The tickets they must offer;<br />

• The maximum fares they can charge for tickets; and<br />

• Other performance standards.<br />

In response, the Government moni<strong>to</strong>rs the quality of services provided <strong>to</strong> the community by the opera<strong>to</strong>rs, with emphasis<br />

on:<br />

• Punctuality and reliability: comparing the performance of train, tram and bus services with government-set<br />

punctuality and service delivery targets; and<br />

• Cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction: using surveys <strong>to</strong> measure whether opera<strong>to</strong>rs are providing the quality of service cus<strong>to</strong>mers<br />

expect.<br />

6.2 Punctuality and reliability measurements<br />

Punctuality<br />

Punctuality is defined as the percentage of delivered services that run on time.<br />

Metropolitan trains, trams and buses - For trains and buses, on-time performance is measured at the end of the journey.<br />

Tram on-time performance is measured at moni<strong>to</strong>ring points along the route (as the average of the second, third and fourth<br />

of five moni<strong>to</strong>ring points) and near the destination (at point four of five moni<strong>to</strong>ring points). Since tram on-time performance<br />

is greatly affected by road congestion, both the destination punctuality performance figures and the average punctuality are<br />

reported.<br />

A metropolitan train or tram service is considered on time if it arrives no more than 59 seconds before and no more than<br />

five minutes and 59 seconds after the time in the timetable.<br />

Metropolitan buses are on time if they are no more than two minutes early or five minutes late at the destination.<br />

For tram services, the 80 per cent compensation threshold for punctuality relates <strong>to</strong> the average of the punctuality at the<br />

second, third and fourth of the five moni<strong>to</strong>ring points along the length of the route.<br />

Regional trains - For V/Line Passenger train services, long-distance services are considered <strong>to</strong> be on time if they arrive no<br />

more than ten minutes 59 seconds late, while short-distance services are considered <strong>to</strong> be on time if they arrive no more<br />

than five minutes 59 seconds late. Early arrival at the destination is also considered <strong>to</strong> be on-time.<br />

Reliability<br />

Reliability is defined as the percentage of scheduled services that actually run. The exception is for trams where the<br />

passenger compensation threshold for reliability is measured by the percentage of actual service kilometres delivered<br />

compared <strong>to</strong> the scheduled kilometres.<br />

17


<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

How punctuality and reliability are measured<br />

All timetabled train and tram services are moni<strong>to</strong>red every day of the week.<br />

Delays, cancellations and other service failures are measured <strong>to</strong> the nearest 60 seconds and ‘weighted’ according <strong>to</strong> the<br />

number of people estimated <strong>to</strong> be travelling on the train or tram. The passenger weightings vary according <strong>to</strong> the time<br />

period, day of week and direction of travel. Delays <strong>to</strong> a heavily-loaded peak train or tram are given a greater value than<br />

delays <strong>to</strong> a less loaded off-peak train or tram. This system provides a measure of operational performance expressed in<br />

‘passenger-weighted minutes’ of delay.<br />

Passenger-weighted minutes of delay in each month are checked against performance targets set in the partnership<br />

agreements. Performance against these targets determines whether a bonus or a penalty applies <strong>to</strong> an opera<strong>to</strong>r. This bonus<br />

and penalty system is referred <strong>to</strong> as the operational performance regime (OPR).<br />

Performance targets are periodically adjusted so they become increasingly challenging. Significant reductions in passengerweighted<br />

minutes of delay are required, compared <strong>to</strong> those measured in 1998, before bonus payments are made. The<br />

required improvements in performance are:<br />

• 32 per cent for metropolitan trams<br />

• 36 per cent for metropolitan trains.<br />

Metropolitan bus services are not included in this performance regime. Bus opera<strong>to</strong>rs provide performance data for bus<br />

services (on-time running and cancellations) via monthly ‘key performance indica<strong>to</strong>r’ returns.<br />

6.3 Payments<br />

The details presented in this bulletin on payments for public transport services include:<br />

• Information on the fares collected and distributed (referred <strong>to</strong> as the farebox); and<br />

• Components of the contract payments made by the State <strong>to</strong> the opera<strong>to</strong>rs and major service suppliers for the<br />

services provided.<br />

The incentive and penalty payments relating <strong>to</strong> performance during a particular period are reported on an accrual basis.<br />

The figures are not final, as the contracts allow for adjustment in limited circumstances in later periods. Payments for prior<br />

quarters are subject <strong>to</strong> change based on audits or mitigated performance adjustments.<br />

All payments are exclusive of GST. Negative figures represent payments by the franchisee <strong>to</strong> the State.<br />

6.4 Passenger compensation<br />

Train and tram partnership agreements require opera<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> provide punctuality and reliability (number of cancellations)<br />

service levels above a government-set threshold. Opera<strong>to</strong>rs must report <strong>to</strong> cus<strong>to</strong>mers every month on whether or not they<br />

have met the minimum service requirements.<br />

Opera<strong>to</strong>rs who fail <strong>to</strong> meet minimum service levels must provide compensation (in the form of complimentary tickets)<br />

<strong>to</strong> cus<strong>to</strong>mers. The compensation applies only <strong>to</strong> passengers holding valid periodical tickets of four weeks or more<br />

who travelled on the service concerned during the month in question. Cus<strong>to</strong>mers apply directly <strong>to</strong> the opera<strong>to</strong>r for the<br />

compensation.<br />

V/Line services within each corridor are separated in<strong>to</strong> short-distance and long-distance services, with passenger<br />

compensation assessed and payable separately for the two categories.<br />

Table 10 Service level thresholds for compensation purposes (%)<br />

Metropolitan trains V/Line Passenger Metropolitan trams<br />

Punctuality 92 92 80<br />

Reliability 98 96 95<br />

18


<strong>Track</strong> <strong>Record</strong><br />

Vic<strong>to</strong>ria’s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

6.5 Cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction<br />

The Direc<strong>to</strong>r of <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> commissions monthly surveys <strong>to</strong> measure whether opera<strong>to</strong>rs are providing the quality of<br />

service cus<strong>to</strong>mers expect. A sample of people is randomly selected from electronic telephone direc<strong>to</strong>ries in areas where<br />

train, tram, bus, coach and metropolitan taxi services operate. Interviews are conducted by telephone. Interviewees are<br />

asked <strong>to</strong>:<br />

• Indicate their usual public transport usage<br />

• State their level of satisfaction with specific aspects of public transport, as well as the service overall.<br />

Respondents who do not use public transport are asked for their reasons and <strong>to</strong> indicate what would influence them <strong>to</strong><br />

begin using public transport.<br />

Responses from interviewees are given a score of between 0 and 100 as per the following scale:<br />

• Totally satisfied 100<br />

• Very satisfied 80<br />

• Somewhat satisfied 60<br />

• Somewhat dissatisfied 40<br />

• Very dissatisfied 20<br />

• Totally dissatisfied 0<br />

Survey results are compiled in<strong>to</strong> quarterly cus<strong>to</strong>mer satisfaction indices <strong>to</strong> allow for comparisons between modes,<br />

opera<strong>to</strong>rs and aspects of service delivery.<br />

Note: Differences between metropolitan and country passenger services should be taken in<strong>to</strong> account when making<br />

such comparisons. These differences include the purpose and distance of travel, and the types of services offered on<br />

metropolitan and country services.<br />

6.6 Ticketing and Cus<strong>to</strong>mer-defined Availability (CDA)<br />

A private company under contract <strong>to</strong> the State Government operates and maintains the Metcard ticketing system for<br />

Melbourne’s public transport. The current contract was awarded in May 1994 <strong>to</strong> the consortium OneLink Transit Systems<br />

Pty Ltd.<br />

CDA measurements commenced in 2004 and include targets <strong>to</strong> represent minimum levels of acceptable availability and<br />

performance, and allow for specified levels of non-availability due <strong>to</strong> maintenance, servicing and breakdowns.<br />

The targets are included in the OneLink contract and determine whether OneLink incurs a penalty or receives an incentive<br />

payment for its performance.<br />

Moni<strong>to</strong>ring of ticketing equipment<br />

The status of ticketing equipment at railway stations is au<strong>to</strong>matically moni<strong>to</strong>red via communication lines <strong>to</strong> OneLink.<br />

OneLink, therefore, has accurate and up-<strong>to</strong>-date information on the availability of ticketing machines at railway stations and<br />

can promptly schedule repairs or servicing. For repairs, OneLink gives priority <strong>to</strong> equipment at busier stations, where more<br />

tickets are purchased.<br />

Mobile equipment on board trams and buses does not have a permanent communication link. Therefore, equipment<br />

availability cannot be known exactly. Tram and bus opera<strong>to</strong>rs are required <strong>to</strong> make vehicles with faulty equipment available<br />

<strong>to</strong> OneLink.<br />

Due <strong>to</strong> these differences between fixed and mobile equipment, measures and performance targets vary between modes.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!