17.01.2015 Views

Final Report - World Trade Organization

Final Report - World Trade Organization

Final Report - World Trade Organization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter-1<br />

Introduction: The 7-Up Project<br />

In the past, most developing countries were<br />

characterised by large state-owned sectors in highly<br />

concentrated industries and inefficient firms operating<br />

in domestic markets that were insulated by trade<br />

barriers. Since the early 1970s many of these<br />

countries have adopted new policies of trade<br />

liberalisation, de-regulation and privatisation. While<br />

these processes are taking place and developing<br />

countries are remodelling their state-dominated<br />

economies into market economies in much the same<br />

way as the so-called economies in transition are<br />

doing, new challenges arise from these same<br />

processes. Developing countries are seeking<br />

instruments to control and strengthen the functioning<br />

of market forces to cater to their own specific<br />

development needs. More and more developing<br />

countries recognise the importance of implementing<br />

an effective competition policy and law, to achieve<br />

the maximum benefit from the process of<br />

liberalisation.<br />

There are, however, divergent views on both the need<br />

and appropriateness of competition law and policy<br />

for developing countries. Some argue that the<br />

promotion of competition in the domestic market may<br />

not always be conducive to industrial growth and<br />

international competitiveness. 1 Others suggest that<br />

the liberalisation of international trade is sufficient to<br />

promote competition and therefore the formulation<br />

of a competition policy and law is unnecessary. Still<br />

others argue that even if competition law is desirable<br />

in the abstract, the probability of improper<br />

enforcement, misuse of bureaucratic power or<br />

regulatory capture is so high in developing countries<br />

that the expected costs of such legislation outweigh<br />

the possible benefits.<br />

In order to find out and analyse the realities of having<br />

and implementing competition legislation in developing<br />

countries, CUTS, Jaipur, India, has implemented a<br />

two-year research and advocacy project entitled ‘A<br />

Comparative Study of Competition Regimes in<br />

Select Developing Countries of the<br />

Commonwealth’. The project has been undertaken<br />

in seven countries, supported by the UK<br />

Government’s Department for International<br />

Development (DFID) and carried out in association<br />

with local NGOs and research organisations as<br />

partners. 2<br />

1.1 The Project: Objectives and Process<br />

Work on the project, popularly known as the 7-Up<br />

project, started in September 2000. It was formally<br />

launched during a meeting on December 20/21, 2000,<br />

organised in Jaipur, India. The seven countries that<br />

have been selected for the project are: India, Pakistan<br />

and Sri Lanka in South Asia; and Kenya, South<br />

Africa, Tanzania and Zambia in Southern and Eastern<br />

Africa. These countries were selected on the basis<br />

that they had all enacted competition legislation and<br />

had some experience in its implementation.<br />

The main objectives of the project are to:<br />

(i) conduct an evaluation of existing competition<br />

legislation and its implementation;<br />

(ii) identify typical problems and suggest solutions,<br />

inter alia, based on practices prevailing<br />

elsewhere;<br />

(iii) suggest ways forward to strengthen existing<br />

legislation and institutions dealing with<br />

competition issues;<br />

(iv) assess the capacity building needs of the<br />

governments, their institutions and civil society;<br />

(v) develop strategies for building expertise among<br />

the competition agency officials, practitioners<br />

and civil society at large;<br />

(vi) help build constituencies for the promotion of a<br />

competition culture; and<br />

(vii) create advocacy groups at both national and<br />

international levels to pursue the necessary and<br />

required reforms.<br />

1 The argument is that the restriction of competition in the domestic market might be necessary for companies to achieve economies of<br />

scale which will enable them to compete with foreign firms that have already achieved such economies of scale in international trade.<br />

2 See Annexure-2 for details on Project Partnership Arrangement.<br />

Pulling Up Our Socks w 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!