17.01.2015 Views

2008 Annual Report - NASA Airborne Science Program

2008 Annual Report - NASA Airborne Science Program

2008 Annual Report - NASA Airborne Science Program

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MSC/JSC for coordination, education,<br />

and capture of knowledge for use in<br />

implementation of remote sensing programs<br />

emanating within the Agency itself. The<br />

sensor teams were generally organized along<br />

“spectral lines”, such as active and passive<br />

microwave, camera, various scanner systems,<br />

etc. A lead university headed both types of<br />

teams with several other universities in direct<br />

support. These people were all leaders in<br />

their field and are deserving of recognition<br />

as pioneers in earth observations remote<br />

sensing. They were spread throughout the<br />

country.<br />

An annual planning and scheduling meeting<br />

was instituted in 1969 to bring the<br />

participants together, inform them of the<br />

current program status and future planning,<br />

Figure 51<br />

First <strong>Annual</strong> Planning Session at MSC in<br />

1971.Notice the young Smistad (center<br />

right) and Nolan (center left) in photo.<br />

Others: J. Algranti, Aircraft Operations<br />

Office (far left) and M. Holter, Earth<br />

Observations Divisions (far right).<br />

solicit inputs for improvements or need for<br />

additional/revised capabilities, and review<br />

a suggested flight program for the next<br />

fiscal year based on user agency, university,<br />

and research institution flight requests for<br />

that period. The various inputs from these<br />

participants, together with internal agency<br />

requests, were then reviewed and prioritized<br />

with the assistance of OSSA, and the original<br />

flight program was revised accordingly. There<br />

were allowances made for contingencies and<br />

revised/additional flight requests during the<br />

year. This was always ‘beat’ against the budget<br />

constraints and established priorities.<br />

The Aircraft and Their Sensor Systems<br />

Convair 240 (CV 240-<strong>NASA</strong> 926)<br />

The CV 240 was acquired in 1964 and<br />

phased out in 1969. The aircraft was limited<br />

in altitude and range because of the heavy<br />

load of sensors and instrumentation. The test<br />

altitudes were in the region of 10,000 feet,<br />

and the operating range was 4 hour/800 mile<br />

flights. Even so, it conducted missions in all<br />

regions of the United States, as well as Alaska<br />

and Iceland. She was a grand old girl. When<br />

she was returned to the surplus pool she was<br />

immediately claimed by another agency, and<br />

may still be flying. In general, the onboard<br />

sensors were not developed specifically for<br />

this program, and although limited for many<br />

uses, they provided a wealth of knowledge,<br />

orientation, and training for scientists, sensor<br />

development teams, applications, and<br />

operations personnel.<br />

Lockheed P-3A (<strong>NASA</strong> 927)<br />

The P-3A was acquired on loan from the<br />

Navy in December of 1965, and after a period<br />

of modification to accept down looking<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!