ED-MEDIA 1999 Proceedings Book - Association for the ...

ED-MEDIA 1999 Proceedings Book - Association for the ... ED-MEDIA 1999 Proceedings Book - Association for the ...

17.01.2015 Views

Meaningfully Incorporating Technology into Graduate and Undergraduate Courses In A College of Education Ni Chang, Ed.D. University of Wisconsin 800 W. Main St. Whitewater, WI 53190 changn@uwwvax.uww.edu 414-472-5798 Introduction With the germination of incorporating technology into students’ learning at the college and university level, literature has shown that technology benefits students’ learning (Bazillion, & Braun, 1998; Berger, 1998; Grossman,1999; McCandless, 1998; Raschke,1998). The merits attribute to different software and technology applied in the education of college students. However, it is an inappropriate practice to infuse technology into curriculum without a careful consideration of possible outcomes how the application of a type of technology can affect students’ understanding of concepts. The pedagogical goal aims at assisting students’ understanding of content of coursework with technology rather than about technology. Demographically, it is true that characteristics of students’ needs and demands to instruction and learning are matchless. Even teaching a same course in a same university over years, an instructor finds that he may encounter groups of students with different attributes and competence in learning. How to use technology effectively requires a careful examination and investigation from the instructor on the impact of uses of technology on students’ maximal development in learning. There exists another reason associated with the inappropriateness in teaching students about technology. In the contemporary technology world, many children are capable of handling a certain type of technology. Many more will soon join the club. Being pre-service teachers, students have to be aware of how to stimulate and promote children mastering concepts effectively with technology. In this sense, college instructors should first and foremost be trained properly. It is imperative for an instructor to pay attention to how learning process with technology is structured. What and how an instructor performs in class will surely affect how pre-service teachers will manage their classroom instruction with technology in the future. Meaningless integration of technology contributes little to an in-depth exploration of learning that plays an unimportant role in the enhancement of students’ comprehension of content work. Reflective Practices To bring about the effective learning results, it requires an instructor to motivate learners’ desire in lore. With respect to employing technology to teach, an instructor should possess rich ideas of how to integrate technology meaningfully into college curriculum, which should result from trials and errors. Much reflection and self- analysis should be part of this process. It is advocated that an instructor provides a wide array of opportunities to invite students’ voices regarding the effect on the application of technology as tools in the assistance of learning as a means to ameliorate outcomes of teaching and learning. Respecting feedback and views from students is crucial in the situation where an instructor is concurrently responsible for four courses in one semester. It is a usual case that a group of same students take two or three out of the four courses that this instructor is teaching during a semester. In this situation, an instructor is required to come up with diversified approaches in teaching and in assigning homework using technology. Employing an analogous method in this regard throughout one semester may decrease otherwise the great desire that students hold for learning. By virtue of this analysis, technology should be incorporated appropriately into the curricular content rather than as a discrete task besides intellectual learning requirement. For example, searching resources from the Internet is an advisable approach for students to extend their knowledge base that may not be encompassed in a class lecture. Locating important and useful information from the Internet as an assignment or a part of a class makeup apparently increases the academic growth of students. However, if this mode of technology crops up in each of the four courses, for which this particular instructor is responsible, a minimum learning effect may take place. Students may grow a feeling of tiredness out of this repeated usage of technology and find learning monotonous and tedious. Exhaustion may distract their attention away from major learning tasks.

Kelly and Leckbee (1998) indicate, “Simply adding technology to existing instructional process and structure have, in many instances, proven to be ineffective . . . What is needed is a meaningful integration of technology into the instruction process” (p. 24). Based on Kelly and Leckbee and due to the reasons provided above, I have cautioned and been concerned about the productiveness of students’ learning. To take an appropriate action, I have experimented in different ways to incorporate technology into the content of learning, which affirms my pedagogical philosophy. My pedagogical philosophy is heavily rooted in the principle of constructivism. A constructivist classroom is built based on mutual respect between students and an instructor, constant improvement of instructional strategies and risk-taking. I firmly believe that in constructivist classroom, students’ learning is meaningful and purposeful with the incorporation of technology. Assigning students grades is not an instructor’s destination of teaching. Rather, exerting great efforts to help students construct an understanding with methods of technology is an end of learning and instruction. Infusion Technology into Instruction and Inquiry Listserv across the World: As such, I created different ways of infusing technology in courses that I hold full accountability. Previous teaching experience informed me that the majority of students had few chances communicating with teachers out in the field when the students are studying in a college of education. To expand their knowledge spectrum and to grasp every opportunity to foster their growth, I guided one of classes to launch conversation electronically with the teachers working with young children. This activity brought about more profits than problems and difficulties that my students and I experienced in this learning process. Some of the students even wanted to continue their communication with teachers across the world after graduating from my class. Listserv on Campus: In another class, I hooked up with one another by email created on the campus. I came up with this idea due to the fact that in the contemporary society, the majority of people have busy schedules. Personal communications, therefore, become less possible. My students faced the same problem. This communicative means provides possibilities to extend in-class discussion and enrich the discussion content. The students in the meanwhile are able to learn from one another via negotiation and teamwork. The Application of the Hypernews: The hypernews is well known as asynchronous platform, which I have been guiding my students to use it since the summer of 1997. And yet, I have gone beyond this focus to more meaningful and purposeful ends. For asynchronous discussion: While giving credit to the use of listserv created on campus for the students to communicate with one another outside the classroom, this type of learning tool still set limits to users (Graves, 1998). In contrast, the hypernews to serve this purpose is promising because it provides convenience to the users. Students, while conversing with one another electronically and advancing their understandings of topics under discussion, attained technological skills, such as typing, deleting, sending, and retrieving messages in addition to unexpected problem-solving skills. The skills that students will use in their later courses or personal and professional growth (Graves, 1998). Publicizing learning products: In addition to communication via the HyperNews, I also used the tool of the HyperNews to encourage students to learn from one another by publishing papers, bookmarks, and writing comments after reading relevant papers, enriching the traditional classroom learning experiences (Graves, 1998). Distance learning: I organized my graduate students to have a synchronous discussion when every student had time but it was not in a originally scheduled time. Graduates from this university are mostly full-time teachers, who have to hold Teacher-Parent conferences once every semester. To ensure the quality of learning, I tried to use the hypernews for make-up time purpose. Power Point: Power Point was used in instruction to inspire students to seek answers for themselves when taking into account the issues like computers and young children. Power Point raised many questions to the students who were encouraged to ponder over “At what age do young children learn with computers” “How to evaluate software for young children appropriately” “How to teach young children learn with technology” “How to introduce technology appropriately to the learning of young children” “Should young children be left unnoticed at the computer” “Should computers be clustered in a computer lab or should computers be installed in individual classrooms” The presentation through this means activated the heated discussion among the students. Conclusion Generally, the multiple ways of infusing technology into curricular learning at a college of education in a meaningful and purposeful manner creates non-linear learning phenomenon. Technology has paved the way for many of us to ease and solve certain problems that we have encountered in our daily life. Let’s put technology to work (Grossman, 1999). “The more involving the learning techniques are, the greater the chance that learning will be retained. Students who interact with

Meaningfully Incorporating Technology into Graduate and Undergraduate Courses<br />

In A College of Education<br />

Ni Chang, Ed.D.<br />

University of Wisconsin<br />

800 W. Main St.<br />

Whitewater, WI 53190<br />

changn@uwwvax.uww.edu<br />

414-472-5798<br />

Introduction<br />

With <strong>the</strong> germination of incorporating technology into students’ learning at <strong>the</strong> college and university level, literature has<br />

shown that technology benefits students’ learning (Bazillion, & Braun, 1998; Berger, 1998; Grossman,<strong>1999</strong>; McCandless,<br />

1998; Raschke,1998). The merits attribute to different software and technology applied in <strong>the</strong> education of college students.<br />

However, it is an inappropriate practice to infuse technology into curriculum without a careful consideration of possible<br />

outcomes how <strong>the</strong> application of a type of technology can affect students’ understanding of concepts. The pedagogical goal<br />

aims at assisting students’ understanding of content of coursework with technology ra<strong>the</strong>r than about technology.<br />

Demographically, it is true that characteristics of students’ needs and demands to instruction and learning are matchless.<br />

Even teaching a same course in a same university over years, an instructor finds that he may encounter groups of students<br />

with different attributes and competence in learning. How to use technology effectively requires a careful examination and<br />

investigation from <strong>the</strong> instructor on <strong>the</strong> impact of uses of technology on students’ maximal development in learning.<br />

There exists ano<strong>the</strong>r reason associated with <strong>the</strong> inappropriateness in teaching students about technology. In <strong>the</strong><br />

contemporary technology world, many children are capable of handling a certain type of technology. Many more will soon<br />

join <strong>the</strong> club. Being pre-service teachers, students have to be aware of how to stimulate and promote children mastering<br />

concepts effectively with technology. In this sense, college instructors should first and <strong>for</strong>emost be trained properly. It is<br />

imperative <strong>for</strong> an instructor to pay attention to how learning process with technology is structured. What and how an<br />

instructor per<strong>for</strong>ms in class will surely affect how pre-service teachers will manage <strong>the</strong>ir classroom instruction with<br />

technology in <strong>the</strong> future. Meaningless integration of technology contributes little to an in-depth exploration of learning that<br />

plays an unimportant role in <strong>the</strong> enhancement of students’ comprehension of content work.<br />

Reflective Practices<br />

To bring about <strong>the</strong> effective learning results, it requires an instructor to motivate learners’ desire in lore. With respect to<br />

employing technology to teach, an instructor should possess rich ideas of how to integrate technology meaningfully into<br />

college curriculum, which should result from trials and errors. Much reflection and self- analysis should be part of this<br />

process. It is advocated that an instructor provides a wide array of opportunities to invite students’ voices regarding <strong>the</strong><br />

effect on <strong>the</strong> application of technology as tools in <strong>the</strong> assistance of learning as a means to ameliorate outcomes of teaching<br />

and learning.<br />

Respecting feedback and views from students is crucial in <strong>the</strong> situation where an instructor is concurrently responsible <strong>for</strong><br />

four courses in one semester. It is a usual case that a group of same students take two or three out of <strong>the</strong> four courses that<br />

this instructor is teaching during a semester. In this situation, an instructor is required to come up with diversified<br />

approaches in teaching and in assigning homework using technology. Employing an analogous method in this regard<br />

throughout one semester may decrease o<strong>the</strong>rwise <strong>the</strong> great desire that students hold <strong>for</strong> learning. By virtue of this analysis,<br />

technology should be incorporated appropriately into <strong>the</strong> curricular content ra<strong>the</strong>r than as a discrete task besides intellectual<br />

learning requirement. For example, searching resources from <strong>the</strong> Internet is an advisable approach <strong>for</strong> students to extend<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir knowledge base that may not be encompassed in a class lecture. Locating important and useful in<strong>for</strong>mation from <strong>the</strong><br />

Internet as an assignment or a part of a class makeup apparently increases <strong>the</strong> academic growth of students. However, if this<br />

mode of technology crops up in each of <strong>the</strong> four courses, <strong>for</strong> which this particular instructor is responsible, a minimum<br />

learning effect may take place. Students may grow a feeling of tiredness out of this repeated usage of technology and find<br />

learning monotonous and tedious. Exhaustion may distract <strong>the</strong>ir attention away from major learning tasks.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!