ED-MEDIA 1999 Proceedings Book - Association for the ...
ED-MEDIA 1999 Proceedings Book - Association for the ... ED-MEDIA 1999 Proceedings Book - Association for the ...
notification module must notify all students to submit quiz answer. Since we can not expect that learners stay on the collaborative learning system all the times, immediate notification to perform action is not necessary. Therefore, the notification can use the action history, as illustrated in figure 4, to generate notification information once a learner log in the collaborative learning system. Requirement Instructor’s Tasks Facilities regulation of learning model Control of learning action Notification and guidance Organizing learning group, Assigning roles, Regulating each role’s capability, Regulating each role’s responsibility Monitoring learners’ action, Checking the accessibility of actions, and Present learning material Monitoring learners’ action, notify learners Activity regulation tool with learning group, role assignment and MTL for specifying capability and responsibility Instructor support system for checking of the learning actions, and dynamically generating HTML file Instructor support system for generation of notification Table 1. Summary of requirement, instructors’ task and supported facilities We provide facility for instructors to regulate intended collaborative learning model, control learning actions, and generate notification information. Table 1 summarizes the requirements, the instructor’s tasks to enact collaborative learning on the Web, and the facilities provided in this investigation. Conclusion The creation of learning environments that renders learning more active is initiating challenges for research on learning (Barfurth 1995). The idea of the investigation comes from different instructors may desire different collaborative learning models to promote learning effect in distance learning environments. The architecture of the devised learning web site system fulfills the ideal to relieve instructors’ tasks in supporting desired collaborative learning models on the Web. Instructors can regulate desired learning model by the use of devised activity regulation tool, regardless of writing complex programs. The instructor support system automates the guidance and control of learners’ learning actions. Instructors may consequently support desired collaborative learning model on the Web easily and quickly. References Alur R. and Henzinger T. A.(1997), Real-time logics: complexity and expressiveness, Information and Computation, 104, pp.35-77, 1997. Barfurth M. A.(1995), Understanding the collaborative learning process in a technology rich environment: the case of children disagreements. Proc. of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, pp. 8-13, 1995. Chang C. K. and Chen G. D.(1997), Constructing collaborative learning activities for distance CAL systems. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol.13, pp.2-15, 1997. Monaghan J. M. and Clement J.(1995), Use of collaborative computer simulation activities to facilitate relative motion learning, Proc. First International Conf. on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, Bloomington, Indiana, pp.242-246, October 1995. Okamoto T. (1994), The current situations and future directions of intelligent CAI research/development, IEICE Trans. Inf. & Syst., vol.E77D, no.1, pp.9-18 , January 1994.
Slavin R.(1994), Small group method, in M. Dunkin(Ed.), The international encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education, pp. 237-243, Elmsford, NY:Pergamon Press, 1986. Stallings J. and Stipek D.(1986), Research on early childhood and elementary school teaching programs, in M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, pp. 727-753, New York:Macmillan, 1986. Thousand J. S., Villa R. A. and Nevin A. I.(1994), Creativity and collaborative learning, Paul H. Publishing Co., Baltimore, Maryland, 1994.
- Page 67 and 68: Java. One of them is already an exp
- Page 69 and 70: • Personal study room management
- Page 71 and 72: As has already been discussed in th
- Page 73 and 74: On-line Support of On-Campus Educat
- Page 75 and 76: In-service Teachers Teaching Pre-se
- Page 77 and 78: How the Construction & Analysis of
- Page 79 and 80: Yet, still we ask ourselves: How do
- Page 81 and 82: us, we need to be ever-conscious of
- Page 83 and 84: A Reporting Simulation Using Toolbo
- Page 85 and 86: environment — it is impossible to
- Page 87 and 88: Actually, when a particular author
- Page 89 and 90: Any instance of this type is an HC
- Page 91 and 92: Figure 5: Saving an Educational App
- Page 93 and 94: To address this problem Webfuse dra
- Page 95 and 96: Cognitive tools can act as structur
- Page 97 and 98: In this study, we propose the follo
- Page 99 and 100: more information about it, for exam
- Page 101 and 102: Charlottesville, VA., 691-696. Muly
- Page 103 and 104: ownership is retained by the instit
- Page 105 and 106: priority, it is in the interests of
- Page 107 and 108: limitations of the prevailing compl
- Page 109 and 110: exchange information with other cla
- Page 111 and 112: whether compiled or interpreted. So
- Page 113 and 114: A web site system for instructors t
- Page 115 and 116: is to monitor the status of learner
- Page 117: the capability grant G13 as Not Set
- Page 121 and 122: tutor. Support offered in the form
- Page 123 and 124: Apart from utilising the functional
- Page 125 and 126: Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (Ed.). (1984
- Page 127 and 128: Java can significantly increase the
- Page 129 and 130: The modules are designed for a vari
- Page 131 and 132: adapted tests to assess the student
- Page 133 and 134: Architecture of HEZINET The system
- Page 135 and 136: Berners-Lee, T. & R. Cailliau, (198
- Page 137 and 138: The ParlEuNet system will provide a
- Page 139 and 140: 3. Students use a dedicated HTML co
- Page 141 and 142: The prototype under development is
- Page 143 and 144: make an hypermedia educational envi
- Page 145 and 146: accreditation or standing in countr
- Page 147 and 148: A government designates a certain a
- Page 149 and 150: will be involved - either in partne
- Page 151 and 152: Streaming 7000 films... Uwe Sander
- Page 153 and 154: and how to innovate will be paramou
- Page 155 and 156: Toward a framework for instruction
- Page 157 and 158: A knowledge integration approach to
- Page 159 and 160: In 1978, the University formalized
- Page 161 and 162: comparisons to conventional instruc
- Page 163 and 164: Multimedia Cases in Teacher Educati
- Page 165 and 166: Merseth, K.K. (1996). Cases and cas
- Page 167 and 168: Using Multimedia to support mentors
notification module must notify all students to submit quiz answer. Since we can not expect that learners stay<br />
on <strong>the</strong> collaborative learning system all <strong>the</strong> times, immediate notification to per<strong>for</strong>m action is not necessary.<br />
There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> notification can use <strong>the</strong> action history, as illustrated in figure 4, to generate notification<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation once a learner log in <strong>the</strong> collaborative learning system.<br />
Requirement Instructor’s Tasks Facilities<br />
regulation of<br />
learning model<br />
Control of learning<br />
action<br />
Notification and<br />
guidance<br />
Organizing learning group,<br />
Assigning roles,<br />
Regulating each role’s capability,<br />
Regulating each role’s responsibility<br />
Monitoring learners’ action,<br />
Checking <strong>the</strong> accessibility of actions, and<br />
Present learning material<br />
Monitoring learners’ action,<br />
notify learners<br />
Activity regulation tool with learning<br />
group, role assignment and MTL <strong>for</strong><br />
specifying capability and responsibility<br />
Instructor support system <strong>for</strong> checking of<br />
<strong>the</strong> learning actions, and dynamically<br />
generating HTML file<br />
Instructor support system <strong>for</strong> generation<br />
of notification<br />
Table 1. Summary of requirement, instructors’ task and supported facilities<br />
We provide facility <strong>for</strong> instructors to regulate intended collaborative learning model, control learning actions,<br />
and generate notification in<strong>for</strong>mation. Table 1 summarizes <strong>the</strong> requirements, <strong>the</strong> instructor’s tasks to enact<br />
collaborative learning on <strong>the</strong> Web, and <strong>the</strong> facilities provided in this investigation.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The creation of learning environments that renders learning more active is initiating challenges <strong>for</strong><br />
research on learning (Barfurth 1995). The idea of <strong>the</strong> investigation comes from different instructors may desire<br />
different collaborative learning models to promote learning effect in distance learning environments. The<br />
architecture of <strong>the</strong> devised learning web site system fulfills <strong>the</strong> ideal to relieve instructors’ tasks in supporting<br />
desired collaborative learning models on <strong>the</strong> Web. Instructors can regulate desired learning model by <strong>the</strong> use<br />
of devised activity regulation tool, regardless of writing complex programs. The instructor support system<br />
automates <strong>the</strong> guidance and control of learners’ learning actions. Instructors may consequently support desired<br />
collaborative learning model on <strong>the</strong> Web easily and quickly.<br />
References<br />
Alur R. and Henzinger T. A.(1997), Real-time logics: complexity and expressiveness, In<strong>for</strong>mation and<br />
Computation, 104, pp.35-77, 1997.<br />
Barfurth M. A.(1995), Understanding <strong>the</strong> collaborative learning process in a technology rich environment: <strong>the</strong><br />
case of children disagreements. Proc. of Computer Support <strong>for</strong> Collaborative Learning, pp. 8-13, 1995.<br />
Chang C. K. and Chen G. D.(1997), Constructing collaborative learning activities <strong>for</strong> distance CAL systems.<br />
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol.13, pp.2-15, 1997.<br />
Monaghan J. M. and Clement J.(1995), Use of collaborative computer simulation activities to facilitate relative<br />
motion learning, Proc. First International Conf. on Computer Support <strong>for</strong> Collaborative Learning,<br />
Bloomington, Indiana, pp.242-246, October 1995.<br />
Okamoto T. (1994), The current situations and future directions of intelligent CAI research/development,<br />
IEICE Trans. Inf. & Syst., vol.E77D, no.1, pp.9-18 , January 1994.