ED-MEDIA 1999 Proceedings Book - Association for the ...
ED-MEDIA 1999 Proceedings Book - Association for the ... ED-MEDIA 1999 Proceedings Book - Association for the ...
1997), basic requirements for supporting collaborative learning on Web include facilities for (1) regulating collaborative learning model (2) controlling the learning actions, and (3) notifying participants to guide learners to interact with others according to the defined learning model. We explain each requirement and why current web servers, e.g. Microsoft IIS and Netscape web server, can not support it in the following collaborative learning scenario. Team game tournament (TGT)(Slavin 1994) is recognized as an effective learning model in conventional classrooms. The TGT model first evaluates learners’ learning status and then divides these learners into heterogeneous groups according to evaluating results. After studying a subject, learners of a group join proper team games with the members of other groups to win points for their own groups. An illustrative TGT scenario, as depicted in figure 1, is given here to clarify the tasks of instructors. First, learners join a quiz activity after they finish an assigned reading activity. According to the portfolio in the quiz, instructors divide the learners into several groups. Then, the learners are assigned to suitable team games to win point for their groups. Finally, learners of a group discuss collaboratively to clarify their misconceptions in team games. Figure 1: The scenario of the illustrative example To support the TGT scenario on the Web, an instructor must do the following tasks. First, there are three roles involved in the quiz activity, i.e. student, teacher, and teaching assistant (TA). The instructor must initially assign each learner and other participant an appropriate role in the quiz activity. In addition, the instructor must regulate the capability and responsibility of each role. For instance, the teacher role should set quiz paper to start the quiz activity. Then, each student role should submit his/her answer in one day. Since existing web server do not distinguish users’ roles, capabilities, and responsibilities, instructors can not regulate desired learning activity on the Web based on group, role, and status. This issue is referred as learning model regulation problem. Second, after the instructor regulate a collaborative learning model, each role has certain capability to perform some actions. For example, in the quiz activity, a student role can read the quiz paper and submit his/her answer. He/she can also read the correct answer posted by a TA. However, until the student submits his/her answer, he/she can not read the correct answer. In addition, some learning material can be access only by a specific learner or participant. For example, the revised answer of a student’s answer can be read only by this student. Other student can not read the revised answer. Therefore, the instructor must prevent learners from performing prohibited actions. We refer this issue as learning action control problem. Finally, each role has responsibility to perform some actions according to the regulated collaborative learning model. For example, an instructor may regulate that the TA role in a discussion activity has to initiate a topic for discussion. Then, the moderator role has to raise issues of the topic in two days. The student roles must post their arguments to an issue in two days. Finally, the TA should conclude the discussion. Therefore, the instructor has to notify appropriate learner to perform proper actions in learning activities. The first thing
is to monitor the status of learners. Then, when the learner log in the system, the system should present appropriate information and tell him/her what to do according to his/her status and the defined learning model. However, current web servers are passive and stateless in nature. They present the same information for each user. These servers will not notify a user when some event or condition happens. This issue is referred as guidance and notification problem. To sum up, in current situation, the instructors, web server managers, or learning system development team should write many programs to build a web based collaborative learning system for each desired learning model. The instructors need an easy-to-use facility tool by which they can easily regulate desired collaborative learning models. An instructor support system is also necessary to automatically manage learners’ learning behavior, i.e. control student’ learning action and generate notification information. The Activity regulation tool To allow instructors for regulating intended learning models, an activity regulation tool is supported in the web site system. An instructor initially organizes a learning group and assigns roles in the group. The learning group is then put in a learning activity. A participant of a certain role has responsibility to perform some actions. The participants of different roles have also different capacities on performing actions. Therefore, to facilitate instructors in regulating desired learning models, the activity regulation tool must allow an instructor for specifying the following information: (1) learning groups that perform the activity, (2) roles involved in the activity, (3) role assignment for organizing the activity, (4) actions that a role can perform in the activity, (5) capabilities of each participating role, and (6) responsibilities of each participating role. An illustrative quiz learning activity is given in figure 2. To clearly explain the idea, an informal notation is used. The team games and discussion activities in the TGT scenario can be also regulated in a similar manner. ------------------------------------------------------- Quiz Activity ------------------------------------------------------------ --- Participants: s 1, s 2,, ta 1 , t 1 Roles: Student, Teacher, TA , All Role assignment: Participants s 1, s 2 play Student role. Participant ta 1 plays TA role. Participant t 1 plays Teacher role. Actions: read quiz paper, read correct answer, read student’s answer, read revised answer, set quiz paper, announce correct answer, submit answer, revise student’s answer Capabilities Grants: G1: All roles (Student, TA, Teacher) can read quiz paper. G2: Teacher roles can read correct answer. G3: TA roles can read correct answer. G4: A student role can read correct answer. But he/she can not read correct answer until he/she has Submit his/her answer. G5: TA roles can read student’s answers. G6: Teacher roles can read student’s answers. G7: A Student roles can read a student’s answer if he/she is the author of the answer. G8: Teacher roles can read revised answer. G9: TA roles can read revised answer. G10: A Student role can read revised answer if the revised answer is for his/her submitted answer. G11: Teacher roles can set quiz paper. G12: TA roles can announce correct answer. G13: A student can submit his/her answer. But he/she can not submit his/her answer one day after Teacher role set the quiz paper. G14: TA roles can revise student’s answer.
- Page 63 and 64: Norfolk Stations. Schools of Distan
- Page 65 and 66: one-on-one with Teaching Assistants
- Page 67 and 68: Java. One of them is already an exp
- Page 69 and 70: • Personal study room management
- Page 71 and 72: As has already been discussed in th
- Page 73 and 74: On-line Support of On-Campus Educat
- Page 75 and 76: In-service Teachers Teaching Pre-se
- Page 77 and 78: How the Construction & Analysis of
- Page 79 and 80: Yet, still we ask ourselves: How do
- Page 81 and 82: us, we need to be ever-conscious of
- Page 83 and 84: A Reporting Simulation Using Toolbo
- Page 85 and 86: environment — it is impossible to
- Page 87 and 88: Actually, when a particular author
- Page 89 and 90: Any instance of this type is an HC
- Page 91 and 92: Figure 5: Saving an Educational App
- Page 93 and 94: To address this problem Webfuse dra
- Page 95 and 96: Cognitive tools can act as structur
- Page 97 and 98: In this study, we propose the follo
- Page 99 and 100: more information about it, for exam
- Page 101 and 102: Charlottesville, VA., 691-696. Muly
- Page 103 and 104: ownership is retained by the instit
- Page 105 and 106: priority, it is in the interests of
- Page 107 and 108: limitations of the prevailing compl
- Page 109 and 110: exchange information with other cla
- Page 111 and 112: whether compiled or interpreted. So
- Page 113: A web site system for instructors t
- Page 117 and 118: the capability grant G13 as Not Set
- Page 119 and 120: Slavin R.(1994), Small group method
- Page 121 and 122: tutor. Support offered in the form
- Page 123 and 124: Apart from utilising the functional
- Page 125 and 126: Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (Ed.). (1984
- Page 127 and 128: Java can significantly increase the
- Page 129 and 130: The modules are designed for a vari
- Page 131 and 132: adapted tests to assess the student
- Page 133 and 134: Architecture of HEZINET The system
- Page 135 and 136: Berners-Lee, T. & R. Cailliau, (198
- Page 137 and 138: The ParlEuNet system will provide a
- Page 139 and 140: 3. Students use a dedicated HTML co
- Page 141 and 142: The prototype under development is
- Page 143 and 144: make an hypermedia educational envi
- Page 145 and 146: accreditation or standing in countr
- Page 147 and 148: A government designates a certain a
- Page 149 and 150: will be involved - either in partne
- Page 151 and 152: Streaming 7000 films... Uwe Sander
- Page 153 and 154: and how to innovate will be paramou
- Page 155 and 156: Toward a framework for instruction
- Page 157 and 158: A knowledge integration approach to
- Page 159 and 160: In 1978, the University formalized
- Page 161 and 162: comparisons to conventional instruc
- Page 163 and 164: Multimedia Cases in Teacher Educati
1997), basic requirements <strong>for</strong> supporting collaborative learning on Web include facilities <strong>for</strong> (1) regulating<br />
collaborative learning model (2) controlling <strong>the</strong> learning actions, and (3) notifying participants to guide<br />
learners to interact with o<strong>the</strong>rs according to <strong>the</strong> defined learning model. We explain each requirement and<br />
why current web servers, e.g. Microsoft IIS and Netscape web server, can not support it in <strong>the</strong> following<br />
collaborative learning scenario.<br />
Team game tournament (TGT)(Slavin 1994) is recognized as an effective learning model in<br />
conventional classrooms. The TGT model first evaluates learners’ learning status and <strong>the</strong>n divides <strong>the</strong>se<br />
learners into heterogeneous groups according to evaluating results. After studying a subject, learners of a<br />
group join proper team games with <strong>the</strong> members of o<strong>the</strong>r groups to win points <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own groups. An<br />
illustrative TGT scenario, as depicted in figure 1, is given here to clarify <strong>the</strong> tasks of instructors. First, learners<br />
join a quiz activity after <strong>the</strong>y finish an assigned reading activity. According to <strong>the</strong> portfolio in <strong>the</strong> quiz,<br />
instructors divide <strong>the</strong> learners into several groups. Then, <strong>the</strong> learners are assigned to suitable team games to<br />
win point <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir groups. Finally, learners of a group discuss collaboratively to clarify <strong>the</strong>ir misconceptions in<br />
team games.<br />
Figure 1: The scenario of <strong>the</strong> illustrative example<br />
To support <strong>the</strong> TGT scenario on <strong>the</strong> Web, an instructor must do <strong>the</strong> following tasks. First, <strong>the</strong>re are<br />
three roles involved in <strong>the</strong> quiz activity, i.e. student, teacher, and teaching assistant (TA). The instructor must<br />
initially assign each learner and o<strong>the</strong>r participant an appropriate role in <strong>the</strong> quiz activity. In addition, <strong>the</strong><br />
instructor must regulate <strong>the</strong> capability and responsibility of each role. For instance, <strong>the</strong> teacher role should set<br />
quiz paper to start <strong>the</strong> quiz activity. Then, each student role should submit his/her answer in one day. Since<br />
existing web server do not distinguish users’ roles, capabilities, and responsibilities, instructors can not<br />
regulate desired learning activity on <strong>the</strong> Web based on group, role, and status. This issue is referred as<br />
learning model regulation problem.<br />
Second, after <strong>the</strong> instructor regulate a collaborative learning model, each role has certain capability to<br />
per<strong>for</strong>m some actions. For example, in <strong>the</strong> quiz activity, a student role can read <strong>the</strong> quiz paper and submit<br />
his/her answer. He/she can also read <strong>the</strong> correct answer posted by a TA. However, until <strong>the</strong> student submits<br />
his/her answer, he/she can not read <strong>the</strong> correct answer. In addition, some learning material can be access only<br />
by a specific learner or participant. For example, <strong>the</strong> revised answer of a student’s answer can be read only by<br />
this student. O<strong>the</strong>r student can not read <strong>the</strong> revised answer. There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> instructor must prevent learners<br />
from per<strong>for</strong>ming prohibited actions. We refer this issue as learning action control problem.<br />
Finally, each role has responsibility to per<strong>for</strong>m some actions according to <strong>the</strong> regulated collaborative<br />
learning model. For example, an instructor may regulate that <strong>the</strong> TA role in a discussion activity has to initiate<br />
a topic <strong>for</strong> discussion. Then, <strong>the</strong> moderator role has to raise issues of <strong>the</strong> topic in two days. The student roles<br />
must post <strong>the</strong>ir arguments to an issue in two days. Finally, <strong>the</strong> TA should conclude <strong>the</strong> discussion. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />
<strong>the</strong> instructor has to notify appropriate learner to per<strong>for</strong>m proper actions in learning activities. The first thing