17.01.2015 Views

A bibliography of English military books up to 1642 and of ...

A bibliography of English military books up to 1642 and of ...

A bibliography of English military books up to 1642 and of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

gro<strong>up</strong>ing works on them except in one class. By the time they<br />

were entirely separated chivalry itself was no more.<br />

And now as <strong>to</strong> the arrangement <strong>of</strong> this catalogue.<br />

I have thought it inadvisable <strong>to</strong> hinge that on the accident <strong>of</strong><br />

an author's name or initial.<br />

Placed in the chronological order, the<br />

title-pages alone form a <strong>military</strong> his<strong>to</strong>ry in miniature.<br />

In reading<br />

through them as they occur here, we trace the descent <strong>of</strong> one book<br />

from another, we watch the <strong>military</strong> art at perhaps the most interesting<br />

phase <strong>of</strong> its development, when, unwilling <strong>to</strong> cut itself<br />

adrift from theories <strong>and</strong> practices consecrated by the conformity <strong>of</strong><br />

wellnigh two thous<strong>and</strong> years, but forced on by the exigencies <strong>of</strong> the<br />

recently-invented artillery, it was painfully endeavouring <strong>to</strong> adapt<br />

itself <strong>to</strong> a new order which was <strong>to</strong> lead, step by step, <strong>to</strong> the system<br />

<strong>of</strong> the; present day. Ranged among its contemporaries, "the most<br />

worthless book <strong>of</strong> a bygone age," says De Morgan,^ "is a record<br />

worthy <strong>of</strong> preservation. Like a telescopic star, its obscurity may<br />

render it unavailable for most purposes, but it serves, in h<strong>and</strong>s which<br />

know how <strong>to</strong> use it, <strong>to</strong> determine the places <strong>of</strong> more important<br />

bodies." The chronological order must be preferred, especially<br />

where it is a question <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> a work <strong>and</strong> its influence,<br />

when it must be weighed against others <strong>of</strong> its own time, not against<br />

those <strong>of</strong> a later <strong>and</strong> more advanced stage. Though, for a view <strong>of</strong><br />

the state <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>and</strong> practice <strong>of</strong> artillery during the sixteenth<br />

century, the student would go <strong>to</strong> Firrufino rather than <strong>to</strong><br />

Tartaglia, he would not, therefore, rank the intelligent summary <strong>of</strong><br />

the one above the original treatise <strong>of</strong> the other, for all<br />

its fallacies.<br />

One book, Vere's "Commentaries", written before <strong>1642</strong>, but<br />

printed after that date, is placed in its chronological order at the<br />

end ; circulating, if at all, in manuscript only, it would have had<br />

no appreciable influence when first written, <strong>and</strong> its value would,<br />

therefore, never have been other than his<strong>to</strong>rical.<br />

*<br />

"Arithmetical Books", London, 1847, p. ii. . . .<br />

xxiii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!