Marketing to women Admap Magazine

Marketing to women Admap Magazine Marketing to women Admap Magazine

17.01.2015 Views

Is this article useful If so why not get a personal subscription to Admap Every month you'll receive the latest ideas, research and techniques about brand communications in a convenient magazine format. Learn more at www.admapmagazine.com Admap Magazine March 2007, Issue 481 www.warc.com Marketing to women Jane Cunningham and Philippa Roberts Women are the most important target audience on earth. Figures published recently by The Economist suggest that women in the West are responsible for almost 80% of purchase decisions. In sectors as traditionally masculine as automotive or consumer electronics, women are becoming the dominant purchase makers. And, in many developed categories, the most substantial areas of growth are driven by increasingly affluent female consumers. Yet despite these figures – and the huge opportunity they represent – the female audience remains under-catered-for by the marketing and communications communities. In a YouGov survey at the end of 2006, over two-thirds of women said they could not identify with women featured in advertising; one in two said they felt people try to sell them things by making them feel bad about themselves; and over 70% said they think marketers believe they are interested only in household and beauty products. So why – despite the importance of women as an audience and the long-established presence of women in the work place – does the female audience remain the short suit of marketing More importantly and constructively, what can be done to better understand female motivation and purchase decision-making The roots of the problem are straightforward, but complicated and camouflaged by well-intended concerns about political correctness. The simple fact is that marketing, like most of business, was constructed, and remains dominated, by men. Even in the most enlightened organisations, much of the thinking and most products are produced by men. The most recent audit of the advertising industry (a survey conducted by the IPA in 2006) revealed that 85% of art directors and 79% of copy-writers were men. Less unexpectedly – but as influentially – 85% of agency top management was male. Given this bias, it is hardly surprising that (despite good intentions to the contrary) much of the thinking and work that agencies produce is constructed along masculine lines. And even less surprising that – as a result – women feel so under whelmed by most communication designed to appeal to them. So far, so well documented. Business is masculine, ergo masculine thinking seeps into the approaches it employs to appeal to women. Not difficult. The really difficult – and long unanswered – question is what to do about it. Fortunately, two significant developments over the last decade mean we are now in a better position to come up with an answer. First, scientific understanding of the differences between men and women has been improving at a huge rate. Knowledge and understanding of sex and gender differences – particularly genetic and neurological differences – is better developed and documented than ever. Male and female mental preferences, stress responses, biological instincts, and strategies for surviving and flourishing are now well researched, mapped out and substantiated. At the same time, a post-feminist political climate has emerged that questions the tenet that equality must mean 'sameness'. Whereas, until recently, any recognition of differences between sexes was deemed sexist, we are now fortunate enough to be living in a region and a climate where things are less inflamed and defensive. Most people acknowledge that men and women are not the same: in fact, they are profoundly, uniquely, interestingly and helpfully different. Together, these scientific and political developments mean that it is possible, for the first time, to acknowledge and tackle the problem of marketing to women: we have more knowledge than ever, and an emerging climate that allows that knowledge to be expressed and explored properly. So, what can science teach us about the differences between men and women and how they approach the world, and what do those differences mean for marketing DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN Masculine is Analytical, Linear, Focused. Feminine is Whole-brained Developments in MRI and PET brain scanning mean that the brain – previously pretty much a mystery revealed only through trial and error and abhorrent illness – is beginning to be well understood. While the science is still emerging (and still controversial) it seems there are hard-wired differences between the way male and female brains are constructed. A primary difference lies with the part of the brain that connects the two lobes of the neo-cortex: the most sophisticated part of the brain,

Is this article useful If so why not get a personal subscription <strong>to</strong> <strong>Admap</strong><br />

Every month you'll receive the latest ideas, research and techniques about brand communications in a convenient magazine format.<br />

Learn more at www.admapmagazine.com<br />

<strong>Admap</strong> <strong>Magazine</strong><br />

March 2007, Issue 481<br />

www.warc.com<br />

<strong>Marketing</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>women</strong><br />

Jane Cunningham and Philippa Roberts<br />

Women are the most important target audience on earth. Figures published recently by The Economist suggest that <strong>women</strong> in the West are<br />

responsible for almost 80% of purchase decisions. In sec<strong>to</strong>rs as traditionally masculine as au<strong>to</strong>motive or consumer electronics, <strong>women</strong> are<br />

becoming the dominant purchase makers. And, in many developed categories, the most substantial areas of growth are driven by<br />

increasingly affluent female consumers.<br />

Yet despite these figures – and the huge opportunity they represent – the female audience remains under-catered-for by the marketing<br />

and communications communities. In a YouGov survey at the end of 2006, over two-thirds of <strong>women</strong> said they could not identify with<br />

<strong>women</strong> featured in advertising; one in two said they felt people try <strong>to</strong> sell them things by making them feel bad about themselves; and<br />

over 70% said they think marketers believe they are interested only in household and beauty products.<br />

So why – despite the importance of <strong>women</strong> as an audience and the long-established presence of <strong>women</strong> in the work place – does the<br />

female audience remain the short suit of marketing More importantly and constructively, what can be done <strong>to</strong> better understand female<br />

motivation and purchase decision-making<br />

The roots of the problem are straightforward, but complicated and camouflaged by well-intended concerns about political correctness. The<br />

simple fact is that marketing, like most of business, was constructed, and remains dominated, by men. Even in the most enlightened<br />

organisations, much of the thinking and most products are produced by men. The most recent audit of the advertising industry (a survey<br />

conducted by the IPA in 2006) revealed that 85% of art direc<strong>to</strong>rs and 79% of copy-writers were men. Less unexpectedly – but as<br />

influentially – 85% of agency <strong>to</strong>p management was male. Given this bias, it is hardly surprising that (despite good intentions <strong>to</strong> the<br />

contrary) much of the thinking and work that agencies produce is constructed along masculine lines. And even less surprising that – as a<br />

result – <strong>women</strong> feel so under whelmed by most communication designed <strong>to</strong> appeal <strong>to</strong> them.<br />

So far, so well documented. Business is masculine, ergo masculine thinking seeps in<strong>to</strong> the approaches it employs <strong>to</strong> appeal <strong>to</strong> <strong>women</strong>. Not<br />

difficult. The really difficult – and long unanswered – question is what <strong>to</strong> do about it.<br />

Fortunately, two significant developments over the last decade mean we are now in a better position <strong>to</strong> come up with an answer.<br />

First, scientific understanding of the differences between men and <strong>women</strong> has been improving at a huge rate. Knowledge and<br />

understanding of sex and gender differences – particularly genetic and neurological differences – is better developed and documented than<br />

ever. Male and female mental preferences, stress responses, biological instincts, and strategies for surviving and flourishing are now well<br />

researched, mapped out and substantiated.<br />

At the same time, a post-feminist political climate has emerged that questions the tenet that equality must mean 'sameness'. Whereas,<br />

until recently, any recognition of differences between sexes was deemed sexist, we are now fortunate enough <strong>to</strong> be living in a region and a<br />

climate where things are less inflamed and defensive. Most people acknowledge that men and <strong>women</strong> are not the same: in fact, they are<br />

profoundly, uniquely, interestingly and helpfully different.<br />

Together, these scientific and political developments mean that it is possible, for the first time, <strong>to</strong> acknowledge and tackle the problem of<br />

marketing <strong>to</strong> <strong>women</strong>: we have more knowledge than ever, and an emerging climate that allows that knowledge <strong>to</strong> be expressed and<br />

explored properly.<br />

So, what can science teach us about the differences between men and <strong>women</strong> and how they approach the world, and what do those<br />

differences mean for marketing<br />

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN<br />

Masculine is Analytical, Linear, Focused. Feminine is Whole-brained<br />

Developments in MRI and PET brain scanning mean that the brain – previously pretty much a mystery revealed only through trial and error<br />

and abhorrent illness – is beginning <strong>to</strong> be well unders<strong>to</strong>od. While the science is still emerging (and still controversial) it seems there are<br />

hard-wired differences between the way male and female brains are constructed.<br />

A primary difference lies with the part of the brain that connects the two lobes of the neo-cortex: the most sophisticated part of the brain,


where thoughts are processed and understanding computed. Evidence suggests that <strong>women</strong> have a greater ability <strong>to</strong> connect the two parts<br />

of the neo-cortex; the left hemisphere, where centres of logical, linear and analytical thinking reside, and the right, where emotional and<br />

intuitive thinking takes place. This may mean that <strong>women</strong> can better access different parts of the brain and different 'thinking styles' when<br />

it comes <strong>to</strong> problem-solving or assessing a situation. Where male thinking is likely <strong>to</strong> be focused in the logical left cortex, females may use<br />

more emotional and intuitive parts of the brain in combination with more reasoned approaches.<br />

Masculine is Action. Feminine is Feeling<br />

A further difference emerges in the less thinking and more primitive inner parts of the brain – the subconscious areas where au<strong>to</strong>matic,<br />

instinctive responses take place. From scanning studies examining levels of activity in these areas, it appears that male and female brains<br />

may have different centres of gravity. When the male brain is at rest, most activity takes place in the most primitive area, that deals with<br />

survival instincts and fight-or-flight responses; when the female brain is at rest, most activity takes place in the limbic system – where<br />

'feeling' is centred.<br />

Further, MRI and PET show that, when processing emotions, far more areas of the brain are activated in <strong>women</strong> than men. Many more<br />

neural pathways, connecting different parts of the brain, appear <strong>to</strong> be activated; in fact, the female brain has 15% more blood flow than<br />

the male brain when processing emotion.<br />

Masculine: Fight or Flight. Feminine: Tend and Befriend<br />

Beyond brain structures and processing patterns, the other major influence on behaviour and response is hormonal – the messaging<br />

system that catalyses and regulates the body's behaviour.<br />

Here again men and <strong>women</strong> have very different make-ups. A well-documented example is tes<strong>to</strong>sterone. Tes<strong>to</strong>sterone, of course, drives<br />

dominating, action-based, physical behaviour, and men have 20 times more in their bodies than <strong>women</strong>. Less well known, but equally<br />

impactful, is oxy<strong>to</strong>cin, which encourages bonding, nurturing and affiliation in mammals. Women have significantly higher levels of oxy<strong>to</strong>cin<br />

than men – in fact, male hormones appear <strong>to</strong> override and cancel out the effects of oxy<strong>to</strong>cin.<br />

Under stress, differences in hormonal effects between the sexes become particularly pronounced. Whereas male response <strong>to</strong> stress is the<br />

release of a cascade of hormones (tes<strong>to</strong>sterone, adrenalin, and so on) that encourage the flight-or-fight response, in <strong>women</strong> stress<br />

responses induce production of oxy<strong>to</strong>cin.<br />

This catalyses a response that the scientists who discovered it dubbed the 'tend and befriend' response; where tes<strong>to</strong>sterone drives men <strong>to</strong><br />

physical action, oxy<strong>to</strong>cin induces an almost opposing response in <strong>women</strong>, and encourages behaviour that is nurturing, calming and<br />

concilia<strong>to</strong>ry.<br />

Masculine: Interest in Things. Feminine: Interest in People<br />

These hard-wired, biological differences between sexes appear <strong>to</strong> determine many differences in primary focus and interest between men<br />

and <strong>women</strong>.<br />

Chief among these is the tendency for <strong>women</strong> <strong>to</strong> be interested in people and for men <strong>to</strong> be interested in things. A number of different<br />

studies – mainly among babies and children who have not yet been influenced by social stereotyping – have highlighted this. Female babies<br />

respond with more interest <strong>to</strong> a picture of a face; female <strong>to</strong>ddlers are less likely <strong>to</strong> engage in mechanical play and more likely <strong>to</strong> initiate<br />

social interaction for fun; little boys are more interested in mobile and mechanical objects than in natural or people-based playthings; little<br />

girls are much more likely <strong>to</strong> draw pictures containing people and natural motifs, whereas little boys draw pictures without people but<br />

containing cars, buildings and other mechanical objects.<br />

Masculine: Self-interest, Hierarchy, Power and Competition. Feminine: Relationships, Empathy and Connections<br />

Further evidence that these tendencies run beyond stereotyping comes from anthropological studies in<strong>to</strong> the primitive survival strategies<br />

employed by men and <strong>women</strong>.<br />

To ensure the survival of their genes, male primates need <strong>to</strong> create mating opportunities. This means that they need <strong>to</strong> be seen as an<br />

attractive prospect within the pack. This leads them <strong>to</strong> focus on the hierarchy and their position within it; their behaviour is about asserting<br />

dominance, and gaining power and control through competition.<br />

By contrast, <strong>to</strong> ensure the survival of their genes, females focus on the survival of their offspring. To do this they employ three different<br />

strategies: first, they choose a mate very carefully <strong>to</strong> make sure they are getting good genes and that the male can protect them and their<br />

offspring; second, they nurture their offspring intensively; finally, they develop relationships with other people <strong>to</strong> provide further protection<br />

from external threats.<br />

This means that <strong>women</strong> are motivated <strong>to</strong> achieve a peaceful, safe and harmonious environment, and employ strategies that deliver that –<br />

building bonds of shared interest and support, working for the greater, mutual good, seeking out order and avoiding risk. By contrast, men<br />

are motivated by much more self-interested strategies, about asserting dominance and competing successfully in the hierarchy.<br />

Masculine: Systematising Feminine: Empathising<br />

Finally – and <strong>to</strong> an extent cumulatively – all this results in men and <strong>women</strong> having fundamentally different mental preferences in viewing<br />

and understanding the world. At an essential, hard-wired level, it seems men and <strong>women</strong> are programmed <strong>to</strong> approach the world in<br />

fundamentally different ways. To quote Simon Baron Cohen, the Cambridge scientist who has done most work in this field, 'the female<br />

brain is predominantly hard-wired for empathy. The male brain is predominantly hardwired for understanding and building systems.'


In other words, men understand the world by breaking things down in<strong>to</strong> their component parts and establishing principles that explain the<br />

underlying behaviour; <strong>women</strong> understand the world by putting themselves in other people's shoes and feeling the emotional atmosphere<br />

between people.<br />

To summarise, then, we can now understand and map male and female differences under six key areas (see Table 1).<br />

THE IMPLICATIONS FOR MARKETING TO WOMEN<br />

When looked at in this bald and comparative way, the problem and the opportunity for marketing quickly becomes clear. Men and <strong>women</strong><br />

are wired differently and therefore need <strong>to</strong> be approached differently. The differences are so profound, in fact, that feminine thinking must<br />

infect all stages of development from the very beginning – the way the organisation thinks and behaves – <strong>to</strong> the very end – the way the<br />

brand executes its ideas, products and services.<br />

Clearly, we do not have space in this article <strong>to</strong> discuss at length all these stages of development and the impact that an understanding of<br />

gender difference makes <strong>to</strong> them. However, it is possible <strong>to</strong> summarise the four key areas that we believe determine the success of a<br />

brand when it comes <strong>to</strong> targeting the female audience. By combining the study of sex and gender difference with the study of those brands<br />

that have successfully appealed <strong>to</strong> the female consumer, we have arrived at Four Feminine Codes: the four areas of influence and activity<br />

that appeal <strong>to</strong> what we now know about female motivation and operation.<br />

The Altruism Code<br />

How and why <strong>women</strong> respond <strong>to</strong> altruistic motives and behaviour in brands.<br />

This code reflects the female tendency <strong>to</strong> focus on the group and the well-being of others rather than on their own individual success or<br />

achievement. It is born out of the female ability <strong>to</strong> empathise – the ability <strong>to</strong> put oneself in another's shoes.<br />

Fairtrade and Red are strong, powerful examples of brands built on overt altruistic positionings. But there are others that are less overt but<br />

equally consonant with the positive, altruistic sentiment <strong>to</strong> which <strong>women</strong> respond.<br />

Among telecoms networks, Orange stands out as the most developed and powerful brand. It has an inspiring brand positioning,<br />

encapsulated in the endline 'The Future's Bright, the Future's Orange'. This thought resonates positively with the Altruism Code, because in<br />

the world of telecoms brands that feel technical, grey, drab and unwelcoming, there is a brand <strong>to</strong> choose not because you are afraid of<br />

being left behind but because you are excited about what is <strong>to</strong> come.<br />

The Aesthetic Code<br />

Why appearance matters <strong>to</strong> <strong>women</strong> and what that means for marketing.<br />

The Aesthetic Code reflects the female desire <strong>to</strong> make the world a more attractive place. It is born out of a belief that a more attractive<br />

environment is a safer, more harmonious and more pleasant place <strong>to</strong> be for everyone. The crea<strong>to</strong>rs of iMac unders<strong>to</strong>od the Aesthetic Code<br />

and responded wholeheartedly.<br />

Until the 1990s, computers were more or less all the same: cumbersome grey boxes, designed entirely for function, enlivened only by a<br />

cheery (i.e. exceptionally annoying) mouse mat or screen saver. PCs represented the archetype of function over form.<br />

Apple, Jonathan Ive and iMac changed all that. There was an appreciation that the aesthetics of a computer were important: at a macro<br />

level, because it was something that you would live and work with all the time, and at a micro level because the way things looked and felt<br />

could help generate a sense of friendliness and approachability (and so encourage experimentation). The look and feel of the iMac<br />

suddenly, and literally, changed the face of computers.<br />

The Ordering Code<br />

The importance of enhanced order and elimination of risk <strong>to</strong> <strong>women</strong>.<br />

This unglamorous code reflects the female belief that order offsets risk, and creates harmony. The tendency <strong>to</strong> take on responsibilities like<br />

the running of the home and family matters, and the meticulous and detailed planning of events evidence the Ordering Code.<br />

The way <strong>women</strong> have embraced the internet is a reflection of 'ordering behaviour'. Women now outnumber men online, and spend more<br />

money than men online. The internet allows <strong>women</strong> <strong>to</strong> execute their many responsibilities and duties (most of which are self-appointed)<br />

with ease, and it provides information <strong>to</strong> give <strong>women</strong> confidence in their decision-making.<br />

Where once <strong>women</strong> had <strong>to</strong> trudge around car showrooms being ignored or patronised, they can now get online, get the information they<br />

need and execute the task of buying a car quickly and relatively painlessly.<br />

The Connecting Code<br />

How and why communities are important <strong>to</strong> <strong>women</strong>.<br />

The Connecting Code is concerned with the female need <strong>to</strong> build relationships and communities, the need <strong>to</strong> draw people <strong>to</strong>gether and find<br />

common ground between them. Businesses that recognise the power of female communities in building or destroying brands, and that use<br />

female networks <strong>to</strong> help provide momentum for the growth of their brands will benefit from 'free' marketing and develop deeper, more<br />

commercially, rewarding relationships with the female audience.


NOTES & EXHIBITS<br />

Jane<br />

Cunningham<br />

co-runs the<br />

marketing<br />

consultancy<br />

PrettyLittleHead.<br />

Previously Jane<br />

worked for DDB<br />

and then Ogilvy,<br />

where she was<br />

planning direc<strong>to</strong>r.<br />

Jane Cunningham<br />

jane.cunningham@prettylittlehead.co.uk<br />

Philippa<br />

Roberts co-runs<br />

the marketing<br />

consultancy<br />

PrettyLittleHead.<br />

Previously<br />

Philippa worked<br />

for DDB and then<br />

Ogilvy, where<br />

she was client<br />

service direc<strong>to</strong>r.<br />

Philippa Roberts<br />

philippa.roberts@prettylittlehead.co.uk<br />

TABLE 1: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MALES AND FEMALES


© Copyright World Advertising Research Center 2007<br />

World Advertising Research Center Ltd.<br />

Farm Road, Henley-on-Thames, Oxon, United Kingdom, RG9 1EJ<br />

Tel: +44 (0)1491 411000, Fax: +44 (0)1491 418600<br />

All rights reserved including database rights. This electronic file is for the personal use of authorised users based at the subscribing<br />

company's office location. It may not be reproduced, posted on intranets, extranets or the internet, e-mailed, archived or shared<br />

electronically either within the purchaser’s organisation or externally without express written permission from World Advertising Research<br />

Center.<br />

www.warc.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!