16.01.2015 Views

Entrez PubMed

Entrez PubMed

Entrez PubMed

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Entrez</strong> <strong>PubMed</strong><br />

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgidb=pubmed&cmd=Ret...<br />

1 sur 1 18/05/2007 22:04<br />

My NCBI<br />

[Sign In] [Register]<br />

All Databases <strong>PubMed</strong> Nucleotide Protein Genome Structure OMIM PMC Journals Books<br />

Search <strong>PubMed</strong> for Go Clear<br />

Limits Preview/Index History Clipboard Details<br />

Display AbstractPlus Show 20 Sort by<br />

Send to<br />

All: 1 Review: 0<br />

1: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Feb 12; [Epub ahead of print]<br />

Links<br />

Inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus<br />

isolates causing bacteremia at a university hospital in southern<br />

Taiwan.<br />

Janapatla RP, Yan JJ, Huang AH, Chen HM, Wu HM, Wu JJ.<br />

Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, College of<br />

Medicine, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan 70101, ROC Taiwan.<br />

A major concern while prescribing clindamycin to treat infections<br />

caused by inducible macrolide, lincosamide, and group B<br />

streptogramin (iMLS(B))-resistant strains is clinical therapy<br />

failure. In this study, we determined the prevalence,<br />

mechanism, and clonality of the iMLS(B) phenotype in<br />

oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ORSA) and<br />

oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus (OSSA). Among the 729 OSSA<br />

isolates collected from July 1995 to March 2006, 72 (10%) were<br />

clindamycin sensitive (Cli(s)) and erythromycin resistant<br />

(Erm(r)), and 55 (8%) had the iMLS(B) phenotype. In the 709<br />

ORSA isolates collected from January 1997 to March 2006, 31<br />

(4%) were Cli(s) and Erm(r), and 29 (4%) isolates<br />

demonstrated the iMLS(B) phenotype. In OSSA, ermC was the<br />

predominant (51 of 55 isolates) genetic determinant responsible<br />

for the iMLS(B) phenotype, whereas in ORSA, ermA was<br />

predominant (27 of 29). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis showed<br />

that 8 pulsed types (RA to RH) were present in ORSA isolates (n<br />

= 27), and pulsed type RC was predominant in 17 isolates with 5<br />

identifiable subtypes (RC1 to RC5); this type was prevalent from<br />

November 1997 to June 2004. In the OSSA (n = 24) isolates, 14<br />

different pulsed types (SA to SN) were identified, but none was<br />

predominant. These results indicate that the incidence of<br />

iMLS(B) resistance phenotype is higher in OSSA than ORSA in<br />

Taiwan, and the genetic determinants responsible for the<br />

iMLS(B) phenotype vary in OSSA and ORSA.<br />

Related Links<br />

Phenotypes and genotypes of<br />

erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus<br />

[Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999]<br />

Testing for induction of clindamycin<br />

resistance in erythromycin-resistant<br />

[J Clin Microbiol. 2005]<br />

Prevalence of polyclonal<br />

mefA-containing isolates [J Clin Microbiol. among 2000]<br />

Failure of clindamycin treatment of<br />

methicillin-resistant [Clin Staphylococcus<br />

Infect Dis. 2003]<br />

Practical disk diffusion method for<br />

detection of inducible [J Clin clindamycin<br />

Microbiol. 2003]<br />

See all Related Articles...<br />

PMID: 17300897 [<strong>PubMed</strong> - as supplied by publisher]<br />

Display AbstractPlus Show 20 Sort by<br />

Send to<br />

Write to the Help Desk<br />

NCBI | NLM | NIH<br />

Department of Health & Human Services<br />

Privacy Statement | Freedom of Information Act | Disclaimer<br />

Apr 30 2007 04:56:27


This document was created with Win2PDF available at http://www.win2pdf.com.<br />

The unregistered version of Win2PDF is for evaluation or non-commercial use only.<br />

This page will not be added after purchasing Win2PDF.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!