Lexicalized Tree-Adjoining Grammars (LTAG) - ad-teaching.infor...

Lexicalized Tree-Adjoining Grammars (LTAG) - ad-teaching.infor... Lexicalized Tree-Adjoining Grammars (LTAG) - ad-teaching.infor...

ad.teaching.informatik.uni.freiburg.de
from ad.teaching.informatik.uni.freiburg.de More from this publisher
16.01.2015 Views

Why Lexicalization Syntactic structures associated with single words can be seen as more powerful POS-tags (“supertags”). Example (Transitive vs. intransitive verb) NP↓ S V eats VP NP↓ NP↓ S VP V sleeps (Finite) lexicalized grammars are finitely ambiguous. ⇒ The generated string languages are decidable. Lexicalization is useful for parsing since it allows us to drastically restrict the search space (as a preprocessing step). 12 / 52

Lexicalization Example (CFG which is not strongly lexicalizable with a TSG) Consider the following CFG: An intuitive approach to lexicalize it with a TSG might be: S → SS S → a S a S↓ S S S S S↓ But this is not a strong lexicalization because it cannot generate the following tree (which the CFG can generate): S a S a S S S S S Problem: In TSGs the distance between two nodes in the same initial tree cannot increase during derivation. a a a a 13 / 52

Why Lexicalization<br />

Syntactic structures associated with single words can be seen<br />

as more powerful POS-tags (“supertags”).<br />

Example (Transitive vs. intransitive verb)<br />

NP↓<br />

S<br />

V<br />

eats<br />

VP<br />

NP↓<br />

NP↓<br />

S<br />

VP<br />

V<br />

sleeps<br />

(Finite) lexicalized grammars are finitely ambiguous.<br />

⇒ The generated string languages are decidable.<br />

Lexicalization is useful for parsing since it allows us to<br />

drastically restrict the search space (as a preprocessing step).<br />

12 / 52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!