East Bay Coalition for the Homeless - Roger Williams University
East Bay Coalition for the Homeless - Roger Williams University East Bay Coalition for the Homeless - Roger Williams University
EBCH Fundraising How Involved in EBCH 60% 50% 40% 30% Current Donors (15) Former Donors (15) 20% 10% 0% Silent Donor A4ended Events Volunteered Time None of the Above Fundraising Events of Interest (Current Donors; n=14) Annual Dinner & AucDon Cocktail Party Walk-‐a-‐thon Dinner Dance Annual Appeal Brick Campaign Run Bike-‐a-‐thon None 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 93
Know Anyone Associated with the EBCH (Non Donors; n=75) Staff Members No Board Members Volunteers Donors 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Why No Longer Donate to the EBCH (Former Donors; n=12) Reason Other organizations needed the donation more Became involved in other organizations # 4 5 Could no longer afford to donate 4 Not a conscious decision; probably will donate in the future 3 I rotate my donations 2 Two additional options were provided but not selected by anyone: I was unhappy with the organization. I did not believe my money was put to good use. 94
- Page 47 and 48: EAST BAY COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS
- Page 49 and 50: Campaign Evaluation What to Track W
- Page 51 and 52: Appendix A Fall 2012 Research Repor
- Page 53 and 54: Executive Summary This report discu
- Page 55 and 56: Research Process Research Objective
- Page 57 and 58: Findings and Analysis Statistical A
- Page 59 and 60: If you were not on the EBCH board,
- Page 61 and 62: If you were asked to describe the E
- Page 63 and 64: If the EBCH did not exist, what wou
- Page 65 and 66: EBCAP Board Responses: Again, messa
- Page 67 and 68: The spread of the ratings is presen
- Page 69 and 70: C. How the Relationship with the EB
- Page 71 and 72: Board Survey 66
- Page 73 and 74: THESE ARE QUESTIONS FOR EBCH BOARD
- Page 75 and 76: ALL RESPONDENTS SEE THE REMAINING Q
- Page 77 and 78: ALL9 * Listed below are four potent
- Page 79 and 80: ALL14 How effective is each of thes
- Page 81 and 82: Appendix B December 13, 2012, EBCH
- Page 83 and 84: You would continue to advocate for
- Page 85 and 86: How many events per year... Should
- Page 87 and 88: Differentiating Characteristics •
- Page 89 and 90: Appendix C Spring 2013 Research Res
- Page 91 and 92: Education 60% 50% 40% 30% 20%
- Page 93 and 94: Familiarity w/ Other Organizations
- Page 95 and 96: Donations: EBCH and Others Reasons
- Page 97: Donate to other charities 100% 90%
- Page 101 and 102: Message Effectiveness Tested five r
- Page 103 and 104: This first question is a SCREENING
- Page 105 and 106: FD5 How likely are you to encourage
- Page 107 and 108: FD9 Why do you no longer donate to
- Page 109 and 110: CD5 How likely are you to encourage
- Page 111 and 112: CD10 Which of these fundraising eve
- Page 113 and 114: CM4 What percentage of people in th
- Page 115 and 116: CM8 How likely might you be to dona
- Page 117 and 118: CM12 What factors do you consider w
- Page 119 and 120: CL5 What is the highest degree or l
- Page 121 and 122: Networked Nonprofits: Maturity of P
- Page 123 and 124: At this stage, the organization doe
- Page 125 and 126: Organizations in this category have
- Page 127 and 128: 122
- Page 129 and 130: 124
- Page 131 and 132: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE East Bay Comm
- Page 133 and 134: Appendix G Radio PSA Alert Template
- Page 135 and 136: Appendix I Press Kit Guidelines Wha
- Page 137 and 138: Appendix J WordPress Guide 132
- Page 139 and 140: 135
- Page 141: 137
EBCH Fundraising<br />
How Involved in EBCH<br />
60% <br />
50% <br />
40% <br />
30% <br />
Current Donors (15) <br />
Former Donors (15) <br />
20% <br />
10% <br />
0% <br />
Silent Donor A4ended Events Volunteered Time None of <strong>the</strong> Above <br />
Fundraising Events of Interest<br />
(Current Donors; n=14)<br />
Annual Dinner & AucDon <br />
Cocktail Party <br />
Walk-‐a-‐thon <br />
Dinner Dance <br />
Annual Appeal <br />
Brick Campaign <br />
Run <br />
Bike-‐a-‐thon <br />
None <br />
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% <br />
93
Change language