16.01.2015 Views

Layout 8 - Winston Churchill

Layout 8 - Winston Churchill

Layout 8 - Winston Churchill

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

D A T E L I N E S<br />

AROUND & ABOUT<br />

Police at Tonypandy, Wales, 1910<br />

TONYPANDY:<br />

THERE THEY GO AGAIN<br />

LONDON, JULY 21ST— Reader Alistair<br />

Cooke (no relation to “the” AC)<br />

picked up on a comment in the Daily<br />

Telegraph by a Labour MP, that, a<br />

century on, “the people of Tonypandy<br />

remember <strong>Churchill</strong> in relation to the<br />

Tonypandy riots.” Few myths, Cooke<br />

wrote, have proved as tenacious as the<br />

unfounded Labour belief that Home<br />

Secretary <strong>Churchill</strong> had used the Army<br />

to suppress Tonypandy rioters. Finest<br />

Hour senior editor Paul Courtenay seconded<br />

Cooke’s motion and raised him<br />

one. The Telegraph truncated Paul’s<br />

response. We reprint it in full:<br />

“Mr. Cooke is quite right to<br />

puncture the myth of <strong>Winston</strong><br />

<strong>Churchill</strong> and Tonypandy. In<br />

November 1910, during disturbances<br />

and looting at Tonypandy, the police<br />

were thought to have enough officers<br />

available to contain the situation, but<br />

the Chief Constable of Glamorgan<br />

asked for 400 cavalry and infantry as a<br />

reserve in case his men were overwhelmed<br />

or became exhausted. The<br />

General Officer Commanding<br />

Southern Command despatched these,<br />

pending further instructions.<br />

“When <strong>Churchill</strong>, the Home<br />

Secretary, heard that these military<br />

forces were on their way, he immediately<br />

gave orders that they were to be<br />

halted wherever they were and to go no<br />

further. The cavalry were initially<br />

halted in Cardiff, but were later<br />

allowed to advance as far as Pontypridd<br />

(five miles short of Tonypandy), and<br />

the infantry were halted in Swindon,<br />

which was not even in Wales and was<br />

as close as they got.<br />

“If anyone finds this hard to<br />

believe they should read the leading<br />

article in The Times of 9 November<br />

1910, in which that newspaper >><br />

Illustrating the reason for the late <strong>Winston</strong><br />

<strong>Churchill</strong>’s appeal to the nation (FH 147 back<br />

cover), the Royal Air Force may shrink to its smallest<br />

size since the First World War under unprecedented cuts<br />

being proposed at the Ministry of Defence, according to Thomas Harding,<br />

Defence Correspondent of the Daily Telegraph. In the most significant<br />

changes to Britain’s defences since the post-Suez review of 1957, ministers<br />

and officials plan to scrap large parts of the British armed forces. The services<br />

will lose up to 16,000 personnel, hundreds of tanks, scores of fighter<br />

jets and half a dozen ships, under detailed proposals passed to the Daily<br />

Telegraph. This is a rather interesting development, since the new<br />

Government ran on the promise of quite the opposite with regard to the military.<br />

Harding continues:<br />

“...the RAF will bear the brunt of the planned cuts. The Air Force will<br />

lose 7000 airmen—almost one sixth of its total staff—and 295 aircraft. The<br />

cuts will leave the Force with fewer than 200 fighter planes for the first time<br />

since 1914. In addition, the Royal Navy will lose two submarines, three<br />

amphibious ships and more than 100 senior officers, along with 2000 sailors<br />

and marines. The Army faces a 40 percent cut to its fleet of 9700 armoured<br />

vehicles and the loss of a 5000-strong brigade of troops.<br />

“The Telegraph has also learnt that the ‘black hole’ in Ministry of<br />

Defence finances, caused by orders which have been made but cannot be<br />

paid for, is approaching £72 billion over the next decade—double the<br />

amount previously suggested.<br />

“While the Strategic Defence and Security Review is yet to be<br />

finalised, officials have drawn up a series of likely options to meet cuts of 10<br />

to 20 percent demanded by the Treasury. By the end of August the<br />

Defence Strategy Group, comprising ministers and military chiefs, will<br />

receive a number of recommendations that they will refine and pass to the<br />

National Security Council, chaired by the Prime Minister, in September.<br />

In October, after agreement with the Treasury, an announcement will be<br />

made in Parliament on precisely what cuts the Forces face as part of the<br />

comprehensive spending review of Whitehall budgets.<br />

“If implemented, the cuts will mean that Britain will almost certainly<br />

depart the world stage as a major military power and become what military<br />

chiefs call a ‘medium-scale player.’”<br />

kkkkk<br />

Telegraph readers commented: “It is madness to cut defense considering<br />

the number of unstable countries wishing us harm; we did the same<br />

thing in the 1930s and look how that turned out” ... “To cut the navy is<br />

suicide; it should be increased; we are an island and must have secure sea<br />

lanes; as for the ‘EUSSR’ we all know we cannot depend on the French or<br />

Germans to defend us, we have to be able to stand on our own” ... “When<br />

exactly were the RAF last involved in dogfights etc. in defence of the UK”<br />

... “They are still scrambled when the Russians test our response times with<br />

long-range bombers—reducing our capacity simply shows how inadequate<br />

the broke-back coalition is.” ... “From time to time Her Majesty’s<br />

Government is embarrassed by the excess of zeal displayed by armament<br />

salesmen. It has accordingly signed solemn agreements with other major<br />

governments, undertaking to stamp out abuse. I am sure that HMG is<br />

capable of noble gestures. After all, it has a foreign aid budget in the region<br />

of £7 billion, for which the recipients do not always express effusive thanks.”<br />

We report, you decide. ,<br />

FINEST HOUR 148 / 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!