You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
D A T E L I N E S<br />
AROUND & ABOUT<br />
Police at Tonypandy, Wales, 1910<br />
TONYPANDY:<br />
THERE THEY GO AGAIN<br />
LONDON, JULY 21ST— Reader Alistair<br />
Cooke (no relation to “the” AC)<br />
picked up on a comment in the Daily<br />
Telegraph by a Labour MP, that, a<br />
century on, “the people of Tonypandy<br />
remember <strong>Churchill</strong> in relation to the<br />
Tonypandy riots.” Few myths, Cooke<br />
wrote, have proved as tenacious as the<br />
unfounded Labour belief that Home<br />
Secretary <strong>Churchill</strong> had used the Army<br />
to suppress Tonypandy rioters. Finest<br />
Hour senior editor Paul Courtenay seconded<br />
Cooke’s motion and raised him<br />
one. The Telegraph truncated Paul’s<br />
response. We reprint it in full:<br />
“Mr. Cooke is quite right to<br />
puncture the myth of <strong>Winston</strong><br />
<strong>Churchill</strong> and Tonypandy. In<br />
November 1910, during disturbances<br />
and looting at Tonypandy, the police<br />
were thought to have enough officers<br />
available to contain the situation, but<br />
the Chief Constable of Glamorgan<br />
asked for 400 cavalry and infantry as a<br />
reserve in case his men were overwhelmed<br />
or became exhausted. The<br />
General Officer Commanding<br />
Southern Command despatched these,<br />
pending further instructions.<br />
“When <strong>Churchill</strong>, the Home<br />
Secretary, heard that these military<br />
forces were on their way, he immediately<br />
gave orders that they were to be<br />
halted wherever they were and to go no<br />
further. The cavalry were initially<br />
halted in Cardiff, but were later<br />
allowed to advance as far as Pontypridd<br />
(five miles short of Tonypandy), and<br />
the infantry were halted in Swindon,<br />
which was not even in Wales and was<br />
as close as they got.<br />
“If anyone finds this hard to<br />
believe they should read the leading<br />
article in The Times of 9 November<br />
1910, in which that newspaper >><br />
Illustrating the reason for the late <strong>Winston</strong><br />
<strong>Churchill</strong>’s appeal to the nation (FH 147 back<br />
cover), the Royal Air Force may shrink to its smallest<br />
size since the First World War under unprecedented cuts<br />
being proposed at the Ministry of Defence, according to Thomas Harding,<br />
Defence Correspondent of the Daily Telegraph. In the most significant<br />
changes to Britain’s defences since the post-Suez review of 1957, ministers<br />
and officials plan to scrap large parts of the British armed forces. The services<br />
will lose up to 16,000 personnel, hundreds of tanks, scores of fighter<br />
jets and half a dozen ships, under detailed proposals passed to the Daily<br />
Telegraph. This is a rather interesting development, since the new<br />
Government ran on the promise of quite the opposite with regard to the military.<br />
Harding continues:<br />
“...the RAF will bear the brunt of the planned cuts. The Air Force will<br />
lose 7000 airmen—almost one sixth of its total staff—and 295 aircraft. The<br />
cuts will leave the Force with fewer than 200 fighter planes for the first time<br />
since 1914. In addition, the Royal Navy will lose two submarines, three<br />
amphibious ships and more than 100 senior officers, along with 2000 sailors<br />
and marines. The Army faces a 40 percent cut to its fleet of 9700 armoured<br />
vehicles and the loss of a 5000-strong brigade of troops.<br />
“The Telegraph has also learnt that the ‘black hole’ in Ministry of<br />
Defence finances, caused by orders which have been made but cannot be<br />
paid for, is approaching £72 billion over the next decade—double the<br />
amount previously suggested.<br />
“While the Strategic Defence and Security Review is yet to be<br />
finalised, officials have drawn up a series of likely options to meet cuts of 10<br />
to 20 percent demanded by the Treasury. By the end of August the<br />
Defence Strategy Group, comprising ministers and military chiefs, will<br />
receive a number of recommendations that they will refine and pass to the<br />
National Security Council, chaired by the Prime Minister, in September.<br />
In October, after agreement with the Treasury, an announcement will be<br />
made in Parliament on precisely what cuts the Forces face as part of the<br />
comprehensive spending review of Whitehall budgets.<br />
“If implemented, the cuts will mean that Britain will almost certainly<br />
depart the world stage as a major military power and become what military<br />
chiefs call a ‘medium-scale player.’”<br />
kkkkk<br />
Telegraph readers commented: “It is madness to cut defense considering<br />
the number of unstable countries wishing us harm; we did the same<br />
thing in the 1930s and look how that turned out” ... “To cut the navy is<br />
suicide; it should be increased; we are an island and must have secure sea<br />
lanes; as for the ‘EUSSR’ we all know we cannot depend on the French or<br />
Germans to defend us, we have to be able to stand on our own” ... “When<br />
exactly were the RAF last involved in dogfights etc. in defence of the UK”<br />
... “They are still scrambled when the Russians test our response times with<br />
long-range bombers—reducing our capacity simply shows how inadequate<br />
the broke-back coalition is.” ... “From time to time Her Majesty’s<br />
Government is embarrassed by the excess of zeal displayed by armament<br />
salesmen. It has accordingly signed solemn agreements with other major<br />
governments, undertaking to stamp out abuse. I am sure that HMG is<br />
capable of noble gestures. After all, it has a foreign aid budget in the region<br />
of £7 billion, for which the recipients do not always express effusive thanks.”<br />
We report, you decide. ,<br />
FINEST HOUR 148 / 8