Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
C H U R C H I L L P R O C E E D I N G S<br />
“Description” suggests<br />
writing that is both easier and<br />
less interesting than<br />
<strong>Churchill</strong>’s. What is most<br />
striking in all his historical<br />
and biographical works is<br />
their astute combination of<br />
narration with analysis.<br />
In “A Day with<br />
Clemenceau,” analysis is less<br />
sustained than in <strong>Churchill</strong>’s<br />
sketch of Clemenceau for<br />
Great Contemporaries. The<br />
account in Thoughts and<br />
Adventures of Clemenceau’s<br />
day visiting allied generals and<br />
the front lines during a major<br />
crisis of World War I,<br />
however, weaves into the narrative<br />
an appraisal of two<br />
styles of leadership, with<br />
<strong>Churchill</strong>’s preference and recommendation<br />
unmistakable.<br />
At the outset,<br />
<strong>Churchill</strong>—and the reader<br />
along with him—discovers<br />
Lloyd George, the British<br />
Prime Minister “in bed, a grey<br />
figure amid a litter of reports<br />
and telegrams” (177). This<br />
grey figure then dispatches a<br />
subordinate—<strong>Churchill</strong>—to France to find out what the<br />
armies are doing about the German offensive. The<br />
French Prime Minister, Georges Clemenceau, taking<br />
<strong>Churchill</strong> along, goes himself to important allied headquarters,<br />
listens to the generals, decides on the spot to<br />
send French reserves into battle in support of hardpressed<br />
British troops, and then insists on also going as<br />
far forward as possible, where he comes under German<br />
shell fire, to have a look at the front line. “A Day with<br />
Clemenceau” shows why Clemenceau was one of<br />
<strong>Churchill</strong>’s heroes and models. It also leaves no doubt<br />
about what style of leadership is best.<br />
“Ludendorff’s ‘All—or Nothing’” is not a narrative<br />
of the March 1918 German offensive as it unfolded, but<br />
rather a gripping, sustained analysis of its causes, horrendous<br />
nature, and consequences—among other things,<br />
ruin for Germany. For our conference on “<strong>Churchill</strong> and<br />
Today’s Challenges” there is surely no essay more relevant<br />
than this one. Here, as a reminder or to whet your<br />
appetite, is a central paragraph:<br />
The Clemenceau statue, Paris. “As much as any single<br />
human being, miraculously magnified, can ever<br />
be a nation, he was France....the Old Tiger, with<br />
his quaint, stylish cap, his white moustache and<br />
burning eye, would make a truer mascot for<br />
France than any barnyard fowl.” —WSC<br />
It was the fatal weakness<br />
of the German empire that<br />
its military leaders, who<br />
knew every detail of their<br />
profession and nothing<br />
outside it, considered themselves,<br />
and became, arbiters<br />
of the whole policy of the<br />
State. In France throughout<br />
the War, even in its darkest<br />
and most convulsive hours,<br />
the civil government, quivering<br />
to its foundations,<br />
was nevertheless supreme.<br />
The President, the Premier,<br />
the Minister of War, the<br />
Chamber, and that amazing<br />
composite entity called<br />
“Paris,” had the power to<br />
break any military man and<br />
set him on one side. In<br />
England Parliament was<br />
largely in abeyance. The<br />
Press exalted the generals, or<br />
“the soldiers” as they called<br />
themselves. But there existed<br />
a strong political caste and<br />
hierarchy which, if it chose<br />
to risk its official existence,<br />
could grapple with the “brass<br />
hats.” In the United States<br />
the civil element was so overwhelmingly<br />
strong that its<br />
main need was to nurture<br />
and magnify the unfledged<br />
military champions. In<br />
Germany there was no one to stand against the General<br />
Staff and to bring their will-power and special point<br />
of view into harmony with the general salvation of the<br />
State. (167)<br />
Among many other points of this paragraph and<br />
this essay, <strong>Churchill</strong>’s analysis shows the danger of not<br />
reading and learning widely beyond that narrow military<br />
education from which he broke free in ways exemplified<br />
by his career, and not least by the book we are here to<br />
discuss this week. ,<br />
Endnotes<br />
1. <strong>Winston</strong> S. <strong>Churchill</strong>, Thoughts and Adventures, ed. James<br />
W. Muller with Paul H. Courtenay and Alana L. Barton<br />
(Wilmington, Delaware: ISI Books, 2009), 318. Subsequent page references<br />
for quotations from this edition of Thoughts and Adventures<br />
are given parenthetically in the text.<br />
2. <strong>Winston</strong> <strong>Churchill</strong>, My Early Life: 1874-1904, intr. William<br />
Manchester (New York: Simon & Schuster Touchstone, 1996), 43.<br />
3. <strong>Churchill</strong>, My Early Life, 113.<br />
FINEST HOUR 148 / 62