The Public Procurement Rules 2008 - LGED
The Public Procurement Rules 2008 - LGED The Public Procurement Rules 2008 - LGED
within the period specified in Schedule II. (8) The Performance Security shall be in the amount specified in the Contract conditions, issued by a bank acceptable to the Procuring Entity, and denominated in the currencies in which the Contract Price is payable. (9) Performance Security shall be valid until a date twenty eight (28) days beyond the Intended Completion Date unless no retention money has been kept in which case the validity shall follow the provision of Rule 27(7)&(8). (10) Before signing the Contract, the Procuring Entity may verify the authenticity of the Performance Security submitted by a Tenderer by sending a written request to the branch of the bank issuing the bank draft or irrevocable bank guarantee. (11) The duly authorised officer of the Procuring Entity and of the successful Tenderer shall sign the Contract within the period specified in Schedule II if the Performance Security submitted by the Tenderer is found to be genuine. (12) If a Performance Security submitted under Sub-Rule (8) is not found to be genuine , the Procuring Entity shall proceed to take measures against the Tenderer as stated under Section 64 of the Act. (13) If the successful Tenderer fails to provide the required Performance Security as stated in Sub-Rule (7) or fails to sign the Contract as stated in this Rule, a Procuring Entity shall proceed to award the Contract to the next lowest evaluated Tenderer, and so on, by order of ranking, provided that such action shall only be taken if the evaluated cost of the Tender is acceptable to the Procuring Entity, and when the point is reached whereby all evaluated costs of the remaining responsive Tenders are significantly higher than the official estimate or budget provision or market price, the Procuring Entity may take action in accordance with Rule 33. 88
CHAPTER SIX PROCUREMENT OF INTELLECTUAL AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PART – 1 METHODS AND PROCEDURES 103. Methods for Procurement of Intellectual and Professional Services and their Use. |— 1) The prime consideration in the selection of the successful Consultant in the Procurement of intellectual and professional Services shall be given to the quality of a Consultant's Technical Proposal. (2) The cost of the Services shall be considered judiciously because in the Procurement of intellectual and professional Services in general, if cost considerations predominate in the evaluation, the quality of the resulting Services often ends up being inferior which in turn places further cost burdens on the Procuring Entity due to rework being needed or less economical solutions being recommended. (3) The Procuring Entity shall encourage the involvement of national Consultants in assignments with international competition. (4) Depending on the nature and complexity of assignments, different methods as specified in this part of these Rules may be used, but the following two (2) methods shall be the preferred options for selection of Consultants - (a) Quality & Cost Based Selection (QCBS) is the preferred method that shall be used in most cases and shall take into account- (i) the quality of the Proposal; and (ii) the cost of the Services. (b) Selection under a Fixed Budget (SFB) is appropriate only when - (i) the assignment is relatively simple and can be precisely defined; and (ii) the budget is fixed. (5) The Procuring Entity shall publish in its website the name of the Consultant to which the Contract was awarded, price, duration and scope of the Contract. (6) General considerations for employment of national and international Consultants are provided for in Schedule IX . 104. Other Methods for Procurement of Intellectual and Professional Services.|— Other methods for Procurement of intellectual and professional Services may also be used under the conditions set-out in the following paragraphs and with the prior written approval of the Head of a Procuring Entity or an officer authorized by him or her: (a) Least Cost Selection (LCS) (i) is appropriate for the selection of Consultants for an assignment of a standard or routine nature such as audits, architectural and engineering designs of non-complex Works, where established practices and standards exist and in which the Contract amount is small as specified in Schedule II. (ii) The Procuring Entity shall use the procedures specified in Rule 107. (b) Selection Based on Consultant’s Qualifications (SBCQ) 89
- Page 37 and 38: (15) The Procuring Entity shall pro
- Page 39 and 40: (b) The Procuring Entity shall dedu
- Page 41 and 42: (2) The Procurement record shall be
- Page 43 and 44: PART- 9 QUALIFICATION OF PERSONS 47
- Page 45 and 46: or trade organizations registered i
- Page 47 and 48: (6) The Procuring Entity, for its s
- Page 49 and 50: for Proposal Document. (7) If there
- Page 51 and 52: (a) in the case of invitations for
- Page 53 and 54: stage, then the Person has the righ
- Page 55 and 56: (3) Unless it dismisses the complai
- Page 57 and 58: PART - 2 NATIONAL PROCUREMENT:- LIM
- Page 59 and 60: consideration. (3) The Evaluation C
- Page 61 and 62: (5) Procuring Entities shall use th
- Page 63 and 64: estricted to the circumstances spec
- Page 65 and 66: (a) contract values must not exceed
- Page 67 and 68: 81. Use of Direct Cash Purchase. |
- Page 69 and 70: Tender in a combination of local an
- Page 71 and 72: (4) Framework Contracts may take se
- Page 73 and 74: CHAPTER FIVE PROCESSING OF PROCUREM
- Page 75 and 76: (b) the response to a clarification
- Page 77 and 78: PART 3 PROCESSING OF TENDERS 94. Is
- Page 79 and 80: Entity, that officer on request fro
- Page 81 and 82: Tender Documents. (3) The TEC shall
- Page 83 and 84: up the average prices offered by ot
- Page 85 and 86: (27) If, after completing a Tender
- Page 87: 101. Approval Process. |— (1) The
- Page 91 and 92: the initial work shall not be exclu
- Page 93 and 94: 110. Procedures for Selection under
- Page 95 and 96: autonomous and semi-autonomous bodi
- Page 97 and 98: to make appropriate amendments to t
- Page 99 and 100: esponsive Proposals and to make the
- Page 101 and 102: such a programme; and (e) National
- Page 103 and 104: (b) if his justification has convin
- Page 105 and 106: (h) Proposed Contract price. (4) A
- Page 107 and 108: CHAPTER SEVEN PROFESSIONAL MISCONDU
- Page 109 and 110: Example 2 If an officer or a member
- Page 111 and 112: and value of Contracts awarded, the
- Page 113 and 114: Procurement Equipment (STD) [Applic
- Page 115 and 116: RPP Rule # Procedures for Procureme
- Page 117 and 118: payment exists . • Five percent (
- Page 119 and 120: 57 (1 ) Time for Administrative Rev
- Page 121 and 122: 71(4) 74(4) 76(1)(J) 76(1)(K) 77(a)
- Page 123 and 124: elapsed. 95(6) 96(11)(a) 101(4) 102
- Page 125 and 126: Approving Authority Approval Projec
- Page 127 and 128: THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT RULES, 2008
- Page 129 and 130: THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT RULES, 2008
- Page 131 and 132: THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT RULES, 2008
- Page 133 and 134: THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT RULES, 2008
- Page 135 and 136: SCHEDULE IV Part-A : [See Rule 16]
- Page 137 and 138: Part-B : [See Rule 8(18)] Procureme
within the period specified in Schedule II.<br />
(8) <strong>The</strong> Performance Security shall be in the amount specified in the Contract conditions,<br />
issued by a bank acceptable to the Procuring Entity, and denominated in the currencies in which<br />
the Contract Price is payable.<br />
(9) Performance Security shall be valid until a date twenty eight (28) days beyond the<br />
Intended Completion Date unless no retention money has been kept in which case the validity<br />
shall follow the provision of Rule 27(7)&(8).<br />
(10) Before signing the Contract, the Procuring Entity may verify the authenticity of the<br />
Performance Security submitted by a Tenderer by sending a written request to the branch of the<br />
bank issuing the bank draft or irrevocable bank guarantee.<br />
(11) <strong>The</strong> duly authorised officer of the Procuring Entity and of the successful Tenderer<br />
shall sign the Contract within the period specified in Schedule II if the Performance Security<br />
submitted by the Tenderer is found to be genuine.<br />
(12) If a Performance Security submitted under Sub-Rule (8) is not found to be genuine ,<br />
the Procuring Entity shall proceed to take measures against the Tenderer as stated under Section<br />
64 of the Act.<br />
(13) If the successful Tenderer fails to provide the required Performance Security as<br />
stated in Sub-Rule (7) or fails to sign the Contract as stated in this Rule, a Procuring Entity shall<br />
proceed to award the Contract to the next lowest evaluated Tenderer, and so on, by order of<br />
ranking, provided that such action shall only be taken if the evaluated cost of the Tender is<br />
acceptable to the Procuring Entity, and when the point is reached whereby all evaluated costs of<br />
the remaining responsive Tenders are significantly higher than the official estimate or budget<br />
provision or market price, the Procuring Entity may take action in accordance with Rule 33.<br />
88