The Public Procurement Rules 2008 - LGED

(a) in the case of invitations for Pre-Qualification -
(i) Pre-Qualification Documents were not ready when the advertisement was
published by the Procuring Entity or not available when requested by a
potential Applicant;
(ii) failure to respond promptly to a request for clarification from a potential
Applicant;
(iii) failure by the TEC to evaluate the qualifications in the light of criteria
stated in the Pre-Qualification Document;
(iv) perceived unfair denial of Pre-Qualification; or
(b)
(c)
(v) apprehended possible corrupt or collusive practices.
in the case of Open Tendering Method, Limited Tendering method, Two- Stage
Tendering Method and Request for Quotations Method-
(i) advertisement procedures not properly adhered to in accordance with Rule
90, where applicable; or
(ii) Tender Documents not ready when the advertisement was published by
the Procuring Entity or not available when requested by a potential Person,
where applicable;or
(iii) failure to respond promptly to a request for clarification from a potential
Tenderer; or
(iv) framing technical specification that can be met by only one or a scanty
number of manufacturers;
(v) failure to hold a pre-Tender meeting as per condition of the published
advertisement or to timely notify the potential Persons of a change in the
pre-fixed date, location, and time , that resulted in some potential Persons’
failure to attend the meeting,where applicable;
(vi) failure to open the Tender as stated in the advertisement of Invitation for
Tenders or improper conduct at the time of Tender opening, ;
(vii) mishandling of Tenders received from Persons resulting in the opening of
one or more Tenders before the specified time that causes either a loss
of confidentiality of the Tender or an actual failure to open a Tender at a
public opening;
(viii) failure to open all Tenders which were received prior to the deadline for the
submission of Tenders;
(ix) failure by the TEC to evaluate the Tenders in compliance with the
evaluation criteria stated in the Tender Documents;
(x) any attempt by the Procuring Entity to ‘negotiate’ with the successful
Tenderer;
(xi) apprehended possible corrupt or collusive practices
(xii) perceived unfair or erroneous award of Contract ; and
(xiii) a breaking of the condition of confidentiality by the Procuring Entity at the
time of clarifications with each Person in the case of evaluation of the
first-stage Tender under the Two-stage Tendering Method.
in the case of Requests for Proposals:
(i) failure on the part of the Procuring Entity to maintain confidentiality
following the opening of the envelopes containing the technical Proposals;
(ii)
opening of the financial Proposals at the same time as the opening of the
technical Proposals;
51