15.01.2015 Views

Pharmacokinetic comparison of inhaled fixed combination ... - copsac

Pharmacokinetic comparison of inhaled fixed combination ... - copsac

Pharmacokinetic comparison of inhaled fixed combination ... - copsac

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chawes et al.<br />

Table 2<br />

<strong>Pharmacokinetic</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> formoterol in Foster® 50/6 mg pMDI <strong>fixed</strong> <strong>combination</strong> <strong>of</strong> BDP and formoterol (test treatment) vs.thefree<strong>combination</strong><strong>of</strong>BDP<br />

and formoterol pMDI (reference treatment)<br />

Formoterol<br />

Adjusted geometric mean (95% CI)<br />

Test<br />

Reference<br />

Ratio Test : Reference<br />

90% CI for ratio<br />

AUC(0,t) (pg ml -1 h) 64.5 66.5 0.97 0.85, 1.10<br />

AUC0-• (pg ml -1 h) 85.0 87.5 0.97 0.84, 1.12<br />

AUC0-0.5 h (pg ml -1 h) 4.5 5.0 0.91 0.77, 1.06<br />

C max (pg ml -1 ) 17.6 19.2 0.92 0.78, 1.08<br />

The estimates are the adjusted least squares mean estimates on the natural log scale; the adjusted geometric means are the back-transformed values. AUC = Area under the plasma<br />

drug concentration-time curve; AUC(0,•) is AUC extrapolated to infinity. C max = maximum observed plasma concentration.<br />

Heart rate (beats min –1 )<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Time (h)<br />

Figure 3<br />

Mean pr<strong>of</strong>ile diagram <strong>of</strong> heart rate from pre-dose (0 h) till 8 h post-dose<br />

by treatment: Foster® 50/6 mg pMDI<strong>fixed</strong><strong>combination</strong><strong>of</strong>BDPandformoterol<br />

(test, ) vs. the free <strong>combination</strong> <strong>of</strong> BDP and formoterol pMDI<br />

(reference, ). n = 20<br />

PEF (l min –1 )<br />

360<br />

340<br />

320<br />

300<br />

280<br />

260<br />

240<br />

220<br />

200<br />

180<br />

160<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

Time (h)<br />

Figure 4<br />

Mean pr<strong>of</strong>ile diagram <strong>of</strong> peak expiratory flow (PEF) from pre-dose (0 h) till<br />

8 h post-dose by treatment: Foster® 50/6 mg pMDI<strong>fixed</strong><strong>combination</strong><strong>of</strong><br />

BDP and formoterol (test, ) vs.thefree<strong>combination</strong><strong>of</strong>BDPandformoterol<br />

pMDI (reference, ). n = 20<br />

<strong>comparison</strong> <strong>of</strong> pharmacokinetic parameters <strong>of</strong> two similar<br />

treatments [5]. With the included minimum wash out<br />

period <strong>of</strong> 7 days there was no risk <strong>of</strong> carry over effect,<br />

taking into account five times the terminal half-life [4],<br />

which is the main potential disadvantage <strong>of</strong> the crossover<br />

study design.<br />

The study treatment was given in the morning at<br />

approximately same time (08.00 –10.00 h) for both treatment<br />

periods in order to minimize any circadian variation<br />

in pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters [6].<br />

Furthermore, the participants were carefully trained in the<br />

inhalation technique prior to any study drug administration<br />

to assure fully comparable treatment periods.<br />

In order to prevent any kind <strong>of</strong> contamination, the<br />

administration <strong>of</strong> the study drug was made in a dedicated<br />

room well separated from the blood sampling station and<br />

the on-site laboratory. In addition, subjects and the physician<br />

administering the study drug wore special protective<br />

coats and gloves, which were removed before blood sampling.<br />

Also, the physician administering the inhalations<br />

was not allowed to participate in the blood sampling<br />

procedures.<br />

Consistency in the study related procedures was<br />

assured as a small dedicated and trained team with special<br />

paediatric competences performed all the procedures<br />

according to standard operating procedures.<br />

Limitations <strong>of</strong> the study<br />

Due to the unease <strong>of</strong> withdrawing blood samples from<br />

very young children,we were only able to enrol six patients<br />

aged 5–8 years instead <strong>of</strong> the planned 10 children. The<br />

primary statistical analysis was performed on all the 20<br />

children aged 5–11 years. A subgroup equal to 30% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total population was considered sufficient to represent the<br />

5–8-year-old subgroup.<br />

Two subjects, who completed the study per protocol,<br />

had no quantifiable study drug concentration detectable<br />

in plasma in one or both treatment phases.This is presum-<br />

1086 / 75:4 / Br J Clin Pharmacol

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!