Lung function measurements in children - copsac

Lung function measurements in children - copsac Lung function measurements in children - copsac

15.01.2015 Views

FEV 0.5 (ml) Table 4: Baseline characteristics Total COPSAC Control group RSV bronchiolitis Baseline lung function (FEV 0.5 /ml) 404 Number Mean (SD) Median 360 66.3 (12.9) 65.8 21 65.5 (13.0) 63.6 PD 15 363 Number 322 20 (PTcO 2 /mmol) Mean (SD) 1.81 (12.2) 0.59 (0.88) Median 0.33 0.16 Baseline FEV 0.5 did not differ between infants with RSV bronchiolitis compared with the control group: OR 1.08 [0.09-13.6], p=0.95 (figure 11); z-score -0.06. Bronchial responsiveness did not differ between infants with RSV bronchiolitis compared with the control group: OR 0.94 [0.74-1.20], p-value 0.64. 120 100 80 60 40 RSV control 20 0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 Length (cm) Figure 11: Neonatal baseline lung function versus body length 40

Discussion Twin study We found no difference within co-habiting MZ twin pairs discordant for hospitalization for RSV bronchiolitis in infancy on the asthma prevalence, baseline lung function, bronchial responsiveness; biomarker of airway inflammation (F E NO) and sensitization 7 years after such severe RSV bronchiolitis. Limitations and Strengths of the study design Monozygotic twins were useful for investigating the role of genetic and environmental factors on asthma because of their identical genetic background and similar childhood environmental exposures. However, comparison of MZ twin pairs discordant to hospitalization for RSV bronchiolitis was prone to a number of biases. We had no evidence to prove that the twin serving as control was actually infected with RSV, but rely on very high virulence of RSV among cohabitating twins previously estimated to 93-96% (115) though this could not be verified. In an optimal study there would have been comparable nasopharyngeal aspirates from the twin pair to quantify RSV virus load (136-138) or a blood sample measuring RSV serum antibodies to detect any difference in association to disease severity (139). Thomsen et al. (2008) reported that in the whole twin cohort the proband-wise concordance rate of hospitalization for RSV-bronchiolitis was significantly higher in MZ (0.66) than in DZ twin pairs (0.53), p=0.02 (115). The decision to hospitalize may have been influenced by local policies such as number of available rooms and the assessment of disease severity varied by different physicians, but this would not influence the fact that only one twin was hospitalized and the other was not. We do not have positive evidence that the control twin had milder symptoms, but rely on the fact that one was hospitalized while the other was not. Danish children are generally only admitted with RSV infection if they need support with feeding tube, suction of upper airways, mask inhalations or nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Yet, this could be biased from registration practice. Indeed, fifty-four% of the parents answered retrospectively that the hospitalized RSV proband twin suffered more severe 41

Discussion<br />

Tw<strong>in</strong> study<br />

We found no difference with<strong>in</strong> co-habit<strong>in</strong>g MZ tw<strong>in</strong> pairs discordant for hospitalization<br />

for RSV bronchiolitis <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fancy on the asthma prevalence, basel<strong>in</strong>e lung <strong>function</strong>,<br />

bronchial responsiveness; biomarker of airway <strong>in</strong>flammation (F E NO) and sensitization 7<br />

years after such severe RSV bronchiolitis.<br />

Limitations and Strengths of the study design<br />

Monozygotic tw<strong>in</strong>s were useful for <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g the role of genetic and environmental<br />

factors on asthma because of their identical genetic background and similar childhood<br />

environmental exposures. However, comparison of MZ tw<strong>in</strong> pairs discordant to<br />

hospitalization for RSV bronchiolitis was prone to a number of biases.<br />

We had no evidence to prove that the tw<strong>in</strong> serv<strong>in</strong>g as control was actually <strong>in</strong>fected with<br />

RSV, but rely on very high virulence of RSV among cohabitat<strong>in</strong>g tw<strong>in</strong>s previously<br />

estimated to 93-96% (115) though this could not be verified. In an optimal study there<br />

would have been comparable nasopharyngeal aspirates from the tw<strong>in</strong> pair to quantify<br />

RSV virus load (136-138) or a blood sample measur<strong>in</strong>g RSV serum antibodies to detect<br />

any difference <strong>in</strong> association to disease severity (139). Thomsen et al. (2008) reported<br />

that <strong>in</strong> the whole tw<strong>in</strong> cohort the proband-wise concordance rate of hospitalization for<br />

RSV-bronchiolitis was significantly higher <strong>in</strong> MZ (0.66) than <strong>in</strong> DZ tw<strong>in</strong> pairs (0.53),<br />

p=0.02 (115).<br />

The decision to hospitalize may have been <strong>in</strong>fluenced by local policies such as number<br />

of available rooms and the assessment of disease severity varied by different physicians,<br />

but this would not <strong>in</strong>fluence the fact that only one tw<strong>in</strong> was hospitalized and the other<br />

was not.<br />

We do not have positive evidence that the control tw<strong>in</strong> had milder symptoms, but rely<br />

on the fact that one was hospitalized while the other was not. Danish <strong>children</strong> are<br />

generally only admitted with RSV <strong>in</strong>fection if they need support with feed<strong>in</strong>g tube,<br />

suction of upper airways, mask <strong>in</strong>halations or nasal cont<strong>in</strong>uous positive airway pressure.<br />

Yet, this could be biased from registration practice. Indeed, fifty-four% of the parents<br />

answered retrospectively that the hospitalized RSV proband tw<strong>in</strong> suffered more severe<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!