15.01.2015 Views

Lung function measurements in children - copsac

Lung function measurements in children - copsac

Lung function measurements in children - copsac

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Normative data<br />

In the second part of the study a center effect could not be found, probably because<br />

center no. 1 was corrected and center no. 6 did not participate. Atopy and smok<strong>in</strong>g did<br />

not significantly differ between centers (Table 2).<br />

A British cohort study found that <strong>children</strong> of atopic parents and those with personal<br />

atopy had impaired lung <strong>function</strong> at the age of 3 years, even <strong>in</strong> the absence of<br />

respiratory symptoms (20). The high <strong>in</strong>cidence of parental atopy <strong>in</strong> our study could be a<br />

selection bias but we did not f<strong>in</strong>d a statically difference between atopic disposed and<br />

non-disposed <strong>children</strong>.<br />

Most papers have reported association between parental smok<strong>in</strong>g and impaired lung<br />

<strong>function</strong> <strong>in</strong> wheez<strong>in</strong>g or asthmatic young <strong>children</strong> (57-59); some have <strong>in</strong>vestigated the<br />

effect of parental smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> healthy <strong>children</strong> (60-62) and found reduced lung <strong>function</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> healthy <strong>in</strong>fants. The ratio of smok<strong>in</strong>g parents <strong>in</strong> the normative data corresponds the<br />

smok<strong>in</strong>g habit <strong>in</strong> the Danish population (63). The complex <strong>in</strong>teraction of genetic and<br />

environmental factors <strong>in</strong>fluence the development of airway disease and dim<strong>in</strong>ished lung<br />

<strong>function</strong> (20, 64). We did not f<strong>in</strong>d an effect of the child’s history of atopy, parental<br />

atopy or smok<strong>in</strong>g on lung <strong>function</strong> <strong>in</strong> our study, this could be biased by either the<br />

relatively small population, or the <strong>children</strong> with atopy, parental atopy or smok<strong>in</strong>g could<br />

be a selected healthy population.<br />

We previously reported normative values from a population of 121 <strong>children</strong> 2-5 years of<br />

age (12); mean sRaw (SD) was 1.31 (0.20). Z-score was -0.5 between the two data sets.<br />

No other reference value for sRaw TOT has been reported, other studies have reported<br />

values of sRaw max (54, 65, 66).<br />

The variance was higher <strong>in</strong> the new collected data (SD 0.33) compared to previous<br />

reported (SD 0.2). This could be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by a small non-significant center variance.<br />

The previous population differs from the current <strong>in</strong> several follow<strong>in</strong>g aspects: 1)<br />

Measurements were done at one center; 2) exclusion of <strong>children</strong> exposed to tobacco<br />

smoke and anyone with a history of eczema or doctor-diagnosed atopy <strong>in</strong> first-degree<br />

relatives; 3) The study <strong>in</strong>cluded more 2- and 3-year-old <strong>children</strong>; many of these<br />

<strong>measurements</strong> had an accompany<strong>in</strong>g adult <strong>in</strong> the whole-body plethysmograph. The<br />

current data only <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>children</strong> who performed a lung <strong>function</strong> measurement alone.<br />

The exact same equipment (unchanged hardware and software) at center no. 3 was used<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!