Lung function measurements in children - copsac

Lung function measurements in children - copsac Lung function measurements in children - copsac

15.01.2015 Views

Additional results sRaw measurement was established at center no. 2 during the year 2005. We registered the feasibility of the sRaw technique on untrained children. Figure 7 was based on 97 children trying sRaw measurement for the first time, consecutively examined; all sitting alone in the whole-body plethysmograph. The patient cases were mixed asthmatic children familiar with the facemask for asthma medication use and children with suspected asthma visiting the out-patients’ clinic for the first time. The main problem in the youngest age group was being seated alone in the box and secondly accepting the facemask. We did not subdivide in gender. Figure 7: Age dependence on completion of sRaw measurement 20

Discussion Between-center variation sRaw offers a method for clinical monitoring and research during the critical period of growth and development early in life. The method is feasible from the age of two years and the precision is high (10-12). Our aim was to examine center agreement between six centers in Denmark currently using identical hardware equipment with different software versions (JLAB 4.51, 4.53 with different sub versions, 4.65 and 4.67). The study was conducted in a “real” setting of a multi-center study; therefore we did not update the centers software into the same version. We assumed the manufacturer had checked the equipments and made adjustments for possible variations in sRaw measurements (also electronic BTPS correction) after releasing new software. The starting point of the study was that there would be no difference in sRaw measurements between the centers despite different software versions. However, the present study showed that the accuracy of sRaw measurements in young children was flawed from errors. A technician from the company (Cardinal Health) was sent to identify the problems in the deviating centers (center no. 1, 2 and 6). This revealed incorrect setting of the “ASC Compensation” at center no. 1. “Time delay for compensation” was set to 20 milliseconds and should have been 50, which resulted in 19-32% lower values. This was a factory setting not accessible for the operator. The technician found no reason for the deviating measurements at the other centers (center no. 2 and 6). Center no. 6 subsequently updated the whole-body plethysmograph software after this study. It was not possible to re-analyse the data because the software saved the sRaw values after the primary calculation of sRaw and the original loops was lost, which was a great limitation of the software. To optimize the study design we could have made prints of the original breath curves and have a third person evaluate the quality of the loops to avoid bias of the operator. In future software updates or development, it would be optimal if the software could determine the best breath curves from algorithms as flow and respiratory rates or encourage the child (with animated biofeedback) to breath with optimal respiratory rates and flow. Currently, it relies on the operator who estimates by visual judgement when the breath curves are representatively and decides when the computer should analyze the loops. 21

Additional results<br />

sRaw measurement was established at center no. 2 dur<strong>in</strong>g the year 2005. We registered<br />

the feasibility of the sRaw technique on untra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>children</strong>. Figure 7 was based on 97<br />

<strong>children</strong> try<strong>in</strong>g sRaw measurement for the first time, consecutively exam<strong>in</strong>ed; all sitt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

alone <strong>in</strong> the whole-body plethysmograph. The patient cases were mixed asthmatic<br />

<strong>children</strong> familiar with the facemask for asthma medication use and <strong>children</strong> with<br />

suspected asthma visit<strong>in</strong>g the out-patients’ cl<strong>in</strong>ic for the first time. The ma<strong>in</strong> problem <strong>in</strong><br />

the youngest age group was be<strong>in</strong>g seated alone <strong>in</strong> the box and secondly accept<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

facemask. We did not subdivide <strong>in</strong> gender.<br />

Figure 7: Age dependence on completion of sRaw measurement<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!