- Page 1:
Lung function measurements in child
- Page 4 and 5:
Contents Acknowledgements .........
- Page 6 and 7:
Acknowledgements The thesis was wri
- Page 8 and 9:
Introduction Symptoms of chronic re
- Page 10 and 11:
pulmonary function test obtained by
- Page 12 and 13:
I. Accuracy of Wholebody Plethysmog
- Page 14 and 15:
Methods Designs Study I: Six center
- Page 16 and 17:
"Loops" on the screen showed the re
- Page 18 and 19:
We included age in the analysis of
- Page 20 and 21:
Normative data (study I) Mean sRaw
- Page 22 and 23:
Additional results sRaw measurement
- Page 24 and 25:
After correcting the factory settin
- Page 26 and 27:
Normative data In the second part o
- Page 28 and 29:
II. -III. Lung function measurement
- Page 30 and 31:
of a diagnosis of asthma: Frequent
- Page 32 and 33:
Figure 8: Familial predisposition t
- Page 34 and 35:
Total twins 12.349 twin pairs Born
- Page 36 and 37:
Methods Designs Study II: Hospital
- Page 38 and 39:
Children less than 7 years were tes
- Page 40 and 41:
Ethics The two studies were approve
- Page 42 and 43:
FEV 0.5 (ml) Table 4: Baseline char
- Page 44 and 45:
lung symptoms, 19% said it was the
- Page 46 and 47:
symptoms in response to verified RS
- Page 48 and 49:
epigenetic factors. Acute environme
- Page 50 and 51:
detection changes in lung function
- Page 52 and 53:
that small airways were not the dis
- Page 54 and 55:
onciolitis. There is an increasing
- Page 56 and 57:
further studies are needed to inves
- Page 58 and 59:
Summary The Ph.D. thesis is based o
- Page 60 and 61:
Danish summary (Dansk resumé) Denn
- Page 62 and 63:
References Reference List (1) Lum S
- Page 64 and 65: (25) Aurora P, Gustafsson P, Bush A
- Page 66 and 67: (50) Klug B, Bisgaard H. Repeatabil
- Page 68 and 69: (76) Meissner HC. Economic impact o
- Page 70 and 71: (101) Young S, Arnott J, O'Keeffe P
- Page 72 and 73: (125) Bisgaard H, Hermansen MN, Lol
- Page 74 and 75: (151) Walton RP, Johnston SL. Role
- Page 76 and 77: disease in otherwise healthy infant
- Page 78 and 79: changes in asthma control. Am J Res
- Page 81: Paper I
- Page 84 and 85: CHEST Original Research Accuracy of
- Page 86 and 87: Figure 1. Center agreement study: l
- Page 88 and 89: observer as well as a common observ
- Page 90 and 91: sRaw (kPa*s) Figure 1 Online: Cente
- Page 93 and 94: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 95 and 96: 54 55 56 57 INTRODUCTION Respirator
- Page 97 and 98: 97 98 99 100 Lung function test Chi
- Page 99 and 100: 141 142 143 144 Mean gestational ag
- Page 101 and 102: 186 187 188 189 190 The discordant
- Page 103 and 104: 232 233 234 235 236 237 viruses and
- Page 105 and 106: 278 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 279 280 281 282
- Page 107 and 108: 335 336 (21) Bisgaard H, Nielsen KG
- Page 109 and 110: 394 395 396 (42) Wu P, Dupont WD, G
- Page 111 and 112: 455 456 457 (64) Bisgaard H, Herman
- Page 113: 488 489 Table 1: Comparison of clin
- Page 118 and 119: Abstract Background: Two-three perc
- Page 120 and 121: RA 08 TSM 133; Respiratory Care Cen
- Page 122 and 123: prospectively if baseline lung func
- Page 124 and 125: who do not develop RSV bronchioliti
- Page 126 and 127: Acknowledgements We thank all the c
- Page 128 and 129: (24) ATS/ERS statement: raised volu
- Page 130 and 131: (53) Stein RT, Sherrill D, Morgan W
- Page 132 and 133: Figure 1: Flow chart COPSAC cohort