PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

Exhibit 21
TROOPER GIBBENS FALSE TESTIMONY THE STATE DID NOT KNOW WHY
HAEG HAD GIVEN UP ONE YEAR OF GUIDING
[TR 1335]
TROOPER GIBBENS: -- the only hunting period that he opted not to guide would be that fall,
’04, for whatever reason it was…
COLE’S ABA TESTIMONY – 7/11/2006
COLE: … there was some discussion at the – in some of the hearings that – that I told David not
to hunt or – and to cancel their hunts -um- in – starting in the summer of 2004. That’s correct.
Shaw: ... to a date when somebody voluntarily stopped hunting
Cole: And they – and he was goanna do it in this case too.
Exhibit 22
JUDGE MURPHY’S FALSE SENTENCING JUSTIFICATION
THE COURT: …since the majority, if not all the wolves were taken in 19-C…. where you were
hunting. Others that take into consideration things that you may not think of, such as the politics
involved. Such as the affects of the wolf kill program. [TR 1437-1441]
Exhibit 23
ROBINSON’S POINTS OF APPEAL
COMES NOW David Haeg, appellant in the above referenced case, by and through his
attorney, Arthur S. Robinson, of the law firm of Robinson & Associates, and hereby files the
following statement of points on appeal:
126