15.01.2015 Views

8th Annual Clinical Evaluations and Investigations for Medical Devices

8th Annual Clinical Evaluations and Investigations for Medical Devices

8th Annual Clinical Evaluations and Investigations for Medical Devices

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

www.in<strong>for</strong>ma-ls.com/clinicalstudy<br />

<strong>8th</strong> <strong>Annual</strong><br />

<strong>Clinical</strong> <strong>Evaluations</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Investigations</strong><br />

<strong>Medical</strong> device recalls around<br />

the world have increased<br />

significantly in recent years:<br />

Don’t miss this crucial<br />

opportunity to discover<br />

how your clinical<br />

studies can help<br />

prevent<br />

product<br />

recall<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Devices</strong><br />

Practical industry case studies, Competent Authority expectations <strong>and</strong> Notified Body insight <strong>for</strong><br />

compliant, cost-effective clinical studies <strong>and</strong> the impact of the revision of the <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Devices</strong> Directive<br />

Our expert speaker panel includes:<br />

• Rob Higgins, Regulatory<br />

Section Head, MHRA, UK<br />

• Paul Scannell, Pre-Market<br />

24-25 April 2013 | Radisson Royal Blu Hotel | Dublin | Irel<strong>and</strong><br />

Competent<br />

Authorities<br />

Evaluation Officer, Irish Medicines Board, Irel<strong>and</strong><br />

• Peter Bunyitai, Head of Department, Department<br />

of <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Devices</strong>, Office of Health<br />

Authorisation <strong>and</strong> Administrative Procedures,<br />

Hungary<br />

• John O’Dwyer, European<br />

Manager, NSAI, Irel<strong>and</strong> Notified<br />

• Gert Bos, Head of Regulatory Bodies<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Clinical</strong> Affairs, BSI, UK<br />

• Bassil Akra, IMC - <strong>Clinical</strong> Affairs, TÜV SÜD<br />

Product Service GmbH, Germany<br />

• Philippe Auclair, Senior Director, Abbott Quality<br />

& Regulatory EMEA, Belgium<br />

• David Appleby, Director, Biostatistics <strong>and</strong> <strong>Clinical</strong><br />

Data Management, Smith & Nephew, USA<br />

• Ryan Magee, Global Post Market Compliance<br />

Manager, Senior, Boston Scientific, USA<br />

• Birte Petersen Jakobsen, Director, <strong>Medical</strong><br />

Affairs, Global R&D, Coloplast A/S, Denmark<br />

• Lynne Kelley, WW Vice President <strong>Medical</strong> Affairs,<br />

Becton Dickinson, USA<br />

• Victoria Cavendish, Senior <strong>Clinical</strong> Project<br />

Manager, Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare UK<br />

Ltd, UK<br />

• Ian Quirk, Worldwide Director of <strong>Clinical</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Regulatory Affairs, Ranier Technology Ltd., UK<br />

• Ruud Nonnekens, Manager <strong>Clinical</strong> Affairs,<br />

Volcano Europe, Belgium<br />

• Sven Knapinski, Head of Premarketing <strong>Clinical</strong><br />

Trials, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerl<strong>and</strong><br />

• Greg LeBlanc, Manager, Regulatory Affairs <strong>and</strong><br />

Quality Systems, Cook (Canada) Inc., Canada<br />

• Torsten Kayser, PhD., Senior Fellow <strong>Clinical</strong><br />

Research, Boston Scientific, Belgium<br />

• Pat Baird, Systems Engineering Specialist, Baxter<br />

International, USA<br />

• Sarah Sorrel, President, MedPass<br />

International, France<br />

• Martine Callaert, <strong>Clinical</strong> Trial Project Manager<br />

EMEA, Terumo BCT Europe N.V., Belgium<br />

• Erik Vollebregt, Partner, Axon Lawyers, The<br />

Netherl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

• Alex Denoon, Partner, Law<strong>for</strong>d Davies<br />

Denoon, UK<br />

What makes this event unbeatable<br />

3 Hear from the Competent Authorities <strong>and</strong> 3 top Notified Body speakers on key<br />

issues including roles <strong>and</strong> expectations related to the revision of the <strong>Medical</strong><br />

<strong>Devices</strong> Directive (MDD)<br />

3 13 industry case studies from leading industry experts on key topics including clinical<br />

investigations in emerging market regions <strong>and</strong> post-market clinical follow-up<br />

3 Interactive round table discussion on successfully outsourcing clinical studies<br />

3 9+ hours of networking with experts in the field<br />

Don’t miss out on these exciting topics <strong>for</strong> 2013…<br />

3 Essential regulatory update including how the revision of the Data Protection<br />

Directive will impact clinical investigations <strong>and</strong> data<br />

3 Examining whether the EU <strong>Clinical</strong> Trials Directive could have a feedback<br />

impact on the new medical device regulations<br />

3 Real life case studies on designing <strong>and</strong> conducting a clinical trial<br />

3 Practically meeting requirements <strong>for</strong> MEDDEV 2.7/3 on serious adverse events<br />

reporting, MEDDEV 2.12/2 rev 2 on post-market clinical follow-up <strong>and</strong><br />

MEDDEV 2.7/1 rev 3 clinical evaluation guidance document<br />

Tuesday 23 April 2013: Pre-Conference Workshop X<br />

Practically Obtaining <strong>Clinical</strong> Evidence <strong>for</strong> Successful Market Access <strong>and</strong><br />

Reimbursement<br />

Led by: Lucio Fumi, MD. CEO, Wyfold <strong>Medical</strong> Consultancy, UK<br />

Dr Paul C. Knox, Reader in Vision Science, University of Liverpool <strong>and</strong> Member of NICE’s <strong>Medical</strong><br />

Technologies Advisory Committee, UK<br />

Lynne Kelley, WW Vice President <strong>Medical</strong> Affairs, Becton Dickinson, USA<br />

Öznur Seyhun, Reimbursement Manager, Medtronic, Inc., Turkey<br />

Isabel Henkel, Head of Market Access <strong>and</strong> Public Policy Europe, Grifols Deutschl<strong>and</strong> GmbH, Germany<br />

Wednesday 24 April 2013: Evening Seminar S<br />

Regulatory Evening Surgery: Harmonisation <strong>and</strong> Successfully Working with<br />

<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Devices</strong> Manufacturers<br />

Led by: Rob Higgins, Regulatory Section Head, MHRA, UK<br />

Gert Bos, Head of Regulatory <strong>and</strong> <strong>Clinical</strong> Affairs, BSI, UK<br />

Bassil Akra, IMC - <strong>Clinical</strong> Affairs, TUEV SUED Product Service GmbH, Germany<br />

John O’Dwyer, European Manager, NSAI, Irel<strong>and</strong><br />

Friday 26 April 2013: Post-Conference Workshop Y<br />

Practical Advice on Successful Use of Software, Electronic Data Capture<br />

<strong>and</strong> Apps <strong>for</strong> <strong>Clinical</strong> <strong>Evaluations</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Investigations</strong><br />

Led by: Erik Vollebregt, Partner, Axon Lawyers, The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

Alex Denoon, Partner, Law<strong>for</strong>d Davies Denoon, UK<br />

Mathias Klümper, Partner, Lützeler Klümper Wachenhausen, Germany<br />

Event Sponsors:<br />

To Register Please Tel: +44 (0) 20 7017 7481 Web: www.in<strong>for</strong>ma-ls.com/clinicalstudy<br />

Fax: +44 (0) 20 7017 7823 Email: registrations@in<strong>for</strong>ma-ls.com Please quote CQ7104<br />

Media Partner:


Pre-Conference Workshop X Tuesday 23 April 2013<br />

Practically Obtaining <strong>Clinical</strong> Evidence <strong>for</strong> Successful Market Access <strong>and</strong> Reimbursement<br />

Registration is at 09:00 <strong>for</strong> a 09:30 start. The workshop will finish no later than 16:00.Workshop documents, refreshments <strong>and</strong> a networking lunch will be provided.<br />

In this interactive workshop, delegates will gain valuable in<strong>for</strong>mation on precisely how to optimise clinical<br />

data analysis <strong>and</strong> quality to achieve approval <strong>and</strong> reimbursement. Delegates will also hear practical advice<br />

on overcoming the challenge of differing requirements <strong>for</strong> reimbursement across Europe <strong>and</strong> the US.<br />

Optimising clinical data generation, analysis <strong>and</strong> quality to achieve approval <strong>and</strong> reimbursement<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the importance of considering data you would need <strong>for</strong> a successful cost-effectiveness<br />

argument early on in the clinical trial process<br />

• Ensuring that in<strong>for</strong>mation of the right level <strong>and</strong> quality is delivered to the decision makers<br />

• Practical advice on how to assemble this data <strong>for</strong> a successful cost-effectiveness argument<br />

Optimising clinical data generation, analysis <strong>and</strong> quality to achieve approval <strong>and</strong> reimbursement<br />

<strong>for</strong> the MEA region<br />

• Significance of creating a trial model <strong>for</strong> a successful cost-effectiveness outcome<br />

• To rein<strong>for</strong>ce the influence stage of decision makers to enchance the process of how the results are<br />

perceived<br />

Conference Day One: Wednesday 24 April 2013<br />

08.30 Conference registration<br />

09.00 Opening remarks from the Chair<br />

David Appleby, Director, Biostatistics <strong>and</strong> <strong>Clinical</strong> Data Management, Smith & Nephew,<br />

USA<br />

Critical Regulatory Updates: Europe<br />

09.10 Competent Authority perspective: Practical advice on successfully adapting to changing<br />

regulatory requirements<br />

• Examining how the regulations have changed over the past two years <strong>and</strong> what further<br />

changes are expected on the horizon<br />

• Reviewing how the revision of the MDD will impact clinical requirements <strong>and</strong> how this<br />

will affect industry<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>ing what Competent Authorities consider as optimal clinical trial design<br />

COMPETENT<br />

AUTHORITY<br />

• Evaluating what Competent Authorities are looking <strong>for</strong> with clinical evaluation through<br />

existing data<br />

Rob Higgins, Regulatory Section Head, MHRA, UK<br />

09.45 Assessing the revision of the Data Protection Directive <strong>and</strong> how this will impact clinical<br />

investigations <strong>and</strong> data<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the key ways in which the revision of the Data Protection Directive will<br />

impact clinical investigations <strong>and</strong> clinical data<br />

• Clarifying whether the revision of the Data Protection Directive will help to harmonise<br />

clinical trial requirements from Competent Authorities throughout Europe<br />

• Practical advice on how industry can prepare <strong>for</strong> the revision of the Data Protection<br />

Directive<br />

• Examining the key differences between EU <strong>and</strong> US data protection requirements<br />

Alex Denoon, Partner, Law<strong>for</strong>d Davies Denoon, UK<br />

10.20 Practically conducting a medical device clinical trial in Hungary<br />

• Introduction of an up-to-date regulation<br />

• Elements of acknowledgement<br />

• Experiences <strong>and</strong> future plans<br />

COMPETENT<br />

AUTHORITY<br />

Peter Bunyitai, Head of Department, Department of <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Devices</strong>, Office of Health<br />

Authorisation <strong>and</strong> Administrative Procedures, Hungary<br />

10.55 Networking <strong>and</strong> morning coffee<br />

Revision of the MDD: Impact on <strong>Clinical</strong> <strong>Evaluations</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Investigations</strong><br />

11.25 Examining the impact of the revision of the <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Devices</strong> Directive (MDD) on clinical<br />

evaluations <strong>and</strong> investigations<br />

• Evaluating the key expected changes that will affect clinical evaluations <strong>and</strong> investigations<br />

• Clarifying the idea of centralised application processing <strong>for</strong> multi-centre clinical<br />

investigations: What will the requirements be <strong>and</strong> how will this impact industry<br />

• Exploring the current status of Eudamed, the changes the revision of the MDD will bring<br />

<strong>and</strong> how this will impact clinical data <strong>for</strong> industry<br />

• Reviewing new timelines <strong>for</strong> approval of starting clinical studies<br />

Philippe Auclair, Senior Director, Abbott Quality & Regulatory EMEA, Belgium<br />

12.00 Underst<strong>and</strong>ing how the EU <strong>Clinical</strong> Trials Directive could have a feedback impact on the<br />

revision of the MDD<br />

• Assessing the key points where the revision of the EU <strong>Clinical</strong> Trials Directive might have<br />

a feedback impact on the new medical device regulations<br />

• Reviewing where in the MDD the pharma system is referred to, including use of database<br />

• Examining how Competent Authorities can tend to use at least some pharma requirements<br />

as medical device guidelines can be less clear<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>ing whether there will be a possibility to communicate between the medical<br />

device <strong>and</strong> pharma systems<br />

Erik Vollebregt, Partner, Axon Lawyers, The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

12.35 Notified Body perspective: Practically meeting requirements <strong>for</strong> clinical evaluations<br />

• Outlining the key requirements <strong>and</strong> expectations of Notified Bodies when reviewing clinical<br />

data<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>ing how the role of the Notified Body will change in reviewing clinical trials<br />

NOTIFIED<br />

BODY<br />

data with the revision of the MDD <strong>and</strong> how this will impact industry<br />

• Practical advice on complying with requirements <strong>for</strong> MEDDEV 2.7/1 rev 3<br />

• Examining whether Notified Bodies have become increasingly strict when evaluating third<br />

party clinical data used by the manufacturer<br />

Please see website www.in<strong>for</strong>ma-ls.com/clinicalstudy <strong>for</strong> full details<br />

Setting realistic expectations <strong>for</strong> the timelines from study concept to regulatory approval in China<br />

<strong>and</strong> other emerging markets<br />

Underst<strong>and</strong>ing evidence from the decision makers’ perspective<br />

• Different decision makers means different evidence<br />

• The hierarchy of clinical evidence that in<strong>for</strong>ms decisions<br />

Lucio Fumi, MD. CEO, Wyfold <strong>Medical</strong> Consultancy, UK<br />

Dr Paul C. Knox, Reader in Vision Science, University of Liverpool <strong>and</strong> Member of NICE’s <strong>Medical</strong><br />

Technologies Advisory Committee, UK<br />

Lynne Kelley, WW Vice President <strong>Medical</strong> Affairs, Becton Dickinson, USA<br />

Isabel Henkel, Head of Market Access <strong>and</strong> Public Policy Europe, Grifols Deutschl<strong>and</strong> GmbH,<br />

Germany<br />

Öznur Seyhun, Reimbursement Manager, Medtronic, Inc., Turkey<br />

• Reviewing Notified Body feedback on clinical data: What are common pitfalls <strong>and</strong> how<br />

can industry overcome these<br />

John O’Dwyer, European Manager, NSAI, Irel<strong>and</strong><br />

13.10 Networking lunch<br />

14.10 TÜV SÜD’s perspective: <strong>Clinical</strong> evaluation requirements<br />

• Evaluating key requirements <strong>and</strong> expectations of TÜV SÜD when reviewing clinical data<br />

• Examining how the Notified Body role will change in reviewing clinical trials data with<br />

the revision of the MDD <strong>and</strong> how this will impact industry<br />

• Practically complying with requirements <strong>for</strong> MEDDEV 2.7/1 rev 3<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>ing whether Notified Bodies have become increasingly strict when evaluating<br />

third party clinical data<br />

• What are common pitfalls <strong>for</strong> clinical data <strong>and</strong> how can industry overcome these<br />

Bassil Akra, IMC - <strong>Clinical</strong> Affairs, TÜV SÜD Product Service GmbH, Germany<br />

14.45 Notified Body perspective: Successfully meeting expectations <strong>for</strong> clinical investigations<br />

• Reviewing the current status of ISO 14155:2011 <strong>and</strong> whether there are any further changes<br />

expected associated with the revision of the MDD<br />

• Practically meeting ISO 14155:2011 in terms of setting up processes <strong>and</strong> writing reports<br />

• Integrating <strong>and</strong> working simultaneously with ISO 14155, MEDDEV 2.7/1 rev 3 <strong>and</strong><br />

MEDDEV 2.12/2 rev 2<br />

• Assessing how the role of Notified Bodies will change <strong>and</strong> how this will affect audit<br />

activities<br />

Gert Bos, Head of Regulatory <strong>and</strong> <strong>Clinical</strong> Affairs, BSI, UK<br />

15.20 Spotlight session<br />

Raise your corporate profile by sponsoring or exhibiting at In<strong>for</strong>ma Life Sciences’ <strong>8th</strong> <strong>Annual</strong><br />

<strong>Clinical</strong> <strong>Evaluations</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Investigations</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Devices</strong>. For details on speaking in this<br />

session or other sponsorship opportunities at this conference, please contact<br />

Linda Cole, Tel: +44 (0) 20 7017 6631, Email: linda.cole@in<strong>for</strong>ma.com<br />

15.55 Networking <strong>and</strong> afternoon tea<br />

16.25 INTERACTIVE ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION: Successfully outsourcing clinical<br />

studies<br />

• Evaluating the pros <strong>and</strong> cons of outsourcing compared to conducting clinical studies in<br />

house<br />

• Strategically deciding what to outsource<br />

• Choosing the most appropriate <strong>Clinical</strong> Research Organisation (CRO) to suit your<br />

company.<br />

• Will the revision of the MDD will change clinical contracting practices<br />

Led by: Victoria Cavendish, Senior <strong>Clinical</strong> Project Manager, Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare<br />

UK Ltd, UK<br />

Case Studies: <strong>Clinical</strong> Evaluation<br />

17.00 Practically meeting the MEDDEV 2.7/1 rev 3 clinical evaluation guidance document<br />

• Key challenges in meeting MEDDEV 2.7/1 rev 3<br />

• What are the Notified Bodies looking <strong>for</strong> (differences between Class I/II/III)<br />

• Practical examples on gathering, evaluating <strong>and</strong> using in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

– Where the in<strong>for</strong>mation came from<br />

– How to decide which in<strong>for</strong>mation to include<br />

– How to draw comparisons <strong>and</strong> parallels from the in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

• Successfully estimating when <strong>and</strong> how often the clinical evaluation report should be<br />

updated in order to remain compliant<br />

Birte Petersen Jakobsen, Director, <strong>Medical</strong> Affairs, Global R&D, Coloplast A/S, Denmark<br />

Statistical Analysis<br />

17.35 Underst<strong>and</strong>ing how effective statistical analysis can be used to optimise scientific<br />

credibility of your clinical data<br />

• Exploring the optimal statistical techniques to assess the clinical data you obtain<br />

• Overcoming the challenge of small clinical trials with limited data <strong>and</strong> practical advice on<br />

which statistical techniques to use<br />

• Reviewing which statistical techniques are available <strong>and</strong> which are most appropriate to use<br />

• Assessing the key challenges associated with statistical analysis <strong>and</strong> how these can be<br />

overcome<br />

David Appleby, Director, Biostatistics <strong>and</strong> <strong>Clinical</strong> Data Management, Smith & Nephew,<br />

USA<br />

18.10 End of conference day one<br />

PROMOTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES<br />

Use this event to raise your corporate profile <strong>and</strong> demonstrate your products <strong>and</strong> services to our targeted, multidisciplinary audience. By joining us in sponsoring <strong>and</strong> exhibiting at this event,<br />

you will be able to:<br />

• Meet new clients with an exhibition st<strong>and</strong> in the main networking area • Raise your corporate profile <strong>and</strong> shape your corporate image with logo placement<br />

• Launch new products <strong>and</strong> ensure market presence with a speaking slot • Develop new client relationships <strong>and</strong> affirm existing ones with your presence at the event<br />

We have a wide range of tailored sponsorship solutions, to find out more please contact:<br />

Linda Cole, Business Development Manager Email: linda.cole@in<strong>for</strong>ma.com Tel: + 44 (0) 20 7017 6631<br />

To Register Please Tel: +44 (0) 20 7017 7481 Web: www.in<strong>for</strong>ma-ls.com/clinicalstudy<br />

Fax: +44 (0) 20 7017 7823 Email: registrations@in<strong>for</strong>ma-ls.com Please quote CQ7104<br />

NOTIFIED<br />

BODY<br />

NOTIFIED<br />

BODY<br />

INTERACTIVE<br />

SESSION


08.30 Morning coffee<br />

Evening Seminar S Wednesday 24 April 2013<br />

Regulatory Evening Surgery: Harmonisation <strong>and</strong> Successfully Working with <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Devices</strong> Manufacturers<br />

Registration is at 18:00 <strong>for</strong> an 18:15 start. The seminar will finish no later than 20:30. Seminar documents <strong>and</strong> an evening networking dinner will be provided.<br />

In this interactive seminar, delegates will have the opportunity to network with key Competent Authorities<br />

<strong>and</strong> Notified Bodies <strong>and</strong> take part in interactive Q&A sessions. Expectations <strong>and</strong> requirements <strong>for</strong> clinical<br />

evaluations <strong>and</strong> investigations <strong>for</strong> medical devices from both Competent Authorities <strong>and</strong> Notified Bodies<br />

across Europe will be analysed.<br />

Assessing the impact of the revision of the MDD on harmonisation<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>ing how the revision of the MDD will impact harmonisation across Europe<br />

• Examining how increased cooperation between authorities will be required including joint inspections<br />

<strong>and</strong> cooperation in post-market surveillance <strong>and</strong> vigilance<br />

Conference Day Two: Thursday 25 April 2013<br />

09.00 Opening remarks from the Chair<br />

Lynne Kelley, WW Vice President <strong>Medical</strong> Affairs, Becton Dickinson, USA<br />

Pre-Market <strong>Clinical</strong> Requirements<br />

09.10 Pre-market requirements: European considerations <strong>for</strong> new medical device start-ups<br />

• Assessing regulations <strong>and</strong> their impact on innovation <strong>and</strong> market access<br />

• A theoretical <strong>and</strong> empirical examination of a medical device start-up’s regulatory<br />

awareness<br />

• Reviewing the key areas of both the current <strong>and</strong> proposed pre-market regulatory<br />

COMPETENT<br />

AUTHORITY<br />

requirements; what, <strong>and</strong> when, should they be considered by medical device start-ups<br />

• Engaging with a Competent Authority – an Irish perspective<br />

Paul Scannell, Pre-Market Evaluation Officer, Irish Medicines Board, Irel<strong>and</strong><br />

09.45 Practically meeting the MEDDEV 2.7/3 on serious adverse events (SAE) reporting <strong>for</strong><br />

pre-market clinical investigations<br />

• Successfully complying with the current requirements <strong>for</strong> SAE reporting<br />

• Examining whether there will be any changes to SAE reporting with the revision of the<br />

MDD <strong>and</strong> how this will impact industry<br />

• Practical advice on successfully using the SAE reporting listing <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>m<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the <strong>for</strong>mat you need to use <strong>for</strong> SAE reporting <strong>and</strong> how this varies in<br />

different countries<br />

• Evaluating whether there are increasing requirements <strong>for</strong> more in<strong>for</strong>mation from<br />

Competent Authorities <strong>for</strong> SAE reporting<br />

Ryan Magee, Global Post Market Compliance Manager, Senior, Boston Scientific, USA<br />

10.20 Real life industry case study: Successfully conducting a pre-market clinical study <strong>and</strong><br />

impact of the revision of the MDD<br />

• Examining how pre-market clinical studies will be affected by the revision of the MDD<br />

<strong>and</strong> how industry should be prepared<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>ing how to meet Competent Authority expectations when submitting a protocol<br />

<strong>and</strong> filling out <strong>for</strong>ms<br />

• Clarifying exactly when to notify a Competent Authority if carrying out a clinical study<br />

• Overcoming the main challenges in conducting a pre-market clinical study<br />

Sarah Sorrel, President, MedPass International, France<br />

10.55 Networking <strong>and</strong> morning coffee<br />

Practically Designing <strong>and</strong> Conducting a <strong>Medical</strong> Device <strong>Clinical</strong> Trial<br />

11.25 Designing <strong>and</strong> conducting a clinical trial – Some practical considerations<br />

• Practical advice on the following key points:<br />

– Defining the goals of the study<br />

– Statistical considerations: Assessing how many patients should be involved<br />

– Deciding how many <strong>and</strong> which centers to use<br />

– How to decide which country to carry out your clinical trial <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing which<br />

authorities will be involved<br />

– Setting up of <strong>and</strong> conducting the study (e.g. outsourcing)<br />

– Study compliance (e.g. processes respected, selecting the correct patients, ensuring<br />

case report <strong>for</strong>ms are filled out timely)<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the importance of remaining compliant with ISO 14155 throughout the process<br />

Ruud Nonnekens, Manager <strong>Clinical</strong> Affairs, Volcano Europe, Belgium<br />

12.00 SME perspective on clinical studies – practical examples<br />

• Outcomes selection <strong>for</strong> optimal trail per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

• Avoiding ‘digit preference’ in endpoint selection<br />

• Managing recruitment<br />

• Navigating ethical committee/Competent Authority approvals<br />

• Fiscal compliance in centre contracts<br />

Ian Quirk, Worldwide Director of <strong>Clinical</strong> <strong>and</strong> Regulatory Affairs, Ranier Technology Ltd., UK<br />

12.35 Case study on a running pre market multi-center study in the US <strong>and</strong> Europe<br />

Practical advice on the following key points:<br />

• How to decide which country to carry out your clinical trial<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>ing which authorities will be involved<br />

• Alignment of different st<strong>and</strong>ards - ISO 14155 <strong>and</strong> FDA-GCP<br />

• eDC - balancing advantages <strong>and</strong> disadvantages<br />

Sven Knapinski, Head of Premarketing <strong>Clinical</strong> Trials, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerl<strong>and</strong><br />

Please see website www.in<strong>for</strong>ma-ls.com/clinicalstudy <strong>for</strong> full details<br />

Clarifying the latest developments in Competent Authority <strong>and</strong> Notified Body harmonisation<br />

• Examining discrepancies in Competent Authority expectations in regards to clinical evaluations <strong>and</strong><br />

investigations across Europe<br />

• Evaluating variability in requests from Notified Bodies across Europe<br />

• Reviewing differing interpretations of ISO 14155<br />

**OPEN Q&A SESSION**<br />

Rob Higgins, Regulatory Section Head, MHRA, UK<br />

Gert Bos, Head of Regulatory <strong>and</strong> <strong>Clinical</strong> Affairs, BSI, UK<br />

Bassil Akra, IMC - <strong>Clinical</strong> Affairs, TÜV SÜD Product Service GmbH, Germany<br />

John O’Dwyer, European Manager, NSAI, Irel<strong>and</strong><br />

14.10 Improving clinical trials by utilising Failure Modes <strong>and</strong> Effect Analysis<br />

<strong>Clinical</strong> studies are complex undertakings, involving significant time <strong>and</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>t by their<br />

sponsors. This presentation will discuss how to use traditional risk management tools in novel<br />

ways to improve the likelihood of study success. This presentation will cover:<br />

• The business need to improve study quality<br />

• Potential failure modes of a study<br />

• A case study using FMEA to identify areas <strong>for</strong> improvement<br />

Pat Baird, Systems Engineering Specialist, Baxter International, USA<br />

International Focus<br />

14.45 Practically meeting FDA requirements <strong>for</strong> clinical evaluations <strong>and</strong> investigations<br />

• Outlining key FDA requirements <strong>and</strong> how these compare to the EU<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the importance of being careful <strong>and</strong> having data in the correct <strong>for</strong>mat when<br />

carrying your clinical study from the EU to the US<br />

• Exploring the FDA’s emphasis on increased data collection earlier on in the pre-market stage<br />

• Overcoming the key challenges experienced when carrying out clinical evaluations <strong>and</strong><br />

investigations in the US<br />

Lynne Kelley, WW Vice President <strong>Medical</strong> Affairs, Becton Dickinson, USA<br />

15.20 Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the work of the Global Harmonisation Task Force (GHTF) Study Group 5<br />

(SG5): Documents on clinical evaluations <strong>and</strong> investigations <strong>and</strong> the evolution into the<br />

International <strong>Medical</strong> Device Regulators’ Forum (IMDRF)<br />

• Outlining the work of <strong>and</strong> perspectives from GHTF SG5 in the areas of clinical evaluations<br />

<strong>and</strong> investigations<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the <strong>for</strong>mation of the IMDRF <strong>and</strong> changes in how the clinical angle is<br />

approached<br />

• Examining whether there have been any changes to post-market clinical guidance since<br />

development of the IMDRF<br />

• Exploring perspectives on which kind of adverse events need to be reported<br />

Greg LeBlanc, Manager, Regulatory Affairs <strong>and</strong> Quality Systems, Cook (Canada) Inc., Canada<br />

15.55 Networking <strong>and</strong> afternoon tea<br />

16.25 Practically conducting clinical investigations in emerging market regions<br />

• Key emerging market regions <strong>for</strong> medical devices including China, India <strong>and</strong> Latin<br />

America<br />

• Experiences with the regulatory processes <strong>and</strong> strategies to assure compliance when<br />

conducting clinical trials in these regions<br />

• Key cultural differences in these regions <strong>and</strong> comparing to the EU<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>ing how genetic differences in populations can impact clinical trials <strong>and</strong> what<br />

the regulators expect when running global trials<br />

• Key challenges associated with working with global CROs<br />

Torsten Kayser, PhD Senior Fellow <strong>Clinical</strong> Research, Boston Scientific, Belguim<br />

Post-Market <strong>Clinical</strong> Requirements<br />

17.00 Practically meeting post-market clinical study requirements <strong>and</strong> impact of the revision of<br />

the MDD<br />

• Outlining the current MEDDEV 2.12/2 rev 2 (2012) guidance on PMCFU<br />

• Assessing how widespread regulatory surveillance (Sentinel/Eudamed) may be used in the<br />

post-market phase: Would this be limited to adverse event reporting or wider use<br />

• Practical advice on meeting post-market clinical study requirements<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>ing how the revision of the MDD will impact vigilance implementation <strong>for</strong><br />

medical devices<br />

• Examining how to put in place a good robust PMS programme including <strong>for</strong> high risk<br />

devices<br />

Ryan Magee, Global Post Market Compliance Manager, Senior, Boston Scientific, USA<br />

17.35 Implications of MDD revision on setting up post-market clinical follow-up (PMCFU)<br />

• Clarifying how PMCFU requirements will change with the revision of the MDD <strong>and</strong> how<br />

this will impact industry<br />

• Reviewing how PMCFU fits into the overall post-market surveillance (PMS) strategy<br />

• Reviewing exactly when a PMCFU should be carried out<br />

• Exploring how <strong>and</strong> when industry should work with a Notified Body when carrying out<br />

PMCFU <strong>and</strong> the discussions that should occur<br />

• Overcoming the key challenges associated with carrying out PMCFU<br />

• Designing a PMCFU study that takes into account endpoints <strong>and</strong> measurement points that<br />

will be also useful <strong>for</strong> health economics<br />

Martine Callaert, <strong>Clinical</strong> Trial Project Manager EMEA, Terumo BCT Europe N.V.,<br />

Belgium<br />

18.10 End of conference day two<br />

13.10 Networking lunch<br />

Post-Conference Workshop Y Friday 26 April 2013<br />

Practical Advice on Successful Use of Software, Electronic Data Capture <strong>and</strong> Apps <strong>for</strong> <strong>Clinical</strong> <strong>Evaluations</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Investigations</strong><br />

Registration is at 08:30 <strong>for</strong> a 09:00 start. The workshop will finish no later than 16:00. Workshop documents, refreshments <strong>and</strong> lunch will be provided.<br />

Practical advice on using software <strong>and</strong> apps <strong>for</strong> clinical evaluations <strong>and</strong> investigations<br />

• Exploring guidelines available <strong>for</strong> use of software <strong>and</strong> apps <strong>for</strong> clinical evaluations <strong>and</strong> investigations<br />

• Reviewing current software <strong>and</strong> apps available <strong>for</strong> medical device clinical evaluations <strong>and</strong><br />

investigations<br />

• Evaluating software <strong>and</strong> app developments <strong>and</strong> what is coming up in the future<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>ing how use of software <strong>and</strong> apps can be beneficial <strong>for</strong> industry<br />

Exploring the use of electronic data <strong>for</strong> clinical evaluations <strong>and</strong> investigations<br />

• Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the use of an electronic trial master file (eTMF) <strong>and</strong> how this can benefit industry<br />

• Assessing the use of r<strong>and</strong>omisation systems <strong>for</strong> use of clinical studies <strong>and</strong> how these can benefit<br />

industry<br />

• Clarifying current guidance available <strong>for</strong> electronic submissions <strong>and</strong> whether there are any changes<br />

coming up<br />

Erik Vollebregt, Partner, Axon Lawyers, The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s • Alex Denoon, Partner, Law<strong>for</strong>d Davies Denoon, UK • Mathias Klümper, Partner, Lützeler Klümper Wachenhausen, Germany<br />

Please see website www.in<strong>for</strong>ma-ls.com/clinicalstudy <strong>for</strong> full details<br />

To Register Please Tel: +44 (0) 20 7017 7481 Web: www.in<strong>for</strong>ma-ls.com/clinicalstudy<br />

Fax: +44 (0) 20 7017 7823 Email: registrations@in<strong>for</strong>ma-ls.com Please quote CQ7104

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!