CAMPUS PLANNING - Roger Williams University

CAMPUS PLANNING - Roger Williams University CAMPUS PLANNING - Roger Williams University

14.01.2015 Views

2002-2003 RWU Presidential Fellowship Report: Campus Planning alternatives. If we want to move parking out of the center of the campus we must make the walk from the parking areas as pleasant as possible. If we treat pedestrians (students, faculty and staff) with respect, that respect will be repaid tenfold. Fig. 6: Parking As the previous diagrams have shown, there is a serious need for the proper planning and placement of parking on this campus. Parking should be considered integral to the planning and placement of buildings and not just an afterthought. Buildings are not only destinations for vehicles, they can also define pedestrian areas and screen out and break up unsightly parking areas. Fig. 7: Views Views to and from the campus need careful consideration in the planning of future development on campus. The original campus had panoramic views in all directions. As new buildings were added these views were cut-off and the spaces between the buildings lost their connection to the water. Buildings do not only offer views for their inhabitants, but also frame views for others. The campus has developed in a linear pattern parallel to the slope and to the water. This has prevented the exploitation of the slope by placing buildings perpendicular to the water and allowing views to penetrate into the heart of the campus. By allowing oblique water views from buildings perpendicular or at a slight angle to the water there is also the potential for lateral views of the coastline or views of the bridge to the South and Mount Hope to the North. The library tower is also an increasingly important marker for the heart of the academic core of the Campus. Views of the Library tower can be an effective means of visually connecting to outlying areas and orienting visitors. Fig. 8: Spatial Structure: Stepping The original campus was planned on a grid with buildings arranged in an informal stepping manner. This allowed for an openness that allowed for the continuity of the existing landscape. Since the 90’s there has been an attempt to compose more traditional academic quadrangles. This has led to a bit of a split identity with some of the original building being retrofitted to define a main quadrangle. An infill strategy would be a more successful approach to solving this problem. In the original campus the landscaping was also an integral part of the spatial structure of the campus. This orchestration of buildings and landscaping working in concert has also been lost in recent additions to the campus. Fig. 9: Green Space The openness of the original farmlands has been maintained in the lawn in front of the campus along Old Ferry Road and in the stepping and scale of the original campus and its buildings, which grow out of the site, using local stone and horizontal wood roof overhangs. The construction of the recreation center, the addition to the architecture building and the proposed student dinning facility will significantly transform the openness of the original entry sequence. While this openness was primarily 31

2002-2003 RWU Presidential Fellowship Report: Campus Planning the result of landscaped parking areas, the original farm complex is now dwarfed by the recreation center and pending additions to the campus. It, is therefore increasingly important, as the core of the campus fills in, to maintain the openness at the fringes of the campus. This pastoral setting is one of the most powerful aspects of to the identity of the University as perceived by visitors and local residents alike. The north campus represents a unique opportunity to extend that identity to the water. The careful placement of buildings along the high ground overlooking this meadow as it rolls down to the Bay offers a spectacular setting for the next phase in the evolution of the University. It is not a question of preservation of the existing meadows, for their own sake, as much as a question of how to use buildings to frame activities and views that will make the meadow a vital extension of the Campus, while preserving the pastoral sense that is such a magical aspect of this region. I this regard, I believe we should aspire to the precedent established by our most prominent neighbors, Blithewold and Mt. Hope Farm. Fig. 10: Topography The campus sits on a powerful and dramatic landform – a peninsula. A peninsula has a strong directionality and campus participates in that directionality in a unique way. Route 114 occupies the crest of a ridge that, along with the water's edge, are the most prominent features of the site. Fig. 11: Grids The grid of the original campus conforms to the orientation of the original farm plots and the orientation of the grid of the town of Bristol dating from colonial times. When Rt. 136 was connected to the Mt. Hope bridge, that connector cut diagonally through this grid roughly parallel to the coastline. The former Nike missile silos are at a slight angle to 136. The resolution of these grids, their relation to the topography and to views represent the key design challenges for the northward expansion of the campus. Conclusion: Roger Williams University enjoys a dramatic natural setting. Many people comment on this without a true appreciation of what it is that they find so appealing. How do we protect or build upon something if we do not know what it is What are the unique qualities of the landscape that resonate with the general public and how do we design buildings that reinforce or support the existing fabric of the campus I hope the preceding analysis has offered some clues. The campus core is expanding and becoming denser at the same time. This density is important in building a sense of community and creating a strong pedestrian core with a variety of outdoor gathering spaces to suit different needs. Views from buildings at the fringe of this core should be maintained and new building sites should respect existing open space corridors, while also exploiting the topography to allow for new building sites to take advantage of water views while maintaining or framing views from above. Inadequate attention to the design and planning of the automotive infrastructure on the campus has and will continue to be a significant problem unless a major effort is 32

2002-2003 RWU Presidential Fellowship Report: Campus Planning<br />

alternatives. If we want to move parking out of the center<br />

of the campus we must make the walk from the parking<br />

areas as pleasant as possible. If we treat pedestrians<br />

(students, faculty and staff) with respect, that respect will<br />

be repaid tenfold.<br />

Fig. 6: Parking<br />

As the previous diagrams have shown, there is a serious<br />

need for the proper planning and placement of parking on<br />

this campus. Parking should be considered integral to the<br />

planning and placement of buildings and not just an<br />

afterthought. Buildings are not only destinations for<br />

vehicles, they can also define pedestrian areas and screen<br />

out and break up unsightly parking areas.<br />

Fig. 7: Views<br />

Views to and from the campus need careful consideration<br />

in the planning of future development on campus. The<br />

original campus had panoramic views in all directions. As<br />

new buildings were added these views were cut-off and the<br />

spaces between the buildings lost their connection to the<br />

water. Buildings do not only offer views for their<br />

inhabitants, but also frame views for others.<br />

The campus has developed in a linear pattern parallel to the<br />

slope and to the water. This has prevented the exploitation<br />

of the slope by placing buildings perpendicular to the water<br />

and allowing views to penetrate into the heart of the<br />

campus. By allowing oblique water views from buildings<br />

perpendicular or at a slight angle to the water there is also<br />

the potential for lateral views of the coastline or views of<br />

the bridge to the South and Mount Hope to the North.<br />

The library tower is also an increasingly important marker<br />

for the heart of the academic core of the Campus. Views of<br />

the Library tower can be an effective means of visually<br />

connecting to outlying areas and orienting visitors.<br />

Fig. 8: Spatial Structure: Stepping<br />

The original campus was planned on a grid with buildings<br />

arranged in an informal stepping manner. This allowed for<br />

an openness that allowed for the continuity of the existing<br />

landscape. Since the 90’s there has been an attempt to<br />

compose more traditional academic quadrangles. This has<br />

led to a bit of a split identity with some of the original<br />

building being retrofitted to define a main quadrangle. An<br />

infill strategy would be a more successful approach to<br />

solving this problem. In the original campus the<br />

landscaping was also an integral part of the spatial structure<br />

of the campus. This orchestration of buildings and<br />

landscaping working in concert has also been lost in recent<br />

additions to the campus.<br />

Fig. 9: Green Space<br />

The openness of the original farmlands has been<br />

maintained in the lawn in front of the campus along Old<br />

Ferry Road and in the stepping and scale of the original<br />

campus and its buildings, which grow out of the site, using<br />

local stone and horizontal wood roof overhangs.<br />

The construction of the recreation center, the addition to the<br />

architecture building and the proposed student dinning<br />

facility will significantly transform the openness of the<br />

original entry sequence. While this openness was primarily<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!