12.11.2012 Views

World Congress of Malacology Antwerp ... - Unitas Malacologica

World Congress of Malacology Antwerp ... - Unitas Malacologica

World Congress of Malacology Antwerp ... - Unitas Malacologica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

each <strong>of</strong> these radiations goes back to a single invasion event, that all these radiations started relatively<br />

simultaneously, and that they are all younger than the lake itself (i.e., intralacustrine radiation).<br />

B) Micro-habitats and intralacustrine barriers may have supported allopatric speciation<br />

Phylogenetic data indicate a strong horizontal (e.g. feeder springs vs. actual lake) and vertical<br />

structuring (e.g. below and above the Chara belt) in Lake Ohrid molluscs that may have contributed<br />

to micro-allopatric speciation.<br />

C) Ongoing speciation<br />

Though intralacustrine radiations started in the early Pleistocene, there is evidence for ongoing<br />

diversification in Lake Ohrid. We hypothesize that the high degree <strong>of</strong> biodiversity seen today may<br />

not be due to elevated speciation rates but rather due to reduced extinction rates.<br />

D) Source function <strong>of</strong> Lake Ohrid<br />

Within a European phylogeographical context, we identified taxa, ancestors <strong>of</strong> which possibly<br />

evolved inside the lake and later spread over the Balkans. Examples include the mussel Dreissena<br />

presbensis and the gastropod Pyrgula annulata.<br />

In summary, it can be said that Lake Ohrid served as evolutionary reservoir for relic species from<br />

different parts <strong>of</strong> Europe. However, the vast majority <strong>of</strong> the endemic faunas seen today is relatively<br />

young and the result <strong>of</strong> allopatric intralacustrine speciation.<br />

Receptor physiology in bivalve eyes and the role <strong>of</strong> primary inhibition<br />

Wilkens, Lon A.<br />

Center for Neurodynamics and Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Missouri-St. Louis, One<br />

University Blvd, St. Louis, Missouri 63121, USA,<br />

Email: wilkensl@umsl.edu<br />

Bivalve molluscs are known for shadow responses involving closure and/or retraction <strong>of</strong> the sipn and<br />

valve adduction. In representative genera (Spisula, Mercenaria, Lima) the pallial nerves contain<br />

photosensitive fibers that exhibit physiological shadow responses. These photoreceptors are mostly<br />

spontaneously active in the dark and inhibited by light. Dimming, i.e., a shadow triggers an excitatory<br />

burst <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-response spikes. Equivalent responses characterize the photoreceptors in bivalve eyes.<br />

Optic nerve fibers with vigorous light-<strong>of</strong>f responses are known for the siphon tentacle eyes <strong>of</strong><br />

Cardium, and the mantle eyes <strong>of</strong> scallops, e.g., (Argo)Pecten and Lima. Invariably these <strong>of</strong>f-receptors<br />

are ciliary based and constitute a distal retinal layer in scallops, distinct from a proximal microvillar<br />

layer. In the ciliary <strong>of</strong>f-receptors, light inhibition is the result <strong>of</strong> a hyperpolarizing receptor potential.<br />

A rebound depolarization generates the spike burst in response to dimming. Hartline (1938) initially<br />

attributed light inhibition to inhibitory synapses, as seen in Limulus lateral eyes. The absence <strong>of</strong><br />

synapses in the scallop retina concludes that the absorption <strong>of</strong> light directly inhibits the <strong>of</strong>f receptors,<br />

in contrast to a depolarizing, excitatory light response in all other invertebrate photoreceptors.<br />

Although primary inhibition is apparently universal among bivalves, the scallop eye also features<br />

proximal (microvillar) receptors depolarized by light with bursts <strong>of</strong> spikes at light onset. Aside from<br />

Pecten and Lima the only other bivalve eye in which receptor potentials have been investigated are<br />

those <strong>of</strong> the giant clam, Tridacna. Here, two types <strong>of</strong> hyperpolarizing light-inhibited receptors have<br />

been described, one <strong>of</strong> which generates spikes at light <strong>of</strong>fset, the other non-spiking. Vertebrate<br />

photoreceptors are the only other receptors where light elicits “inhibitory” hyperpolarizing receptor<br />

potentials. However, membrane conductance and ion specificity is unrelated. In bivalves light<br />

triggers an increase in K + current whereas in vertebrates light triggers a decrease in the dark Na +<br />

current.<br />

243

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!