World Congress of Malacology Antwerp ... - Unitas Malacologica
World Congress of Malacology Antwerp ... - Unitas Malacologica
World Congress of Malacology Antwerp ... - Unitas Malacologica
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Pupilla muscorum (Linnaeus, 1758) is the most widespread species in the genus Pupilla. The species<br />
is highly variable and rich in forms. The taxonomic identity <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> these forms, var. pratensis<br />
(Clessin, 1871), commonly considered an ecophenotype <strong>of</strong> wet habitats, has been investigated using<br />
morphological, ecological and molecular data. The forms differ in a row <strong>of</strong> morphological characters,<br />
pratensis being larger, more thin-shelled, and having a toothless aperture. They separate well also<br />
using molecular data (COI and CytB) and hence, we conclude that the two forms represent distinct<br />
species. Pupilla pratensis shows some resemblance to the high alpine taxon Pupilla alpiola<br />
(Charpentier, 1837), but differs distinctly in some morphological characters. P. pratensis is<br />
pronounced hygrophile, occurring in calcareous fens. It was described from Germany and also occurs<br />
in Poland and the Czech Republic. It is distributed almost throughout all <strong>of</strong> Scandinavia. A wide, but<br />
scattered distribution, mainly in calcareous areas in central, north (and possibly western) Europe is to<br />
be expected.<br />
The underused combined approach (morphology, ecology and DNA-barcoding) proves to be a<br />
powerful tool in distinguishing among closely related species within the genus Pupilla. We suggest<br />
that combined results from several methods should be used before assigning taxonomic identity and<br />
when sorting out complexes in other taxonomic groups as well.<br />
Approaches and problems in species delimitation <strong>of</strong> tropical freshwater snails: examples from<br />
Southeast Asian pachychilids<br />
von Rintelen, Thomas; Köhler, Frank; Glaubrecht, Matthias<br />
Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Humboldt University Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43, 10115 Berlin,<br />
Germany,<br />
Email: thomas.rintelen@museum.hu-berlin.de<br />
The destruction <strong>of</strong> freshwater biota and the loss <strong>of</strong> habitats is particularly dramatic in Southeast Asia.<br />
The region has rich endemic assemblages <strong>of</strong> limnic molluscs, especially prosobranch gastropods, and<br />
their inventorization is a prerequisite for the conservation <strong>of</strong> freshwater diversity. We here employ<br />
data from the endemic and speciose Southeast Asian genera <strong>of</strong> the cerithioidean Pachychilidae to<br />
illuminate issues arising from using classical morphological and recent molecular methods such as<br />
DNA barcoding in the process <strong>of</strong> species delimitation and diversity assessment.<br />
We used traditional morphological characters such as the shell or radula in the initial delimitation <strong>of</strong><br />
pachychilid species. This procedure proved straightforward in sympatric situations, which were then<br />
employed as a benchmark against which species status could be estimated in allopatric situations.<br />
This approach revealed a considerably higher number <strong>of</strong> putative species than previously described,<br />
mostly endemics with a restricted occurrence. The taxa delineated by this method did show a poor<br />
match to genetic units derived from a molecular phylogeny based on mtDNA, though. The high level<br />
<strong>of</strong> congruence among different morphological characters and geography indicates that this rather is a<br />
problem inherent to properties <strong>of</strong> the mtDNA markers than reflecting errors in prior species<br />
delimitation or cryptic species.<br />
The widespread mismatch between species hypotheses derived from morphological and molecular<br />
data even among sympatric taxa suggests that a mere ‘barcoding shortcut’ is not applicable in<br />
diversity assessment in these freshwater gastropods, which are probably representative for many<br />
tropical limnic caenogastropods. While sequencing may fail in facilitating easy species recognition,<br />
estimates <strong>of</strong> genetic diversity remain nevertheless valuable. In allopatric situations, which constitute<br />
the majority <strong>of</strong> cases, species delimitation remains ambiguous, since our molecular data indicate that<br />
even a high genetic distinctiveness may not be correlated with reproductive isolation. Species<br />
diversity estimates will have to take account <strong>of</strong> that intrinsic uncertainty.<br />
236