World Congress of Malacology Antwerp ... - Unitas Malacologica
World Congress of Malacology Antwerp ... - Unitas Malacologica
World Congress of Malacology Antwerp ... - Unitas Malacologica
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Comprehensive phylogeographic surveys for many marine molluscan clades support this pattern.<br />
Moreover, many broadly distributed species turn out to be species complexes <strong>of</strong> allopatrically<br />
distributed lineages. Allopatric diversification can occur on basinal, sub-basinal, peripheral or<br />
archipelagic scales, and is most strongly related to dispersal ability. A survey <strong>of</strong> available<br />
phylogeographic studies for over 100 described marine species reveals that these taxa actually<br />
represent nearly 300 distinct lineages; an average allopatric cryptic multiplier <strong>of</strong> ~x3. The results are<br />
strongly bimodal, however, based on larval type. Those with feeding larvae, and presumably greater<br />
dispersal ability, have an average x2.8 multiplier; whereas those without feeding larvae average x14.<br />
Given that much <strong>of</strong> molluscan diversity is small, and that dispersal ability tends to scale with size, the<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> allopatrically distributed species complexes in micromollusks may contribute<br />
substantially to global marine species estimates.<br />
A combinatorial phylogenetic analysis <strong>of</strong> Conoidea<br />
Meyer, Christopher P. 1 .; Duda, Thomas F. 2 ; Rawlings, Timothy 3 ; Kohn, Alan J. 4 ; Todd,<br />
Jonathan A. 5 ; Olivera, Baldomero M. 6 , Watkins, Maren 7 ; Ownby, John-Paul 6 ; Thomas,<br />
Richard 8<br />
1. Berkeley Natural History Museums, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 95720, USA,<br />
Email: cpmeyer@berkeley.edu<br />
2. Museum <strong>of</strong> Zoology, University <strong>of</strong> Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA,<br />
Email: tfduda@umich.edu<br />
3. Dept. <strong>of</strong> Biology, Cape Breton University, PO Box 5300, 1250 Grand Lake Road, Sydney, Nova<br />
Scotia B1P 6L2, Canada,<br />
Email: Timothy_Rawlings@cbu.ca<br />
4. Dept. <strong>of</strong> Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1800, USA,<br />
Email: kohn@u.washington.edu<br />
5. Palaeontology Department, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK,<br />
Email: j.todd@nhm.ac.uk<br />
6. Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA,<br />
Email: olivera@biology.utah.edu, jonpol@gmail.com<br />
7. Department <strong>of</strong> Pathology, University <strong>of</strong> Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA,<br />
Email: maren.watkins@hsc.utah.edu<br />
8. Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Carbondale IL 62901-6899,<br />
USA, Email: rthomas@zoology.siu.edu<br />
In joint collaboration, we assembled a supermatrix <strong>of</strong> all available mtDNA sequence data for<br />
Conoidea species to better assess overall relationships within the group. The dataset includes<br />
members <strong>of</strong> twelve currently recognized familes/subfamilies within the superfamily, with especially<br />
broad coverage across the genus Conus. Based on examination <strong>of</strong> sequence similarity, we culled a<br />
larger dataset consisting <strong>of</strong> over 1500 OTUs to 334 exemplar taxa that best represent independent<br />
species or ESUs. We performed a series <strong>of</strong> phylogenetic analyses using this data set: (A) separate<br />
analyses for each <strong>of</strong> three genes, 16S, 12S and COI; (B) analyses including only taxa for which all<br />
genes are present, with and without areas <strong>of</strong> ambiguous alignments; and (C) analyses including all<br />
taxa regardless <strong>of</strong> sequence coverage, with and without areas <strong>of</strong> ambiguous alignments. We<br />
compared the results from each <strong>of</strong> these analyses to determine if subtrees are concordant and if<br />
certain species and/or sequences bias topological stability and support. We use the subsequent<br />
phylogeny to examine Conoidea systematics, as well as evolutionary dynamics within the genus<br />
Conus.<br />
144