13.01.2015 Views

Transcript [PDF] - House Foreign Affairs Committee Democrats

Transcript [PDF] - House Foreign Affairs Committee Democrats

Transcript [PDF] - House Foreign Affairs Committee Democrats

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

33<br />

Chairman BERMAN. In other words, essentially call the roll at<br />

2:15 and keep the roll open until 2:45. Is there any objection to<br />

that suggestion<br />

[No response.]<br />

Chairman BERMAN. Without objection, that will be the order, Mr.<br />

Henry Clay. You didn’t hear me, or I am doing something I am not<br />

allowed to do You are saying I am doing something I am not allowed<br />

to do. I am willing to take any embarrassment. Why don’t<br />

you tell us what you are thinking here<br />

Ms. RUSH. I would defer to the chief counsel, but I believe unless<br />

we spoke slowly for 1 ⁄2 hour to take the vote. I guess that would<br />

be okay, but we can’t——<br />

Chairman BERMAN. If I get unanimous consent to schedule a vote<br />

where the roll will be called in a regular order at 2:15, but that<br />

roll will not close until 2:45, there is something in the <strong>House</strong> rules<br />

that keeps me from doing that<br />

Ms. RUSH. Well, normally we would just——<br />

Chairman BERMAN. Let us leave that as the decision now. I have<br />

received unanimous consent to call the roll at 2:15 and keep that<br />

roll open until 2:45, and if I am advised that that is not the proper<br />

way to do it we will come back with another suggestion.<br />

Ms. RUSH. Okay.<br />

Chairman BERMAN. Okay. All right. The gentleman from South<br />

Carolina, Mr. Inglis, is recognized.<br />

Mr. INGLIS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.<br />

Chairman BERMAN. Move to strike the last word. The gentleman<br />

is recognized for 5 minutes.<br />

Mr. INGLIS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I just would associate myself<br />

with the comments by Mr. Delahunt and Mr. McCaul. It is a<br />

very difficult question.<br />

If the atrocities were ongoing then it seems to me the United<br />

States would have an obligation to act, but these are historical<br />

facts and the current parties, which are different governments, are<br />

trying to work out that history and to come to some reconciliation.<br />

And so for us to enter that seems ill-advised because while I<br />

would agree with what has been said here, that we see the facts<br />

of the genocide, we see the horrors, and the United States has already<br />

spoken on this, to enter now and to potentially disrupt the<br />

process, the reconciliation process, I think is ill-advised.<br />

Also I think the thing that affects me is I have some information<br />

that it may in fact harm Armenians and so to have our entrance<br />

into this actually harm people who are trying to seek reconciliation<br />

now seems like not a terribly good way to proceed.<br />

All countries have to deal with their past, and we all have things<br />

that we must work through about our past. Several things about<br />

our past have been mentioned here—our treatment of Native<br />

Americans, our treatment of slaves in America. We are still dealing<br />

with the scourges of those sins, but to have other countries entering<br />

and trying to urge us along to award some resolution when in<br />

fact the resolution is going to come in the hearts of Americans and<br />

working through those things will take time.<br />

I think this is probably the same case with the Armenians and<br />

the Turks. So with that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back.<br />

VerDate 0ct 09 2002 14:28 May 18, 2010 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 F:\WORK\FULL\030410M\55273 HFA PsN: SHIRL

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!