ENDOSCOPIC SLIDE Flyer - AGES
ENDOSCOPIC SLIDE Flyer - AGES
ENDOSCOPIC SLIDE Flyer - AGES
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Australian<br />
Gynaecological<br />
Endoscopy<br />
Society Ltd<br />
President <strong>AGES</strong>:<br />
Dr Robert O'Shea<br />
in association with the<br />
Asia Pacific Association<br />
of Gynecologic Endoscopy and<br />
Minimally Invasive Therapy<br />
President APAGE:<br />
Assoc. Prof. P M Yuen<br />
Chairman:<br />
Co-Chairman:<br />
Scientific Chairman:<br />
Assoc. Prof. Alan Lam<br />
Prof. Felix Wong<br />
Dr Geoffrey Reid<br />
Organising Committee:<br />
>>>>THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
– An <strong>AGES</strong> Meeting in association with APAGE<br />
Dr Robert O'Shea<br />
Prof. Chyi-Long Lee<br />
Dr Greg Cario<br />
Dr Jim Tsaltas<br />
Assoc. Prof. P M Yuen<br />
18 & 19 AUGUST 2006>>>>>>>>>>><br />
Program and Abstracts<br />
Platinum sponsor of <strong>AGES</strong><br />
Major Sponsor of <strong>AGES</strong>
<strong>AGES</strong> gratefully acknowledges the following<br />
companies which have supported this conference:<br />
Platinum Sponsor of <strong>AGES</strong><br />
Major Sponsor of <strong>AGES</strong><br />
Major Sponsor of <strong>AGES</strong> ‘Limits<br />
of Endoscopic Surgery 2006’<br />
Exhibitors<br />
Fisher & Paykel<br />
Olympus<br />
American Medical Systems<br />
Applied Medical<br />
B Braun Australia<br />
Bard Australia<br />
ConMed Linvatec<br />
Cook Australia<br />
Cytyc (Australia)<br />
Device Technologies<br />
Endocorp<br />
Experien<br />
Gyrus ACMI<br />
InSight Oceania<br />
Mayne/Symbion Health<br />
N. Stenning & Co.<br />
Smith and Nephew<br />
Sydmed
CONTENTS<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
Faculty and Committee Members 2<br />
Welcome Message 3<br />
The Limits of Endoscopic Surgery 4<br />
Conference Program<br />
Abstracts – Friday 18 August 10<br />
Abstracts – Saturday 19 August 19<br />
Abstracts: Free Communications 23<br />
– Friday 18 August<br />
Abstracts: Free Communications 35<br />
– Saturday 19 August<br />
Abstracts: Free Communications 50<br />
Poster Exhibition<br />
PR&CRM Points - CPD Points<br />
The Conference has been approved as a RANZCOG Approved<br />
O&G Meeting and eligible Fellows of the College will earn points<br />
for attendance as follows:<br />
Full attendance: 18 CPD points in the Meetings category.<br />
Attendance one day: 9 CPD points<br />
Attendance at each breakfast session: 1 additional CPD point<br />
Completion of Pre- and Post- Questionnaires: 5 PR&CRM points<br />
Delegates will be required to sign the attendance sheet prior to<br />
morning tea on both Friday 18 and Saturday 19 August.<br />
Pre- and Post- Questionnaires<br />
The College approved Pre- and Post- Questionnaires are<br />
comprised of a number of multiple choice questions from<br />
lectures to be given on Friday 18 and Saturday 19 August.<br />
The Pre- Questionnaire is to be handed in at morning tea on<br />
Friday 18 August. The Post- Questionnaire is to be handed in<br />
at the close of the Meeting. No exceptions can be made to<br />
these deadlines.<br />
Breakfast Sessions<br />
Please refer to conference program. Pre-booking is essential at<br />
the registration desk. Hot breakfast is included.<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
1
Conference Committee<br />
>>>>>>>>>>><br />
<strong>AGES</strong> Board<br />
Assoc. Professor Alan Lam<br />
Professor Felix Wong<br />
Dr Geoff Reid<br />
Dr Robert O’Shea<br />
Professor Chyi-Long Lee<br />
Dr Greg Cario<br />
Dr Jim Tsaltas<br />
Assoc. Professor Pong Mo Yuen<br />
>>>>>>>>>>><br />
International Faculty<br />
Chairman<br />
Co-Chairman<br />
Scientific Chairman<br />
Dr Robert O’Shea<br />
Assoc. Professor Alan Lam<br />
Dr Jim Tsaltas<br />
Dr Geoffrey Reid<br />
Dr Greg Cario<br />
Dr Jenny Cook<br />
Professor David Healy<br />
Dr Krish Karthigasu<br />
Assoc. Professor Chris Maher<br />
Dr Anusch Yazdani<br />
Australian Faculty<br />
President<br />
Vice President<br />
Hon. Secretary<br />
Treasurer<br />
Professor Masaaki Andou<br />
Dr Pongsakdi Chaisilwattana<br />
Dr SM Bernard Chern<br />
Dr Wachyu Hadisaputra<br />
Professor Hiroshi Hoshiai<br />
Professor Kuan-Gen Huang<br />
Professor Chyi-Long Lee<br />
Professor Bao-Liang Lin<br />
Dr Leslie Lo<br />
Dr Foo Hoe Loh<br />
Professor Prashant Mangeshikar<br />
Professor Joo-Hyun Nam<br />
Dr Regta Pichay<br />
Dr Shailesh Puntambekar<br />
Dr Kai Y See Tho<br />
Professor Osamu Tsutsumi<br />
Assoc. Professor Pong Mo Yuen<br />
Professor Enlan Xia<br />
>>>>>>>>>>><br />
<strong>AGES</strong> Secretariat<br />
– Conference Organiser<br />
Michele Bender, Director<br />
Conference Connection<br />
Phone: +61 2 9967 2928<br />
Fax: +61 2 9967 2627<br />
Mobile: +61 411 110 464<br />
E-mail:<br />
Mail:<br />
Japan<br />
India<br />
Singapore<br />
Indonesia<br />
Japan<br />
Taiwan<br />
Taiwan<br />
Japan<br />
Hong Kong<br />
China<br />
India<br />
Korea<br />
Phillipines<br />
India<br />
Singapore<br />
Japan<br />
Hong Kong<br />
China<br />
conferences@ages.com.au<br />
282 Edinburgh Road<br />
CASTLECRAG NSW 2068 AUSTRALIA<br />
Dr Jason Abbott<br />
New South Wales<br />
Dr Alison Brand<br />
New South Wales<br />
Dr Linda Calabresi<br />
New South Wales<br />
Dr Greg Cario<br />
New South Wales<br />
Professor Jonathan Carter New South Wales<br />
Dr Danny Chou<br />
New South Wales<br />
Dr George Condous<br />
New South Wales<br />
Dr Jenny Cook<br />
South Australia<br />
Dr Michael Cooper<br />
New South Wales<br />
Dr Alan Ferrier<br />
New South Wales<br />
Dr Robert Ford<br />
New South Wales<br />
Professor Neville Hacker New South Wales<br />
Professor David Healy<br />
Victoria<br />
Professor Roger Houghton New South Wales<br />
Dr Thomas Hugh<br />
New South Wales<br />
Professor Robert Jansen New South Wales<br />
Dr Krish Karthigasu<br />
Western Australia<br />
Dr Andrew Korda<br />
New South Wales<br />
Assoc. Professor Alan Lam New South Wales<br />
Dr Kenneth Loi<br />
New South Wales<br />
Assoc. Professor David Lubowski New South Wales<br />
Dr Stuart Lyon<br />
Victoria<br />
Assoc. Professor Chris Maher Queensland<br />
Dr David Molloy<br />
Queensland<br />
Dr Matthew Morgan<br />
New South Wales<br />
Assoc.Professor Andreas Obermair Queensland<br />
Dr Robert O’Shea<br />
South Australia<br />
Dr Geoff Reid<br />
New South Wales<br />
Dr Frank Stening<br />
New South Wales<br />
Dr Hugh Torode<br />
New South Wales<br />
Dr Jim Tsaltas<br />
Victoria<br />
Assoc. Professor Thierry Vancaillie New South Wales<br />
Professor Felix Wong<br />
New South Wales<br />
Dr Anusch Yazdani<br />
Queensland<br />
2<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
Welcome<br />
<strong>AGES</strong> President and Conference Chairman<br />
Dear Colleagues,<br />
On behalf of the Australian Gynaecological Endoscopy Society, we would like<br />
to warmly welcome everyone to the inaugural joint meeting between <strong>AGES</strong><br />
and the Asia-Pacific Association of Gynaecologic Endoscopy and Minimally<br />
Invasive Therapy (APAGE).<br />
Together, at this beautiful and luxurious Westin hotel, we will put the LIMITS<br />
OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY under endoscopic scrutiny.<br />
In the last decade, the practice of gynaecological surgery has witnessed an<br />
‘endoscopic revolution’, brought about by improved imaging technology,<br />
advances in surgical skills, modern energy sources, and perhaps most<br />
importantly a greater understanding of pelvic anatomy. Like pioneers<br />
exploring the uncharted waters of the world during the last millennium,<br />
pelvic surgeons have explored, tested, described and successfully<br />
performed almost every open gynaecological procedure endoscopically.<br />
How far have we come, what can be done, what should be done, how<br />
effective, at what costs, risks and benefits are fundamentally important<br />
questions we hope to address and discuss together at this meeting over<br />
the next two days.<br />
We are delighted to have brought together an outstanding faculty of national<br />
and international speakers to present their techniques, dissect evidence,<br />
analyse published results, and debate the ‘limits of endoscopic surgery’. We<br />
are also thrilled to have received an unprecedented number of free<br />
communications which have filled the 4 sessions on each of the two days of<br />
the conference. We are delighted that these not only come from <strong>AGES</strong><br />
members, but also from many international registrants to this meeting.<br />
Once again, our warmest welcome to all <strong>AGES</strong> members and to all<br />
colleagues from neighbouring countries who are APAGE members and those<br />
who are not but have come to participate in this conference and enjoy the<br />
best harbour city in the world.<br />
Best wishes<br />
Alan Lam<br />
Conference Chairman<br />
<strong>AGES</strong> Vice President<br />
Robert O’Shea<br />
President <strong>AGES</strong><br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
3
THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
2006>>>>>>>>><br />
FRIDAY 18 AUGUST 2006<br />
THE BALLROOM<br />
WESTIN SYDNEY<br />
0700 – 0800 OPTIONAL BREAKFAST SESSION<br />
NOVASURE ENDOMETRIAL ABLATION<br />
SYSTEM INFORMATION & OVERVIEW<br />
Sponsored by Cytyc<br />
HERITAGE BALLROOM – LEVEL 6<br />
Technology overview & contra-indications<br />
T Vancaillie<br />
Procedure steps including anaesthesia<br />
requirements<br />
J Abbott<br />
Clinical data and worldwide results<br />
T Vancaillie<br />
Post-op care and management of complications<br />
J Abbott<br />
0730 – 0800 Conference Registration<br />
0800 – 0805 WELCOME AND OPENING<br />
R O’Shea A Lam PM Yuen<br />
0805 – 0930 SESSION 1<br />
HYSTERECTOMY<br />
Sponsored by Stryker<br />
Chairs: R O’Shea, PM Yuen<br />
0805 – 0820 DVD presentation on laparoscopic<br />
hysterectomy<br />
KY See Tho<br />
0820 – 0835 Anatomical and technical limits to<br />
laparoscopic hysterectomy<br />
A Lam<br />
0835 – 0850 Limits to the uptake of laparoscopic<br />
hysterectomy Training, costs and<br />
consumer demand<br />
D Molloy<br />
0850 – 0905 What are the safety concerns with<br />
laparoscopic hysterectomy, and how can<br />
they be overcome<br />
G Cario<br />
0905 – 0920 The consumer’s view – why should I<br />
have a laparoscopic hysterectomy, is it<br />
safe, how many have you done, where<br />
did you do your training and what are<br />
your statistics<br />
L Calabresi<br />
0920 – 0930 Panel - Questions<br />
0930 – 1015 SESSION 2<br />
NOVEL APPROACHES<br />
Sponsored by Stryker<br />
Chairs: M Cooper, J Cook<br />
0930 – 0945 Laparoscopic ovarian transposition<br />
KG Huang<br />
0945 – 1000 Laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation<br />
M Andou<br />
1000 – 1015 Laparoscopic uterine artery ligation<br />
CL Lee<br />
1015 – 1045 Morning Tea and Trade Exhibition<br />
1045 – 1230 SESSION 3<br />
UTERINE FIBROIDS<br />
Sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Medical<br />
Chairs: H Torode, B Chern<br />
1045 – 1115 DVD presentations on laparoscopic<br />
myomectomy and hysteroscopic myomectomy<br />
The monster myoma<br />
Hysteroscopic myomectomy<br />
R Ford<br />
BL Lin<br />
1115 – 1135 What are the limits of endoscopic<br />
myomectomy<br />
J Tsaltas<br />
1135 – 1155 Endoscopic myomectomy – outcomes<br />
and fertility issues<br />
D Healy<br />
1155 – 1215 Current non-surgical approaches to fibroids<br />
S Lyon<br />
1215 – 1230 Panel-Questions<br />
1230 – 1330 Lunch and Trade Exhibition<br />
1330 – 1430 SESSION 4<br />
4 simultaneous free<br />
communications sessions<br />
1330 – 1430 FREE COMMUNICATIONS A<br />
LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY<br />
BALLROOM 3<br />
Chairs: F Wong, R Pichay<br />
1330 – 1340 Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (type I/II/III):<br />
A review and complications of 245 cases<br />
Park Y<br />
1340 – 1350 The Biswas uterine elevator and cup for use in<br />
laparoscopic hysterectomy<br />
Soo S, Merkur H<br />
1350 – 1400 The plasma trissector at laparoscopic<br />
hysterectomy – a video presentation<br />
Soo S, Merkur H, Hardas G<br />
1400 – 1410 A modified technique of LAVH using a Biswas<br />
uterovaginal elevator (BUVE) for uteri weighing<br />
500 gm or more<br />
Lee ETC, Wong FWS<br />
1410 – 1420 Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Intention to<br />
treat ongoing prospective trial<br />
Condous GS, Lam A<br />
4<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
PROGRAM<br />
1420 – 1430 An enlarged uterus is not a contraindication to<br />
performing total laparoscopic hysterectomy:<br />
age matched control study<br />
Condous GS, Lam A<br />
1330 – 1430 FREE COMMUNICATIONS B<br />
LAPAROSCOPIC ONCOLOGY<br />
BALLROOM 4<br />
Chairs: C Maher, H Liddell<br />
1330 – 1340 Laparoscopic Approach to Carcinoma of the<br />
Endometrium (LACE)<br />
Obermair A, Gebski V, Forder P, Jackson D,<br />
Williams G, Janda M<br />
1340 – 1350 Completely total laparoscopic radical<br />
hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer;<br />
Initial reports<br />
Lee YS, Lee JM, Kim BS, Cho YL, Park IS<br />
1350 – 1400 Laroscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy<br />
versus abdominal hysterectomy in patients with<br />
early stage endometrial cancer:<br />
10 year experience<br />
Nam JH, Yoon J, Kim DY, Suh DS, Kim JH,<br />
Kim YM, Kim YT<br />
1400 – 1410 Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy (LRT)<br />
in Korea<br />
Nam JH, Kim JH, Kim DY, Suh DS, Kim YM,<br />
Kim YT, Kim SH, Kim DJ, Kim YB<br />
1410 – 1420 Comparison of laparoscopically –assisted<br />
radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical<br />
abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of<br />
cervical cancer<br />
Lee JW, Kim WY, Choi CH, Kim TJ, Kim BG,<br />
Lee JH, Bae DS<br />
1420 – 1430 Successful pregnancy after conservative<br />
treatment of stage IA endometrial carcinoma<br />
early detected by hysterofiberscopy<br />
Matsumi H, Nakabayashi M, Ohnuki H,<br />
Horiya M, Tajima Y, Mizuguchi K, Nishii O<br />
1330 – 1430 FREE COMMUNICATIONS C<br />
HYSTEROSCOPY<br />
HERITAGE BALLROOM – LEVEL 6<br />
Chairs: A Yazdani, P Chaisilwattana<br />
1330 – 1340 Hysteroscopic metroplasty for unicornuate<br />
uterus to improve reproductive outcome<br />
Tandulwadkar S, Margale A<br />
1340 – 1350 A randomised controlled trial comparing<br />
Microwave Endometrial Ablation (MEATM) and<br />
Mirena® (levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine<br />
device) in the treatment of menorrhagia.<br />
Behnia-Willison F, Cook J, Seman EI, Lam C,<br />
Manifold E, Agniewska , O’Shea RT<br />
1350 – 1400 Endoscopic surgery for previous cesarean<br />
section scar induce menorrhagia<br />
Shih CL, Lin WC<br />
1400 – 1410 Outpatient hysteroscopy: a review of 225 cases<br />
Cameron M, Bickerstaffe C, Readman E,<br />
Maher P<br />
1410 – 1420 The diagnosis & management of<br />
intra-uterine pathology<br />
Lyons SD, Kingston AJ, Abbott JA, Vancaillie TG<br />
1420 – 1430 The occurrence and outcome of 39 pregnancies<br />
after 1621 cases of transcervical resection of<br />
endometrium (TCRE)<br />
Xia E, Li TC, Yu D, Huang X , Zheng J, Liu Y,<br />
Zhang M<br />
1330 – 1430 FREE COMMUNICATIONS D<br />
OVARIAN & ADNEXAL DISEASE<br />
BARNET ROOM – LEVEL 6<br />
Chairs: R Ford, S Puntambekar<br />
1330 – 1340 Role of laparoscopy in ovarian tumours<br />
Sathe R, Puntambekar S<br />
1340 – 1350 Preoperative discrimination between benign and<br />
malignant ovarian cysts treated surgically in an<br />
Australian tertiary centre<br />
Daly JO, Huang A, Ang WC, Healey M<br />
1350 – 1400 Hydrodissection in laparoscopic surgery of<br />
ovarian pregnancy<br />
Chang Y<br />
1400 – 1410 Laparoscopic management of twisted adnexa in<br />
infertile woman<br />
Tandulwadkar S, Margale A<br />
1410 – 1420 Laparoscopic detorsion and oophoropexy for<br />
treatment of ovarian torsion<br />
Tan YT, Lyons SD, De Decker AP, Vancaillie TG<br />
1420 – 1430 A medical management of interstitial ectopic<br />
pregnancy: A five year clinical study<br />
Tang A, Baartz D, Khoo SK<br />
1430 – 1600 SESSION 5<br />
GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY<br />
Sponsored by tyco Healthcare<br />
Chairs: R Houghton, KG Huang<br />
1430 – 1500 DVD presentations on aspects of<br />
laparoscopic oncology<br />
Radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer<br />
CL Lee<br />
Radical surgery for ovarian cancer M Andou<br />
Pelvic exenteration<br />
S Puntambekar<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
5
THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
2006>>>>>>>>><br />
1500 – 1515 Comparison of laparoscopic radical<br />
hysterectomy and abdominal radical<br />
hysterectomy in patients with early<br />
cervical cancer<br />
JH Nam<br />
1515 – 1530 Evidence-based approaches to endoscopic<br />
management of gynaecological cancer<br />
A Ferrier<br />
1530 – 1600 Hypothetical issues for debate – What are the<br />
obstacles to the uptake of laparoscopic surgery<br />
in gynaecological oncology<br />
Moderator: N Hacker<br />
Panel: J Carter, A Brand, JH Nam,<br />
A Obermair, CL Lee<br />
1600 – 1630 Afternoon Tea and Trade Exhibition<br />
1630 – 1800 SESSION 6<br />
PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR<br />
Sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Medical<br />
Chairs: G Cario, P Chaisilwattana<br />
1630 – 1700 DVD presentation on laparoscopic pelvic<br />
floor repair, anterior paravaginal repair<br />
and total pelvic floor repair with mesh<br />
D Chou R O’Shea<br />
1700 – 1715 Evidence-based surgery for pelvic<br />
organ prolapse<br />
C Maher<br />
1715 – 1730 What are the limits of endoscopic surgery for<br />
pelvic organ prolapse T Vancaillie<br />
1730 – 1745 Morbidity associated with pelvic floor repair<br />
A Korda<br />
1745 – 1800 Panel – Questions<br />
1800 Close<br />
SATURDAY 19 AUGUST 2006<br />
THE BALLROOM<br />
WESTIN SYDNEY<br />
0700 – 0800 OPTIONAL BREAKFAST SESSION<br />
ADVANCES IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY<br />
Sponsored by tyco Healthcare<br />
HERITAGE BALLROOM – LEVEL 6<br />
0700 – 0715 Total laparoscopic hysterectomy and results<br />
A Obermair<br />
0715 – 0730 Total laparoscopic hysterectomy – converting<br />
from LAVH to TLH with the McCartney Tube<br />
J Tsaltas<br />
0730 – 0745 Complications of TLH R O’Shea<br />
0745 – 0755 Panel discussion<br />
Convenor:<br />
A Lawrence<br />
0800 – 1000 SESSION 7<br />
ENDOMETRIOSIS<br />
Sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Medical<br />
Chairs: O Tsutsumi, J Tsaltas<br />
0800 – 0830 DVD presentation on the anatomical and<br />
technical aspects of resection of<br />
endometriosis – Ovarian, Pouch of<br />
Douglas, recto-sigmoid and vesicoureteric<br />
disease<br />
A Lam<br />
M Andou<br />
0830 – 0845 Can endometriosis surgery improve<br />
quality of life<br />
J Abbott<br />
0845 – 0900 Uterine sparing approaches to adenomyosis<br />
GD Reid<br />
0900 – 0915 When, how and by whom should bowel<br />
resection for endometriosis be performed<br />
M Morgan<br />
0915 – 0930 Ovarian reserve after endometriosis surgery<br />
FH Loh<br />
1900 Coach transportation from<br />
The Westin Sydney to King Street Wharf<br />
1930 – 2300 Cocktail Reception<br />
& Gala Conference Dinner<br />
Sydney Glass Island<br />
Harbour Cruise<br />
2300 Coach transportation from<br />
King Street Wharf to The Westin Sydney<br />
0930 – 1000 Should the primary treatment for endometriosisrelated<br />
infertility be surgery of IVF<br />
R Jansen<br />
1000 – 1030 SESSION 8<br />
PLENARY LECTURE<br />
Chair: D Healy, EL Xia<br />
What’s best for our patients<br />
1030 – 1100 Morning Tea and Trade Exhibition<br />
A Brand<br />
6<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
PROGRAM<br />
1100 – 1200 SESSION 9<br />
LAPAROSCOPY IN DIFFICULT<br />
CIRCUMSTANCES<br />
Sponsored by Stryker<br />
Chairs: C Maher, L Lo<br />
1100 – 1120 Laparoscopy in pregnancy PM Yuen<br />
1120 – 1140 Laparoscopy in the morbidly obese patient<br />
K Loi<br />
1140 – 1200 The unwell patient after laparoscopy<br />
F Stening<br />
1200 – 1300 SESSION 10<br />
ADHESIONS<br />
Sponsored by tyco Healthcare<br />
Chair: D Molloy<br />
Transponder Session<br />
Case presentation:<br />
Adhesiolysis for chronic pain – a<br />
medico-legal dilemma<br />
Presenter:<br />
Moderator:<br />
K Karthigasu<br />
D Molloy<br />
Questions to the audience and panel<br />
Panel: T Hugh, A Korda,<br />
F Stening, D Lubowski,<br />
M Cooper, A Lam,<br />
FH Loh, S Evans<br />
1300 – 1400 Lunch and Trade Exhibition<br />
1400 – 1515 SESSION 11<br />
4 simultaneous free<br />
communications sessions<br />
1400 – 1515 FREE COMMUNICATIONS E<br />
ENDOMETRIOSIS<br />
BALLROOM 3<br />
Chairs: O Tsutsumi, J Cook<br />
1400 – 1410 Is history taking important in women with<br />
suspected endometriosis<br />
Condous GS, Lam A<br />
1410 – 1420 Outpatient pelvic examination in the woman<br />
with endometriosis – do abnormal findings<br />
correlate with the presence of rectal disease<br />
Burke C, Karthigasu K, Hart R, Garry R<br />
1420 – 1430 Saline infusion vaginography<br />
(sonovaginography): can we predict rectovaginal<br />
endometriosis<br />
Condous GS, Lam A<br />
1430 – 1440 Laparoscopic resection of bowel endometriosis<br />
Shukla-Kulkarni A, Johnston K, Cooper M, Reid G<br />
1440 – 1450 Outcomes of patients requiring surgery for<br />
rectovaginal endometriosis<br />
Jagasia N, Ang WC, Chen F, Healey M<br />
1450 – 1500 Laparoscopic excision of endometriotic urinary<br />
bladder nodule<br />
Shashian T, Ahmed H, Tsaltas J<br />
1500 – 1510 Abdominal wall endometriosis<br />
Lam C, Seman EI, Behnia-Willison F<br />
1400 – 1515 FREE COMMUNICATIONS F<br />
COMPLICATIONS<br />
BALLROOM 4<br />
Chairs: G Reid, M Insull<br />
1400 – 1410 Preliminary experience in colon repair during<br />
laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy<br />
Koh LW, Sun YL, Chen SY, Huang MH<br />
1410 – 1420 Laparoscopic reanastamosis for low ureter<br />
injury<br />
Wu TP, Sa L, Lee CL<br />
1420 – 1430 Successful repair of vesico-vaginal fistula at the<br />
critical site under endoscopic guiding - A video<br />
presentation<br />
Lee JC, Lin WC, Yeh LS, Shih CL<br />
1430 – 1440 Vaginal vault evisceration after total<br />
laparoscopic hysterectomy: A presentation of<br />
12 cases<br />
Park Y, Lee CN, Chung C, Kim I, Chang T<br />
1440 – 1450 Ureteric injuries and their laparoscopic<br />
management<br />
Puntambekar S<br />
1450 – 1500 Complications of advanced gynaecological<br />
laparoscopic surgery<br />
Sathe R, Puntambekar S<br />
1500 – 1510 A prospective multi-centre study of major<br />
complications experienced during excisional<br />
laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis<br />
Shukla-Kulkarni A, Kaloo PD, Cooper MJW,<br />
Reid G<br />
1400 – 1515 FREE COMMUNICATIONS G<br />
PROLAPSE & MISCELLANEOUS<br />
HERITAGE BALLROOM – LEVEL 6<br />
Chairs: J Abbott, PM Yuen<br />
1400 – 1410 Pre and post operative Magnetic Resonance<br />
Imaging (MRI) in women with multicompartment<br />
pelvic floor prolapse undergoing<br />
laparoscopic pelvic floor reconstruction<br />
Johnston KM, Cario G, Carlton M, Rosen D,<br />
Chou D, Raikes C, Moses D, Masters L<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
7
THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY2006>>>>>>>>>>><br />
PROGRAM<br />
1410 – 1420 Vagina-assisted laparoscopic hystero-colpopexy<br />
with bilateral round ligaments shortening-the<br />
crucial anatomies and simplifying of technique<br />
Lin WC, Lee JC<br />
1420 – 1430 Our experiences in treating cases of uterine<br />
prolapse—Round ligament suspension<br />
with LAVH<br />
Wu CM, Kan YY<br />
1430 – 1440 Techniques of exposure in laparoscopy<br />
Thoma V, Waters N, Hummel M, Garbin O,<br />
Wattiez A<br />
1440 – 1450 Laparoscopic Workshops- Do they Work A<br />
study of the effectiveness of a laparoscopic<br />
suturing and knot tying workshop<br />
Karthigasu K, Hart R<br />
1450 – 1500 Laparoscopic myomectomy using the ACE<br />
harmonic scalpel – A video presentation<br />
Ahmed H, Shashian T, Tsaltas J<br />
1500 – 1510 Surgical approach and case selection in<br />
myomectomy<br />
Waters NV , Thoma V, Wattiez A<br />
1400 – 1510 FREE COMMUNICATIONS H<br />
MISCELLANEOUS<br />
BARNET ROOM – LEVEL 6<br />
Chairs: J Tsaltas, KY See Tho<br />
1400 – 1410 The effects of heated, humidified carbon dioxide<br />
in laparoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial<br />
Manwaring J, Cameron M, Readman E, Maher P<br />
1410 – 1420 Laparoscopic cervical cerclage for recurrent<br />
second trimester miscarriage<br />
Liddell HS, Stone PR<br />
1420 – 1430 The operative role of laparoscopy in chronic<br />
pelvic pain<br />
Hadisaputra W<br />
1430 – 1440 The rectus sheath block in preventing postoperative<br />
wound pain after laparoscopic<br />
gynaecological surgery<br />
Ng PS, Chan S, Sahota DS, Yuen PM<br />
1440 – 1450 Take 500 -the experience of laparoscopic<br />
entry amongst gynaecological surgeons of a<br />
single unit<br />
Burke C, Garry R, Hart R, Karthigasu K<br />
1450 – 1500 A modified method of laparoscopic<br />
presacral neurectomy for the treatment of<br />
midline dysmenorrhea<br />
Chang Y, Tsai E-M, Long C-Y, Lin W-C<br />
1500 – 1510 A case of secondary amenorrhea with disorder<br />
of the uterine cervix<br />
Lin CP, Chou CY<br />
1515 – 1545 Afternoon Tea and Trade Exhibition<br />
1545 – 1600 SESSION 12<br />
CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES<br />
Chairs: H Hoshiai, K Karthigasu<br />
DVD – anatomical and technical aspects<br />
of laparoscopic surgery for correction of<br />
vaginal agenesis<br />
1545 – 1600 Vecchietti procedure M Cooper<br />
1600 – 1800 SESSION 13<br />
THE ADNEXAL MASS<br />
Sponsored by Stryker<br />
Chairs: J Carter, W Hadisaputra<br />
1600 – 1630 DVD presentations on dermoid cysts,<br />
hydrosalpinges, ovarian cysts including<br />
borderline ovarian tumours G Condous<br />
H Hoshiai<br />
1630 – 1645 The hidden dangers of the entrapped ovary<br />
P Mangeshikar<br />
1645 – 1700 Laparoscopic approaches to a suspicious<br />
adnexal mass<br />
F Wong<br />
Transponder Session<br />
Case presentation:<br />
1700 – 1745 The “suspicious” ovarian mass<br />
Presenter: K Karthigasu<br />
Moderator: R Houghton<br />
Questions to audience and panel<br />
Panel: C L Lee, N Hacker, F Wong,<br />
P M Yuen, D Molloy, FH Loh<br />
1745 – 1800 Close A Lam<br />
POSTER EXHIBITION<br />
BALLROOM 1 & 2<br />
All poster presentations will be available for viewing<br />
during morning and afternoon tea and lunch breaks<br />
during the Conference<br />
8<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
CONFERENCE SOCIAL PROGRAM<br />
Cocktail Reception and Gala Dinner<br />
Sydney Glass Island Harbour Cruise<br />
departing King Street Wharf<br />
1900 till 2300<br />
Friday 18 August 2006<br />
Transportation from The Westin Sydney to King Street Wharf<br />
departs at 1900.<br />
Return transportation to The Westin Sydney departs at 2300.<br />
<strong>AGES</strong> PELVIC FLOOR SYMPOSIUM & WORKSHOP VII 2006<br />
<strong>AGES</strong> PELVIC FLOOR SYMPOSIUM & WORKSHOP VII<br />
Anatomy<br />
& Function<br />
of the Female Pelvic Floor<br />
17 & 18 November 2006<br />
Brisbane Australia<br />
Hilton Brisbane<br />
Australian<br />
Gynaecological<br />
Endosocpy<br />
Society Ltd.<br />
LIVE SURGERY<br />
CADAVERIC DISSECTION<br />
INTERACTIVE DISCUSSIONS<br />
International Guest Speakers:<br />
Professor John DeLancey USA<br />
Professor Michel Cosson FRANCE<br />
Platinum sponsor of <strong>AGES</strong><br />
Major Sponsor of <strong>AGES</strong><br />
Chairman: Assoc. Professor Chris Maher<br />
Co-Chairman: Dr Anusch Yazdani<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
9
PROGRAM ABSTRACTS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
Laparoscopic hysterectomy<br />
– a viable surgery<br />
Friday 18 August / Session 1 / 0805 - 0820<br />
See Tho KY<br />
Laparoscopic hysterectomy in its various forms is now 17 years old.<br />
During these years, much have been written and debated about<br />
this operation.<br />
However, it has not established itself as a routine procedure for the<br />
general gynaecologist. It is still not the gold standard operation in the<br />
treatment of benign diseases of the female reproduction system.<br />
This presentation is a personal view and audit on laparascopic<br />
hysterectomy, and is derived from retrospective analysis of 363<br />
cases of hysterectomy performed by the author from April 1995 to<br />
Dec. 2005.<br />
Results: Hysterectomy by the laparoscopic method, be it<br />
laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) or total<br />
laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), was achieved in 303 cases<br />
(83.5%). Uterine fibroids and adenomyosis comprised some<br />
70% of cases. There were 5 malignancies. Uterine size ranged<br />
from 100 grams to 1350 grams, and the operating time from 90-<br />
210 minutes.<br />
Major complications were 3 cases of haemorrhage requiring<br />
transfusion, 2 cases of large bowel injury, 2 cases of ureteric injury<br />
and 2 bladder lacerations. Intraoperative conversion to laparotomy<br />
occurred in 9 patients. These conversions were not the result of<br />
organ injuries.<br />
Conclusion: Laparoscopic hysterectomy is a viable operation in the<br />
surgical management of benign pelvic pathology, and may even be the<br />
preferred method.<br />
Anatomical and technical limits to<br />
laparoscopic hysterectomy<br />
Friday 18 August / Session 1 / 0820 - 0835<br />
Lam A<br />
Laparoscopic hysterectomy is one of the most common major<br />
operations performed in the developed countries. It is an operation<br />
which, despite its commonness, continues to generate mixed<br />
feelings, emotions and perceptions in the mind of the public on the<br />
one hand, controversies and debates amongst surgeons in relation to<br />
indications, techniques and outcomes on the other.<br />
By and large, there is general consensus that the objectives of<br />
hysterectomy should be:<br />
• To remove pathology<br />
• To improve symptoms<br />
• To prevent or minimise morbidity and complications<br />
• To improve quality of life<br />
• In the case of malignancy, to save life<br />
Amongst the methods available to the surgeon, the choice revolves<br />
around the 3 routes:<br />
• Abdominal route<br />
• Vaginal route<br />
• Laparoscopic route<br />
The chosen route offered to every patient should be based on the<br />
principles of;<br />
• Safety<br />
• Efficiency<br />
• Reproducibility<br />
• Cost-effectiveness<br />
• Pain<br />
• Recovery<br />
• Length of hospitalization<br />
• Return to normal life<br />
• Long-term side-effects<br />
The evidence in the literature remains controversial and debates<br />
continue as to which route of hysterectomy is the preferred method.<br />
The surgeon needs to take into consideration the anatomical and<br />
technical factors which may present limits to every case in which<br />
laparoscopic hysterectomy is chosen as the primary approach.<br />
These may include:<br />
Anatomical factors:<br />
• Size<br />
• Shape<br />
• Mobility<br />
• Co-existing pelvic pathology<br />
• Previous surgery eg. C-section<br />
Technical factors:<br />
• Port placement<br />
• Access<br />
• Visibility<br />
• Knowledge and choice of energy sources<br />
• Dissection skills<br />
• Bladder dissection<br />
• Ureteric dissection<br />
• Suturing skills<br />
10<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FRIDAY 18 AUGUST<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
PROGRAM ABSTRACTS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
procedure into a new unsafe procedure. The pitfalls relate to a 2D<br />
optical system, an inability to touch and feel in a conventional way and<br />
also the possibility of being disorientated in this new often “virtual”<br />
environment. Practise, practise, practise is the way to overcome this<br />
small pitfall.<br />
I think that a hidden pitfall of laparoscopic hysterectomy is that<br />
apart from being trendy and having all the advantages of minimally<br />
invasive surgery we must make sure that this technique is<br />
commercially viable and also attractive to our health care dollar<br />
managers and this means optimising disposables and making sure<br />
that bed stays are efficient. After the learning curve has been<br />
negotiated, the operation properly choreographed and a successful<br />
theatre team established, the procedure should not take any<br />
longer than the traditional operation and in general patients should<br />
be discharged in 24-48 hours.<br />
In summary it is all about training, anatomy, the learning curve<br />
and practise.<br />
Author address: Dr Greg Cario. Sydney Womens Endosurgery Centre<br />
A new approach for laparoscopic ovarian<br />
transposition<br />
Friday 18 August / Session 2 / 0930 - 0945<br />
Huang KG<br />
Pelvic irradiation of premenopausal female patients with<br />
gynecological neoplasm constantly induces castration. It is<br />
justified to attempt to preserve normal ovarian function in these<br />
patients, because long term hormone replacement therapy is<br />
expensive and patients' compliance is always poor. For effective<br />
ovarian function preservation, surgical technique and irradiation<br />
plan is important.<br />
Patients under the age of 45 planned for irradiation are suitable<br />
for laparoscopic ovarian transpositon, and there is more benefit<br />
for younger females especially under the age of 40. Ovarian<br />
transposition is absolutely contraindicated for patients with<br />
carcinomatosis, patients with ovarian or tubal cancer<br />
metastasis, and patients with positive ascites or positive<br />
washing cytology. Using Lee-Huang point as the first trocar<br />
entry, ovaries were seperated and infundibulopelvic ligament<br />
were dissected as long as ovaries could be fixed to<br />
anterolateral abdominal wall to avoid direct irradiation and<br />
scattered irradiation. Metal clips should be placed on the<br />
ovarian stump to allow radiologic detection. Ovarian function<br />
is evaluated by symptom/sign and by serial serum FSH, LH and<br />
E2 levels.<br />
According to our experience, using Lee-Huang point as the first<br />
trocar entry, ovaries transposed to anterolateral abdominal wall<br />
above the level of umbilicus 3-4 cm. by laparoscopy is enough to<br />
avoid radiation exposure in conventional whole pelvis irradiation.<br />
Author address: Kuan-Gen Huang, M.D.Taiwan<br />
Laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation<br />
Friday 18 Aug / Session 2 / 0945 - 1000<br />
Andou M, Ikuma K<br />
Background: We developed a laparoscopic reconstruction<br />
technique for the urinary tract in the case of accidental injury, or<br />
ureteral endometriosis.<br />
Materials and methods: Three cases underwent laparoscopic antivesicoureteral<br />
reflux ureteroneocystostomy. Case 1 required<br />
reconstruction of the urinary tract due to accidental transection<br />
during a laparoscopic hysterectomy for a huge fibroid. Case 2<br />
suffered from late ureteral stenosis after a laparoscopic<br />
hysterectomy, probably due to a thermal injury. The stenosis<br />
improved after conservative management using a double J stent.<br />
However, one year after the removal of the double J stent, the<br />
case presented again with right hydronephrosis. We decided to<br />
perform ureteral reimplantation to secure sufficient blood<br />
perfusion. The third case was referred from an urologist because<br />
she was suffering from ureteral endometriosis. On removal of a<br />
double J stent during a stent exchange, the ureter completely<br />
became obstructed so that it was impossible for the new stent to<br />
be inserted. So segmental resection of the lower ureter was<br />
decided. In in all three procedures we used a newly developed DJ<br />
stent introducer, which eliminated the need for cystoscopy.<br />
Results: The post-operative course for all patients was uneventful.<br />
No blood transfusion or reoperation was required. The patients<br />
resumed a regular diet and began ambulation the day after surgery.<br />
Avoidance of tension, torsion and angulation is of paramount<br />
importance for intact anastomosis.<br />
Conclusions: To achieve a quality reconstruction it is important to<br />
master precise suturing techniques. Of course prevention is the best<br />
tactic, but once injury to the ureter occurs, a minimally invasive<br />
reimplantation strategy is the second best option. For endometriosis<br />
cases, removal of questionable tissue is important to eradicate all<br />
pathology and facilitate intact reconstruction. Laparoscopic ureteric<br />
reimplantation is safe and feasible.<br />
12<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FRIDAY 18 AUGUST<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
PROGRAM ABSTRACTS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
2) Cheng YM and Lin BL: Modified sonohysterography immediately<br />
after hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of submucous myoma. J Am<br />
Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9(1):24-28,2002<br />
3) Yang JH and Lin BL: Changes in myometrial thickness during<br />
hysteroscopic resection of deeply invasive submucous myomas. J<br />
Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8(4):501-505,2001.<br />
4) Lin BL, Akiba Y, Iwata Y: One – step hysteroscopic removal of<br />
sinking submucous myoma in two infertile patients. Fertil Steril<br />
74(5):1035-1038,2000<br />
Author address: Bao-Liang Lin, MD, PhD Kawasaki Municipal<br />
Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan<br />
Refererence:<br />
Eldar - Geva et al .Fert & Steril.1998,70:687<br />
Pritts.Ob Gyn Survey.2001,56:483.<br />
Min et al.Human Reprod.2004,19:1.<br />
Author address: David Healy, Monash University Department of<br />
Obstetrics and Gynaecology<br />
Current non surgical approaches to fibroids<br />
Friday 18 August / Session 3 / 1155 - 1215<br />
Endoscopic myomectomy - outcomes &<br />
fertility issues<br />
Friday 18 August / Session 3 / 1135 - 1155<br />
Healy D<br />
Governments demand Evidence-Based Medicine(EBM). I will<br />
discuss application of EBM to uterine fibroids in 4 ways. Firstly,<br />
our retrospective study of the effect of subserosal (SS), intramural<br />
(IM), & submucosal (SM) fibroids on the outcome of assisted<br />
reproductive technology(ART) treatment. We compared treatment<br />
outcome of 106 ART cycles in 88 patients with uterine fibroids.<br />
Pregnancy rates per transfer were 34, 16, 10 & 30 %<br />
respectively in patients with SS, IM, SM & no fibroids. Implantation<br />
rates were 15, 6, 4 & 16% respectively. Both rates were<br />
significantly lower in patients with SM & IM fibroids than in those<br />
with SS fibroids or no fibroids, even when there was no<br />
deformation of the uterine cavity. A subsequent meta-analysis of<br />
fibroids & infertility showed gynecologists had poor quality EBM<br />
data for this issue. This meta-analysis found no confirmation<br />
between IM fibroids & infertility.<br />
Indeed, no evidence that myomectomy will enhance pregnancy<br />
rates for fibroids of any size- unless they distort the uterine cavity.<br />
Thirdly, the endpoint chosen is vital in any analysis of fibroid<br />
surgery outcome. We suggest that the endpoint in such fibroid &<br />
infertile patients must be Birth Emphasizing a Successful Singleton<br />
delivery at Term gestation( BESST). Future directions for <strong>AGES</strong><br />
could be a prospective, randomised study of endoscopic<br />
myomectomy, or not, for infertile patients with BESST as the<br />
outcome. We estimate, at alpha = 0.05,and 80% power, and a<br />
relative sample size of 6 patients without fibroids to 1 fibroid<br />
patient, that the required sample size would be 100 in the fibroid<br />
group and 600 controls.<br />
Lyon SM<br />
Over the last decade uterine artery embolization has become a real<br />
alternative for women either wishing to preserve their uterus or a<br />
less invasive approach to surgery. More than 30,000 women have<br />
undergone this procedure worldwide and currently, between 13,000<br />
to 14,000 uterine artery embolization's are being performed in the<br />
United States annually.<br />
More recently, a number of medical therapies as well as, image<br />
guided high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) have entered trials<br />
overseas. HIFU is already being used clinically to treat myoma,<br />
prostate cancer and pancreatic cancer. Although, some of these<br />
technologies are in their infancy, the future is suggesting truly noninvasive<br />
approaches to many traditionally surgical diseases.<br />
Author address: Dr Stuart M Lyon. Head of Interventional Radiology,<br />
The Alfred Hospital. Honorary Senior Lecturer, Department of Medicine,<br />
Monash University. Melbourne, Victoria<br />
Laparoscopy in treating gynecologic cancer<br />
Friday 18 August / Session 5 / 1430 - 1500<br />
Lee CL<br />
Cervical cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies of the lower<br />
female genital tract. Though there are many debates in treating<br />
gynecologic cancer by laparotomy or laparoscopy, evidences have<br />
mounted that surgical management in gynecologic cancer not only<br />
could decrease either mortality or recurrence rate, it would also<br />
14<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FRIDAY 18 AUGUST<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
PROGRAM ABSTRACTS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
and only one case experienced bowel obstruction. One case<br />
experienced bowel injury and another two cases experienced bladder<br />
injury. They were repaired intraoperatively without any sequel.<br />
Conclusion: Laparoscopic management of early, and in selected<br />
cases, advanced ovarian cancer is safe and feasible and may be as<br />
efficacious as the traditional laparotomy with the advantage of being<br />
minimally invasive.<br />
Author address: M. Andou M.D, Ph.D. Kurashiki Medical Center<br />
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy (LRH):<br />
Evaluation of 203 patients with early<br />
cervical cancer<br />
Comparison with Abdominal Radical<br />
Hysterectomy and analysis by time periods<br />
Friday 18 August / Session 5 / 1500 - 1515<br />
Nam JH<br />
Laparoscopic pelvic exenteration for<br />
advanced pelvic cancers : A review of<br />
16 cases<br />
Friday 18 August / Session 5 / 1430 - 1500<br />
Puntambekar S, Sathe R<br />
Objective: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate,<br />
in a series of 16 patients, the technique, feasibility and Oncological<br />
safety of laparoscopic anterior exenteration for locally advanced<br />
pelvic cancers.<br />
Study design: Since August 2003, 16 patients with locally<br />
advanced pelvic cancer were considered. All patients were in a good<br />
general condition, in the age group of 50-50 yrs of which 12 had<br />
cervical cancer and 4 had bladder cancer.<br />
Results: The median operative time was 180 min. The mean<br />
number of harvested pelvic iliac nodes was 14. All margins were<br />
tumor free. The median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days.<br />
Three patients had postoperative complications; two had sub acute<br />
intestinal obstruction and one had ureteric leak. The median follow up<br />
was 15 months.<br />
Conclusions: Our results have demonstrated the feasibility and<br />
Oncological safety of performing anterior exenteration laparoscopically<br />
in advanced pelvic cancer patients with acceptable morbidity.<br />
Intermediate term follow up validates the adequacy of this procedure.<br />
With recent advances of laparoscopic surgery in gynecology,<br />
laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) with lymphadenectomy<br />
has become a new surgical procedure in the management of<br />
patients with early cervical cancer. However, laparoscopic<br />
surgery for cervical cancer has not been widely used, despite of<br />
many advantages in terms of less pain, short hospital stay,<br />
rapid recovery and so on. Difficulties in learning surgical<br />
techniques and uncertainty in outcomes of surgery were main<br />
obstacles for wide use of this new surgical option. It is true that<br />
only a few reports have published on the survival of LRH in<br />
patients with cervical cancer with long-term follow-up.<br />
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the outcomes of<br />
patients treated by LRH, to compare surgical parameters and<br />
recurrence rates with those of patients treated by conventional<br />
abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) and to analyze<br />
perioperative complications and survival trends over the time<br />
periods for investigating learning curve.<br />
From 1997 to 2005, we performed 203 cases of LRH + PLA<br />
(pelvic lymphadenectomy ± paraaortic lymph node sampling).<br />
Inclusion criteria for the laparoscopic surgery were patients with<br />
FIGO stage IA to IIA. Of 203 patients, 155 patients with stage Ib1<br />
patients were compared to 102 patients who undertaken ARH in<br />
the same period. Also, we divided the LRH patients into two period<br />
groups: the first period from 1997 to 2000 (65 patients) and the<br />
second period from 2001 to 2005 (138 patients).<br />
The number of lymph nodes and the rate of intraoperative and<br />
postoperative complications were similar in both the<br />
laparoscopic and the conventional laparotomy group. The mean<br />
surgery duration and the median length of hospital stay was<br />
significantly shorter in patients treated by laparoscopic surgery<br />
LRH vs. ARH ; 219.3 vs. 238.2 min. and 13 vs. 21 days. Five<br />
(3.2of 155 LRH patients and four (2.8of 142 RH patients<br />
had recurrences. The five year progression-free survival rates<br />
were 96.2 in the LRH group and 96.8in the RH group<br />
(p0.316).<br />
Considering the time period, the mean duration of surgery was<br />
significantly shorter (212.8 vs. 233.9 min) and the numbers of<br />
lymph nodes obtained were also significantly more (36 vs. 27.5)<br />
in the second time period. The median hospital stay and the<br />
number of transfusion were similar in both time periods.<br />
Overall, there were fourteen (14/203, 6.9%) major<br />
perioperative complications including bladder, ureter, vessels<br />
16<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FRIDAY 18 AUGUST<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
PROGRAM ABSTRACTS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
10% of women developed new symptoms after surgery. However,<br />
more women with occult stress urinary incontinence developed<br />
postoperative stress urinary incontinence after endopelvic fascia<br />
plication alone than after endopelvic fascia plication and tensionfree<br />
vaginal tape (RR 5.5, 95% CI 1.36 to 22.32).<br />
Reviewers' conclusions: Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is<br />
associated with a lower rate of recurrent vault prolapse and<br />
dyspareunia than the vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy. These<br />
benefits must be balanced against a longer operating time, longer<br />
time to return to activities of daily living and increased cost of the<br />
abdominal approach. The use of a polyglactin mesh overlay at the<br />
time of anterior vaginal wall repair may reduce the risk of<br />
recurrent cystocele. Posterior vaginal wall repair may be better<br />
than transanal repair in the management of rectoceles in terms of<br />
recurrence of prolapse. Adequately powered randomised controlled<br />
clinical trials are urgently needed.<br />
Author address: Assoc. Professor Christopher Maher. Mater,<br />
Women’s and Wesley Urogynaecology Units, Brisbane<br />
ages<br />
ranzcog<br />
Platinum Sponsor of <strong>AGES</strong><br />
Major Sponsor of <strong>AGES</strong><br />
Trainee<br />
Workshop<br />
1& 2<br />
september<br />
2006<br />
THE BOARDROOM LEVEL 1<br />
ST GEORGE PRIVATE HOSPITAL<br />
1 SOUTH ST, KOGARAH<br />
SYDNEY NSW<br />
18<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
SATURDAY 19 AUGUST<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
PROGRAM ABSTRACTS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
Laparoscopy in pregnancy<br />
Saturday 19 August / Session 9 / 1100 - 1120<br />
Yuen PM<br />
complications. The prevention, recognition and management of<br />
these problems are essential for this surgery to be acceptable.<br />
Methods include the broad use of minimally invasive reinvestigation<br />
as indicated, and that delay in recognising and managing<br />
complications can result in significant morbidity and mortality.<br />
Background: Pregnancy, especially in more advanced gestation,<br />
was considered as an absolute contraindication for laparoscopy. With<br />
the advance in technology and improvement in surgical skill,<br />
laparoscopy has also been employed in advanced pregnancy, mostly<br />
for removal of persistent adnexal mass. We evaluated our 10 years<br />
experience in the performance of laparoscopy for removal of<br />
persistent adnexal mass in the second trimester of pregnancy.<br />
Methods: Between April 1994 and December 2005, 75<br />
consecutive women underwent laparoscopic removal of adnexal<br />
masses that had persisted into the second trimester of pregnancy<br />
in an academic tertiary referral centre. Operative complications,<br />
pregnancy and labor outcomes were evaluated.<br />
Results: The median gestation was 10.5 weeks (range 5-25) at<br />
diagnosis and 16 weeks (range 12-25) at the time of operation.<br />
Only two women required conversion to laparotomy. Cystectomy<br />
was performed in 62 women, oophorectomy in 10 and fenestration<br />
in 3. The median operating time was 50 minutes (range 30-120).<br />
There were no intra-operative complications or major<br />
postoperative complications. No women were given tocolytic<br />
therapy and none developed uterine contractions. There was one<br />
spontaneous abortion 6 weeks after the operation and one woman<br />
was lost to follow up. Of the remaining 73 women, the median<br />
gestation at delivery was 39 weeks (range 33-42) and the median<br />
birthweight was 3155 gms (range 2220 – 4200). Conclusions:<br />
Laparosocpic surgery for persistent adnexal masses in the second<br />
trimester of pregnancy is safe with low maternal and perinatal<br />
morbidity and mortality when performed by experienced surgeons.<br />
Author address: Professor Pong Mo Yuen President of Asia-Pacific<br />
Association of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Therapy<br />
(APAGE). Consultant and Honorary Clinical Associate Professor,<br />
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The<br />
Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong<br />
The unwell patient after laparoscopy<br />
Saturday 19 August / Session 9 / 1140 - 1200<br />
Stening F<br />
Laparoscopy has revolutionised abdominal surgery and, as a<br />
result, has been associated with some unique post operative<br />
Case presentation: Adhesiolysis for chronic<br />
pain – a medico-legal dilemma<br />
Saturday 19 August / Session 10 / 1200 - 1300<br />
Karthigasu K<br />
Adhesions:- Adhesions are a difficult dilemma for all<br />
gynaecologists. Do they cause symptoms Do they cause pain<br />
How can we distinguish which adhesions cause pain Will operating<br />
on them provide relief of symptoms Will operating make the<br />
patients worse Do the risks of surgery outweigh benefits All<br />
these questions we ask ourselves when faced with patients with<br />
possible adhesions. In this session we present a number of cases<br />
and ask an expert panel their opinions on management.<br />
Vecchietti procedure<br />
Saturday 19 August / Session 12 / 1545 - 1600<br />
Cooper M<br />
Mayer-Von Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) Syndrome is a<br />
rare congenital abnormality characterised by normal secondary<br />
sexual characteristics, vaginal aplasia, normal ovaries and a<br />
rudimentary uterus. The prevalence of this anomaly is one case<br />
per 4-5,000 live female births. To produce a functioning<br />
neovagina in affected subjects, management relies on one of<br />
several approaches; non-surgical i.e. Frank technique (1), a<br />
split-thickness skin graft i.e. McIndoes technique (2), sigmoid<br />
colon grafts (3,4) or a combination of surgical and non-surgical<br />
(Vecchietti technique). Numerous variations of these techniques<br />
have also been described.<br />
Giuseppe Vecchietti first described his technique for creating a<br />
neovagina in subjects with Mayer-Von Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser<br />
Syndrome (MRKH) in 1965 (5). The initial description was of an<br />
open abdominal procedure involving a Pfannenstiel incision,<br />
20<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
SATURDAY 19 AUGUST<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
PROGRAM ABSTRACTS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
suspicious ovarian cysts/tumours, debate on the choices of<br />
optimal procedures in their management remains unabated.<br />
After a pre-operative evaluation, the laparoscopic diagnosis of nonmalignancy<br />
is usually reliable. In some centre, there are increasing<br />
uses of intraoperative use of ultrasound scan to further improve<br />
the sonographic diagnosis of pathological characteristics of<br />
adnexal mass prior to the operation. The usefulness and<br />
practicality of intraoperative ultrasonogram will be discussed.<br />
With increasing experience and technological advances,<br />
laparoscopic management of early ovarian cancer is now feasible in<br />
some tertiary centres, this minimally access surgery can<br />
sometimes avoid the need for laparotomy without compromising<br />
on the prognosis provided adequate staging, proper training can<br />
ensure a complete removal.<br />
Conclusions: Regarding the strategies to management<br />
unexpected ovarian malignancy, it must rely on a more stringent<br />
selection of patients to reduce the incidence of unexpected<br />
malignant ovarian tumour diagnosed at laparoscopic procedures.<br />
The gynaecologist, even faced with this situation must be able to<br />
manage appropriately. The appropriate management includes<br />
Case presentation: The ‘suspicious’<br />
ovarian mass<br />
Saturday 19 August / Session 13 / 1700 - 1745<br />
Karthigasu K<br />
Suspicious mass- complex ovarian masses by ultrasound are<br />
not an uncommon presentation to the gynaecologist. One the<br />
first questions we ask ourselves is: could this be cancer<br />
Should I be treating this Is the laparoscope appropriate In this<br />
session we present a number of cases and ask the expert panel<br />
advice in trying to determine what mass is most likely to be<br />
neoplastic and requires referral to a gynaecology oncologist,<br />
which masses require open surgery and which are suitable for<br />
laparoscopic surgery.<br />
1. Full preoperative discussion and counseling with all patients with<br />
a likelihood of malignancy. The extent of surgery to be taken if<br />
malignancy is found and its impact on fertility and subsequent<br />
chemotherapy have to be discussed.<br />
2. There should be frozen section facility and gynaecological<br />
oncologist to stand by especially if the preoperative assessment<br />
with ultrasound scan or tumour markers raises any clinical<br />
suspicions of malignancy.<br />
3. Avoid uncontrolled puncture and spillage of any suspicious<br />
adnexal mass if at all possible<br />
4. Liberal use of endoscopic bag for specimen retrieval to avoid<br />
future port site metastasis.<br />
5. If malignancy encountered at laparoscopy or confirmed<br />
pathologically by frozen section, ensure adequate staging and<br />
cytoreductive procedures are performed by laparotomy as soon<br />
as possible<br />
Author addess: Felix Wong WS, Tel: 02-98285686 Mobile:<br />
0418207049 Address: University of New South Wales, Liverpool<br />
Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia<br />
22<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
A<br />
and cup in use at Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and a short tribute<br />
to the late Dr Nicholas Biswas.<br />
Author address: Samuel Soo Endoscopic Gynaecological Surgery<br />
Fellow, Harry Merkur<br />
Sydney West Advance Gynaecological Endoscopy Unit<br />
Sydney West Advance Pelvic Surgery Unit<br />
Sydney West Area Health Service<br />
A modified technique of LAVH using a<br />
Biswas uterovaginal elevator (BUVE) for<br />
uteri weighing 500 gm or more<br />
Friday 18 August / Free Communications A / 1400 - 1410<br />
Lee ETC, Wong FWS<br />
Objectives: The objective is to evaluate the surgical outcome<br />
of a new technique of LAVH using the BUVE for uteri weighing<br />
500 gm or more.<br />
The plasma trissector at laparoscopic<br />
hysterectomy – a video presentation<br />
Friday 18 August / Free Communications A / 1350 - 1400<br />
Soo S, Merkur H, Hardas G<br />
Introduction: Bipolar in the form of PK technology from Gyrus<br />
ACMI has been available for a few years now with variable uptake<br />
in Gynaecological Surgery units across Australia. The main claimed<br />
advantage to PK technology is the use of pulsatile bipolar<br />
diathermy to minimize lateral tissue spread with optimal sealing of<br />
vascular pedicles. The introduction of the new Plasma Trissector<br />
allows vascular pedicles to be sealed and cut with the same<br />
instrument. This may have implications towards reduced operating<br />
times and the safety of using one power source.<br />
Video objective: To discuss the physics of the delivery of<br />
electrical energy in PK technology. To demonstrate our<br />
experience with the use of the Plasma Trissector at<br />
Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy and Total<br />
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. To discuss the advantages,<br />
disadvantages and limitations of the instrument.<br />
Setting: Advanced gynecological endoscopy teaching hospitals.<br />
Author address: Samuel SOO Endoscopic Gynaecological Surgery<br />
Fellow, Harry Merkur, George Hardas<br />
Sydney West Advance Gynaecological Endoscopy Unit<br />
Sydney West Advance Pelvic Surgery Unit<br />
Sydney West Area Health Service<br />
Methods: This was a retrospective review of 31 consecutive<br />
cases of LAVH involving uteri weighing 500 gm or more using the<br />
BUVE between October 2003 and May 2006. Variables analysed<br />
included patient demographics, operative time, concomitant<br />
surgeries, uterine weight, hospital stay, intraoperative and<br />
postoperative complications. The laparoscopic part included the<br />
securing of upper uterine pedicle, bladder flap preparation, and<br />
anterior and posterior colpotomies. Vaginal removal of the large<br />
uteri was performed using the morcellation technique of `rotational<br />
deep spiral cut’.<br />
Results: The mean operative times for the laparoscopic part,<br />
vaginal part and the total procedure were 25.55 + 12 minutes,<br />
55 + 16 minutes, and 95 + 27 minutes respectively. The mean<br />
uterine weight was 668 +/- 158 grams (range 500 - 1100<br />
grams). The mean blood loss was 217.74 +150.86 ml (range 50<br />
- 800 ml). The mean length of hospital stay was 1.45 + 0.623<br />
days (range 1 – 3 days). There was no major intraoperative or<br />
postoperative complication in these patients. Three patients had<br />
intraoperative haemorrhage requiring blood transfusion (10%).<br />
Postoperative complication included 1 postoperative bleeding which<br />
did not require surgical intervention. No febrile morbidity or injury<br />
to ureter, bowel, major vessels or bleeding or haematoma<br />
requiring conversion, readmission or re-operation.<br />
Conclusions: LAVH using the BUVE can eliminate the need for<br />
laparotomy in performing hysterectomies even for large uteri<br />
weighing > 500 grams. The BUVE can serve to steady the cervix<br />
and can achieve a full range of uterine manipulation. It also allows<br />
safe and easy dissection of the bladder and avoids ureteric injury<br />
as the surgical field is far from the ureters. The uterosacral<br />
ligaments become obvious to identify while they are placed under<br />
tension thus allowing intrafascial type of hysterectomy to be<br />
performed. The BUVE also provides an absolute vaginal seal and<br />
the pneumoperitoneum is maintained at all times. The technique<br />
described incorporates the merits of both laparoscopic and vaginal<br />
approaches with a unique uterine morcellation technique for large<br />
uteri. In the surgeon’s own experience, the procedure is<br />
reproducible, safe and versatile.<br />
Author address: Eric T C Lee, Tel: 852-25212567 Department of<br />
O&G, Canossa Hospital, Old Peak Road, Hong Kong, China. Felix W S<br />
Wong, University of New South Wales, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW<br />
2170, Australia<br />
24<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
B<br />
Conclusions: Uterine morcellation is a safe approach to the<br />
piecemeal removal an enlarged uterus at time of TLH. Although<br />
the uterine morcellation is peformed for larger specimens, it is not<br />
associated with longer operating times or greater EBLs. An<br />
enlarged uterus alone is not a contra-indication to TLH. We<br />
acknowledge that sample sizes are small and therefore p-values<br />
are not easily significant.<br />
Author address: George S Condous and Alan Lam. Centre for<br />
Advanced Reproductive Endosurgery, Royal North Shore Hospital,<br />
University of Sydney, Sydney<br />
FREE COMMUNICATIONS B<br />
LAPAROSCOPIC ONCOLOGY<br />
respect to disease free survival with 80% power and · = 0.05.<br />
Equivalence will be assumed if the difference in DFS does not<br />
exceed 7 per cent at 4 years. Secondary outcomes include<br />
treatment related morbidity, postoperative pain and analgesic<br />
consumption; costs and cost-effectiveness; patterns of recurrence<br />
(date and localisation of first recurrence – local, vault, pelvis,<br />
distal); and overall survival. All data from this multicentre<br />
study will be entered using online electronic case report forms (e-<br />
CRF), allowing real time assessment of data completeness and<br />
patient follow-up.<br />
Conclusions: The LACE trial will allow to establish the<br />
equivalence of a total laparascopic surgical approach for patients<br />
with stage 1 endometrial cancer following a two stage protocol to<br />
accommodate potential windfalls to patient recruitment.<br />
Author address: Andreas Obermair, Val Gebski, Peta Forder, Dan<br />
Jackson, Gail Williams and Monika Janda for the LACE Trialists Group<br />
Laparoscopic Approach to Carcinoma of the<br />
Endometrium (LACE)<br />
Friday 18 August / Free Communications B / 1330 - 1340<br />
Obermair A, Gebski V, Forder P, Jackson D,<br />
Williams G, Janda M<br />
Purpose: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological<br />
malignancy in Australia and in other countries of the developed<br />
world. Current standard treatment involves open surgery to<br />
remove the uterus, and both tubes and ovaries (TAH). The<br />
Laparoscopic Approach to Cancer of the Endometrium (LACE) trial<br />
was designed and implemented to assess equivalence of<br />
performing this in a total laparoscopic approach (TLH).<br />
Laparoscopic procedures appeal to patients and patients<br />
frequently request to be treated by laparoscopic procedures even<br />
if these are not proven to be equivalent.<br />
Methods: Patient recruitment for this trial was designed to<br />
proceed along two stages to accommodate for a potential increase<br />
in patient requests of laparoscopic surgery. During the first stage,<br />
patients are randomised in a 2:1 allocation to receive TLH or TAH.<br />
The primary endpoint for this stage is quality of life (QoL) at 6<br />
month post-surgery, requiring 180 patients to be enrolled to have<br />
80% power at · = 0.05 to detect a clinically significant difference<br />
of 8 points on the Functional Assessment of Cancer General<br />
(FACT-G) QoL measurement instruments. If additional recruitment<br />
of patients seems impossible after accrual of 180 patients, this<br />
cohort will be followed for 4 years, and disease free survival (DFS)<br />
of patients treated by TLH will be compared to disease free<br />
survival within the population of endometrial cancer patients.<br />
During the second stage, recruitment will be extended to a total of<br />
590 patients in a 1:1 TLH: TAH allocation. This sample size will<br />
allow to assess the equivalence of these two procedures with<br />
Completely total laparoscopic radical<br />
hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer;<br />
Initial reports<br />
Friday 18 August / Free Communications B / 1340 - 1350<br />
Lee YS, Lee JM, Kim BS, Cho YL, Park IS<br />
Objectives: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the<br />
surgical outcomes and to discuss the role of completely total<br />
laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the cervical cancer.<br />
Methods: Among the 63 patients of cervical cancer patients,<br />
forty five patients who underwent total laparoscopic radical<br />
hysterectomy between November 2003 and April 2005 in the<br />
Kyungpook national university hospital were studied prospectively.<br />
Among them, 40 patients had completely total laparoscopic<br />
radical hysterectomy (89%), including laparoscopic removal of<br />
upper vagina and closure of vaginal stump but five patients needed<br />
upper vaginal incision and suturing through vagina (11%).<br />
Results: Mean age was 47.2. Mean BMI was 24.1±2.8. FIGO<br />
stage were stage 1, 37cases and IIA were 3 cases. Mean<br />
operative time was 215.4±51.1 (84-280) minutes and mean<br />
blood loss was 186.5±155.3 (40-800) mL. Mean time for<br />
laparoscopic closure of vaginal stump was 15.4±5.3 (8-30) min.<br />
There was one bladder injury in intraoperative. There were one<br />
ileus and one vesicovaginal fistula and 2 vaginal stump infection at<br />
the postoperative period. Mean postoperative hospital stay were<br />
8.6±3.1 (5~20) days. Mean self voiding day was 11.4±6.3<br />
(4~29)days. All resected margins were tumor free. The mean<br />
number of retrieved pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes were<br />
26<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
B<br />
Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy<br />
versus abdominal hysterectomy in patients<br />
with early stage endometrial cancer: 10<br />
year experience<br />
Friday 18 August / Free Communications B / 1350 - 1400<br />
Nam JH, Yoon J, Kim DY, Suh DS, Kim JH,<br />
Kim YM, Kim YT<br />
Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and<br />
to compare surgical parameters and recurrence rate of these with<br />
those of conventional abdominal surgery in patients with<br />
endometrial cancer.<br />
Methods: From August 1997 to June 2006, we have performed<br />
163 cases of LAVH (laparoscope-assisted vaginal hysterectomy)<br />
with or without lymph node dissection. Laparoscopic approach was<br />
adapted in patients with FIGO clinical stage I by imaging study. Of<br />
the 163 patients, 150 patients who were proved to be surgical<br />
stage I and II were enrolled in this comparative study. As a control<br />
group, we selected 168 cases for the laparotomy group of the<br />
same stages.<br />
Results: The mean duration of surgery, the amount of blood<br />
transfusion and hemoglobin changes were similar in both the<br />
laparoscopic and the conventional laparotomy group. The mean<br />
duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter in patients<br />
treated by laparoscopic surgery (10.1 vs. 15.6 days). The number<br />
of lymph node obtained was significantly higher in the laparoscopic<br />
group. three year recurrence-free survival rates were 97.4% in<br />
laparoscopic group and 98.3% in laparotomy group. (p=0.451)<br />
Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of early<br />
stage endometrial cancer is safe and effective alternatives in<br />
terms of perioperative complications. Overall and recurrence-free<br />
survival did not differ significantly in both groups, however long<br />
term risk for recurrence and survival has yet to be defined.<br />
Author address: Joon Yoon, M.D. Dept. of OB/GYN, Asan medical<br />
Center, 388-1 Poongnap-dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736, Seoul, Korea Tel :<br />
+82 2 3010 3628, E-mail: bestjuny@hanmail.net Joo-Hyun Nam, Joon<br />
Yoon, Dae-Yeon Kim, Dae-Sik Suh, Jong-Hyeok Kim, Yong-Man Kim, Young-<br />
Tak Kim Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan<br />
College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea<br />
Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy (LRT)<br />
in Korea<br />
Friday 18 August / Free Communications B / 1400 - 1410<br />
Nam JH, Kim JH, Kim DY, Suh DS, Kim YM,<br />
Kim YT, Kim SH, Kim DJ, Kim YB<br />
Objectives: Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy with pelvic<br />
lymphadenectomy(LRH) is now increasingly performed in Korea for<br />
the young patients with early-stage cervical cancer. We evaluated<br />
the feasibility and the outcome of LRH performed in Korea.<br />
Methods: We performed retrospective chart review of the<br />
patients who received LRH at the representative centers in Korea<br />
between January 1995 and June 2006.<br />
Results: Thirty-one patients were enrolled in this study. Median<br />
age of the patients was twenty-nine years (range 25-36). Number<br />
of patients was three in stage Ia1 (9%), five in stage Ia2 (16%),<br />
twenty-two in stage Ib1 (69%) and one in stage IIa (3%). Twentysix<br />
patients were squamous cell carcinoma (81%), four patients<br />
were adenocarcinoma (13%) and one patient was adenosquamous<br />
carcinoma. Median operation length was 263 minutes (range 120-<br />
494). Median blood loss was 290cc (range 60-1600). LRH were<br />
changed to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in three patients<br />
because of positive lymph node (two patients) and parametrial<br />
invasion and they all received chemoradiation. Median hospital stay<br />
was 8.5 days and there was no intraoperative or postoperative<br />
complication. Three patients tried pregnancy and two patients<br />
succeeded in delivery. Three patients who were successful in LRH<br />
received adjuvant chemotherapy. Two patients were recurred, but<br />
treated successfully by chemoradiation and 2-year disease-free<br />
survival was 100%.<br />
Conclusions: LRH is supposed to be a safe and effective<br />
treatment modality for the young patients with early cervical cancer<br />
and conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy may be able to<br />
be substituted with LRH for such patients. But more follow-up is<br />
required to evaluate the ability of LRH to preserve fertility.<br />
Author address: Jong Hyeok Kim, M.D. Dept. of OB/GYN, Asan<br />
medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736, Seoul, Korea.<br />
Tel : +82 2 3010 3643 E-mail: hyeokkim@amc.seoul.kr Joo Hyun Nam 1 ,<br />
Jong Hyeok Kim 1 , Dae Yeon Kim 1 , Dae Sik Suh 1 , Yong Man Kim 1 , Young Tak<br />
Kim 1 , Sung Han Kim 2 , Dong Jin Kim 3 , Yong Bong Kim 4 Department of<br />
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center 1 , Kosin University Gospel<br />
Hospital 2 , Seoul Medical Center 3 , Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital 4 , Korea<br />
28<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
C<br />
FREE COMMUNICATIONS C<br />
HYSTEROSCOPY<br />
Hysteroscopic metroplasty for unicornuate<br />
uterus to improve reproductive outcome<br />
Friday 18 August / Free Communications C / 1330 - 1340<br />
Tandulwadkar S, Margale A<br />
A video of an Innovative Surgery in case of unicornuate uterus with<br />
recurrent pregnancy losses at 16 –20 weeks will be presented.<br />
With the help of versa point hysteroscopic metroplasty has been<br />
performed so as to convert tubular cavity into a triangular cavity<br />
resembling normal cavity.<br />
Conclusion: Reduced intrauterine capacity is the probable cause<br />
for recurrent abortions or preterm delivery in case of unicornuate<br />
uterus. Keeping this in mind, we have innovated this hysteroscopic<br />
surgery to improve the reproductive outcome in case of<br />
unicornuate uterus. Our patient had a successful 33 weeks<br />
delivery after this reconstructive surgery that had previous 3<br />
pregnancy losses between 16-20 weeks of gestation inspite of<br />
cervical encircalage.<br />
Author address: Dr. Sunita Tandulwadkar, Chief, Ruby Hall IVF and<br />
Endoscopy Centre, Pune, India.<br />
Dr. Ashwini Margale, DNB Student, Ruby Hall IVF and Endoscopy Centre,<br />
Pune, India.<br />
Affiliation: Ruby Hall IVF and Endoscopy Centre, Pune, India<br />
A randomised controlled trial comparing<br />
Microwave Endometrial Ablation (MEA )<br />
and Mirena ® (levonorgestrel-releasing<br />
intra-uterine device) in the treatment<br />
of menorrhagia.<br />
Friday 18 August / Free Communications C / 1340 - 1350<br />
Behnia-Willison F, Cook J, Seman EI, Lam C,<br />
Manifold E, Agniewska, O’Shea RT<br />
Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding is a major clinical<br />
problem, with significant effects on quality of life. It accoun<br />
ts for 12% of referrals to gynaecological outpatients in<br />
Western countries.1<br />
Objective: To compare the subjective and objective outcomes for<br />
two methods for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding;<br />
I) Mirena ® (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device)<br />
II)<br />
MEA (microwave endometrial ablation)<br />
Method: 90 women presenting to the gynaecology outpatients<br />
department with heavy menstrual bleeding were assigned to one of<br />
two treatment arms. Three quality of life questionnaires were<br />
administered pre-operatively and at 3 monthly intervals postoperatively<br />
up to 2 years. These included two condition specific<br />
QOL questionnaires (Menstrual Severity Scale, Pictorial Blood Loss<br />
Assessment Chart) and a generalised QOL questionnaire<br />
(WHOQOL-BREF).<br />
Results: There was one major complication in the MEA group<br />
(haematometra) and no major complications in the Mirena ®<br />
group.The MEA group demonstrated a higher satisfaction rate<br />
and lower objective measurement of blood loss as determined by<br />
quality of life questionnaires.<br />
Conclusion: MEA achieved a greater improvement in quality of<br />
life parameters than Mirena ® .<br />
Reference:<br />
1. Cooper KG, Parkin DE, Garratt AM, Grant AM. A randomised<br />
comparison of medical and hysteroscopic management in<br />
women consulting a gynaecologist for treatment of heavy<br />
menstrual loss. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:1360-6<br />
30<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
D<br />
Method: Retrospective study of 39 pregnancies after 1621<br />
procedures of TCRE.<br />
Results: Among 1621 women who were successful followedup<br />
after TCRE, there were 39 pregnancies in 32 women,<br />
including five ectopic pregnancies (12.8%) and 34 intrauterine<br />
pregnancies (87.2%). The majority of pregnancies (84.6%)<br />
occurred within the first two years. In the first year after TCRE,<br />
the incidence of pregnancy was 1.5%. 32 cases with<br />
intrauterine pregnancy were terminated under ultrasound<br />
guidance with 2 difficult procedures. Only one pregnancy in our<br />
study resulted in spontaneous miscarriage which was managed<br />
by suction curettage. One term pregnancy had placenta increta<br />
resulting in caesarean hysterectomy.<br />
Conclusions: Pregnancies after TCRE are associated with<br />
increased risk and Clinicians should be aware of the various<br />
complications of pregnancy that may occur after TCRE, including<br />
an increased risk of ectopic pregnancy. Surgical termination of<br />
pregnancy after TCRE is potentially a difficult procedure and should<br />
be carried out under ultrasound guidance.<br />
Author address: Enlan Xia 1, 3 ; Tin-Chiu Li 2 ; Dan Yu 1, 2 ; Xiaowu Huang<br />
1; Jie Zheng 1 ; Yuhuan Liu 1 and Mei Zhang 1<br />
1 Hysteroscopic Center, Fuxing Hospital affiliate of Capital University of<br />
Medical Sciences, Beijing 100038, China.<br />
2 The Jessop Wing, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, S10 2SF, UK<br />
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed.<br />
Email: xiaenlan@public.bta.net.cn<br />
Stage IIA – IIIA: a) No role of laparoscopy as a primary modality.<br />
b) Chances of transcoelomic spread.<br />
c) Following down-staging – following anterior<br />
chemo therapy or as a second look in patients<br />
with chemical recurrence(CA-125 rising)<br />
Stage IIIC: All patients who have peritoneal deposits. CO2<br />
insufflation is not going to add to further transcoelomic spread. So<br />
if optimal debulking can be achieved with minimal residual disease<br />
by laparoscopy then early adjuvent therapy namely chemo therapy<br />
can be given. In all of the cases tumours are removed per vaginally<br />
to prevent port metastasis.<br />
Retroperitoneal and Para- aortic dissection: Laparoscopy is the best<br />
and minimal invasive method for para aortic lymphnode dissection in<br />
post chemotherapy patients with nodes positive status.<br />
Conclusion: We have the experience of doing laparoscopy in<br />
every stage of ovarian cancers as listed above. In conclusion there<br />
is a definite role of laparoscopy at every stage of ovarian cancers,<br />
especially in later stages also. Judiciousness and rationalism<br />
should be the key factors in deciding the final outcome.<br />
Author address: Dr. Ravi Sathe. Dr. Shailesh Puntambekar. Galaxy<br />
Laparoscopy Institute, Pune. India<br />
FREE COMMUNICATIONS D<br />
OVARIAN AND ADNEXAL DISEASE<br />
Preoperative discrimination between benign<br />
and malignant ovarian cysts treated<br />
surgically in an Australian tertiary centre<br />
Friday 18 August / Free Communications D / 1340 - 1350<br />
Role of laparoscopy in ovarian tumours<br />
Daly JO, Huang A, Ang WC, Healey M.<br />
Friday 18 August / Free Communication D / 1330 - 1340<br />
Sathe R, Puntambekar S<br />
Introduction: Laparoscopy has proved to be the preferred<br />
modality for all types of gynaecological surgeries, but literature<br />
says it has no use in ovarian tumours because of chances of<br />
metastasis.The study was designed to find out if there was any<br />
role of laparoscopy in the management of ovarian cancers.<br />
Materials and Methods:<br />
Role of laparoscopy in various stages:<br />
Stage IA : Non-epithelial –Stromal and Germ cell tumours.<br />
Accidentally found tumours, total excision without spillage possible.<br />
Objective: To report a series of surgically treated ovarian cysts<br />
and analysis of the characteristics associated with benign and<br />
malignant cases.<br />
Population/Setting: All public patients diagnosed with an<br />
ovarian cyst undergoing surgery at the Royal Women’s Hospital,<br />
Melbourne, Australia, between July 2001 and June 2003.<br />
Methods and Materials: Patients were identified through the<br />
operating theatre reporting system and their medical records<br />
reviewed. Information was collated regarding their clinical and<br />
ultrasonographic features, tumour markers and final diagnosis.<br />
The Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) was calculated for each<br />
patient. These data were analysed to identify those features<br />
associated most strongly with benign or malignant cysts.<br />
32<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
D<br />
Author address: Dr. Sunita Tandulwadkar, Chief, Ruby Hall IVF and<br />
Endoscopy Centre, Pune, India. Dr. Ashwini Margale, DNB Student, Ruby<br />
Hall IVF and Endoscopy Centre, Pune, India.<br />
Affiliation: Ruby Hall IVF and Endoscopy Centre, Pune, India<br />
Author address: Dr Yasmin T. Tan, Paediatric and Adolescent<br />
Gynaecology Fellow, Royal Hospital for Women Email:<br />
Yasmin.Tan@SESIAHS.HEALTH.NSW.GOV.AU Tel: (02) 9382 6111 Page:<br />
43268. Address: Royal Hospital for Women Barker Street, Randwick<br />
NSW 2031. Affiliations: Department of Endo-Gynaecology, Royal Hospital<br />
for Women, Sydney<br />
Laparoscopic detorsion and oophoropexy<br />
for treatment of ovarian torsion<br />
Friday 18 August / Free Communications D / 1410 - 1420<br />
Tan YT, Lyons SD, De Decker AP, Vancaillie TG<br />
A medical management of interstitial<br />
ectopic pregnancy: A five year clinical study<br />
Friday 18 August / Free Communications D / 1420 - 1430<br />
Introduction: Adnexal torsion is the fifth most common<br />
gynaecologic surgical emergency, with an incidence of 2.7%1. It<br />
remains both a diagnostic and management challenge. Salpingooophorectomy<br />
is commonly performed, as the torted adnexum<br />
is considered unsalvageable. Alternatively, conservative surgery<br />
may occur with additional cystectomy or cyst drainage. We<br />
describe a treatment method aimed at conservation of adnexal<br />
structures and preservation of reproductive potential.<br />
Method: Laparoscopy is established in the standard fashion.<br />
Upon confirmation of ovarian torsion, attention is turned<br />
towards management of the ovarian cyst. If prior imaging and<br />
clinical characteristics are consistent with a benign entity then<br />
treatment of the cyst via fenestration may be attempted.<br />
Alternatively, the cyst may be left intact so as not to further<br />
compromise ovarian tissue. Detorsion of the involved structures<br />
should then be performed and the ovary and fallopian tube<br />
observed for revascularisation. In the absence of reperfusion<br />
then oophorectomy/salpingectomy is required. If the ovary is<br />
conserved the potential for recurrent torsion should be<br />
addressed. Oophoropexy may be performed by placing a<br />
concertina suture in the ovarian ligament. The ovarian ligament<br />
is consequently shortened and the axis of torsion disrupted2.<br />
The patient is observed in hospital for a further 24 hours, and<br />
then discharged. Sonographic follow-up is arranged to monitor<br />
for cyst resolution and resumption of normal ovarian vascularity,<br />
architecture and follicular formation.<br />
Conclusion: Conservative laparoscopic surgical management<br />
of adnexal torsion should be attempted as it may protect<br />
reproductive potential. We describe a safe and effective method<br />
of detorsion and oophoropexy.<br />
References:<br />
1. Hibbard LT. Adnexal torsion. American Journal of Obstetrics<br />
and Gynaecology 1985; 152:456-61.<br />
2. Vancaillie T & Schmidt EH. Recovery of ovarian function after<br />
laparoscopic treatment of acute adnexal torsion. Reproductive<br />
Medicine 1987; 32:561-62.<br />
Tang A, Baartz D, Khoo SK<br />
Background: Interstitial ectopic pregnancy is rare; however, it<br />
poses a challenge in diagnosis and management due to its<br />
anatomic location. Medical treatment with local or systemic<br />
methotrexate has been considered a safer alternative to surgical<br />
resection by laparotomy or laparoscopy, an example of “the limits<br />
of endoscopic surgery”.<br />
Aim: From an audit of management of interstitial pregnancies, to<br />
determine the treatment success rate with a single dose intravenous<br />
methotrexate / folinic acid regimen and to identify predictors of<br />
treatment outcome.<br />
Methods: A 5 year retrospective audit (April 2000 – August 2005)<br />
of 13 consecutive interstitial pregnancies was carried out, collecting<br />
data on serum beta human chorionic gonadotrophin (‚-hCG) level, size<br />
of gestation sac, gestational age and presence of fetal heart motion<br />
so they could be tested for their influence on treatment success.<br />
Time taken for complete ‚-hCG resolution was recorded and a<br />
negative ‚-hCG result was used as an endpoint of successful outcome.<br />
Results: Of the 13 cases, 2 required urgent surgery for rupture on<br />
presentation. In the remaining 11 cases, intravenous methotrexate<br />
(300mg) was used, with oral folinic acid rescue (15mg x 4 doses).<br />
There were no side effects. Complete ‚-hCG resolution was achieved<br />
in 10 of the 11 medically treated cases (91% success rate),<br />
requiring 21 – 129 days. Successful outcome was seen with initial ‚-<br />
hCG level as high as 106 634 IU/L and gestation sac as large as<br />
6cm and a live fetus.<br />
Conclusion: The methotrexate / folinic acid regimen used as a one<br />
dose treatment is safe and effective for unruptured interstitial<br />
pregnancy, with no side effects and the advantage of avoiding invasive<br />
surgery. Subsequent tubal patency and reproductive function are yet<br />
to be ascertained.<br />
Author address: Amy Tang, David Baartz and Soo Keat Khoo<br />
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Queensland,<br />
Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia<br />
34<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
E<br />
Saline infusion vaginography<br />
(sonovaginography): can we predict<br />
rectovaginal endometriosis<br />
Saturday 19 August / Free Communications E / 1420 - 1430<br />
Condous GS, Lam A<br />
Objectives: The aim of this pilot study was to perform saline<br />
infusion vaginography or sonovaginography in order to establish the<br />
presence or absence of recto-vaginal endometriosis. We also wanted<br />
to establish normative data for the recto-vaginal septum.<br />
Methods: To achieve these aims we performed saline infusion<br />
transvaginal sonography or sonovaginography during the general<br />
anaesthetic at the time of the woman’s laparoscopy. Women<br />
underwent 2-D greyscale sonovaginography intra-operatively and just<br />
before laparoscopy was performed. The rectovaginal septum was<br />
measured (mm) at three points in the longitudinal plane: at the<br />
posterior fornix; at the mid rectovaginal septum; and at the level<br />
above perineal body. The ultrasonographer (GC) predicted whether<br />
there was a rectovaginal nodule or not. The women proceeded to<br />
laparoscopy (AL) and the presence of a normal or abnormal<br />
rectovaginal septum was recorded with histological confirmation of<br />
endometriosis in the rectovaginal septum being the gold standard.<br />
Results: 11 women to date enrolled in the study. The mean age<br />
was 38.8 years (26 – 48). 72.7% (8/11) had a history of<br />
endometriosis. All women underwent intra-operative<br />
sonovaginography followed by laparoscopy. The mean thickness of the<br />
rectovaginal septum at the posterior fornix, mid rectovaginal septum,<br />
and just above perineal body were 5.4 mm (3.6 – 8.5), 3.4 mm (1.7<br />
– 6.6) and 4.6 mm (2.8 – 6.9) respectively. 9/11 had a negative<br />
sonovaginogram for rectovaginal nodule, i.e. normal rectovaginal<br />
septum and 2/11 had a positive sonovaginogram for rectovaginal<br />
nodule, i.e. abnormal rectovaginal septum. 9/11 had a normal<br />
rectovaginal septum at laparoscopy and 2/11 had an endometriotic<br />
rectovaginal nodule excised at laparoscopy with histological<br />
confirmation.<br />
Conclusions: Sonovaginography may be the tool which delineates<br />
normative data for the rectovaginal septum. In the future,<br />
sonovaginography may be the pre-operative tool of choice to<br />
diagnose rectovaginal disease.<br />
Author address: George S Condous and Alan Lam. Centre for<br />
Advanced Reproductive Endosurgery, Royal North Shore Hospital,<br />
University of Sydney, Sydney<br />
Laparoscopic resection of bowel<br />
endometriosis<br />
Saturday 19 August / Free Communications E / 1430 - 1440<br />
Shukla-Kulkarni A, Johnston K, Cooper M, Reid G<br />
Aim: Surgical treatment of patients with rectal endometriosis is<br />
challenging. The aim of this study was to review the laparoscopic<br />
management of rectal endometriosis by resection.<br />
Method: All cases of complex tertiary referral pelvic<br />
endometriosis requiring laparoscopic surgical intervention of the<br />
bowel were identified and reviewed from a prospective database.<br />
Results: 79 patients between January2000 and May 2006 had<br />
surgical procedures performed for severe rectal endometriosis.<br />
This was a multi disciplinary approach involving two senior<br />
gynecologic laparoscopic surgeons and colorectal surgeons.All<br />
rectal procedures were completed laparoscopically.15% had<br />
shaving of rectal wall lesion, 45% had disc resection of anterior<br />
rectal wall using the ILS system, 35% had laparoscopic assisted<br />
segmental low anterior resection.5% of patients had other sites of<br />
endometriosis on bowel which were managed laparoscopically by<br />
excision. There were no rectal anastomotic leaks.<br />
Conclusions: Patients with complex endometriosis of the bowel<br />
can be safely managed laparoscopically using a multidisciplinary<br />
approach.This case.series suggests that a history of rectal pain<br />
during defecation that occurs only during menstruation is<br />
predictive of females with more extensive rectal disease.<br />
Author address: A Shukla-Kulkarni, Keith Johnston, Michael Cooper,<br />
Geoff Reid Sydney Women’s Endosurgery Centre, St George Hospital,<br />
Kogarah,NSW, Sydney Australia<br />
Outcomes of patients requiring surgery for<br />
rectovaginal endometriosis<br />
Saturday 19 August / Free Communications E / 1440 - 1450<br />
Jagasia N, Ang WC, Chen F, Healey M<br />
Objective: A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate<br />
the outcomes of patients with suspected or previously<br />
diagnosed rectovaginal endometriosis undergoing surgical<br />
treatment at the Royal Women’s Hospital in Melbourne between<br />
January 2004 and June 2006.<br />
Methods and Materials: The hospital’s operating theatre<br />
database and unit’s theatre list bookings diary was used to<br />
36<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
F<br />
Results: The postoperative course of the patient was smooth<br />
and uneventful. She was discharged 4 days after operation.<br />
Conclusions: The incidence of bowel damage during laparoscopic<br />
surgery is 0.5%.33 Damage is most likely to occur while entering<br />
the peritoneal cavity or adhesiolysis. Primary closure either by<br />
laparoscopy or laparotomy was recommended if the patient got<br />
adequate colon prepare before surgery and the golden time is<br />
within 8 hours. Laparoscopic repair should be considered in the<br />
selective management of colon perforation. Prophylactic<br />
antibiotics,profuse peritoneal irrigation and a functioning drainage<br />
should be provided to reduce the risk of infection.<br />
Author address: Lim Woh Koh M.D., Ying Lun Sun M.D.,Shi Yau<br />
Chen M.D., Min Ho Huang M.D. Show Chwan Memorial Hospital,<br />
Changhua, Taiwan Corresponding author: Lim Woh Koh M.D,Department<br />
of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua,<br />
Taiwan, No.542,Section 1, Chung-shan Road,Changhua, Taiwan<br />
Tel:+88647256166 e-mail:klw416@gmail.com<br />
Laparoscopic reanastamosis for low<br />
ureter injury<br />
Saturday 19 August / Free Communications F / 1410 - 1420<br />
Wu TP, Sa L, Lee CL<br />
Purpose: To report our experience with laparoscopic reanastamosis<br />
of the ureter conducted at the ureterovesical junction.<br />
Patient and method: A 40-year-old woman who developed<br />
abdominal distention with ascites 19 days after laparoscopic<br />
hysterectomy. Laparoscopy uretero-ureteral anastomosis carried out.<br />
Cystoscopy and double-J stent removal was done after 4 weeks.<br />
Result: There was no significant intraoperative or<br />
postoperative morbidity. Follow-up imaging revealed good<br />
drainage without consequence.<br />
Conclusion: With obvious benefit, Laparoscopic reanastamosis<br />
could be a more feasible method than reimplantation.<br />
Author address: Tung Pi Wu*, MD MPH, Li Sa, MD*, Chyi-Long<br />
LEE, MD.** *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sinlau Christian<br />
Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan. Duckwu0415@seed.net.tw<br />
Successful repair of vesico-vaginal fistula at<br />
the critical site under endoscopic guiding -<br />
a video presentation<br />
Saturday 19 August / Free Communications F / 1420 - 1430<br />
Lee JC, Lin WC, Yeh LS, Shih CL<br />
Study Objective: To report some key points to the successful<br />
repair of vesico-vaginal fistula under endoscopic guiding.<br />
Design: A case report of vesico-vaginal fistula beneath the<br />
right ureter orifice after laparoscopic assisted vaginal<br />
hysterectomy (LAVH).<br />
Setting: China Medical University Hospital, Taiwan. Tertiary<br />
Medical Center<br />
Case: A 44 Y-O female patient who received LAVH for<br />
adenomyosis and myoma on May 30th, 2005. Clear watery vaginal<br />
discharge noted on the 10th post-operative day.<br />
Intervention: Voiding cystourethrogram and cystoscopy revealed<br />
a vesico-vaginal fistula at the bladder base just beneath the righr<br />
ureteral orifice 2 cm away. Late-repair was performed via vagina 3<br />
months later.<br />
Measurements and Managements: Right ureteral stent<br />
was inserted to identify the right ureter.Under cystoscopic aid,the<br />
V-V fistula was excised and repaired through vagina.It was done<br />
under the guiding of a foley catheter inserted in the fistula. We<br />
repaired the fistula by 3 layers suture in a crossed direction<br />
fashion. The detailed technique will be presented in the vedio. After<br />
surgery, a supra-pubic cystostomy was performed.<br />
Results: The ureteral stent was removed on the third postoperative<br />
day. She was discharge once the urine was clear. The<br />
suprapubic cystostomy was removed 2 weeks later. The whole<br />
course was smooth and the patient was uneventful after following<br />
for 1 year.<br />
Conclusion: When facing a vesico-vaginal fistula near the<br />
ureteral orifice, we always choose transabdominal repair to<br />
prevent ureteral injury. With the aid of ureteral stent insertion and<br />
foley catheter inserted in fistula, this kind of fistula can be repaired<br />
safely through vagina.<br />
Author address: Jui- Chi Lee M.D. Dep.OB/GYN, China Medical<br />
University Hospital Taiwan. No.2, Yuh-Der Road, Taichung City, 404<br />
Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886-4-22052121 Ext.2058, 886-920-122812 (Cell<br />
phone) E-mail: rickylee7890@yahoo.com.tw.<br />
Wu-Chou Lin, Assistant Professor, Director of GYN Endoscopy,<br />
Dep.OB/GYN, China Medical University Hospital Taiwan Chairman of<br />
Taiwan Association of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Laparoscopy<br />
(TAMIG). Lian-Shung Yeh, Assistant Professor, Director of Dep.OB/GYN,<br />
China Medical University Hospital Taiwan.<br />
Chao-Lan Shih Dep.OB/GYN, China Medical University Hospital Taiwan<br />
38<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
F<br />
Results: The median operative time was 130 min and median<br />
blood loss was 50 ml. The patients were discharged on day 3 with<br />
the stents and urinary catheter. All patients had complete<br />
cessation of urinary leak immediate postoperatively. The urinary<br />
catheter was removed after 3 weeks and the DJ stents after 6<br />
weeks. All patients were asymptomatic after 6 months follow-up.<br />
MCU was also done at 6 months to demonstrate that there was<br />
no reflux.<br />
Conclusion: The repair of ureterovaginal fistula can be done<br />
laparoscopically with equal results as open technique and thus<br />
decreases the morbidity of the patients.<br />
Author address: Dr.Shailesh Puntambekar. Galaxy Laparoscopic<br />
Institute Pune. India<br />
Organ Damage: Immediate – Bowel, bladder and ureteric injury,<br />
Entry into liver, omentum during Verres needle insertion,<br />
insufflation of wrong space.<br />
Delayed - Fistulas.<br />
Conclusion: Complications are inevitable part of laparoscopic<br />
surgery. Wherever necessary open surgery has to be<br />
considered to overcome complications. Laparoscopic surgery<br />
has limitations and proper patient selection should stand first<br />
before proper technique.<br />
Author address: Dr. Ravi Sathe. Dr. Shailesh Puntambekar. Galaxy<br />
Laparoscopy Institute, Pune. India<br />
Complications of advanced gynaecological<br />
laparoscopic surgery<br />
Saturday 19 August / Free Communications F / 1450 - 1500<br />
Sathe R, Puntambekar S<br />
Introduction: Laparoscopy has proved its value in surgery to<br />
improve patient care. With the package also come numerous<br />
complications if unrecognized can become serious. This study was<br />
done to evaluate different complications associated with advanced<br />
laparoscopic surgery.<br />
Materials and Methods: 200 cases of laparoscopic radical<br />
hysterectomy and 220 non oncological cases a total of 440 cases<br />
were studied from the year 2002. Complications found were<br />
evaluated for the cause and treated accordingly.<br />
Results: Complications can be divided in to Haemmorhagic,<br />
Oncological, and Organ damage.<br />
General complications: Infections- port site and general,<br />
positional injuries, thromboembolism, Co2 retention, surgical<br />
emphysema nerve injuries, thermal injuries due to energy and<br />
light sources, anaesthetic complications.<br />
Heammorhagic complications:<br />
Causes- Accidental, congestion and neovascularization.<br />
Sites – Uterine A and Internal Illiac Vessels injury, Port site due to<br />
inferior epigastric A. injury.<br />
Inference – Venous bleeding difficult to control.<br />
Oncological Complications: Entry in to tumour, Missed lesion,<br />
incomplete resection and port site metastasis.<br />
A prospective multi-centre study of major<br />
complications experienced during excisional<br />
laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis<br />
Saturday 19 August / Free Comminications F / 1500 - 1510<br />
Shukla-Kulkarni A, Kaloo PD, Cooper MJW, Reid G<br />
Objective: To clarify the rate of major intra-operative and postoperative<br />
complications experienced during excisional surgery<br />
for endometriosis.<br />
Design: Prospective multi-centre observational study set in<br />
two University teaching hospitals and three private hospitals in<br />
Sydney, Australia.<br />
All consecutive subjects undergoing laparoscopic excisional<br />
surgery for minimal to severe endometriosis were recruited<br />
(790 subjects).<br />
Complications were recorded intra-operatively or post-operatively<br />
on a secure computerised patient database.<br />
Major intra- and post-operative complications i.e. inadvertent<br />
visceral or vascular injury or other complications directly related to<br />
surgery that either significantly prolonged the operating time,<br />
delayed discharge or necessitated re-admission.<br />
Results: Seven hundred and ninety subjects were recruited over<br />
a 3-year period. Seven major complications were experienced<br />
(8.8/1000); four bowel injuries, one cystotomy, one ureteric<br />
transection, and one major vascular injury. All visceral or vascular<br />
injuries were diagnosed prior to completion of the surgery. No<br />
significant longterm sequelae were experienced.<br />
Conclusion: The incidence of major complications in this study of<br />
8.8/1000 compares favourably with other similar reports. In view<br />
of the potential symptom relief obtained, the authors continue to<br />
40<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
G<br />
This video displays a laparoscopic technique for hystero-colpopexy.<br />
Bone anchors are shown to permit efficient, precise and<br />
hemostatic anchoring to the bony sacrum. This video should be<br />
useful to surgeons wishing to refine this approach or to use it as<br />
an alternative to an open abdominal procedure.<br />
Author address: Wu-Chou Lin , Jui-Chi Lee<br />
d0562@www.cmuh.org.tw Endoscopic Section, OB-Gyn Depart. China<br />
Medical University Hospital, Taiwan<br />
Our experiences in treating cases of<br />
uterine prolapse –<br />
Round ligament suspension with LAVH<br />
Saturday 19 August / Free Communications G / 1420 - 1430<br />
Wu CM, Kan YY<br />
Uterine prolapse typically is not an isolated event and is most often<br />
associated with a variety of pelvic support defects. While we perform<br />
laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy ( LAVH ) for uterine<br />
prolapse, other procedures to treat pelvic floor prolapse, including<br />
enterocele repair, vaginal vault suspension, and cystourethropexy, can<br />
be done simultaneously. As we know that round ligaments correspond<br />
with uterosacral ligaments for proper position of uterus in pelvic<br />
cavity. We will present one simple and convenient method --- round<br />
ligament suspension combined with LAVH --- for cases of uterine<br />
prolapse. We use prolene 1-0 to suture the round ligament with the<br />
upper margin of vaginal cuff bilaterally. Anterior and posterior<br />
colporrhaphy can be done, or not. Post-hysterectomy vaginal vault<br />
prolapse, anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse, enterocele,<br />
urinary stress incontinence were all surveyed. We have used these<br />
method for over 20 cases, with follow-up time ranging from 6<br />
months to 5 years.<br />
Author address: Chin-Ming Wu M.D., Yuan-Yen Kan M.D M.P.H.<br />
OB-Gyn Depart. Kaohsiung Yuan’s General Hospital, OB-Gyn Depart.<br />
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital<br />
Techniques of exposure in laparoscopy<br />
Saturday 19 August / Free Communications G / 1430 - 1440<br />
Thoma V, Waters N, Hummel M, Garbin O,<br />
Wattiez A<br />
Study Objective: To improve widespread acceptance of<br />
laparoscopy for major and minor gynecological surgery by<br />
demonstrating basic principles to exposure of the surgical field.<br />
The reputation of laparoscopic surgery for being complex, difficult<br />
to perform and to teach can be overcome by returning to<br />
fundamental surgical principles such as ergonomics and more<br />
importantly, adequate exposure.<br />
Design: We demonstrate exposure techniques adapted to the<br />
surgical steps required in the treatment of various pathologies.<br />
Setting: University Hospital of Strasbourg, France.<br />
Patients or Participants: Patients have been selected on the<br />
basis of their pathology.<br />
Interventions: Different laparoscopic exposure techniques are<br />
demonstrated in pictures and in brief videos along with the<br />
resultant improvements in surgical outcomes.<br />
Measurements and Main Results: By commencement of<br />
surgery with correct exposure of the surgical field, the surgeon<br />
can expect four major benefits. Firstly, the assistant goes from<br />
being a sleeping and passive agent to an active and efficient cosurgeon.<br />
Secondly, surgical performance quickly improves by the<br />
attainment of greater comfort and confidence and by the improved<br />
ability of the surgeon to operate with both hands. Thirdly, surgical<br />
safety principles are reinforced, particularly during difficult<br />
moments. Fourthly, although this technique consumes several<br />
minutes at the start of surgery, good exposure will ultimately save<br />
time over the course of procedure.<br />
Conclusion: One of the reasons for the limited of success of the<br />
operation is due to complexity and duration of procedure. One of<br />
the main factors affecting the capacity of the surgeon is ability to<br />
work with majority of instruments available and have good<br />
exposure which spares the assistant.<br />
In laparoscopy, as in conventional surgery the exposure is the key<br />
factor for the success of the procedure. Teaching adequate<br />
exposure should be an integral part of laparoscopic training.<br />
42<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
H<br />
multiple. All patients with rapid growth or suspicion of malignancy<br />
were selected for laparotomy. Both groups had similar utilization<br />
rates of uterine artery occlusion strategies and of LHRH analogs.<br />
Blood loss as reflected by actual haemoglobin drop was similar<br />
between the two groups, but the length of stay was 1.9 times<br />
longer in the laparotomy group (p
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
H<br />
The rectus sheath block in preventing postoperative<br />
wound pain after laparoscopic<br />
gynaecological surgery<br />
Take 500 – the experience of laparoscopic<br />
entry amongst gynaecological surgeons of a<br />
single unit<br />
Saturday 19 August / Free Communications H / 1430 - 1440<br />
Saturday 19 August / Free Communications H / 1440 - 1450<br />
Ng PS, Chan S, Sahota DS, Yuen PM<br />
Burke C, Garry R, Hart R, Karthigasu K<br />
Objective: The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of the<br />
rectus sheath block in postoperative pain relief in patients<br />
undergoing the gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.<br />
Methods: This was a double blinded randomised placebo<br />
controlled study. Eighty-six patients who underwent the<br />
laparoscopic adnexal surgery were randomised to either the<br />
Ropivacaine group or placebo group. Both groups were received<br />
rectus sheath block with 10ml of 0.75% Ropivacaine or 10ml of<br />
Normal saline. All the patients underwent laparoscopic surgery<br />
under general anaesthesia using a standardised anaesthetic<br />
regimen. The laparoscopy surgery is performed in the usual<br />
manner in all cases. A standardised analgesia regimen will be<br />
used for post-operative pain relief. This includes intramuscular<br />
injection of Pethidine on demand and Dologesic is also prescribed<br />
orally as required. Postoperative pain of the umbilical wound and<br />
was assessed immediately at 1, 6, 12 and 24 hours after the<br />
operation using a 10-cm visual analogue scale. The incidence of<br />
postoperative nausea and vomiting was also assessed at the same<br />
time with the pain assessment.<br />
Results: The postoperative pain was significantly less in the<br />
Ropivacaine group at 1 after the operation. (The mean pain score<br />
at 1 hour, NS 2.8+/-2.1 versus R 1.7+/- 1.6) The pain score at 6,<br />
12 and 24 hours were less in the Ropivacaine group, but was not<br />
statistically significant. There were more patient required oral<br />
Dologesic in the Ropivacaine group then Normal Saline group (22<br />
versus 13). However, most of the patients require the oral<br />
analgesic at least 6 hours after the operation. There was no<br />
difference in the requirement of the postoperative intramuscular<br />
Pethidine injection. There was no different in the incidence of<br />
postoperative nausea and vomiting and the requirement of<br />
postoperative antiemetic.<br />
Conclusion: By using the rectus sheath block with Ropivacaine<br />
can relieve the early postoperative pain in patients undergoing the<br />
gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.<br />
Author address: P.S. Ng 1 ; S. Chan 2 ; D.S. Sahota 1 and P.M. Yuen 1<br />
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital,<br />
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR<br />
2 Department of Anaesthesia, North District Hospital, New Territories<br />
East Cluster, Hong Kong SAR<br />
Introduction: Entry into the abdomino-pelvic cavity is regarded<br />
as the most perilous point of any laparoscopic procedure. Planning<br />
the type of entry to be utilised as well as verification tests used to<br />
confirm entry are regarded as important surgical principles.<br />
Variations exist in entry techniques and the number and type of<br />
entry verification tests used. Factors presumed to contribute to<br />
difficult or complicated laparoscopic entry include previous<br />
surgery, patient obesity, and experience of the surgeon. The<br />
objective of this study was to prospectively audit laparoscopic<br />
entry among surgeons at our gynaecological unit in order to<br />
identify entry techniques, entry verification tests used, occurrence<br />
of difficult laparoscopic entry and the relationship of the factors<br />
mentioned above to the ease of laparoscopic entry.<br />
Methods: All gynaecologists and trainees were requested to<br />
complete an anonymised datasheet following each laparoscopy they<br />
performed. Data which was recorded included indication for surgery,<br />
patient weight, previous surgery, entry technique, entry verification<br />
tests used, intra-abdominal pressures achieved before primary trocar<br />
insertion and entry-related intra-operative findings (presence or<br />
absence of omental emphysaema, omental or bowel adhesions and<br />
the occurrence of visceral or vascular complications.)<br />
Results: Laparoscopic entry in 528 women was prospectively<br />
assessed over a ten month period. Consultants performed 36.4%<br />
of laparoscopic entries, with 35% by senior registrars, 26.4% by<br />
registrars and 2.1% by RMOs. Median patient age was 36 yrs.<br />
Median patient weight was 67kg (range 29 to 150kg).<br />
Laparoscopy was for diagnostic purposes in 28% and for the<br />
treatment of known pathology in 72%. Previous surgical entry into<br />
the abdominal cavity had occurred in 55% of women. Thirty eight<br />
percent of women had had at least one prior laparoscopy (median<br />
# laparoscopies=1, range=1-6) and 30.2% had had at least one<br />
prior laparotomy (median # laparotomies=1, range 1-5). Midline<br />
laparotomy scar was present in 6% of women.<br />
Standard closed Veress entry was the initial entry technique of<br />
choice in 95% of cases. Six per cent of women had Hasson entry<br />
of whom 56% had undergone laparotomy previously. Veress<br />
placement was successful after a single insertion in 86.9% with<br />
8.9%, 3.8%, 0.2% and 0.2% requiring second, third, fourth and<br />
fifth placements respectively. A range of entry tests were used by<br />
practitioners, the commonest being the double-click test used at<br />
92.5% of entries followed by intra-abdominal pressure >>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
H<br />
female karyotype later. However, the hematometra recurred after<br />
T-tube removal. The secondary intervention was arranged. This<br />
time, Gortex tube was placed instead of rubber T-tube.<br />
She was well two months after last surgery. The abdominal pain<br />
subsided after secondary intervention. The Gortex tube would be<br />
removed three months after last intervention to see if the<br />
menstruation restored normally.<br />
Discussion: Here presented was an unusual case of secondary<br />
amenorrhea. The cervical synechiae was considered for normal<br />
chromosome study and normal female organs. The nature was not<br />
well documented in this case. Gortex tube was the drainage of<br />
choice for less tissue reaction. The effect of this method was to<br />
be evaluated later to see if menstruation restored.<br />
Author address: Chao-po Lin, M.D. Chia-yi Christian Hospital Dept<br />
Ob/Gyn No 539 Jhongsiao Rd. Chiayi City 60002 Taiwan. Tel: 886-9-<br />
63411262 Fax: 886-5-2781893 E-mail: bors.tw@yahoo.com.tw<br />
Cheng-Yang Chou, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology2,<br />
National Cheng Kung University<br />
48<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
POSTER EXHIBITION<br />
PROLAPSE<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
Clinical outcome 8 years post laparoscopic<br />
burch colposuspension<br />
Free Communications - Poster<br />
Johnston K, Cario G, Carlton M, Rosen D, Chou D<br />
Laparovaginal approach to anterior<br />
compartment defects<br />
Free Communications - Poster<br />
Behnia-Willison F, Seman EI, Cook J, O’Shea RT, Lam C<br />
Study Objectives: To report on patient outcome 8 years post<br />
Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension, in terms of stress<br />
incontinence,urge incontinence, prolapse symptoms and reoperation<br />
rate.<br />
Design: Postal questionnaire with graded responses, collecting<br />
subjective data on patients’ symptoms. The questionnaire was sent<br />
out (January 2005), 8 years after original operation<br />
Patients: 23 of 36 (64%) patients responded to questionnaire.<br />
All patients underwent a Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension<br />
between 1st January 1996 – 31st December 1996. All patients<br />
had urodynamics proven Genuine Stress Incontinence.<br />
Setting: Single hospital specialising in endoscopic surgery. All<br />
surgery was performed by 2 advanced laparoscopic surgeons.<br />
Measurements and Main Results: Subjective data was<br />
reviewed from 23 patients. Patients responded to questions on<br />
stress incontinence, urge incontinence, prolapse, pre and post<br />
operation. Information regarding any subsequent operations for<br />
urinary incontinence or prolapse was also gathered. A complete<br />
cure to stress incontinence was reported in 11/23 (48%), 9/23<br />
(39%) reported an improvement and 3/23 reported no<br />
improvement or a worsening of their stress incontinence. Urge<br />
incontinence coexisted in 17/23 (74%) of patients pre-operatively.<br />
This was cured in 8/17 (47%) and improved in 8/17 (47%) and<br />
deteriorated in 1 patient. De-novo urge incontinence developed in<br />
3/23 (13%). Symptoms of prolapse coexisted pre-operatively in<br />
16 (74%) of patients and were cured or improved in 15/16 (94%)<br />
post operatively. De-novo symptoms of prolapse developed in 5<br />
(21%) of patients. No patients sought a repeat operation for<br />
incontinence, and 2 patients had vaginal hysterectomies for middle<br />
compartment prolapse 6 and 7 years after their original operation.<br />
Conclusions: Burch Colposuspension still remains the “Gold<br />
Standard” operation in terms of long term success for the<br />
management of stress incontinence. This series although small<br />
demonstrates a the considerable success of the laparoscopic<br />
approach to this operation. We report an overall subject success<br />
rate of 87% eight years post operatively.<br />
Author address: K. Johnston, G. Cario, M. Carlton, D. Rosen,<br />
D. Chou. Sydney’s Women Endosurgery Centre (SWEC), St George Private<br />
Hospital,Sydney, New South Wales, Australia<br />
Objective: To assess the results of laparovaginal repair of<br />
anterior vaginal prolapse in terms of durability of repair and<br />
perioperative morbidity<br />
Method: Prospective study of 274 women with anterior<br />
compartment prolapse who underwent laparoscopic paravaginal<br />
repair bilaterally. 20/84 women with a residual central defect<br />
subsequently underwent a graft-reinforced anterior colporrhapy<br />
(mean interval 14 months). All women are assessed with the<br />
pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) system before and<br />
after surgery.<br />
Results: Major complications occurred in 15 (out of 274)<br />
women. 76% prolapse cure was achieved by laparoscopic repair<br />
alone but increased to 82% by adding the vaginal repair.<br />
Conclusion: An overall prolapse cure of 82% was achieved with<br />
the laparoscopic paravaginal repair and graft-reinforced anterior<br />
colporrhapy when indicated. This procedure was also associated<br />
with low perioperative morbidity.<br />
Quality of life study – Pelvic floor dysfunction<br />
Free Communications - Poster<br />
Cook J, Behnia-Willison F, Seman E, O’Shea RT<br />
Background: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a general term<br />
that describes conditions which adversely affect the female urinary<br />
and faecal continence mechanisms, together with genital prolapse.<br />
It is not uncommon for several pelvic floor disorders to coexist in<br />
the same woman or to develop sequentially over time. Disorders of<br />
the pelvic floor rarely result in severe morbidity or mortality.<br />
Rather, they affect the quality of a woman’s life and it has long<br />
been assumed that sexual function and satisfaction are<br />
compromised by these disorders.<br />
Hypothesis: Pelvic floor dysfunction adversely affects life in<br />
terms of bladder, bowel and sexual function.<br />
Method: Over a 12 month period, 61 women underwent<br />
laparoscopic Pelvic Floor Repair (PFR). Four questionnaires were<br />
administered pre-operatively. These were the Pelvic Floor Distress<br />
Inventory (PFDI), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), Pelvic<br />
Organ Prolapse-Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire<br />
(PISQ) and the WHOQOL-BREF, which is a general health related<br />
50<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
POSTER EXHIBITION<br />
PROLAPSE<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
POSTER EXHIBITION<br />
UTERINE SURGERY<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
Inadvertent cystotomy at laparoscopic<br />
hysterectomy<br />
Free Communications - Poster<br />
Soo S, Hardas G, Merkur H<br />
Study objective: This study was undertaken to investigate the<br />
inadvertent cystotomy rates and outcomes associated with<br />
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. To compare this with other series in<br />
the literature and to identify risk-factors, site of injury, method of<br />
repair, post-operative course and long-term sequelae.<br />
Design: 616 patients who had Laparoscopic Hysterectomy were<br />
identified. The data was prospectively collected between 1999 and<br />
2006 and retrospectively analyzed. All cases complicated by an<br />
inadvertent cystotomy were documented and follow up was<br />
performed at 3to 6 months in all cases. Analysis is by intention<br />
to treat.<br />
Setting: Advanced gynecological endoscopy teaching hospitals.<br />
Patients: 616 patients undergoing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy<br />
with either Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy or Total<br />
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.<br />
Measurements and main results: Of the 616 patients who<br />
had laparoscopic hysterectomy, the inadvertent cystotomy rate<br />
was 1.46% (9/616) with no reported long term sequelae.<br />
Results & discussion: The rate of inadvertent cystotomy in<br />
this study is comparable to that in recent published data. Our<br />
results also compare well with those published on abdominal<br />
hysterectomy (1.5-2%). All injuries occurred at the bladder dome<br />
where repair is relatively simple with minimal risk of ureteric<br />
disruption. This contrasts with vaginal hysterectomy where bladder<br />
injury, although rare, may involve the trigone with a greater risk of<br />
ureteric disruption following repair. Further data and discussion of<br />
the management in each of the 9 cases of inadvertent cystotomy<br />
will be presented.<br />
Author address: Samuel Soo Endoscopic Gynaecological Surgery<br />
Fellow, George Hardas, Harry MerkurSydney West Advance<br />
Gynaecological Endoscopy Unit : Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery<br />
Unit : Sydney West Area Health Service<br />
Review of 100 cases of laparoscopic<br />
hysterectomy in patients with previous<br />
caesarean sections<br />
Free Communications - Poster<br />
Soo S, Merkur H, Herdas G<br />
Study objective: This study was undertaken to investigate the<br />
complication rates associated with Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in<br />
patients who have had caesarean section(s). To identify if there are<br />
specific complications that are higher in this group of patients<br />
and to compare these rates with patients who have not had<br />
Caesarean section(s).<br />
Design: 616 patients had Laparoscopic Hysterectomy of which<br />
100 patients have had one or more previous Caesarean section.<br />
The data was prospectively collected between 1999 and 2006 and<br />
retrospectively analyzed. All peri-operative complications were<br />
documented and follow up was performed at 4 to 8 weeks in all<br />
cases. Analysis is by intention to treat. Major complications<br />
include inadvertent cystotomy, ureteric injury, bowel injury,<br />
haemorrhage greater than 500mls.<br />
Setting: Advanced gynecological endoscopy teaching hospitals.<br />
Patients: 100 patients with one or more previous Caesarean<br />
Section undergoing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.<br />
Interventions: Laparoscopic Hysterectomy completed with<br />
either Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy or Total<br />
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.<br />
Measurements and main results: Of the 100 patients who<br />
had laparoscopic hysterectomy with previous Caesarean(s), the<br />
major complication rate was 14% (14/94) with a conversion to<br />
laparotomy rate of 7% (7/94).<br />
Results: A higher major complication rate of 14% and a<br />
significant higher rate of inadvertent cystotomy of 5% was<br />
observed in the group of patients undergoing Laparoscopic<br />
Hysterectomy with one or more previous Caesarean.<br />
Conclusions: This study suggest that there is a higher major<br />
complication rate when performing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in<br />
patients with previous Caesarean sections. This has important<br />
implications towards counseling and consenting in these patients<br />
for Laparoscopic hysterectomy. There is currently inadequate data<br />
to suggest whether a laparoscopic, laparotomy or vaginal<br />
approach is safest in these patients and a randomized controlled<br />
trial comparing the above is needed.<br />
Author address: Samuel Soo Endoscopic Gynaecological Surgery<br />
Fellow, Harry Merkur, George Hardas: Sydney West Advance<br />
Gynaecological Endoscopy Unit: Sydney West Advance Pelvic Surgery Unit:<br />
Sydney West Area Health Service<br />
52<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
POSTER EXHIBITION<br />
UTERINE SURGERY<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
POSTER EXHIBITION<br />
UTERINE SURGERY<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
Result: Operation time and amount of blood loss were<br />
significantly greater in the group with fibroid 80 g than in the<br />
group < 80 g (121.5 ± 58.9 min versus 79.1 ± 28.6 min P <<br />
0.001, and 346.3 ± 299.6 mL versus 123.0 ± 89.7 mL P <<br />
0.001, respectively). However, there was no difference in the<br />
length of hospital stay and overall incidence of operative<br />
complications between these two groups. None of the women had<br />
any major complications. Nevertheless, 11 minor complications<br />
were noted including two pelvic abscess formations requiring<br />
another laparoscopic treatment. There was no incidence of<br />
switching to laparatomy during the operation. Extreme intraoperative<br />
hemorrhage of more than 1000 mL occurred in eight<br />
patients; however, they had full recovery after blood transfusion.<br />
Rate of blood transfusion was significantly lower in the group with<br />
fibroid < 80 g (3.2% versus 22.1%, P < 0.001).<br />
hospital stay , intravenous fluid usage over 48 hrs or not and the<br />
complication . Is different schedule time affecting the performance<br />
of surgeon doing LAVH Is it associated with a surgeon’s<br />
pressure, exhaustion or fatigue Further study results and findings<br />
will be presented.<br />
Author address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, China<br />
Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan<br />
Conclusion: Despite the increased operation time and blood<br />
loss, LM can be safely performed for large uterine fibroid.<br />
However, high risk of blood transfusion in these patients has to be<br />
kept in mind.<br />
Key words: Laparoscopy; myomectomy; fibroid<br />
Author address: Chun-Chen Hsu, M.D. 1 ,Chin-Jung Wang, M.D. 2 ,<br />
Chyi-Long Lee, M.D. 2 ,and Yung-Kuei Soong, M.D. 2<br />
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Hwa Hospital;<br />
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic<br />
Endoscopy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center and Chang<br />
Gung University College of Medicine, Kwei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan<br />
Schedule effect and laparoscopic-assisted<br />
vaginal hysterectomy<br />
Free Communications - Poster<br />
Chang WC , Lin WC , Yeh LS , Hung YC<br />
Background: Ensuring patient safety in the operating room and<br />
maintaining quality of care are currently emphasized under the<br />
medical environment of cost containment. Is different schedule<br />
time a possible factor affecting the performance of a surgeon<br />
doing the procedure of LAVH Does it matter the quality of care<br />
Method: This was a retrospective study consisting of a sample<br />
of 218 patients who underwent LAVH in a medical center. They<br />
were divided into 3 groups according to the starting time of<br />
implementing the procedure of LAVH. The 3 different starting time<br />
were Am8:30~9:30, 11:30~13:30 and 15:00~17:00. The<br />
clinical outcomes were compared and analysed.<br />
Results and conclusion: The clinical outcomes of the 3 groups<br />
measured and compared were the operating time , the estimated<br />
blood loss , the Ht. shift , the flatus passage time , the length of<br />
54<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
POSTER EXHIBITION<br />
GENERAL<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
POSTER EXHIBITION<br />
GENERAL<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
Measurement of the force required for<br />
trocar insertion during gynaecological<br />
laparoscopic surgery<br />
Free Communications - Poster<br />
Sahota DS, Ng PS, Yuen PM<br />
Objective: To measure the force required for trocar insertion<br />
during laparoscopic surgery using a single transducer made from<br />
piezo-resitive material.<br />
Study design: A 3cm circular transducer was designed and<br />
constructed from piezo-resistive material, which changes its<br />
impedance as force is exerted on its surface. The transducer was<br />
connected via an interface box to a personal computer to digitally<br />
record the pressure (Pressure = Force/Area) profile continuously<br />
during the trocar insertion. The transducer was positioned in the<br />
center of the operator's palm such that each flat surface was in<br />
contact with either the hand or the top of the trocar. Each study<br />
subject had three trocars inserted. A 10mm trocar was inserted<br />
at the umbilicus after the creation of the pneumoperitoneum with<br />
intra-abdominal pressure of 15mmHg. Two additional 5mm<br />
trocars, either pyramidal or conical tip, were inserted at the left<br />
and right side of the lower abdomen. The insertion of the trocars<br />
was performed by the same operator.<br />
Results: Recordings were successfully obtained from the first 45<br />
subjects. The mean peak pressure for the insertion of the<br />
subumbilical port was 9.3 pounds per square inch and 7.8 pounds<br />
per square inch in nulliparous and multiparous women respectively.<br />
The mean peak pressure for the insertion of conical tip trocar in the<br />
lower abdomen was 10.6 pounds per square inch and 7.7 pounds<br />
per square inch in nulliparous and multiparous women respectively.<br />
The mean peak pressure for the insertion of pyramidal tip trocars<br />
was 8.5 pounds per square inch and 7.4 pounds per square inch in<br />
nulliparous and multiparous women respectively.<br />
Conclusions: A model has been developed by which trocar<br />
insertion force can be objectively measured. Preliminary findings<br />
would suggest that different type and size of trocars require<br />
different insertion force. Moreover, higher insertion force are<br />
required for the insertion of trocars in nulliparous women.<br />
Author address: Sahota DS, Ng PS, Yuen PM. Department of<br />
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Prince<br />
of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR<br />
Follow-up on an observational prospective<br />
study of a laparoscopic excisional approach<br />
in the treatment of pelvic pain associated<br />
with endometriosis<br />
Free Communications - Poster<br />
Johnston KM, Phung H, Cooper MJW, Reid GD<br />
Study Objective: To assess the clinical outcome of an excisional<br />
approach to endometriosis in the treatment of pain associated<br />
with pelvic endometriosis.<br />
Design: Observational prospective clinical study.<br />
Settings: Tertiary advanced laparoscopic referral centres: Prince<br />
Alfred, Liverpool, St Lukes and St Vincents Hospitals, Sydney, New<br />
South Wales, Australia.<br />
Patients: Review of 112 patients with pain (dysmenorrhoea,<br />
deep dyspareunia, dyschezia, mid cycle, thigh and back pain) who<br />
underwent excision of mild, moderate and severe pelvic<br />
endometriosis. Endometriosis was excised in all patients using<br />
high power density monopolar electrosurgery and adhesiolysis<br />
performed were necessary. All patients had endometriosis<br />
confirmed by biopsy. All operations were performed by two<br />
advanced laparoscopic surgeons with a special interest in<br />
endometriosis. Patients filled in a preoperative baseline subjective<br />
scoring questionnaire, this was repeated at 3, 6 and 12 months<br />
post operatively. Main outcome measured was the improvement of<br />
pain at 3, 6 and 12 months post-operation.<br />
Measurents and Main Results: At 3 months (n=81), 6<br />
months (n=66) and 12 months (n=52) all patients reported a<br />
statistically significant improvement in dysmenorrhoea. At 3<br />
months (n=43) and at 6 months (n=21) there was a statistically<br />
significant improvement of deep dyspareunia however by 12<br />
months (n=31) this improvement was no longer significant. At 3<br />
months (n=39), 6 months (n=30) and 12 months (n=33) all<br />
patients reported a statistically significant improvement of<br />
dyschezia. Mid cycle pain was significantly improved at 3 months<br />
(n=59), 6 months (n=54) and 12 months (n=44). Thigh pain was<br />
significantly improved at 6 months (n=42) and 12 months (n=29).<br />
Back pain was significantly improved by 3 months (n=70), but by 6<br />
months (n=62) this improvement was no longer significant. There<br />
were no intraoperative complications.<br />
Conclusions: Excision of endometriosis when performed by<br />
experienced surgeons is a safe, effective treatment for pelvic and<br />
referred pain for up to 12 months.<br />
Author address: Johnston KM, 1 Phung H, 2 Cooper MJW, 1 Reid GD. 3<br />
1 Sydney Womens Endosurgery Centre (SWEC) and 2 The Simpson Centre<br />
for Health Services Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia<br />
56<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />
POSTER EXHIBITION<br />
GENERAL<br />
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
<strong>AGES</strong> HOSTS WORLD ENDOMETRIOSIS 2008<br />
Mark it in your DIARY NOW!<br />
Our vision:<br />
The energy of <strong>AGES</strong> in Surgery, Science and Patient<br />
Care in the 21st Century.<br />
Our theme:<br />
ART AND SCIENCE OF ENDOMETRIOSIS<br />
Clinical acumen, surgical flare and<br />
biomedical advances unite to engage<br />
endometriosis: do not miss this event!<br />
MELBOURNE AUSTRALIA<br />
11-14 MARCH 2008<br />
10 TH<br />
WORLD CONGRESS<br />
ON ENDOMETRIOSIS<br />
Artwork: Fiona Hall born Australia 1953 | Paradisus Terrestris Entitled: Miwulngini (Ngan’gikurunggurr) / Nelumbo nucifera / lotus (1996) | aluminium and tin 24.6 x 12.1 x 3.6 cm | Purchased through The Art Foundation of<br />
Victoria with the assistance of the Rudy Komon Fund, Governor, 1997 | National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne. | Fiona Hall is a leading Australian contemporary artist with a formidable career spanning three decades.<br />
ART & SCIENCE<br />
OF ENDOMETRIOSIS<br />
WCE 2008<br />
<strong>AGES</strong> President:<br />
Dr Rob O’Shea<br />
Chairman:<br />
Prof. David Healy<br />
Organiser:<br />
Mrs Michele Bender<br />
Platinum Sponsor<br />
World<br />
Endometriosis<br />
Society<br />
Australian<br />
Gynaecological<br />
Endoscopy<br />
Society
THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
MEMBERSHIP OF <strong>AGES</strong><br />
>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />
MEMBERSHIP FORM<br />
YOUR DETAILS:<br />
PAYMENT DETAILS<br />
TITLE<br />
FIRST NAME<br />
COMPANY<br />
ADDRESS<br />
SURNAME<br />
Payment by cheque<br />
Please send membership form and cheque made payable to ‘<strong>AGES</strong>’<br />
to:<br />
<strong>AGES</strong> Secretariat<br />
Conference Connection<br />
Phone: +61 2 9967 2928<br />
Fax: +61 2 9967 2627<br />
Mobile: +61 411 110 464<br />
E-mail:<br />
Mail:<br />
conferences@ages.com.au<br />
282 Edinburgh Road<br />
CASTLECRAG NSW 2068 AUSTRALIA<br />
CITY STATE POSTCODE<br />
Payment by credit card<br />
(Visa or Mastercard only)<br />
COUNTRY<br />
PHONE<br />
MOBILE<br />
FACSIMILE<br />
E-MAIL<br />
Card Number<br />
Expiry Date<br />
Cardholder Name<br />
PROPOSER<br />
SECONDER<br />
Signature<br />
Description<br />
Date<br />
Membership subscription to the Australian Gynaecological<br />
Endoscopy Society for period:<br />
1 January 2006 to 31 December 2006<br />
Please tick the appropriate membership<br />
Fellow $308.00 Overseas Fellow $280.00<br />
Registrar $176.00 Overseas Registrar $160.00<br />
Preferred website password:<br />
(up to 8 alphanumeric characters)<br />
60<br />
>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />
<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY
MEMBERSHIP OF <strong>AGES</strong><br />
more than endoscopic surgery<br />
<strong>AGES</strong> at its scientific meetings considers all aspects of gynaecological<br />
surgery. The successful <strong>AGES</strong> Pelvic Floor Group has provided a<br />
benchmark forum for gynaecologists predominantly interested in vaginal<br />
and reconstructive surgery.<br />
keep informed<br />
Through its conferences, forums and publications, the Australian<br />
Gynaecological Endoscopy Society (<strong>AGES</strong>) constantly updates members’<br />
knowledge and expertise.<br />
save money<br />
As a member of the Society, you will receive discounts on fees for <strong>AGES</strong><br />
Scientific Meetings as well as receiving the American Association of<br />
Gynecologic Laparoscopists Journal and <strong>AGES</strong>’ newsletter, SCOPE, free<br />
of charge. The AAGL Journal is normally available at US$185 [in excess<br />
of AU$250*] annually.<br />
*Based on exchange rates at time of printing.<br />
do research<br />
$300,000 is available to <strong>AGES</strong> members over three years from 2005<br />
for research into Gynaecological Surgery and the improvement of<br />
women’s health.<br />
earn PR&CRM points<br />
At <strong>AGES</strong> Scientific Meetings, delegates earn PR&CRM points, in addition<br />
to CPD points.<br />
better education<br />
One of the ongoing principal roles of <strong>AGES</strong> will be in education.<br />
The <strong>AGES</strong> Education Subcommittee has been extremely active in helping<br />
the College to improve laparoscopic surgical training.<br />
objectives<br />
• To encourage high standards of Gynaecological Surgery<br />
• To provide a forum for discussion and innovation in all aspects of<br />
Gynaecological Surgery<br />
• To organise scientific meetings for the exchange of knowledge<br />
and expertise<br />
• To provide a network of experienced Gynaecological Endoscopic<br />
Surgeons to optimise patient care and facilitate liaison with other<br />
health professionals<br />
• To encourage scientific research and publications on<br />
Gynaecological and Endoscopic Surgery<br />
• To acknowledge individuals who have made outstanding<br />
contributions to the field of Gynaecological Endoscopy<br />
• To provide opportunities for training in Gynaecological Endoscopy<br />
by organising workshops and training courses<br />
membership benefits<br />
• Discounted registration fees at all <strong>AGES</strong> Scientific Meetings<br />
• Free subscription to the American Association of Gynecological<br />
Laparoscopists’ Journal, a dedicated and highly respected<br />
endoscopic journal<br />
• Free <strong>AGES</strong> newsletter, SCOPE, published three times annually<br />
• Member access to <strong>AGES</strong> website (www.ages.com.au)<br />
• Free listing in the Membership Directory of the <strong>AGES</strong> website<br />
• Scholarships are awarded to <strong>AGES</strong> members to enhance<br />
their skills<br />
• Dissemination of clinical updates on a regular basis<br />
• Eligibility to apply for <strong>AGES</strong> Research Grants<br />
• Eligibility to earn PR&CRM & CPD points at <strong>AGES</strong> Scientific Meetings<br />
<strong>AGES</strong> Clinical Research Fund<br />
<strong>AGES</strong> also supports research into Endoscopic and Gynaecological<br />
Surgery. A Clinical Research Fund has been established by <strong>AGES</strong> as a<br />
result of a significant funding commitment from Stryker. <strong>AGES</strong> is also<br />
investing in this fund so that $300,000 is available to <strong>AGES</strong> members<br />
over three years from 2005 for research into Gynaecological Surgery<br />
and the improvement of women’s health.<br />
Annual Membership Fee:<br />
Fellows $308 including gst<br />
Trainee $176 including gst<br />
Overseas Residents<br />
Fellows<br />
AU$280<br />
Trainee<br />
AU$160<br />
Membership Application Forms are available from:<br />
www.ages.com.au<br />
or<br />
<strong>AGES</strong> Secretariat<br />
Conference Connection<br />
E-mail: conferences@ages.com.au<br />
Mail: 282 Edinburgh Road<br />
CASTLECRAG NSW 2068 AUSTRALIA
CONFERENCE INFORMATION AND CONDITIONS<br />
DEPOSITS AND FINAL PAYMENTS: All costs are<br />
payable in advance. If, for any reason, your entire<br />
payment has not been received by the due date,<br />
we reserve the right to treat your booking fee as<br />
cancelled and will apply the appropriate<br />
cancellation fee.<br />
CANCELLATION POLICY: Should you or a member of<br />
your party be forced to cancel, you should advise the<br />
Conference Organisers in writing. Single Meeting<br />
Registrations: The <strong>AGES</strong> cancellation policy for<br />
workshops and courses allows a cancellation fee of<br />
$100.00 of registration fees for cancellations<br />
received 8 weeks’ prior to the first day of the<br />
Meeting and of 50% of registration fees for<br />
cancellations 4 weeks’ prior to the Meeting. No<br />
refund will be made after this time. Multiple meeting<br />
registrants: No refunds apply.<br />
Hotels and other suppliers of services, depending on<br />
date of cancellation, may also impose cancellation<br />
charges. Accommodation payments will be forfeited<br />
if the room is not occupied on the requested checkin<br />
date. Please note that a claim for reimbursement<br />
of cancellation charges may fall within the terms of<br />
travel insurance you effect. <strong>AGES</strong> reserves the right<br />
to cancel any workshop or course if there are<br />
insufficient registrations.<br />
INSURANCE: Registration fees do not include<br />
insurance of any kind. Insurance is strongly<br />
recommended to cover: loss of payments as a result<br />
of cancellation of your participation in the<br />
Conference, or through cancellation of the<br />
Conference itself, loss of airfares for any reason,<br />
loss or damage to personal property, additional<br />
expenses and repatriation should travel<br />
arrangements need to be altered, medical expenses,<br />
or any other related losses.<br />
PRICING POLICY: It is impossible to predict<br />
increases to cost elements such as government<br />
taxes and other service provider tariffs. In the event<br />
of such fluctuations or increases affecting the price<br />
of the Conference tour, we reserve the right to<br />
adjust our tour prices as may be necessary at any<br />
time up to and including the day of departure, even<br />
though the balance payment may have been made. If<br />
we are forced to change your booking or any part of<br />
it for any reasons beyond our control, for instance, if<br />
an airline changes its schedule - we reserve the<br />
right to vary your itinerary and will give you, or cause<br />
to be given to you, prompt notice thereof.<br />
COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE: Insurance, telephone<br />
calls, laundry, food and beverage except as itemised<br />
in the brochure, items of a personal nature.<br />
TRAVEL AND ACCOMMODATION: <strong>AGES</strong> and<br />
Conference Connection are not itself carriers or<br />
hoteliers nor do we own aircraft, hotels, or coaches.<br />
The flights, coach journeys, other travel and hotel<br />
accommodation herein are provided by reputable<br />
carriers and hoteliers on their own conditions. It is<br />
important to note, therefore, that all bookings with<br />
the Conference Organisers are subject to the terms<br />
and conditions and limitations of liability imposed by<br />
hoteliers and other service providers whose services<br />
we utilise, some of which limit or exclude liability in<br />
respect of death, personal injury, delay and loss or<br />
damage to baggage.<br />
OUR RESPONSIBILITY: <strong>AGES</strong> and Conference<br />
Connection cannot accept any liability of whatever<br />
nature for the acts, omissions or default, whether<br />
negligent or otherwise of those airlines, coach<br />
operators, shipping companies, hoteliers, or<br />
other persons providing services in connection<br />
with your tour pursuant to a contract between<br />
themselves and yourself (which may be evidenced<br />
in writing by the issue of a ticket, voucher, coupon<br />
or the like) and over whom we have no direct and<br />
exclusive control.<br />
<strong>AGES</strong> and Conference Connection do not accept<br />
any liability in contract or in tort (actionable<br />
wrong) for any injury, damage, loss, delay,<br />
additional expense or inconvenience caused<br />
directly or indirectly by force majeure or other<br />
events which are beyond our control, or which are<br />
not preventable by reasonable diligence on our<br />
part including but not limited to war, civil<br />
disturbance, fire, floods, unusually severe weather,<br />
acts of God, act of Government or any authorities,<br />
accidents to or failure of machinery or equipment<br />
or industrial action (whether or not involving our<br />
employees and even though such action may be<br />
settled by acceding to the demands of a labour<br />
group. Please note that the prices quoted are<br />
subject to change without notice.<br />
PRIVACY ACT 1988, Corporations Act 2001:<br />
Collection, maintenance and disclosure of certain<br />
personal information are governed by legislation<br />
included in these Acts. Please note that your<br />
details may be disclosed to the parties mentioned<br />
in this brochure.