13.01.2015 Views

ENDOSCOPIC SLIDE Flyer - AGES

ENDOSCOPIC SLIDE Flyer - AGES

ENDOSCOPIC SLIDE Flyer - AGES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Australian<br />

Gynaecological<br />

Endoscopy<br />

Society Ltd<br />

President <strong>AGES</strong>:<br />

Dr Robert O'Shea<br />

in association with the<br />

Asia Pacific Association<br />

of Gynecologic Endoscopy and<br />

Minimally Invasive Therapy<br />

President APAGE:<br />

Assoc. Prof. P M Yuen<br />

Chairman:<br />

Co-Chairman:<br />

Scientific Chairman:<br />

Assoc. Prof. Alan Lam<br />

Prof. Felix Wong<br />

Dr Geoffrey Reid<br />

Organising Committee:<br />

>>>>THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

– An <strong>AGES</strong> Meeting in association with APAGE<br />

Dr Robert O'Shea<br />

Prof. Chyi-Long Lee<br />

Dr Greg Cario<br />

Dr Jim Tsaltas<br />

Assoc. Prof. P M Yuen<br />

18 & 19 AUGUST 2006>>>>>>>>>>><br />

Program and Abstracts<br />

Platinum sponsor of <strong>AGES</strong><br />

Major Sponsor of <strong>AGES</strong>


<strong>AGES</strong> gratefully acknowledges the following<br />

companies which have supported this conference:<br />

Platinum Sponsor of <strong>AGES</strong><br />

Major Sponsor of <strong>AGES</strong><br />

Major Sponsor of <strong>AGES</strong> ‘Limits<br />

of Endoscopic Surgery 2006’<br />

Exhibitors<br />

Fisher & Paykel<br />

Olympus<br />

American Medical Systems<br />

Applied Medical<br />

B Braun Australia<br />

Bard Australia<br />

ConMed Linvatec<br />

Cook Australia<br />

Cytyc (Australia)<br />

Device Technologies<br />

Endocorp<br />

Experien<br />

Gyrus ACMI<br />

InSight Oceania<br />

Mayne/Symbion Health<br />

N. Stenning & Co.<br />

Smith and Nephew<br />

Sydmed


CONTENTS<br />

>>>>>>>>><br />

Faculty and Committee Members 2<br />

Welcome Message 3<br />

The Limits of Endoscopic Surgery 4<br />

Conference Program<br />

Abstracts – Friday 18 August 10<br />

Abstracts – Saturday 19 August 19<br />

Abstracts: Free Communications 23<br />

– Friday 18 August<br />

Abstracts: Free Communications 35<br />

– Saturday 19 August<br />

Abstracts: Free Communications 50<br />

Poster Exhibition<br />

PR&CRM Points - CPD Points<br />

The Conference has been approved as a RANZCOG Approved<br />

O&G Meeting and eligible Fellows of the College will earn points<br />

for attendance as follows:<br />

Full attendance: 18 CPD points in the Meetings category.<br />

Attendance one day: 9 CPD points<br />

Attendance at each breakfast session: 1 additional CPD point<br />

Completion of Pre- and Post- Questionnaires: 5 PR&CRM points<br />

Delegates will be required to sign the attendance sheet prior to<br />

morning tea on both Friday 18 and Saturday 19 August.<br />

Pre- and Post- Questionnaires<br />

The College approved Pre- and Post- Questionnaires are<br />

comprised of a number of multiple choice questions from<br />

lectures to be given on Friday 18 and Saturday 19 August.<br />

The Pre- Questionnaire is to be handed in at morning tea on<br />

Friday 18 August. The Post- Questionnaire is to be handed in<br />

at the close of the Meeting. No exceptions can be made to<br />

these deadlines.<br />

Breakfast Sessions<br />

Please refer to conference program. Pre-booking is essential at<br />

the registration desk. Hot breakfast is included.<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

1


Conference Committee<br />

>>>>>>>>>>><br />

<strong>AGES</strong> Board<br />

Assoc. Professor Alan Lam<br />

Professor Felix Wong<br />

Dr Geoff Reid<br />

Dr Robert O’Shea<br />

Professor Chyi-Long Lee<br />

Dr Greg Cario<br />

Dr Jim Tsaltas<br />

Assoc. Professor Pong Mo Yuen<br />

>>>>>>>>>>><br />

International Faculty<br />

Chairman<br />

Co-Chairman<br />

Scientific Chairman<br />

Dr Robert O’Shea<br />

Assoc. Professor Alan Lam<br />

Dr Jim Tsaltas<br />

Dr Geoffrey Reid<br />

Dr Greg Cario<br />

Dr Jenny Cook<br />

Professor David Healy<br />

Dr Krish Karthigasu<br />

Assoc. Professor Chris Maher<br />

Dr Anusch Yazdani<br />

Australian Faculty<br />

President<br />

Vice President<br />

Hon. Secretary<br />

Treasurer<br />

Professor Masaaki Andou<br />

Dr Pongsakdi Chaisilwattana<br />

Dr SM Bernard Chern<br />

Dr Wachyu Hadisaputra<br />

Professor Hiroshi Hoshiai<br />

Professor Kuan-Gen Huang<br />

Professor Chyi-Long Lee<br />

Professor Bao-Liang Lin<br />

Dr Leslie Lo<br />

Dr Foo Hoe Loh<br />

Professor Prashant Mangeshikar<br />

Professor Joo-Hyun Nam<br />

Dr Regta Pichay<br />

Dr Shailesh Puntambekar<br />

Dr Kai Y See Tho<br />

Professor Osamu Tsutsumi<br />

Assoc. Professor Pong Mo Yuen<br />

Professor Enlan Xia<br />

>>>>>>>>>>><br />

<strong>AGES</strong> Secretariat<br />

– Conference Organiser<br />

Michele Bender, Director<br />

Conference Connection<br />

Phone: +61 2 9967 2928<br />

Fax: +61 2 9967 2627<br />

Mobile: +61 411 110 464<br />

E-mail:<br />

Mail:<br />

Japan<br />

India<br />

Singapore<br />

Indonesia<br />

Japan<br />

Taiwan<br />

Taiwan<br />

Japan<br />

Hong Kong<br />

China<br />

India<br />

Korea<br />

Phillipines<br />

India<br />

Singapore<br />

Japan<br />

Hong Kong<br />

China<br />

conferences@ages.com.au<br />

282 Edinburgh Road<br />

CASTLECRAG NSW 2068 AUSTRALIA<br />

Dr Jason Abbott<br />

New South Wales<br />

Dr Alison Brand<br />

New South Wales<br />

Dr Linda Calabresi<br />

New South Wales<br />

Dr Greg Cario<br />

New South Wales<br />

Professor Jonathan Carter New South Wales<br />

Dr Danny Chou<br />

New South Wales<br />

Dr George Condous<br />

New South Wales<br />

Dr Jenny Cook<br />

South Australia<br />

Dr Michael Cooper<br />

New South Wales<br />

Dr Alan Ferrier<br />

New South Wales<br />

Dr Robert Ford<br />

New South Wales<br />

Professor Neville Hacker New South Wales<br />

Professor David Healy<br />

Victoria<br />

Professor Roger Houghton New South Wales<br />

Dr Thomas Hugh<br />

New South Wales<br />

Professor Robert Jansen New South Wales<br />

Dr Krish Karthigasu<br />

Western Australia<br />

Dr Andrew Korda<br />

New South Wales<br />

Assoc. Professor Alan Lam New South Wales<br />

Dr Kenneth Loi<br />

New South Wales<br />

Assoc. Professor David Lubowski New South Wales<br />

Dr Stuart Lyon<br />

Victoria<br />

Assoc. Professor Chris Maher Queensland<br />

Dr David Molloy<br />

Queensland<br />

Dr Matthew Morgan<br />

New South Wales<br />

Assoc.Professor Andreas Obermair Queensland<br />

Dr Robert O’Shea<br />

South Australia<br />

Dr Geoff Reid<br />

New South Wales<br />

Dr Frank Stening<br />

New South Wales<br />

Dr Hugh Torode<br />

New South Wales<br />

Dr Jim Tsaltas<br />

Victoria<br />

Assoc. Professor Thierry Vancaillie New South Wales<br />

Professor Felix Wong<br />

New South Wales<br />

Dr Anusch Yazdani<br />

Queensland<br />

2<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


Welcome<br />

<strong>AGES</strong> President and Conference Chairman<br />

Dear Colleagues,<br />

On behalf of the Australian Gynaecological Endoscopy Society, we would like<br />

to warmly welcome everyone to the inaugural joint meeting between <strong>AGES</strong><br />

and the Asia-Pacific Association of Gynaecologic Endoscopy and Minimally<br />

Invasive Therapy (APAGE).<br />

Together, at this beautiful and luxurious Westin hotel, we will put the LIMITS<br />

OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY under endoscopic scrutiny.<br />

In the last decade, the practice of gynaecological surgery has witnessed an<br />

‘endoscopic revolution’, brought about by improved imaging technology,<br />

advances in surgical skills, modern energy sources, and perhaps most<br />

importantly a greater understanding of pelvic anatomy. Like pioneers<br />

exploring the uncharted waters of the world during the last millennium,<br />

pelvic surgeons have explored, tested, described and successfully<br />

performed almost every open gynaecological procedure endoscopically.<br />

How far have we come, what can be done, what should be done, how<br />

effective, at what costs, risks and benefits are fundamentally important<br />

questions we hope to address and discuss together at this meeting over<br />

the next two days.<br />

We are delighted to have brought together an outstanding faculty of national<br />

and international speakers to present their techniques, dissect evidence,<br />

analyse published results, and debate the ‘limits of endoscopic surgery’. We<br />

are also thrilled to have received an unprecedented number of free<br />

communications which have filled the 4 sessions on each of the two days of<br />

the conference. We are delighted that these not only come from <strong>AGES</strong><br />

members, but also from many international registrants to this meeting.<br />

Once again, our warmest welcome to all <strong>AGES</strong> members and to all<br />

colleagues from neighbouring countries who are APAGE members and those<br />

who are not but have come to participate in this conference and enjoy the<br />

best harbour city in the world.<br />

Best wishes<br />

Alan Lam<br />

Conference Chairman<br />

<strong>AGES</strong> Vice President<br />

Robert O’Shea<br />

President <strong>AGES</strong><br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

3


THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

2006>>>>>>>>><br />

FRIDAY 18 AUGUST 2006<br />

THE BALLROOM<br />

WESTIN SYDNEY<br />

0700 – 0800 OPTIONAL BREAKFAST SESSION<br />

NOVASURE ENDOMETRIAL ABLATION<br />

SYSTEM INFORMATION & OVERVIEW<br />

Sponsored by Cytyc<br />

HERITAGE BALLROOM – LEVEL 6<br />

Technology overview & contra-indications<br />

T Vancaillie<br />

Procedure steps including anaesthesia<br />

requirements<br />

J Abbott<br />

Clinical data and worldwide results<br />

T Vancaillie<br />

Post-op care and management of complications<br />

J Abbott<br />

0730 – 0800 Conference Registration<br />

0800 – 0805 WELCOME AND OPENING<br />

R O’Shea A Lam PM Yuen<br />

0805 – 0930 SESSION 1<br />

HYSTERECTOMY<br />

Sponsored by Stryker<br />

Chairs: R O’Shea, PM Yuen<br />

0805 – 0820 DVD presentation on laparoscopic<br />

hysterectomy<br />

KY See Tho<br />

0820 – 0835 Anatomical and technical limits to<br />

laparoscopic hysterectomy<br />

A Lam<br />

0835 – 0850 Limits to the uptake of laparoscopic<br />

hysterectomy Training, costs and<br />

consumer demand<br />

D Molloy<br />

0850 – 0905 What are the safety concerns with<br />

laparoscopic hysterectomy, and how can<br />

they be overcome<br />

G Cario<br />

0905 – 0920 The consumer’s view – why should I<br />

have a laparoscopic hysterectomy, is it<br />

safe, how many have you done, where<br />

did you do your training and what are<br />

your statistics<br />

L Calabresi<br />

0920 – 0930 Panel - Questions<br />

0930 – 1015 SESSION 2<br />

NOVEL APPROACHES<br />

Sponsored by Stryker<br />

Chairs: M Cooper, J Cook<br />

0930 – 0945 Laparoscopic ovarian transposition<br />

KG Huang<br />

0945 – 1000 Laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation<br />

M Andou<br />

1000 – 1015 Laparoscopic uterine artery ligation<br />

CL Lee<br />

1015 – 1045 Morning Tea and Trade Exhibition<br />

1045 – 1230 SESSION 3<br />

UTERINE FIBROIDS<br />

Sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Medical<br />

Chairs: H Torode, B Chern<br />

1045 – 1115 DVD presentations on laparoscopic<br />

myomectomy and hysteroscopic myomectomy<br />

The monster myoma<br />

Hysteroscopic myomectomy<br />

R Ford<br />

BL Lin<br />

1115 – 1135 What are the limits of endoscopic<br />

myomectomy<br />

J Tsaltas<br />

1135 – 1155 Endoscopic myomectomy – outcomes<br />

and fertility issues<br />

D Healy<br />

1155 – 1215 Current non-surgical approaches to fibroids<br />

S Lyon<br />

1215 – 1230 Panel-Questions<br />

1230 – 1330 Lunch and Trade Exhibition<br />

1330 – 1430 SESSION 4<br />

4 simultaneous free<br />

communications sessions<br />

1330 – 1430 FREE COMMUNICATIONS A<br />

LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY<br />

BALLROOM 3<br />

Chairs: F Wong, R Pichay<br />

1330 – 1340 Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (type I/II/III):<br />

A review and complications of 245 cases<br />

Park Y<br />

1340 – 1350 The Biswas uterine elevator and cup for use in<br />

laparoscopic hysterectomy<br />

Soo S, Merkur H<br />

1350 – 1400 The plasma trissector at laparoscopic<br />

hysterectomy – a video presentation<br />

Soo S, Merkur H, Hardas G<br />

1400 – 1410 A modified technique of LAVH using a Biswas<br />

uterovaginal elevator (BUVE) for uteri weighing<br />

500 gm or more<br />

Lee ETC, Wong FWS<br />

1410 – 1420 Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Intention to<br />

treat ongoing prospective trial<br />

Condous GS, Lam A<br />

4<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


PROGRAM<br />

1420 – 1430 An enlarged uterus is not a contraindication to<br />

performing total laparoscopic hysterectomy:<br />

age matched control study<br />

Condous GS, Lam A<br />

1330 – 1430 FREE COMMUNICATIONS B<br />

LAPAROSCOPIC ONCOLOGY<br />

BALLROOM 4<br />

Chairs: C Maher, H Liddell<br />

1330 – 1340 Laparoscopic Approach to Carcinoma of the<br />

Endometrium (LACE)<br />

Obermair A, Gebski V, Forder P, Jackson D,<br />

Williams G, Janda M<br />

1340 – 1350 Completely total laparoscopic radical<br />

hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer;<br />

Initial reports<br />

Lee YS, Lee JM, Kim BS, Cho YL, Park IS<br />

1350 – 1400 Laroscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy<br />

versus abdominal hysterectomy in patients with<br />

early stage endometrial cancer:<br />

10 year experience<br />

Nam JH, Yoon J, Kim DY, Suh DS, Kim JH,<br />

Kim YM, Kim YT<br />

1400 – 1410 Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy (LRT)<br />

in Korea<br />

Nam JH, Kim JH, Kim DY, Suh DS, Kim YM,<br />

Kim YT, Kim SH, Kim DJ, Kim YB<br />

1410 – 1420 Comparison of laparoscopically –assisted<br />

radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical<br />

abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of<br />

cervical cancer<br />

Lee JW, Kim WY, Choi CH, Kim TJ, Kim BG,<br />

Lee JH, Bae DS<br />

1420 – 1430 Successful pregnancy after conservative<br />

treatment of stage IA endometrial carcinoma<br />

early detected by hysterofiberscopy<br />

Matsumi H, Nakabayashi M, Ohnuki H,<br />

Horiya M, Tajima Y, Mizuguchi K, Nishii O<br />

1330 – 1430 FREE COMMUNICATIONS C<br />

HYSTEROSCOPY<br />

HERITAGE BALLROOM – LEVEL 6<br />

Chairs: A Yazdani, P Chaisilwattana<br />

1330 – 1340 Hysteroscopic metroplasty for unicornuate<br />

uterus to improve reproductive outcome<br />

Tandulwadkar S, Margale A<br />

1340 – 1350 A randomised controlled trial comparing<br />

Microwave Endometrial Ablation (MEATM) and<br />

Mirena® (levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine<br />

device) in the treatment of menorrhagia.<br />

Behnia-Willison F, Cook J, Seman EI, Lam C,<br />

Manifold E, Agniewska , O’Shea RT<br />

1350 – 1400 Endoscopic surgery for previous cesarean<br />

section scar induce menorrhagia<br />

Shih CL, Lin WC<br />

1400 – 1410 Outpatient hysteroscopy: a review of 225 cases<br />

Cameron M, Bickerstaffe C, Readman E,<br />

Maher P<br />

1410 – 1420 The diagnosis & management of<br />

intra-uterine pathology<br />

Lyons SD, Kingston AJ, Abbott JA, Vancaillie TG<br />

1420 – 1430 The occurrence and outcome of 39 pregnancies<br />

after 1621 cases of transcervical resection of<br />

endometrium (TCRE)<br />

Xia E, Li TC, Yu D, Huang X , Zheng J, Liu Y,<br />

Zhang M<br />

1330 – 1430 FREE COMMUNICATIONS D<br />

OVARIAN & ADNEXAL DISEASE<br />

BARNET ROOM – LEVEL 6<br />

Chairs: R Ford, S Puntambekar<br />

1330 – 1340 Role of laparoscopy in ovarian tumours<br />

Sathe R, Puntambekar S<br />

1340 – 1350 Preoperative discrimination between benign and<br />

malignant ovarian cysts treated surgically in an<br />

Australian tertiary centre<br />

Daly JO, Huang A, Ang WC, Healey M<br />

1350 – 1400 Hydrodissection in laparoscopic surgery of<br />

ovarian pregnancy<br />

Chang Y<br />

1400 – 1410 Laparoscopic management of twisted adnexa in<br />

infertile woman<br />

Tandulwadkar S, Margale A<br />

1410 – 1420 Laparoscopic detorsion and oophoropexy for<br />

treatment of ovarian torsion<br />

Tan YT, Lyons SD, De Decker AP, Vancaillie TG<br />

1420 – 1430 A medical management of interstitial ectopic<br />

pregnancy: A five year clinical study<br />

Tang A, Baartz D, Khoo SK<br />

1430 – 1600 SESSION 5<br />

GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY<br />

Sponsored by tyco Healthcare<br />

Chairs: R Houghton, KG Huang<br />

1430 – 1500 DVD presentations on aspects of<br />

laparoscopic oncology<br />

Radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer<br />

CL Lee<br />

Radical surgery for ovarian cancer M Andou<br />

Pelvic exenteration<br />

S Puntambekar<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

5


THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

2006>>>>>>>>><br />

1500 – 1515 Comparison of laparoscopic radical<br />

hysterectomy and abdominal radical<br />

hysterectomy in patients with early<br />

cervical cancer<br />

JH Nam<br />

1515 – 1530 Evidence-based approaches to endoscopic<br />

management of gynaecological cancer<br />

A Ferrier<br />

1530 – 1600 Hypothetical issues for debate – What are the<br />

obstacles to the uptake of laparoscopic surgery<br />

in gynaecological oncology<br />

Moderator: N Hacker<br />

Panel: J Carter, A Brand, JH Nam,<br />

A Obermair, CL Lee<br />

1600 – 1630 Afternoon Tea and Trade Exhibition<br />

1630 – 1800 SESSION 6<br />

PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR<br />

Sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Medical<br />

Chairs: G Cario, P Chaisilwattana<br />

1630 – 1700 DVD presentation on laparoscopic pelvic<br />

floor repair, anterior paravaginal repair<br />

and total pelvic floor repair with mesh<br />

D Chou R O’Shea<br />

1700 – 1715 Evidence-based surgery for pelvic<br />

organ prolapse<br />

C Maher<br />

1715 – 1730 What are the limits of endoscopic surgery for<br />

pelvic organ prolapse T Vancaillie<br />

1730 – 1745 Morbidity associated with pelvic floor repair<br />

A Korda<br />

1745 – 1800 Panel – Questions<br />

1800 Close<br />

SATURDAY 19 AUGUST 2006<br />

THE BALLROOM<br />

WESTIN SYDNEY<br />

0700 – 0800 OPTIONAL BREAKFAST SESSION<br />

ADVANCES IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY<br />

Sponsored by tyco Healthcare<br />

HERITAGE BALLROOM – LEVEL 6<br />

0700 – 0715 Total laparoscopic hysterectomy and results<br />

A Obermair<br />

0715 – 0730 Total laparoscopic hysterectomy – converting<br />

from LAVH to TLH with the McCartney Tube<br />

J Tsaltas<br />

0730 – 0745 Complications of TLH R O’Shea<br />

0745 – 0755 Panel discussion<br />

Convenor:<br />

A Lawrence<br />

0800 – 1000 SESSION 7<br />

ENDOMETRIOSIS<br />

Sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Medical<br />

Chairs: O Tsutsumi, J Tsaltas<br />

0800 – 0830 DVD presentation on the anatomical and<br />

technical aspects of resection of<br />

endometriosis – Ovarian, Pouch of<br />

Douglas, recto-sigmoid and vesicoureteric<br />

disease<br />

A Lam<br />

M Andou<br />

0830 – 0845 Can endometriosis surgery improve<br />

quality of life<br />

J Abbott<br />

0845 – 0900 Uterine sparing approaches to adenomyosis<br />

GD Reid<br />

0900 – 0915 When, how and by whom should bowel<br />

resection for endometriosis be performed<br />

M Morgan<br />

0915 – 0930 Ovarian reserve after endometriosis surgery<br />

FH Loh<br />

1900 Coach transportation from<br />

The Westin Sydney to King Street Wharf<br />

1930 – 2300 Cocktail Reception<br />

& Gala Conference Dinner<br />

Sydney Glass Island<br />

Harbour Cruise<br />

2300 Coach transportation from<br />

King Street Wharf to The Westin Sydney<br />

0930 – 1000 Should the primary treatment for endometriosisrelated<br />

infertility be surgery of IVF<br />

R Jansen<br />

1000 – 1030 SESSION 8<br />

PLENARY LECTURE<br />

Chair: D Healy, EL Xia<br />

What’s best for our patients<br />

1030 – 1100 Morning Tea and Trade Exhibition<br />

A Brand<br />

6<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


PROGRAM<br />

1100 – 1200 SESSION 9<br />

LAPAROSCOPY IN DIFFICULT<br />

CIRCUMSTANCES<br />

Sponsored by Stryker<br />

Chairs: C Maher, L Lo<br />

1100 – 1120 Laparoscopy in pregnancy PM Yuen<br />

1120 – 1140 Laparoscopy in the morbidly obese patient<br />

K Loi<br />

1140 – 1200 The unwell patient after laparoscopy<br />

F Stening<br />

1200 – 1300 SESSION 10<br />

ADHESIONS<br />

Sponsored by tyco Healthcare<br />

Chair: D Molloy<br />

Transponder Session<br />

Case presentation:<br />

Adhesiolysis for chronic pain – a<br />

medico-legal dilemma<br />

Presenter:<br />

Moderator:<br />

K Karthigasu<br />

D Molloy<br />

Questions to the audience and panel<br />

Panel: T Hugh, A Korda,<br />

F Stening, D Lubowski,<br />

M Cooper, A Lam,<br />

FH Loh, S Evans<br />

1300 – 1400 Lunch and Trade Exhibition<br />

1400 – 1515 SESSION 11<br />

4 simultaneous free<br />

communications sessions<br />

1400 – 1515 FREE COMMUNICATIONS E<br />

ENDOMETRIOSIS<br />

BALLROOM 3<br />

Chairs: O Tsutsumi, J Cook<br />

1400 – 1410 Is history taking important in women with<br />

suspected endometriosis<br />

Condous GS, Lam A<br />

1410 – 1420 Outpatient pelvic examination in the woman<br />

with endometriosis – do abnormal findings<br />

correlate with the presence of rectal disease<br />

Burke C, Karthigasu K, Hart R, Garry R<br />

1420 – 1430 Saline infusion vaginography<br />

(sonovaginography): can we predict rectovaginal<br />

endometriosis<br />

Condous GS, Lam A<br />

1430 – 1440 Laparoscopic resection of bowel endometriosis<br />

Shukla-Kulkarni A, Johnston K, Cooper M, Reid G<br />

1440 – 1450 Outcomes of patients requiring surgery for<br />

rectovaginal endometriosis<br />

Jagasia N, Ang WC, Chen F, Healey M<br />

1450 – 1500 Laparoscopic excision of endometriotic urinary<br />

bladder nodule<br />

Shashian T, Ahmed H, Tsaltas J<br />

1500 – 1510 Abdominal wall endometriosis<br />

Lam C, Seman EI, Behnia-Willison F<br />

1400 – 1515 FREE COMMUNICATIONS F<br />

COMPLICATIONS<br />

BALLROOM 4<br />

Chairs: G Reid, M Insull<br />

1400 – 1410 Preliminary experience in colon repair during<br />

laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy<br />

Koh LW, Sun YL, Chen SY, Huang MH<br />

1410 – 1420 Laparoscopic reanastamosis for low ureter<br />

injury<br />

Wu TP, Sa L, Lee CL<br />

1420 – 1430 Successful repair of vesico-vaginal fistula at the<br />

critical site under endoscopic guiding - A video<br />

presentation<br />

Lee JC, Lin WC, Yeh LS, Shih CL<br />

1430 – 1440 Vaginal vault evisceration after total<br />

laparoscopic hysterectomy: A presentation of<br />

12 cases<br />

Park Y, Lee CN, Chung C, Kim I, Chang T<br />

1440 – 1450 Ureteric injuries and their laparoscopic<br />

management<br />

Puntambekar S<br />

1450 – 1500 Complications of advanced gynaecological<br />

laparoscopic surgery<br />

Sathe R, Puntambekar S<br />

1500 – 1510 A prospective multi-centre study of major<br />

complications experienced during excisional<br />

laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis<br />

Shukla-Kulkarni A, Kaloo PD, Cooper MJW,<br />

Reid G<br />

1400 – 1515 FREE COMMUNICATIONS G<br />

PROLAPSE & MISCELLANEOUS<br />

HERITAGE BALLROOM – LEVEL 6<br />

Chairs: J Abbott, PM Yuen<br />

1400 – 1410 Pre and post operative Magnetic Resonance<br />

Imaging (MRI) in women with multicompartment<br />

pelvic floor prolapse undergoing<br />

laparoscopic pelvic floor reconstruction<br />

Johnston KM, Cario G, Carlton M, Rosen D,<br />

Chou D, Raikes C, Moses D, Masters L<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

7


THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY2006>>>>>>>>>>><br />

PROGRAM<br />

1410 – 1420 Vagina-assisted laparoscopic hystero-colpopexy<br />

with bilateral round ligaments shortening-the<br />

crucial anatomies and simplifying of technique<br />

Lin WC, Lee JC<br />

1420 – 1430 Our experiences in treating cases of uterine<br />

prolapse—Round ligament suspension<br />

with LAVH<br />

Wu CM, Kan YY<br />

1430 – 1440 Techniques of exposure in laparoscopy<br />

Thoma V, Waters N, Hummel M, Garbin O,<br />

Wattiez A<br />

1440 – 1450 Laparoscopic Workshops- Do they Work A<br />

study of the effectiveness of a laparoscopic<br />

suturing and knot tying workshop<br />

Karthigasu K, Hart R<br />

1450 – 1500 Laparoscopic myomectomy using the ACE<br />

harmonic scalpel – A video presentation<br />

Ahmed H, Shashian T, Tsaltas J<br />

1500 – 1510 Surgical approach and case selection in<br />

myomectomy<br />

Waters NV , Thoma V, Wattiez A<br />

1400 – 1510 FREE COMMUNICATIONS H<br />

MISCELLANEOUS<br />

BARNET ROOM – LEVEL 6<br />

Chairs: J Tsaltas, KY See Tho<br />

1400 – 1410 The effects of heated, humidified carbon dioxide<br />

in laparoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial<br />

Manwaring J, Cameron M, Readman E, Maher P<br />

1410 – 1420 Laparoscopic cervical cerclage for recurrent<br />

second trimester miscarriage<br />

Liddell HS, Stone PR<br />

1420 – 1430 The operative role of laparoscopy in chronic<br />

pelvic pain<br />

Hadisaputra W<br />

1430 – 1440 The rectus sheath block in preventing postoperative<br />

wound pain after laparoscopic<br />

gynaecological surgery<br />

Ng PS, Chan S, Sahota DS, Yuen PM<br />

1440 – 1450 Take 500 -the experience of laparoscopic<br />

entry amongst gynaecological surgeons of a<br />

single unit<br />

Burke C, Garry R, Hart R, Karthigasu K<br />

1450 – 1500 A modified method of laparoscopic<br />

presacral neurectomy for the treatment of<br />

midline dysmenorrhea<br />

Chang Y, Tsai E-M, Long C-Y, Lin W-C<br />

1500 – 1510 A case of secondary amenorrhea with disorder<br />

of the uterine cervix<br />

Lin CP, Chou CY<br />

1515 – 1545 Afternoon Tea and Trade Exhibition<br />

1545 – 1600 SESSION 12<br />

CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES<br />

Chairs: H Hoshiai, K Karthigasu<br />

DVD – anatomical and technical aspects<br />

of laparoscopic surgery for correction of<br />

vaginal agenesis<br />

1545 – 1600 Vecchietti procedure M Cooper<br />

1600 – 1800 SESSION 13<br />

THE ADNEXAL MASS<br />

Sponsored by Stryker<br />

Chairs: J Carter, W Hadisaputra<br />

1600 – 1630 DVD presentations on dermoid cysts,<br />

hydrosalpinges, ovarian cysts including<br />

borderline ovarian tumours G Condous<br />

H Hoshiai<br />

1630 – 1645 The hidden dangers of the entrapped ovary<br />

P Mangeshikar<br />

1645 – 1700 Laparoscopic approaches to a suspicious<br />

adnexal mass<br />

F Wong<br />

Transponder Session<br />

Case presentation:<br />

1700 – 1745 The “suspicious” ovarian mass<br />

Presenter: K Karthigasu<br />

Moderator: R Houghton<br />

Questions to audience and panel<br />

Panel: C L Lee, N Hacker, F Wong,<br />

P M Yuen, D Molloy, FH Loh<br />

1745 – 1800 Close A Lam<br />

POSTER EXHIBITION<br />

BALLROOM 1 & 2<br />

All poster presentations will be available for viewing<br />

during morning and afternoon tea and lunch breaks<br />

during the Conference<br />

8<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


CONFERENCE SOCIAL PROGRAM<br />

Cocktail Reception and Gala Dinner<br />

Sydney Glass Island Harbour Cruise<br />

departing King Street Wharf<br />

1900 till 2300<br />

Friday 18 August 2006<br />

Transportation from The Westin Sydney to King Street Wharf<br />

departs at 1900.<br />

Return transportation to The Westin Sydney departs at 2300.<br />

<strong>AGES</strong> PELVIC FLOOR SYMPOSIUM & WORKSHOP VII 2006<br />

<strong>AGES</strong> PELVIC FLOOR SYMPOSIUM & WORKSHOP VII<br />

Anatomy<br />

& Function<br />

of the Female Pelvic Floor<br />

17 & 18 November 2006<br />

Brisbane Australia<br />

Hilton Brisbane<br />

Australian<br />

Gynaecological<br />

Endosocpy<br />

Society Ltd.<br />

LIVE SURGERY<br />

CADAVERIC DISSECTION<br />

INTERACTIVE DISCUSSIONS<br />

International Guest Speakers:<br />

Professor John DeLancey USA<br />

Professor Michel Cosson FRANCE<br />

Platinum sponsor of <strong>AGES</strong><br />

Major Sponsor of <strong>AGES</strong><br />

Chairman: Assoc. Professor Chris Maher<br />

Co-Chairman: Dr Anusch Yazdani<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

9


PROGRAM ABSTRACTS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

Laparoscopic hysterectomy<br />

– a viable surgery<br />

Friday 18 August / Session 1 / 0805 - 0820<br />

See Tho KY<br />

Laparoscopic hysterectomy in its various forms is now 17 years old.<br />

During these years, much have been written and debated about<br />

this operation.<br />

However, it has not established itself as a routine procedure for the<br />

general gynaecologist. It is still not the gold standard operation in the<br />

treatment of benign diseases of the female reproduction system.<br />

This presentation is a personal view and audit on laparascopic<br />

hysterectomy, and is derived from retrospective analysis of 363<br />

cases of hysterectomy performed by the author from April 1995 to<br />

Dec. 2005.<br />

Results: Hysterectomy by the laparoscopic method, be it<br />

laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) or total<br />

laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), was achieved in 303 cases<br />

(83.5%). Uterine fibroids and adenomyosis comprised some<br />

70% of cases. There were 5 malignancies. Uterine size ranged<br />

from 100 grams to 1350 grams, and the operating time from 90-<br />

210 minutes.<br />

Major complications were 3 cases of haemorrhage requiring<br />

transfusion, 2 cases of large bowel injury, 2 cases of ureteric injury<br />

and 2 bladder lacerations. Intraoperative conversion to laparotomy<br />

occurred in 9 patients. These conversions were not the result of<br />

organ injuries.<br />

Conclusion: Laparoscopic hysterectomy is a viable operation in the<br />

surgical management of benign pelvic pathology, and may even be the<br />

preferred method.<br />

Anatomical and technical limits to<br />

laparoscopic hysterectomy<br />

Friday 18 August / Session 1 / 0820 - 0835<br />

Lam A<br />

Laparoscopic hysterectomy is one of the most common major<br />

operations performed in the developed countries. It is an operation<br />

which, despite its commonness, continues to generate mixed<br />

feelings, emotions and perceptions in the mind of the public on the<br />

one hand, controversies and debates amongst surgeons in relation to<br />

indications, techniques and outcomes on the other.<br />

By and large, there is general consensus that the objectives of<br />

hysterectomy should be:<br />

• To remove pathology<br />

• To improve symptoms<br />

• To prevent or minimise morbidity and complications<br />

• To improve quality of life<br />

• In the case of malignancy, to save life<br />

Amongst the methods available to the surgeon, the choice revolves<br />

around the 3 routes:<br />

• Abdominal route<br />

• Vaginal route<br />

• Laparoscopic route<br />

The chosen route offered to every patient should be based on the<br />

principles of;<br />

• Safety<br />

• Efficiency<br />

• Reproducibility<br />

• Cost-effectiveness<br />

• Pain<br />

• Recovery<br />

• Length of hospitalization<br />

• Return to normal life<br />

• Long-term side-effects<br />

The evidence in the literature remains controversial and debates<br />

continue as to which route of hysterectomy is the preferred method.<br />

The surgeon needs to take into consideration the anatomical and<br />

technical factors which may present limits to every case in which<br />

laparoscopic hysterectomy is chosen as the primary approach.<br />

These may include:<br />

Anatomical factors:<br />

• Size<br />

• Shape<br />

• Mobility<br />

• Co-existing pelvic pathology<br />

• Previous surgery eg. C-section<br />

Technical factors:<br />

• Port placement<br />

• Access<br />

• Visibility<br />

• Knowledge and choice of energy sources<br />

• Dissection skills<br />

• Bladder dissection<br />

• Ureteric dissection<br />

• Suturing skills<br />

10<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FRIDAY 18 AUGUST<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


PROGRAM ABSTRACTS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

procedure into a new unsafe procedure. The pitfalls relate to a 2D<br />

optical system, an inability to touch and feel in a conventional way and<br />

also the possibility of being disorientated in this new often “virtual”<br />

environment. Practise, practise, practise is the way to overcome this<br />

small pitfall.<br />

I think that a hidden pitfall of laparoscopic hysterectomy is that<br />

apart from being trendy and having all the advantages of minimally<br />

invasive surgery we must make sure that this technique is<br />

commercially viable and also attractive to our health care dollar<br />

managers and this means optimising disposables and making sure<br />

that bed stays are efficient. After the learning curve has been<br />

negotiated, the operation properly choreographed and a successful<br />

theatre team established, the procedure should not take any<br />

longer than the traditional operation and in general patients should<br />

be discharged in 24-48 hours.<br />

In summary it is all about training, anatomy, the learning curve<br />

and practise.<br />

Author address: Dr Greg Cario. Sydney Womens Endosurgery Centre<br />

A new approach for laparoscopic ovarian<br />

transposition<br />

Friday 18 August / Session 2 / 0930 - 0945<br />

Huang KG<br />

Pelvic irradiation of premenopausal female patients with<br />

gynecological neoplasm constantly induces castration. It is<br />

justified to attempt to preserve normal ovarian function in these<br />

patients, because long term hormone replacement therapy is<br />

expensive and patients' compliance is always poor. For effective<br />

ovarian function preservation, surgical technique and irradiation<br />

plan is important.<br />

Patients under the age of 45 planned for irradiation are suitable<br />

for laparoscopic ovarian transpositon, and there is more benefit<br />

for younger females especially under the age of 40. Ovarian<br />

transposition is absolutely contraindicated for patients with<br />

carcinomatosis, patients with ovarian or tubal cancer<br />

metastasis, and patients with positive ascites or positive<br />

washing cytology. Using Lee-Huang point as the first trocar<br />

entry, ovaries were seperated and infundibulopelvic ligament<br />

were dissected as long as ovaries could be fixed to<br />

anterolateral abdominal wall to avoid direct irradiation and<br />

scattered irradiation. Metal clips should be placed on the<br />

ovarian stump to allow radiologic detection. Ovarian function<br />

is evaluated by symptom/sign and by serial serum FSH, LH and<br />

E2 levels.<br />

According to our experience, using Lee-Huang point as the first<br />

trocar entry, ovaries transposed to anterolateral abdominal wall<br />

above the level of umbilicus 3-4 cm. by laparoscopy is enough to<br />

avoid radiation exposure in conventional whole pelvis irradiation.<br />

Author address: Kuan-Gen Huang, M.D.Taiwan<br />

Laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation<br />

Friday 18 Aug / Session 2 / 0945 - 1000<br />

Andou M, Ikuma K<br />

Background: We developed a laparoscopic reconstruction<br />

technique for the urinary tract in the case of accidental injury, or<br />

ureteral endometriosis.<br />

Materials and methods: Three cases underwent laparoscopic antivesicoureteral<br />

reflux ureteroneocystostomy. Case 1 required<br />

reconstruction of the urinary tract due to accidental transection<br />

during a laparoscopic hysterectomy for a huge fibroid. Case 2<br />

suffered from late ureteral stenosis after a laparoscopic<br />

hysterectomy, probably due to a thermal injury. The stenosis<br />

improved after conservative management using a double J stent.<br />

However, one year after the removal of the double J stent, the<br />

case presented again with right hydronephrosis. We decided to<br />

perform ureteral reimplantation to secure sufficient blood<br />

perfusion. The third case was referred from an urologist because<br />

she was suffering from ureteral endometriosis. On removal of a<br />

double J stent during a stent exchange, the ureter completely<br />

became obstructed so that it was impossible for the new stent to<br />

be inserted. So segmental resection of the lower ureter was<br />

decided. In in all three procedures we used a newly developed DJ<br />

stent introducer, which eliminated the need for cystoscopy.<br />

Results: The post-operative course for all patients was uneventful.<br />

No blood transfusion or reoperation was required. The patients<br />

resumed a regular diet and began ambulation the day after surgery.<br />

Avoidance of tension, torsion and angulation is of paramount<br />

importance for intact anastomosis.<br />

Conclusions: To achieve a quality reconstruction it is important to<br />

master precise suturing techniques. Of course prevention is the best<br />

tactic, but once injury to the ureter occurs, a minimally invasive<br />

reimplantation strategy is the second best option. For endometriosis<br />

cases, removal of questionable tissue is important to eradicate all<br />

pathology and facilitate intact reconstruction. Laparoscopic ureteric<br />

reimplantation is safe and feasible.<br />

12<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FRIDAY 18 AUGUST<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


PROGRAM ABSTRACTS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

2) Cheng YM and Lin BL: Modified sonohysterography immediately<br />

after hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of submucous myoma. J Am<br />

Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9(1):24-28,2002<br />

3) Yang JH and Lin BL: Changes in myometrial thickness during<br />

hysteroscopic resection of deeply invasive submucous myomas. J<br />

Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8(4):501-505,2001.<br />

4) Lin BL, Akiba Y, Iwata Y: One – step hysteroscopic removal of<br />

sinking submucous myoma in two infertile patients. Fertil Steril<br />

74(5):1035-1038,2000<br />

Author address: Bao-Liang Lin, MD, PhD Kawasaki Municipal<br />

Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan<br />

Refererence:<br />

Eldar - Geva et al .Fert & Steril.1998,70:687<br />

Pritts.Ob Gyn Survey.2001,56:483.<br />

Min et al.Human Reprod.2004,19:1.<br />

Author address: David Healy, Monash University Department of<br />

Obstetrics and Gynaecology<br />

Current non surgical approaches to fibroids<br />

Friday 18 August / Session 3 / 1155 - 1215<br />

Endoscopic myomectomy - outcomes &<br />

fertility issues<br />

Friday 18 August / Session 3 / 1135 - 1155<br />

Healy D<br />

Governments demand Evidence-Based Medicine(EBM). I will<br />

discuss application of EBM to uterine fibroids in 4 ways. Firstly,<br />

our retrospective study of the effect of subserosal (SS), intramural<br />

(IM), & submucosal (SM) fibroids on the outcome of assisted<br />

reproductive technology(ART) treatment. We compared treatment<br />

outcome of 106 ART cycles in 88 patients with uterine fibroids.<br />

Pregnancy rates per transfer were 34, 16, 10 & 30 %<br />

respectively in patients with SS, IM, SM & no fibroids. Implantation<br />

rates were 15, 6, 4 & 16% respectively. Both rates were<br />

significantly lower in patients with SM & IM fibroids than in those<br />

with SS fibroids or no fibroids, even when there was no<br />

deformation of the uterine cavity. A subsequent meta-analysis of<br />

fibroids & infertility showed gynecologists had poor quality EBM<br />

data for this issue. This meta-analysis found no confirmation<br />

between IM fibroids & infertility.<br />

Indeed, no evidence that myomectomy will enhance pregnancy<br />

rates for fibroids of any size- unless they distort the uterine cavity.<br />

Thirdly, the endpoint chosen is vital in any analysis of fibroid<br />

surgery outcome. We suggest that the endpoint in such fibroid &<br />

infertile patients must be Birth Emphasizing a Successful Singleton<br />

delivery at Term gestation( BESST). Future directions for <strong>AGES</strong><br />

could be a prospective, randomised study of endoscopic<br />

myomectomy, or not, for infertile patients with BESST as the<br />

outcome. We estimate, at alpha = 0.05,and 80% power, and a<br />

relative sample size of 6 patients without fibroids to 1 fibroid<br />

patient, that the required sample size would be 100 in the fibroid<br />

group and 600 controls.<br />

Lyon SM<br />

Over the last decade uterine artery embolization has become a real<br />

alternative for women either wishing to preserve their uterus or a<br />

less invasive approach to surgery. More than 30,000 women have<br />

undergone this procedure worldwide and currently, between 13,000<br />

to 14,000 uterine artery embolization's are being performed in the<br />

United States annually.<br />

More recently, a number of medical therapies as well as, image<br />

guided high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) have entered trials<br />

overseas. HIFU is already being used clinically to treat myoma,<br />

prostate cancer and pancreatic cancer. Although, some of these<br />

technologies are in their infancy, the future is suggesting truly noninvasive<br />

approaches to many traditionally surgical diseases.<br />

Author address: Dr Stuart M Lyon. Head of Interventional Radiology,<br />

The Alfred Hospital. Honorary Senior Lecturer, Department of Medicine,<br />

Monash University. Melbourne, Victoria<br />

Laparoscopy in treating gynecologic cancer<br />

Friday 18 August / Session 5 / 1430 - 1500<br />

Lee CL<br />

Cervical cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies of the lower<br />

female genital tract. Though there are many debates in treating<br />

gynecologic cancer by laparotomy or laparoscopy, evidences have<br />

mounted that surgical management in gynecologic cancer not only<br />

could decrease either mortality or recurrence rate, it would also<br />

14<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FRIDAY 18 AUGUST<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


PROGRAM ABSTRACTS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

and only one case experienced bowel obstruction. One case<br />

experienced bowel injury and another two cases experienced bladder<br />

injury. They were repaired intraoperatively without any sequel.<br />

Conclusion: Laparoscopic management of early, and in selected<br />

cases, advanced ovarian cancer is safe and feasible and may be as<br />

efficacious as the traditional laparotomy with the advantage of being<br />

minimally invasive.<br />

Author address: M. Andou M.D, Ph.D. Kurashiki Medical Center<br />

Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy (LRH):<br />

Evaluation of 203 patients with early<br />

cervical cancer<br />

Comparison with Abdominal Radical<br />

Hysterectomy and analysis by time periods<br />

Friday 18 August / Session 5 / 1500 - 1515<br />

Nam JH<br />

Laparoscopic pelvic exenteration for<br />

advanced pelvic cancers : A review of<br />

16 cases<br />

Friday 18 August / Session 5 / 1430 - 1500<br />

Puntambekar S, Sathe R<br />

Objective: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate,<br />

in a series of 16 patients, the technique, feasibility and Oncological<br />

safety of laparoscopic anterior exenteration for locally advanced<br />

pelvic cancers.<br />

Study design: Since August 2003, 16 patients with locally<br />

advanced pelvic cancer were considered. All patients were in a good<br />

general condition, in the age group of 50-50 yrs of which 12 had<br />

cervical cancer and 4 had bladder cancer.<br />

Results: The median operative time was 180 min. The mean<br />

number of harvested pelvic iliac nodes was 14. All margins were<br />

tumor free. The median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days.<br />

Three patients had postoperative complications; two had sub acute<br />

intestinal obstruction and one had ureteric leak. The median follow up<br />

was 15 months.<br />

Conclusions: Our results have demonstrated the feasibility and<br />

Oncological safety of performing anterior exenteration laparoscopically<br />

in advanced pelvic cancer patients with acceptable morbidity.<br />

Intermediate term follow up validates the adequacy of this procedure.<br />

With recent advances of laparoscopic surgery in gynecology,<br />

laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) with lymphadenectomy<br />

has become a new surgical procedure in the management of<br />

patients with early cervical cancer. However, laparoscopic<br />

surgery for cervical cancer has not been widely used, despite of<br />

many advantages in terms of less pain, short hospital stay,<br />

rapid recovery and so on. Difficulties in learning surgical<br />

techniques and uncertainty in outcomes of surgery were main<br />

obstacles for wide use of this new surgical option. It is true that<br />

only a few reports have published on the survival of LRH in<br />

patients with cervical cancer with long-term follow-up.<br />

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the outcomes of<br />

patients treated by LRH, to compare surgical parameters and<br />

recurrence rates with those of patients treated by conventional<br />

abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) and to analyze<br />

perioperative complications and survival trends over the time<br />

periods for investigating learning curve.<br />

From 1997 to 2005, we performed 203 cases of LRH + PLA<br />

(pelvic lymphadenectomy ± paraaortic lymph node sampling).<br />

Inclusion criteria for the laparoscopic surgery were patients with<br />

FIGO stage IA to IIA. Of 203 patients, 155 patients with stage Ib1<br />

patients were compared to 102 patients who undertaken ARH in<br />

the same period. Also, we divided the LRH patients into two period<br />

groups: the first period from 1997 to 2000 (65 patients) and the<br />

second period from 2001 to 2005 (138 patients).<br />

The number of lymph nodes and the rate of intraoperative and<br />

postoperative complications were similar in both the<br />

laparoscopic and the conventional laparotomy group. The mean<br />

surgery duration and the median length of hospital stay was<br />

significantly shorter in patients treated by laparoscopic surgery<br />

LRH vs. ARH ; 219.3 vs. 238.2 min. and 13 vs. 21 days. Five<br />

(3.2of 155 LRH patients and four (2.8of 142 RH patients<br />

had recurrences. The five year progression-free survival rates<br />

were 96.2 in the LRH group and 96.8in the RH group<br />

(p0.316).<br />

Considering the time period, the mean duration of surgery was<br />

significantly shorter (212.8 vs. 233.9 min) and the numbers of<br />

lymph nodes obtained were also significantly more (36 vs. 27.5)<br />

in the second time period. The median hospital stay and the<br />

number of transfusion were similar in both time periods.<br />

Overall, there were fourteen (14/203, 6.9%) major<br />

perioperative complications including bladder, ureter, vessels<br />

16<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FRIDAY 18 AUGUST<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


PROGRAM ABSTRACTS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

10% of women developed new symptoms after surgery. However,<br />

more women with occult stress urinary incontinence developed<br />

postoperative stress urinary incontinence after endopelvic fascia<br />

plication alone than after endopelvic fascia plication and tensionfree<br />

vaginal tape (RR 5.5, 95% CI 1.36 to 22.32).<br />

Reviewers' conclusions: Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is<br />

associated with a lower rate of recurrent vault prolapse and<br />

dyspareunia than the vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy. These<br />

benefits must be balanced against a longer operating time, longer<br />

time to return to activities of daily living and increased cost of the<br />

abdominal approach. The use of a polyglactin mesh overlay at the<br />

time of anterior vaginal wall repair may reduce the risk of<br />

recurrent cystocele. Posterior vaginal wall repair may be better<br />

than transanal repair in the management of rectoceles in terms of<br />

recurrence of prolapse. Adequately powered randomised controlled<br />

clinical trials are urgently needed.<br />

Author address: Assoc. Professor Christopher Maher. Mater,<br />

Women’s and Wesley Urogynaecology Units, Brisbane<br />

ages<br />

ranzcog<br />

Platinum Sponsor of <strong>AGES</strong><br />

Major Sponsor of <strong>AGES</strong><br />

Trainee<br />

Workshop<br />

1& 2<br />

september<br />

2006<br />

THE BOARDROOM LEVEL 1<br />

ST GEORGE PRIVATE HOSPITAL<br />

1 SOUTH ST, KOGARAH<br />

SYDNEY NSW<br />

18<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


SATURDAY 19 AUGUST<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


PROGRAM ABSTRACTS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

Laparoscopy in pregnancy<br />

Saturday 19 August / Session 9 / 1100 - 1120<br />

Yuen PM<br />

complications. The prevention, recognition and management of<br />

these problems are essential for this surgery to be acceptable.<br />

Methods include the broad use of minimally invasive reinvestigation<br />

as indicated, and that delay in recognising and managing<br />

complications can result in significant morbidity and mortality.<br />

Background: Pregnancy, especially in more advanced gestation,<br />

was considered as an absolute contraindication for laparoscopy. With<br />

the advance in technology and improvement in surgical skill,<br />

laparoscopy has also been employed in advanced pregnancy, mostly<br />

for removal of persistent adnexal mass. We evaluated our 10 years<br />

experience in the performance of laparoscopy for removal of<br />

persistent adnexal mass in the second trimester of pregnancy.<br />

Methods: Between April 1994 and December 2005, 75<br />

consecutive women underwent laparoscopic removal of adnexal<br />

masses that had persisted into the second trimester of pregnancy<br />

in an academic tertiary referral centre. Operative complications,<br />

pregnancy and labor outcomes were evaluated.<br />

Results: The median gestation was 10.5 weeks (range 5-25) at<br />

diagnosis and 16 weeks (range 12-25) at the time of operation.<br />

Only two women required conversion to laparotomy. Cystectomy<br />

was performed in 62 women, oophorectomy in 10 and fenestration<br />

in 3. The median operating time was 50 minutes (range 30-120).<br />

There were no intra-operative complications or major<br />

postoperative complications. No women were given tocolytic<br />

therapy and none developed uterine contractions. There was one<br />

spontaneous abortion 6 weeks after the operation and one woman<br />

was lost to follow up. Of the remaining 73 women, the median<br />

gestation at delivery was 39 weeks (range 33-42) and the median<br />

birthweight was 3155 gms (range 2220 – 4200). Conclusions:<br />

Laparosocpic surgery for persistent adnexal masses in the second<br />

trimester of pregnancy is safe with low maternal and perinatal<br />

morbidity and mortality when performed by experienced surgeons.<br />

Author address: Professor Pong Mo Yuen President of Asia-Pacific<br />

Association of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Therapy<br />

(APAGE). Consultant and Honorary Clinical Associate Professor,<br />

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The<br />

Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong<br />

The unwell patient after laparoscopy<br />

Saturday 19 August / Session 9 / 1140 - 1200<br />

Stening F<br />

Laparoscopy has revolutionised abdominal surgery and, as a<br />

result, has been associated with some unique post operative<br />

Case presentation: Adhesiolysis for chronic<br />

pain – a medico-legal dilemma<br />

Saturday 19 August / Session 10 / 1200 - 1300<br />

Karthigasu K<br />

Adhesions:- Adhesions are a difficult dilemma for all<br />

gynaecologists. Do they cause symptoms Do they cause pain<br />

How can we distinguish which adhesions cause pain Will operating<br />

on them provide relief of symptoms Will operating make the<br />

patients worse Do the risks of surgery outweigh benefits All<br />

these questions we ask ourselves when faced with patients with<br />

possible adhesions. In this session we present a number of cases<br />

and ask an expert panel their opinions on management.<br />

Vecchietti procedure<br />

Saturday 19 August / Session 12 / 1545 - 1600<br />

Cooper M<br />

Mayer-Von Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) Syndrome is a<br />

rare congenital abnormality characterised by normal secondary<br />

sexual characteristics, vaginal aplasia, normal ovaries and a<br />

rudimentary uterus. The prevalence of this anomaly is one case<br />

per 4-5,000 live female births. To produce a functioning<br />

neovagina in affected subjects, management relies on one of<br />

several approaches; non-surgical i.e. Frank technique (1), a<br />

split-thickness skin graft i.e. McIndoes technique (2), sigmoid<br />

colon grafts (3,4) or a combination of surgical and non-surgical<br />

(Vecchietti technique). Numerous variations of these techniques<br />

have also been described.<br />

Giuseppe Vecchietti first described his technique for creating a<br />

neovagina in subjects with Mayer-Von Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser<br />

Syndrome (MRKH) in 1965 (5). The initial description was of an<br />

open abdominal procedure involving a Pfannenstiel incision,<br />

20<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


SATURDAY 19 AUGUST<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


PROGRAM ABSTRACTS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

suspicious ovarian cysts/tumours, debate on the choices of<br />

optimal procedures in their management remains unabated.<br />

After a pre-operative evaluation, the laparoscopic diagnosis of nonmalignancy<br />

is usually reliable. In some centre, there are increasing<br />

uses of intraoperative use of ultrasound scan to further improve<br />

the sonographic diagnosis of pathological characteristics of<br />

adnexal mass prior to the operation. The usefulness and<br />

practicality of intraoperative ultrasonogram will be discussed.<br />

With increasing experience and technological advances,<br />

laparoscopic management of early ovarian cancer is now feasible in<br />

some tertiary centres, this minimally access surgery can<br />

sometimes avoid the need for laparotomy without compromising<br />

on the prognosis provided adequate staging, proper training can<br />

ensure a complete removal.<br />

Conclusions: Regarding the strategies to management<br />

unexpected ovarian malignancy, it must rely on a more stringent<br />

selection of patients to reduce the incidence of unexpected<br />

malignant ovarian tumour diagnosed at laparoscopic procedures.<br />

The gynaecologist, even faced with this situation must be able to<br />

manage appropriately. The appropriate management includes<br />

Case presentation: The ‘suspicious’<br />

ovarian mass<br />

Saturday 19 August / Session 13 / 1700 - 1745<br />

Karthigasu K<br />

Suspicious mass- complex ovarian masses by ultrasound are<br />

not an uncommon presentation to the gynaecologist. One the<br />

first questions we ask ourselves is: could this be cancer<br />

Should I be treating this Is the laparoscope appropriate In this<br />

session we present a number of cases and ask the expert panel<br />

advice in trying to determine what mass is most likely to be<br />

neoplastic and requires referral to a gynaecology oncologist,<br />

which masses require open surgery and which are suitable for<br />

laparoscopic surgery.<br />

1. Full preoperative discussion and counseling with all patients with<br />

a likelihood of malignancy. The extent of surgery to be taken if<br />

malignancy is found and its impact on fertility and subsequent<br />

chemotherapy have to be discussed.<br />

2. There should be frozen section facility and gynaecological<br />

oncologist to stand by especially if the preoperative assessment<br />

with ultrasound scan or tumour markers raises any clinical<br />

suspicions of malignancy.<br />

3. Avoid uncontrolled puncture and spillage of any suspicious<br />

adnexal mass if at all possible<br />

4. Liberal use of endoscopic bag for specimen retrieval to avoid<br />

future port site metastasis.<br />

5. If malignancy encountered at laparoscopy or confirmed<br />

pathologically by frozen section, ensure adequate staging and<br />

cytoreductive procedures are performed by laparotomy as soon<br />

as possible<br />

Author addess: Felix Wong WS, Tel: 02-98285686 Mobile:<br />

0418207049 Address: University of New South Wales, Liverpool<br />

Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia<br />

22<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

A<br />

and cup in use at Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and a short tribute<br />

to the late Dr Nicholas Biswas.<br />

Author address: Samuel Soo Endoscopic Gynaecological Surgery<br />

Fellow, Harry Merkur<br />

Sydney West Advance Gynaecological Endoscopy Unit<br />

Sydney West Advance Pelvic Surgery Unit<br />

Sydney West Area Health Service<br />

A modified technique of LAVH using a<br />

Biswas uterovaginal elevator (BUVE) for<br />

uteri weighing 500 gm or more<br />

Friday 18 August / Free Communications A / 1400 - 1410<br />

Lee ETC, Wong FWS<br />

Objectives: The objective is to evaluate the surgical outcome<br />

of a new technique of LAVH using the BUVE for uteri weighing<br />

500 gm or more.<br />

The plasma trissector at laparoscopic<br />

hysterectomy – a video presentation<br />

Friday 18 August / Free Communications A / 1350 - 1400<br />

Soo S, Merkur H, Hardas G<br />

Introduction: Bipolar in the form of PK technology from Gyrus<br />

ACMI has been available for a few years now with variable uptake<br />

in Gynaecological Surgery units across Australia. The main claimed<br />

advantage to PK technology is the use of pulsatile bipolar<br />

diathermy to minimize lateral tissue spread with optimal sealing of<br />

vascular pedicles. The introduction of the new Plasma Trissector<br />

allows vascular pedicles to be sealed and cut with the same<br />

instrument. This may have implications towards reduced operating<br />

times and the safety of using one power source.<br />

Video objective: To discuss the physics of the delivery of<br />

electrical energy in PK technology. To demonstrate our<br />

experience with the use of the Plasma Trissector at<br />

Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy and Total<br />

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. To discuss the advantages,<br />

disadvantages and limitations of the instrument.<br />

Setting: Advanced gynecological endoscopy teaching hospitals.<br />

Author address: Samuel SOO Endoscopic Gynaecological Surgery<br />

Fellow, Harry Merkur, George Hardas<br />

Sydney West Advance Gynaecological Endoscopy Unit<br />

Sydney West Advance Pelvic Surgery Unit<br />

Sydney West Area Health Service<br />

Methods: This was a retrospective review of 31 consecutive<br />

cases of LAVH involving uteri weighing 500 gm or more using the<br />

BUVE between October 2003 and May 2006. Variables analysed<br />

included patient demographics, operative time, concomitant<br />

surgeries, uterine weight, hospital stay, intraoperative and<br />

postoperative complications. The laparoscopic part included the<br />

securing of upper uterine pedicle, bladder flap preparation, and<br />

anterior and posterior colpotomies. Vaginal removal of the large<br />

uteri was performed using the morcellation technique of `rotational<br />

deep spiral cut’.<br />

Results: The mean operative times for the laparoscopic part,<br />

vaginal part and the total procedure were 25.55 + 12 minutes,<br />

55 + 16 minutes, and 95 + 27 minutes respectively. The mean<br />

uterine weight was 668 +/- 158 grams (range 500 - 1100<br />

grams). The mean blood loss was 217.74 +150.86 ml (range 50<br />

- 800 ml). The mean length of hospital stay was 1.45 + 0.623<br />

days (range 1 – 3 days). There was no major intraoperative or<br />

postoperative complication in these patients. Three patients had<br />

intraoperative haemorrhage requiring blood transfusion (10%).<br />

Postoperative complication included 1 postoperative bleeding which<br />

did not require surgical intervention. No febrile morbidity or injury<br />

to ureter, bowel, major vessels or bleeding or haematoma<br />

requiring conversion, readmission or re-operation.<br />

Conclusions: LAVH using the BUVE can eliminate the need for<br />

laparotomy in performing hysterectomies even for large uteri<br />

weighing > 500 grams. The BUVE can serve to steady the cervix<br />

and can achieve a full range of uterine manipulation. It also allows<br />

safe and easy dissection of the bladder and avoids ureteric injury<br />

as the surgical field is far from the ureters. The uterosacral<br />

ligaments become obvious to identify while they are placed under<br />

tension thus allowing intrafascial type of hysterectomy to be<br />

performed. The BUVE also provides an absolute vaginal seal and<br />

the pneumoperitoneum is maintained at all times. The technique<br />

described incorporates the merits of both laparoscopic and vaginal<br />

approaches with a unique uterine morcellation technique for large<br />

uteri. In the surgeon’s own experience, the procedure is<br />

reproducible, safe and versatile.<br />

Author address: Eric T C Lee, Tel: 852-25212567 Department of<br />

O&G, Canossa Hospital, Old Peak Road, Hong Kong, China. Felix W S<br />

Wong, University of New South Wales, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW<br />

2170, Australia<br />

24<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

B<br />

Conclusions: Uterine morcellation is a safe approach to the<br />

piecemeal removal an enlarged uterus at time of TLH. Although<br />

the uterine morcellation is peformed for larger specimens, it is not<br />

associated with longer operating times or greater EBLs. An<br />

enlarged uterus alone is not a contra-indication to TLH. We<br />

acknowledge that sample sizes are small and therefore p-values<br />

are not easily significant.<br />

Author address: George S Condous and Alan Lam. Centre for<br />

Advanced Reproductive Endosurgery, Royal North Shore Hospital,<br />

University of Sydney, Sydney<br />

FREE COMMUNICATIONS B<br />

LAPAROSCOPIC ONCOLOGY<br />

respect to disease free survival with 80% power and · = 0.05.<br />

Equivalence will be assumed if the difference in DFS does not<br />

exceed 7 per cent at 4 years. Secondary outcomes include<br />

treatment related morbidity, postoperative pain and analgesic<br />

consumption; costs and cost-effectiveness; patterns of recurrence<br />

(date and localisation of first recurrence – local, vault, pelvis,<br />

distal); and overall survival. All data from this multicentre<br />

study will be entered using online electronic case report forms (e-<br />

CRF), allowing real time assessment of data completeness and<br />

patient follow-up.<br />

Conclusions: The LACE trial will allow to establish the<br />

equivalence of a total laparascopic surgical approach for patients<br />

with stage 1 endometrial cancer following a two stage protocol to<br />

accommodate potential windfalls to patient recruitment.<br />

Author address: Andreas Obermair, Val Gebski, Peta Forder, Dan<br />

Jackson, Gail Williams and Monika Janda for the LACE Trialists Group<br />

Laparoscopic Approach to Carcinoma of the<br />

Endometrium (LACE)<br />

Friday 18 August / Free Communications B / 1330 - 1340<br />

Obermair A, Gebski V, Forder P, Jackson D,<br />

Williams G, Janda M<br />

Purpose: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological<br />

malignancy in Australia and in other countries of the developed<br />

world. Current standard treatment involves open surgery to<br />

remove the uterus, and both tubes and ovaries (TAH). The<br />

Laparoscopic Approach to Cancer of the Endometrium (LACE) trial<br />

was designed and implemented to assess equivalence of<br />

performing this in a total laparoscopic approach (TLH).<br />

Laparoscopic procedures appeal to patients and patients<br />

frequently request to be treated by laparoscopic procedures even<br />

if these are not proven to be equivalent.<br />

Methods: Patient recruitment for this trial was designed to<br />

proceed along two stages to accommodate for a potential increase<br />

in patient requests of laparoscopic surgery. During the first stage,<br />

patients are randomised in a 2:1 allocation to receive TLH or TAH.<br />

The primary endpoint for this stage is quality of life (QoL) at 6<br />

month post-surgery, requiring 180 patients to be enrolled to have<br />

80% power at · = 0.05 to detect a clinically significant difference<br />

of 8 points on the Functional Assessment of Cancer General<br />

(FACT-G) QoL measurement instruments. If additional recruitment<br />

of patients seems impossible after accrual of 180 patients, this<br />

cohort will be followed for 4 years, and disease free survival (DFS)<br />

of patients treated by TLH will be compared to disease free<br />

survival within the population of endometrial cancer patients.<br />

During the second stage, recruitment will be extended to a total of<br />

590 patients in a 1:1 TLH: TAH allocation. This sample size will<br />

allow to assess the equivalence of these two procedures with<br />

Completely total laparoscopic radical<br />

hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer;<br />

Initial reports<br />

Friday 18 August / Free Communications B / 1340 - 1350<br />

Lee YS, Lee JM, Kim BS, Cho YL, Park IS<br />

Objectives: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the<br />

surgical outcomes and to discuss the role of completely total<br />

laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the cervical cancer.<br />

Methods: Among the 63 patients of cervical cancer patients,<br />

forty five patients who underwent total laparoscopic radical<br />

hysterectomy between November 2003 and April 2005 in the<br />

Kyungpook national university hospital were studied prospectively.<br />

Among them, 40 patients had completely total laparoscopic<br />

radical hysterectomy (89%), including laparoscopic removal of<br />

upper vagina and closure of vaginal stump but five patients needed<br />

upper vaginal incision and suturing through vagina (11%).<br />

Results: Mean age was 47.2. Mean BMI was 24.1±2.8. FIGO<br />

stage were stage 1, 37cases and IIA were 3 cases. Mean<br />

operative time was 215.4±51.1 (84-280) minutes and mean<br />

blood loss was 186.5±155.3 (40-800) mL. Mean time for<br />

laparoscopic closure of vaginal stump was 15.4±5.3 (8-30) min.<br />

There was one bladder injury in intraoperative. There were one<br />

ileus and one vesicovaginal fistula and 2 vaginal stump infection at<br />

the postoperative period. Mean postoperative hospital stay were<br />

8.6±3.1 (5~20) days. Mean self voiding day was 11.4±6.3<br />

(4~29)days. All resected margins were tumor free. The mean<br />

number of retrieved pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes were<br />

26<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

B<br />

Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy<br />

versus abdominal hysterectomy in patients<br />

with early stage endometrial cancer: 10<br />

year experience<br />

Friday 18 August / Free Communications B / 1350 - 1400<br />

Nam JH, Yoon J, Kim DY, Suh DS, Kim JH,<br />

Kim YM, Kim YT<br />

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and<br />

to compare surgical parameters and recurrence rate of these with<br />

those of conventional abdominal surgery in patients with<br />

endometrial cancer.<br />

Methods: From August 1997 to June 2006, we have performed<br />

163 cases of LAVH (laparoscope-assisted vaginal hysterectomy)<br />

with or without lymph node dissection. Laparoscopic approach was<br />

adapted in patients with FIGO clinical stage I by imaging study. Of<br />

the 163 patients, 150 patients who were proved to be surgical<br />

stage I and II were enrolled in this comparative study. As a control<br />

group, we selected 168 cases for the laparotomy group of the<br />

same stages.<br />

Results: The mean duration of surgery, the amount of blood<br />

transfusion and hemoglobin changes were similar in both the<br />

laparoscopic and the conventional laparotomy group. The mean<br />

duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter in patients<br />

treated by laparoscopic surgery (10.1 vs. 15.6 days). The number<br />

of lymph node obtained was significantly higher in the laparoscopic<br />

group. three year recurrence-free survival rates were 97.4% in<br />

laparoscopic group and 98.3% in laparotomy group. (p=0.451)<br />

Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of early<br />

stage endometrial cancer is safe and effective alternatives in<br />

terms of perioperative complications. Overall and recurrence-free<br />

survival did not differ significantly in both groups, however long<br />

term risk for recurrence and survival has yet to be defined.<br />

Author address: Joon Yoon, M.D. Dept. of OB/GYN, Asan medical<br />

Center, 388-1 Poongnap-dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736, Seoul, Korea Tel :<br />

+82 2 3010 3628, E-mail: bestjuny@hanmail.net Joo-Hyun Nam, Joon<br />

Yoon, Dae-Yeon Kim, Dae-Sik Suh, Jong-Hyeok Kim, Yong-Man Kim, Young-<br />

Tak Kim Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan<br />

College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea<br />

Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy (LRT)<br />

in Korea<br />

Friday 18 August / Free Communications B / 1400 - 1410<br />

Nam JH, Kim JH, Kim DY, Suh DS, Kim YM,<br />

Kim YT, Kim SH, Kim DJ, Kim YB<br />

Objectives: Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy with pelvic<br />

lymphadenectomy(LRH) is now increasingly performed in Korea for<br />

the young patients with early-stage cervical cancer. We evaluated<br />

the feasibility and the outcome of LRH performed in Korea.<br />

Methods: We performed retrospective chart review of the<br />

patients who received LRH at the representative centers in Korea<br />

between January 1995 and June 2006.<br />

Results: Thirty-one patients were enrolled in this study. Median<br />

age of the patients was twenty-nine years (range 25-36). Number<br />

of patients was three in stage Ia1 (9%), five in stage Ia2 (16%),<br />

twenty-two in stage Ib1 (69%) and one in stage IIa (3%). Twentysix<br />

patients were squamous cell carcinoma (81%), four patients<br />

were adenocarcinoma (13%) and one patient was adenosquamous<br />

carcinoma. Median operation length was 263 minutes (range 120-<br />

494). Median blood loss was 290cc (range 60-1600). LRH were<br />

changed to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in three patients<br />

because of positive lymph node (two patients) and parametrial<br />

invasion and they all received chemoradiation. Median hospital stay<br />

was 8.5 days and there was no intraoperative or postoperative<br />

complication. Three patients tried pregnancy and two patients<br />

succeeded in delivery. Three patients who were successful in LRH<br />

received adjuvant chemotherapy. Two patients were recurred, but<br />

treated successfully by chemoradiation and 2-year disease-free<br />

survival was 100%.<br />

Conclusions: LRH is supposed to be a safe and effective<br />

treatment modality for the young patients with early cervical cancer<br />

and conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy may be able to<br />

be substituted with LRH for such patients. But more follow-up is<br />

required to evaluate the ability of LRH to preserve fertility.<br />

Author address: Jong Hyeok Kim, M.D. Dept. of OB/GYN, Asan<br />

medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-dong, Songpa-gu, 138-736, Seoul, Korea.<br />

Tel : +82 2 3010 3643 E-mail: hyeokkim@amc.seoul.kr Joo Hyun Nam 1 ,<br />

Jong Hyeok Kim 1 , Dae Yeon Kim 1 , Dae Sik Suh 1 , Yong Man Kim 1 , Young Tak<br />

Kim 1 , Sung Han Kim 2 , Dong Jin Kim 3 , Yong Bong Kim 4 Department of<br />

Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center 1 , Kosin University Gospel<br />

Hospital 2 , Seoul Medical Center 3 , Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital 4 , Korea<br />

28<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

C<br />

FREE COMMUNICATIONS C<br />

HYSTEROSCOPY<br />

Hysteroscopic metroplasty for unicornuate<br />

uterus to improve reproductive outcome<br />

Friday 18 August / Free Communications C / 1330 - 1340<br />

Tandulwadkar S, Margale A<br />

A video of an Innovative Surgery in case of unicornuate uterus with<br />

recurrent pregnancy losses at 16 –20 weeks will be presented.<br />

With the help of versa point hysteroscopic metroplasty has been<br />

performed so as to convert tubular cavity into a triangular cavity<br />

resembling normal cavity.<br />

Conclusion: Reduced intrauterine capacity is the probable cause<br />

for recurrent abortions or preterm delivery in case of unicornuate<br />

uterus. Keeping this in mind, we have innovated this hysteroscopic<br />

surgery to improve the reproductive outcome in case of<br />

unicornuate uterus. Our patient had a successful 33 weeks<br />

delivery after this reconstructive surgery that had previous 3<br />

pregnancy losses between 16-20 weeks of gestation inspite of<br />

cervical encircalage.<br />

Author address: Dr. Sunita Tandulwadkar, Chief, Ruby Hall IVF and<br />

Endoscopy Centre, Pune, India.<br />

Dr. Ashwini Margale, DNB Student, Ruby Hall IVF and Endoscopy Centre,<br />

Pune, India.<br />

Affiliation: Ruby Hall IVF and Endoscopy Centre, Pune, India<br />

A randomised controlled trial comparing<br />

Microwave Endometrial Ablation (MEA )<br />

and Mirena ® (levonorgestrel-releasing<br />

intra-uterine device) in the treatment<br />

of menorrhagia.<br />

Friday 18 August / Free Communications C / 1340 - 1350<br />

Behnia-Willison F, Cook J, Seman EI, Lam C,<br />

Manifold E, Agniewska, O’Shea RT<br />

Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding is a major clinical<br />

problem, with significant effects on quality of life. It accoun<br />

ts for 12% of referrals to gynaecological outpatients in<br />

Western countries.1<br />

Objective: To compare the subjective and objective outcomes for<br />

two methods for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding;<br />

I) Mirena ® (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device)<br />

II)<br />

MEA (microwave endometrial ablation)<br />

Method: 90 women presenting to the gynaecology outpatients<br />

department with heavy menstrual bleeding were assigned to one of<br />

two treatment arms. Three quality of life questionnaires were<br />

administered pre-operatively and at 3 monthly intervals postoperatively<br />

up to 2 years. These included two condition specific<br />

QOL questionnaires (Menstrual Severity Scale, Pictorial Blood Loss<br />

Assessment Chart) and a generalised QOL questionnaire<br />

(WHOQOL-BREF).<br />

Results: There was one major complication in the MEA group<br />

(haematometra) and no major complications in the Mirena ®<br />

group.The MEA group demonstrated a higher satisfaction rate<br />

and lower objective measurement of blood loss as determined by<br />

quality of life questionnaires.<br />

Conclusion: MEA achieved a greater improvement in quality of<br />

life parameters than Mirena ® .<br />

Reference:<br />

1. Cooper KG, Parkin DE, Garratt AM, Grant AM. A randomised<br />

comparison of medical and hysteroscopic management in<br />

women consulting a gynaecologist for treatment of heavy<br />

menstrual loss. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:1360-6<br />

30<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

D<br />

Method: Retrospective study of 39 pregnancies after 1621<br />

procedures of TCRE.<br />

Results: Among 1621 women who were successful followedup<br />

after TCRE, there were 39 pregnancies in 32 women,<br />

including five ectopic pregnancies (12.8%) and 34 intrauterine<br />

pregnancies (87.2%). The majority of pregnancies (84.6%)<br />

occurred within the first two years. In the first year after TCRE,<br />

the incidence of pregnancy was 1.5%. 32 cases with<br />

intrauterine pregnancy were terminated under ultrasound<br />

guidance with 2 difficult procedures. Only one pregnancy in our<br />

study resulted in spontaneous miscarriage which was managed<br />

by suction curettage. One term pregnancy had placenta increta<br />

resulting in caesarean hysterectomy.<br />

Conclusions: Pregnancies after TCRE are associated with<br />

increased risk and Clinicians should be aware of the various<br />

complications of pregnancy that may occur after TCRE, including<br />

an increased risk of ectopic pregnancy. Surgical termination of<br />

pregnancy after TCRE is potentially a difficult procedure and should<br />

be carried out under ultrasound guidance.<br />

Author address: Enlan Xia 1, 3 ; Tin-Chiu Li 2 ; Dan Yu 1, 2 ; Xiaowu Huang<br />

1; Jie Zheng 1 ; Yuhuan Liu 1 and Mei Zhang 1<br />

1 Hysteroscopic Center, Fuxing Hospital affiliate of Capital University of<br />

Medical Sciences, Beijing 100038, China.<br />

2 The Jessop Wing, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, S10 2SF, UK<br />

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed.<br />

Email: xiaenlan@public.bta.net.cn<br />

Stage IIA – IIIA: a) No role of laparoscopy as a primary modality.<br />

b) Chances of transcoelomic spread.<br />

c) Following down-staging – following anterior<br />

chemo therapy or as a second look in patients<br />

with chemical recurrence(CA-125 rising)<br />

Stage IIIC: All patients who have peritoneal deposits. CO2<br />

insufflation is not going to add to further transcoelomic spread. So<br />

if optimal debulking can be achieved with minimal residual disease<br />

by laparoscopy then early adjuvent therapy namely chemo therapy<br />

can be given. In all of the cases tumours are removed per vaginally<br />

to prevent port metastasis.<br />

Retroperitoneal and Para- aortic dissection: Laparoscopy is the best<br />

and minimal invasive method for para aortic lymphnode dissection in<br />

post chemotherapy patients with nodes positive status.<br />

Conclusion: We have the experience of doing laparoscopy in<br />

every stage of ovarian cancers as listed above. In conclusion there<br />

is a definite role of laparoscopy at every stage of ovarian cancers,<br />

especially in later stages also. Judiciousness and rationalism<br />

should be the key factors in deciding the final outcome.<br />

Author address: Dr. Ravi Sathe. Dr. Shailesh Puntambekar. Galaxy<br />

Laparoscopy Institute, Pune. India<br />

FREE COMMUNICATIONS D<br />

OVARIAN AND ADNEXAL DISEASE<br />

Preoperative discrimination between benign<br />

and malignant ovarian cysts treated<br />

surgically in an Australian tertiary centre<br />

Friday 18 August / Free Communications D / 1340 - 1350<br />

Role of laparoscopy in ovarian tumours<br />

Daly JO, Huang A, Ang WC, Healey M.<br />

Friday 18 August / Free Communication D / 1330 - 1340<br />

Sathe R, Puntambekar S<br />

Introduction: Laparoscopy has proved to be the preferred<br />

modality for all types of gynaecological surgeries, but literature<br />

says it has no use in ovarian tumours because of chances of<br />

metastasis.The study was designed to find out if there was any<br />

role of laparoscopy in the management of ovarian cancers.<br />

Materials and Methods:<br />

Role of laparoscopy in various stages:<br />

Stage IA : Non-epithelial –Stromal and Germ cell tumours.<br />

Accidentally found tumours, total excision without spillage possible.<br />

Objective: To report a series of surgically treated ovarian cysts<br />

and analysis of the characteristics associated with benign and<br />

malignant cases.<br />

Population/Setting: All public patients diagnosed with an<br />

ovarian cyst undergoing surgery at the Royal Women’s Hospital,<br />

Melbourne, Australia, between July 2001 and June 2003.<br />

Methods and Materials: Patients were identified through the<br />

operating theatre reporting system and their medical records<br />

reviewed. Information was collated regarding their clinical and<br />

ultrasonographic features, tumour markers and final diagnosis.<br />

The Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) was calculated for each<br />

patient. These data were analysed to identify those features<br />

associated most strongly with benign or malignant cysts.<br />

32<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

D<br />

Author address: Dr. Sunita Tandulwadkar, Chief, Ruby Hall IVF and<br />

Endoscopy Centre, Pune, India. Dr. Ashwini Margale, DNB Student, Ruby<br />

Hall IVF and Endoscopy Centre, Pune, India.<br />

Affiliation: Ruby Hall IVF and Endoscopy Centre, Pune, India<br />

Author address: Dr Yasmin T. Tan, Paediatric and Adolescent<br />

Gynaecology Fellow, Royal Hospital for Women Email:<br />

Yasmin.Tan@SESIAHS.HEALTH.NSW.GOV.AU Tel: (02) 9382 6111 Page:<br />

43268. Address: Royal Hospital for Women Barker Street, Randwick<br />

NSW 2031. Affiliations: Department of Endo-Gynaecology, Royal Hospital<br />

for Women, Sydney<br />

Laparoscopic detorsion and oophoropexy<br />

for treatment of ovarian torsion<br />

Friday 18 August / Free Communications D / 1410 - 1420<br />

Tan YT, Lyons SD, De Decker AP, Vancaillie TG<br />

A medical management of interstitial<br />

ectopic pregnancy: A five year clinical study<br />

Friday 18 August / Free Communications D / 1420 - 1430<br />

Introduction: Adnexal torsion is the fifth most common<br />

gynaecologic surgical emergency, with an incidence of 2.7%1. It<br />

remains both a diagnostic and management challenge. Salpingooophorectomy<br />

is commonly performed, as the torted adnexum<br />

is considered unsalvageable. Alternatively, conservative surgery<br />

may occur with additional cystectomy or cyst drainage. We<br />

describe a treatment method aimed at conservation of adnexal<br />

structures and preservation of reproductive potential.<br />

Method: Laparoscopy is established in the standard fashion.<br />

Upon confirmation of ovarian torsion, attention is turned<br />

towards management of the ovarian cyst. If prior imaging and<br />

clinical characteristics are consistent with a benign entity then<br />

treatment of the cyst via fenestration may be attempted.<br />

Alternatively, the cyst may be left intact so as not to further<br />

compromise ovarian tissue. Detorsion of the involved structures<br />

should then be performed and the ovary and fallopian tube<br />

observed for revascularisation. In the absence of reperfusion<br />

then oophorectomy/salpingectomy is required. If the ovary is<br />

conserved the potential for recurrent torsion should be<br />

addressed. Oophoropexy may be performed by placing a<br />

concertina suture in the ovarian ligament. The ovarian ligament<br />

is consequently shortened and the axis of torsion disrupted2.<br />

The patient is observed in hospital for a further 24 hours, and<br />

then discharged. Sonographic follow-up is arranged to monitor<br />

for cyst resolution and resumption of normal ovarian vascularity,<br />

architecture and follicular formation.<br />

Conclusion: Conservative laparoscopic surgical management<br />

of adnexal torsion should be attempted as it may protect<br />

reproductive potential. We describe a safe and effective method<br />

of detorsion and oophoropexy.<br />

References:<br />

1. Hibbard LT. Adnexal torsion. American Journal of Obstetrics<br />

and Gynaecology 1985; 152:456-61.<br />

2. Vancaillie T & Schmidt EH. Recovery of ovarian function after<br />

laparoscopic treatment of acute adnexal torsion. Reproductive<br />

Medicine 1987; 32:561-62.<br />

Tang A, Baartz D, Khoo SK<br />

Background: Interstitial ectopic pregnancy is rare; however, it<br />

poses a challenge in diagnosis and management due to its<br />

anatomic location. Medical treatment with local or systemic<br />

methotrexate has been considered a safer alternative to surgical<br />

resection by laparotomy or laparoscopy, an example of “the limits<br />

of endoscopic surgery”.<br />

Aim: From an audit of management of interstitial pregnancies, to<br />

determine the treatment success rate with a single dose intravenous<br />

methotrexate / folinic acid regimen and to identify predictors of<br />

treatment outcome.<br />

Methods: A 5 year retrospective audit (April 2000 – August 2005)<br />

of 13 consecutive interstitial pregnancies was carried out, collecting<br />

data on serum beta human chorionic gonadotrophin (‚-hCG) level, size<br />

of gestation sac, gestational age and presence of fetal heart motion<br />

so they could be tested for their influence on treatment success.<br />

Time taken for complete ‚-hCG resolution was recorded and a<br />

negative ‚-hCG result was used as an endpoint of successful outcome.<br />

Results: Of the 13 cases, 2 required urgent surgery for rupture on<br />

presentation. In the remaining 11 cases, intravenous methotrexate<br />

(300mg) was used, with oral folinic acid rescue (15mg x 4 doses).<br />

There were no side effects. Complete ‚-hCG resolution was achieved<br />

in 10 of the 11 medically treated cases (91% success rate),<br />

requiring 21 – 129 days. Successful outcome was seen with initial ‚-<br />

hCG level as high as 106 634 IU/L and gestation sac as large as<br />

6cm and a live fetus.<br />

Conclusion: The methotrexate / folinic acid regimen used as a one<br />

dose treatment is safe and effective for unruptured interstitial<br />

pregnancy, with no side effects and the advantage of avoiding invasive<br />

surgery. Subsequent tubal patency and reproductive function are yet<br />

to be ascertained.<br />

Author address: Amy Tang, David Baartz and Soo Keat Khoo<br />

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Queensland,<br />

Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia<br />

34<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

E<br />

Saline infusion vaginography<br />

(sonovaginography): can we predict<br />

rectovaginal endometriosis<br />

Saturday 19 August / Free Communications E / 1420 - 1430<br />

Condous GS, Lam A<br />

Objectives: The aim of this pilot study was to perform saline<br />

infusion vaginography or sonovaginography in order to establish the<br />

presence or absence of recto-vaginal endometriosis. We also wanted<br />

to establish normative data for the recto-vaginal septum.<br />

Methods: To achieve these aims we performed saline infusion<br />

transvaginal sonography or sonovaginography during the general<br />

anaesthetic at the time of the woman’s laparoscopy. Women<br />

underwent 2-D greyscale sonovaginography intra-operatively and just<br />

before laparoscopy was performed. The rectovaginal septum was<br />

measured (mm) at three points in the longitudinal plane: at the<br />

posterior fornix; at the mid rectovaginal septum; and at the level<br />

above perineal body. The ultrasonographer (GC) predicted whether<br />

there was a rectovaginal nodule or not. The women proceeded to<br />

laparoscopy (AL) and the presence of a normal or abnormal<br />

rectovaginal septum was recorded with histological confirmation of<br />

endometriosis in the rectovaginal septum being the gold standard.<br />

Results: 11 women to date enrolled in the study. The mean age<br />

was 38.8 years (26 – 48). 72.7% (8/11) had a history of<br />

endometriosis. All women underwent intra-operative<br />

sonovaginography followed by laparoscopy. The mean thickness of the<br />

rectovaginal septum at the posterior fornix, mid rectovaginal septum,<br />

and just above perineal body were 5.4 mm (3.6 – 8.5), 3.4 mm (1.7<br />

– 6.6) and 4.6 mm (2.8 – 6.9) respectively. 9/11 had a negative<br />

sonovaginogram for rectovaginal nodule, i.e. normal rectovaginal<br />

septum and 2/11 had a positive sonovaginogram for rectovaginal<br />

nodule, i.e. abnormal rectovaginal septum. 9/11 had a normal<br />

rectovaginal septum at laparoscopy and 2/11 had an endometriotic<br />

rectovaginal nodule excised at laparoscopy with histological<br />

confirmation.<br />

Conclusions: Sonovaginography may be the tool which delineates<br />

normative data for the rectovaginal septum. In the future,<br />

sonovaginography may be the pre-operative tool of choice to<br />

diagnose rectovaginal disease.<br />

Author address: George S Condous and Alan Lam. Centre for<br />

Advanced Reproductive Endosurgery, Royal North Shore Hospital,<br />

University of Sydney, Sydney<br />

Laparoscopic resection of bowel<br />

endometriosis<br />

Saturday 19 August / Free Communications E / 1430 - 1440<br />

Shukla-Kulkarni A, Johnston K, Cooper M, Reid G<br />

Aim: Surgical treatment of patients with rectal endometriosis is<br />

challenging. The aim of this study was to review the laparoscopic<br />

management of rectal endometriosis by resection.<br />

Method: All cases of complex tertiary referral pelvic<br />

endometriosis requiring laparoscopic surgical intervention of the<br />

bowel were identified and reviewed from a prospective database.<br />

Results: 79 patients between January2000 and May 2006 had<br />

surgical procedures performed for severe rectal endometriosis.<br />

This was a multi disciplinary approach involving two senior<br />

gynecologic laparoscopic surgeons and colorectal surgeons.All<br />

rectal procedures were completed laparoscopically.15% had<br />

shaving of rectal wall lesion, 45% had disc resection of anterior<br />

rectal wall using the ILS system, 35% had laparoscopic assisted<br />

segmental low anterior resection.5% of patients had other sites of<br />

endometriosis on bowel which were managed laparoscopically by<br />

excision. There were no rectal anastomotic leaks.<br />

Conclusions: Patients with complex endometriosis of the bowel<br />

can be safely managed laparoscopically using a multidisciplinary<br />

approach.This case.series suggests that a history of rectal pain<br />

during defecation that occurs only during menstruation is<br />

predictive of females with more extensive rectal disease.<br />

Author address: A Shukla-Kulkarni, Keith Johnston, Michael Cooper,<br />

Geoff Reid Sydney Women’s Endosurgery Centre, St George Hospital,<br />

Kogarah,NSW, Sydney Australia<br />

Outcomes of patients requiring surgery for<br />

rectovaginal endometriosis<br />

Saturday 19 August / Free Communications E / 1440 - 1450<br />

Jagasia N, Ang WC, Chen F, Healey M<br />

Objective: A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate<br />

the outcomes of patients with suspected or previously<br />

diagnosed rectovaginal endometriosis undergoing surgical<br />

treatment at the Royal Women’s Hospital in Melbourne between<br />

January 2004 and June 2006.<br />

Methods and Materials: The hospital’s operating theatre<br />

database and unit’s theatre list bookings diary was used to<br />

36<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

F<br />

Results: The postoperative course of the patient was smooth<br />

and uneventful. She was discharged 4 days after operation.<br />

Conclusions: The incidence of bowel damage during laparoscopic<br />

surgery is 0.5%.33 Damage is most likely to occur while entering<br />

the peritoneal cavity or adhesiolysis. Primary closure either by<br />

laparoscopy or laparotomy was recommended if the patient got<br />

adequate colon prepare before surgery and the golden time is<br />

within 8 hours. Laparoscopic repair should be considered in the<br />

selective management of colon perforation. Prophylactic<br />

antibiotics,profuse peritoneal irrigation and a functioning drainage<br />

should be provided to reduce the risk of infection.<br />

Author address: Lim Woh Koh M.D., Ying Lun Sun M.D.,Shi Yau<br />

Chen M.D., Min Ho Huang M.D. Show Chwan Memorial Hospital,<br />

Changhua, Taiwan Corresponding author: Lim Woh Koh M.D,Department<br />

of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua,<br />

Taiwan, No.542,Section 1, Chung-shan Road,Changhua, Taiwan<br />

Tel:+88647256166 e-mail:klw416@gmail.com<br />

Laparoscopic reanastamosis for low<br />

ureter injury<br />

Saturday 19 August / Free Communications F / 1410 - 1420<br />

Wu TP, Sa L, Lee CL<br />

Purpose: To report our experience with laparoscopic reanastamosis<br />

of the ureter conducted at the ureterovesical junction.<br />

Patient and method: A 40-year-old woman who developed<br />

abdominal distention with ascites 19 days after laparoscopic<br />

hysterectomy. Laparoscopy uretero-ureteral anastomosis carried out.<br />

Cystoscopy and double-J stent removal was done after 4 weeks.<br />

Result: There was no significant intraoperative or<br />

postoperative morbidity. Follow-up imaging revealed good<br />

drainage without consequence.<br />

Conclusion: With obvious benefit, Laparoscopic reanastamosis<br />

could be a more feasible method than reimplantation.<br />

Author address: Tung Pi Wu*, MD MPH, Li Sa, MD*, Chyi-Long<br />

LEE, MD.** *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sinlau Christian<br />

Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan. Duckwu0415@seed.net.tw<br />

Successful repair of vesico-vaginal fistula at<br />

the critical site under endoscopic guiding -<br />

a video presentation<br />

Saturday 19 August / Free Communications F / 1420 - 1430<br />

Lee JC, Lin WC, Yeh LS, Shih CL<br />

Study Objective: To report some key points to the successful<br />

repair of vesico-vaginal fistula under endoscopic guiding.<br />

Design: A case report of vesico-vaginal fistula beneath the<br />

right ureter orifice after laparoscopic assisted vaginal<br />

hysterectomy (LAVH).<br />

Setting: China Medical University Hospital, Taiwan. Tertiary<br />

Medical Center<br />

Case: A 44 Y-O female patient who received LAVH for<br />

adenomyosis and myoma on May 30th, 2005. Clear watery vaginal<br />

discharge noted on the 10th post-operative day.<br />

Intervention: Voiding cystourethrogram and cystoscopy revealed<br />

a vesico-vaginal fistula at the bladder base just beneath the righr<br />

ureteral orifice 2 cm away. Late-repair was performed via vagina 3<br />

months later.<br />

Measurements and Managements: Right ureteral stent<br />

was inserted to identify the right ureter.Under cystoscopic aid,the<br />

V-V fistula was excised and repaired through vagina.It was done<br />

under the guiding of a foley catheter inserted in the fistula. We<br />

repaired the fistula by 3 layers suture in a crossed direction<br />

fashion. The detailed technique will be presented in the vedio. After<br />

surgery, a supra-pubic cystostomy was performed.<br />

Results: The ureteral stent was removed on the third postoperative<br />

day. She was discharge once the urine was clear. The<br />

suprapubic cystostomy was removed 2 weeks later. The whole<br />

course was smooth and the patient was uneventful after following<br />

for 1 year.<br />

Conclusion: When facing a vesico-vaginal fistula near the<br />

ureteral orifice, we always choose transabdominal repair to<br />

prevent ureteral injury. With the aid of ureteral stent insertion and<br />

foley catheter inserted in fistula, this kind of fistula can be repaired<br />

safely through vagina.<br />

Author address: Jui- Chi Lee M.D. Dep.OB/GYN, China Medical<br />

University Hospital Taiwan. No.2, Yuh-Der Road, Taichung City, 404<br />

Taiwan, R.O.C. Tel: 886-4-22052121 Ext.2058, 886-920-122812 (Cell<br />

phone) E-mail: rickylee7890@yahoo.com.tw.<br />

Wu-Chou Lin, Assistant Professor, Director of GYN Endoscopy,<br />

Dep.OB/GYN, China Medical University Hospital Taiwan Chairman of<br />

Taiwan Association of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Laparoscopy<br />

(TAMIG). Lian-Shung Yeh, Assistant Professor, Director of Dep.OB/GYN,<br />

China Medical University Hospital Taiwan.<br />

Chao-Lan Shih Dep.OB/GYN, China Medical University Hospital Taiwan<br />

38<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

F<br />

Results: The median operative time was 130 min and median<br />

blood loss was 50 ml. The patients were discharged on day 3 with<br />

the stents and urinary catheter. All patients had complete<br />

cessation of urinary leak immediate postoperatively. The urinary<br />

catheter was removed after 3 weeks and the DJ stents after 6<br />

weeks. All patients were asymptomatic after 6 months follow-up.<br />

MCU was also done at 6 months to demonstrate that there was<br />

no reflux.<br />

Conclusion: The repair of ureterovaginal fistula can be done<br />

laparoscopically with equal results as open technique and thus<br />

decreases the morbidity of the patients.<br />

Author address: Dr.Shailesh Puntambekar. Galaxy Laparoscopic<br />

Institute Pune. India<br />

Organ Damage: Immediate – Bowel, bladder and ureteric injury,<br />

Entry into liver, omentum during Verres needle insertion,<br />

insufflation of wrong space.<br />

Delayed - Fistulas.<br />

Conclusion: Complications are inevitable part of laparoscopic<br />

surgery. Wherever necessary open surgery has to be<br />

considered to overcome complications. Laparoscopic surgery<br />

has limitations and proper patient selection should stand first<br />

before proper technique.<br />

Author address: Dr. Ravi Sathe. Dr. Shailesh Puntambekar. Galaxy<br />

Laparoscopy Institute, Pune. India<br />

Complications of advanced gynaecological<br />

laparoscopic surgery<br />

Saturday 19 August / Free Communications F / 1450 - 1500<br />

Sathe R, Puntambekar S<br />

Introduction: Laparoscopy has proved its value in surgery to<br />

improve patient care. With the package also come numerous<br />

complications if unrecognized can become serious. This study was<br />

done to evaluate different complications associated with advanced<br />

laparoscopic surgery.<br />

Materials and Methods: 200 cases of laparoscopic radical<br />

hysterectomy and 220 non oncological cases a total of 440 cases<br />

were studied from the year 2002. Complications found were<br />

evaluated for the cause and treated accordingly.<br />

Results: Complications can be divided in to Haemmorhagic,<br />

Oncological, and Organ damage.<br />

General complications: Infections- port site and general,<br />

positional injuries, thromboembolism, Co2 retention, surgical<br />

emphysema nerve injuries, thermal injuries due to energy and<br />

light sources, anaesthetic complications.<br />

Heammorhagic complications:<br />

Causes- Accidental, congestion and neovascularization.<br />

Sites – Uterine A and Internal Illiac Vessels injury, Port site due to<br />

inferior epigastric A. injury.<br />

Inference – Venous bleeding difficult to control.<br />

Oncological Complications: Entry in to tumour, Missed lesion,<br />

incomplete resection and port site metastasis.<br />

A prospective multi-centre study of major<br />

complications experienced during excisional<br />

laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis<br />

Saturday 19 August / Free Comminications F / 1500 - 1510<br />

Shukla-Kulkarni A, Kaloo PD, Cooper MJW, Reid G<br />

Objective: To clarify the rate of major intra-operative and postoperative<br />

complications experienced during excisional surgery<br />

for endometriosis.<br />

Design: Prospective multi-centre observational study set in<br />

two University teaching hospitals and three private hospitals in<br />

Sydney, Australia.<br />

All consecutive subjects undergoing laparoscopic excisional<br />

surgery for minimal to severe endometriosis were recruited<br />

(790 subjects).<br />

Complications were recorded intra-operatively or post-operatively<br />

on a secure computerised patient database.<br />

Major intra- and post-operative complications i.e. inadvertent<br />

visceral or vascular injury or other complications directly related to<br />

surgery that either significantly prolonged the operating time,<br />

delayed discharge or necessitated re-admission.<br />

Results: Seven hundred and ninety subjects were recruited over<br />

a 3-year period. Seven major complications were experienced<br />

(8.8/1000); four bowel injuries, one cystotomy, one ureteric<br />

transection, and one major vascular injury. All visceral or vascular<br />

injuries were diagnosed prior to completion of the surgery. No<br />

significant longterm sequelae were experienced.<br />

Conclusion: The incidence of major complications in this study of<br />

8.8/1000 compares favourably with other similar reports. In view<br />

of the potential symptom relief obtained, the authors continue to<br />

40<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

G<br />

This video displays a laparoscopic technique for hystero-colpopexy.<br />

Bone anchors are shown to permit efficient, precise and<br />

hemostatic anchoring to the bony sacrum. This video should be<br />

useful to surgeons wishing to refine this approach or to use it as<br />

an alternative to an open abdominal procedure.<br />

Author address: Wu-Chou Lin , Jui-Chi Lee<br />

d0562@www.cmuh.org.tw Endoscopic Section, OB-Gyn Depart. China<br />

Medical University Hospital, Taiwan<br />

Our experiences in treating cases of<br />

uterine prolapse –<br />

Round ligament suspension with LAVH<br />

Saturday 19 August / Free Communications G / 1420 - 1430<br />

Wu CM, Kan YY<br />

Uterine prolapse typically is not an isolated event and is most often<br />

associated with a variety of pelvic support defects. While we perform<br />

laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy ( LAVH ) for uterine<br />

prolapse, other procedures to treat pelvic floor prolapse, including<br />

enterocele repair, vaginal vault suspension, and cystourethropexy, can<br />

be done simultaneously. As we know that round ligaments correspond<br />

with uterosacral ligaments for proper position of uterus in pelvic<br />

cavity. We will present one simple and convenient method --- round<br />

ligament suspension combined with LAVH --- for cases of uterine<br />

prolapse. We use prolene 1-0 to suture the round ligament with the<br />

upper margin of vaginal cuff bilaterally. Anterior and posterior<br />

colporrhaphy can be done, or not. Post-hysterectomy vaginal vault<br />

prolapse, anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse, enterocele,<br />

urinary stress incontinence were all surveyed. We have used these<br />

method for over 20 cases, with follow-up time ranging from 6<br />

months to 5 years.<br />

Author address: Chin-Ming Wu M.D., Yuan-Yen Kan M.D M.P.H.<br />

OB-Gyn Depart. Kaohsiung Yuan’s General Hospital, OB-Gyn Depart.<br />

Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital<br />

Techniques of exposure in laparoscopy<br />

Saturday 19 August / Free Communications G / 1430 - 1440<br />

Thoma V, Waters N, Hummel M, Garbin O,<br />

Wattiez A<br />

Study Objective: To improve widespread acceptance of<br />

laparoscopy for major and minor gynecological surgery by<br />

demonstrating basic principles to exposure of the surgical field.<br />

The reputation of laparoscopic surgery for being complex, difficult<br />

to perform and to teach can be overcome by returning to<br />

fundamental surgical principles such as ergonomics and more<br />

importantly, adequate exposure.<br />

Design: We demonstrate exposure techniques adapted to the<br />

surgical steps required in the treatment of various pathologies.<br />

Setting: University Hospital of Strasbourg, France.<br />

Patients or Participants: Patients have been selected on the<br />

basis of their pathology.<br />

Interventions: Different laparoscopic exposure techniques are<br />

demonstrated in pictures and in brief videos along with the<br />

resultant improvements in surgical outcomes.<br />

Measurements and Main Results: By commencement of<br />

surgery with correct exposure of the surgical field, the surgeon<br />

can expect four major benefits. Firstly, the assistant goes from<br />

being a sleeping and passive agent to an active and efficient cosurgeon.<br />

Secondly, surgical performance quickly improves by the<br />

attainment of greater comfort and confidence and by the improved<br />

ability of the surgeon to operate with both hands. Thirdly, surgical<br />

safety principles are reinforced, particularly during difficult<br />

moments. Fourthly, although this technique consumes several<br />

minutes at the start of surgery, good exposure will ultimately save<br />

time over the course of procedure.<br />

Conclusion: One of the reasons for the limited of success of the<br />

operation is due to complexity and duration of procedure. One of<br />

the main factors affecting the capacity of the surgeon is ability to<br />

work with majority of instruments available and have good<br />

exposure which spares the assistant.<br />

In laparoscopy, as in conventional surgery the exposure is the key<br />

factor for the success of the procedure. Teaching adequate<br />

exposure should be an integral part of laparoscopic training.<br />

42<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

H<br />

multiple. All patients with rapid growth or suspicion of malignancy<br />

were selected for laparotomy. Both groups had similar utilization<br />

rates of uterine artery occlusion strategies and of LHRH analogs.<br />

Blood loss as reflected by actual haemoglobin drop was similar<br />

between the two groups, but the length of stay was 1.9 times<br />

longer in the laparotomy group (p


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

H<br />

The rectus sheath block in preventing postoperative<br />

wound pain after laparoscopic<br />

gynaecological surgery<br />

Take 500 – the experience of laparoscopic<br />

entry amongst gynaecological surgeons of a<br />

single unit<br />

Saturday 19 August / Free Communications H / 1430 - 1440<br />

Saturday 19 August / Free Communications H / 1440 - 1450<br />

Ng PS, Chan S, Sahota DS, Yuen PM<br />

Burke C, Garry R, Hart R, Karthigasu K<br />

Objective: The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of the<br />

rectus sheath block in postoperative pain relief in patients<br />

undergoing the gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.<br />

Methods: This was a double blinded randomised placebo<br />

controlled study. Eighty-six patients who underwent the<br />

laparoscopic adnexal surgery were randomised to either the<br />

Ropivacaine group or placebo group. Both groups were received<br />

rectus sheath block with 10ml of 0.75% Ropivacaine or 10ml of<br />

Normal saline. All the patients underwent laparoscopic surgery<br />

under general anaesthesia using a standardised anaesthetic<br />

regimen. The laparoscopy surgery is performed in the usual<br />

manner in all cases. A standardised analgesia regimen will be<br />

used for post-operative pain relief. This includes intramuscular<br />

injection of Pethidine on demand and Dologesic is also prescribed<br />

orally as required. Postoperative pain of the umbilical wound and<br />

was assessed immediately at 1, 6, 12 and 24 hours after the<br />

operation using a 10-cm visual analogue scale. The incidence of<br />

postoperative nausea and vomiting was also assessed at the same<br />

time with the pain assessment.<br />

Results: The postoperative pain was significantly less in the<br />

Ropivacaine group at 1 after the operation. (The mean pain score<br />

at 1 hour, NS 2.8+/-2.1 versus R 1.7+/- 1.6) The pain score at 6,<br />

12 and 24 hours were less in the Ropivacaine group, but was not<br />

statistically significant. There were more patient required oral<br />

Dologesic in the Ropivacaine group then Normal Saline group (22<br />

versus 13). However, most of the patients require the oral<br />

analgesic at least 6 hours after the operation. There was no<br />

difference in the requirement of the postoperative intramuscular<br />

Pethidine injection. There was no different in the incidence of<br />

postoperative nausea and vomiting and the requirement of<br />

postoperative antiemetic.<br />

Conclusion: By using the rectus sheath block with Ropivacaine<br />

can relieve the early postoperative pain in patients undergoing the<br />

gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.<br />

Author address: P.S. Ng 1 ; S. Chan 2 ; D.S. Sahota 1 and P.M. Yuen 1<br />

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital,<br />

The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR<br />

2 Department of Anaesthesia, North District Hospital, New Territories<br />

East Cluster, Hong Kong SAR<br />

Introduction: Entry into the abdomino-pelvic cavity is regarded<br />

as the most perilous point of any laparoscopic procedure. Planning<br />

the type of entry to be utilised as well as verification tests used to<br />

confirm entry are regarded as important surgical principles.<br />

Variations exist in entry techniques and the number and type of<br />

entry verification tests used. Factors presumed to contribute to<br />

difficult or complicated laparoscopic entry include previous<br />

surgery, patient obesity, and experience of the surgeon. The<br />

objective of this study was to prospectively audit laparoscopic<br />

entry among surgeons at our gynaecological unit in order to<br />

identify entry techniques, entry verification tests used, occurrence<br />

of difficult laparoscopic entry and the relationship of the factors<br />

mentioned above to the ease of laparoscopic entry.<br />

Methods: All gynaecologists and trainees were requested to<br />

complete an anonymised datasheet following each laparoscopy they<br />

performed. Data which was recorded included indication for surgery,<br />

patient weight, previous surgery, entry technique, entry verification<br />

tests used, intra-abdominal pressures achieved before primary trocar<br />

insertion and entry-related intra-operative findings (presence or<br />

absence of omental emphysaema, omental or bowel adhesions and<br />

the occurrence of visceral or vascular complications.)<br />

Results: Laparoscopic entry in 528 women was prospectively<br />

assessed over a ten month period. Consultants performed 36.4%<br />

of laparoscopic entries, with 35% by senior registrars, 26.4% by<br />

registrars and 2.1% by RMOs. Median patient age was 36 yrs.<br />

Median patient weight was 67kg (range 29 to 150kg).<br />

Laparoscopy was for diagnostic purposes in 28% and for the<br />

treatment of known pathology in 72%. Previous surgical entry into<br />

the abdominal cavity had occurred in 55% of women. Thirty eight<br />

percent of women had had at least one prior laparoscopy (median<br />

# laparoscopies=1, range=1-6) and 30.2% had had at least one<br />

prior laparotomy (median # laparotomies=1, range 1-5). Midline<br />

laparotomy scar was present in 6% of women.<br />

Standard closed Veress entry was the initial entry technique of<br />

choice in 95% of cases. Six per cent of women had Hasson entry<br />

of whom 56% had undergone laparotomy previously. Veress<br />

placement was successful after a single insertion in 86.9% with<br />

8.9%, 3.8%, 0.2% and 0.2% requiring second, third, fourth and<br />

fifth placements respectively. A range of entry tests were used by<br />

practitioners, the commonest being the double-click test used at<br />

92.5% of entries followed by intra-abdominal pressure >>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

H<br />

female karyotype later. However, the hematometra recurred after<br />

T-tube removal. The secondary intervention was arranged. This<br />

time, Gortex tube was placed instead of rubber T-tube.<br />

She was well two months after last surgery. The abdominal pain<br />

subsided after secondary intervention. The Gortex tube would be<br />

removed three months after last intervention to see if the<br />

menstruation restored normally.<br />

Discussion: Here presented was an unusual case of secondary<br />

amenorrhea. The cervical synechiae was considered for normal<br />

chromosome study and normal female organs. The nature was not<br />

well documented in this case. Gortex tube was the drainage of<br />

choice for less tissue reaction. The effect of this method was to<br />

be evaluated later to see if menstruation restored.<br />

Author address: Chao-po Lin, M.D. Chia-yi Christian Hospital Dept<br />

Ob/Gyn No 539 Jhongsiao Rd. Chiayi City 60002 Taiwan. Tel: 886-9-<br />

63411262 Fax: 886-5-2781893 E-mail: bors.tw@yahoo.com.tw<br />

Cheng-Yang Chou, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology2,<br />

National Cheng Kung University<br />

48<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

POSTER EXHIBITION<br />

PROLAPSE<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

Clinical outcome 8 years post laparoscopic<br />

burch colposuspension<br />

Free Communications - Poster<br />

Johnston K, Cario G, Carlton M, Rosen D, Chou D<br />

Laparovaginal approach to anterior<br />

compartment defects<br />

Free Communications - Poster<br />

Behnia-Willison F, Seman EI, Cook J, O’Shea RT, Lam C<br />

Study Objectives: To report on patient outcome 8 years post<br />

Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension, in terms of stress<br />

incontinence,urge incontinence, prolapse symptoms and reoperation<br />

rate.<br />

Design: Postal questionnaire with graded responses, collecting<br />

subjective data on patients’ symptoms. The questionnaire was sent<br />

out (January 2005), 8 years after original operation<br />

Patients: 23 of 36 (64%) patients responded to questionnaire.<br />

All patients underwent a Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension<br />

between 1st January 1996 – 31st December 1996. All patients<br />

had urodynamics proven Genuine Stress Incontinence.<br />

Setting: Single hospital specialising in endoscopic surgery. All<br />

surgery was performed by 2 advanced laparoscopic surgeons.<br />

Measurements and Main Results: Subjective data was<br />

reviewed from 23 patients. Patients responded to questions on<br />

stress incontinence, urge incontinence, prolapse, pre and post<br />

operation. Information regarding any subsequent operations for<br />

urinary incontinence or prolapse was also gathered. A complete<br />

cure to stress incontinence was reported in 11/23 (48%), 9/23<br />

(39%) reported an improvement and 3/23 reported no<br />

improvement or a worsening of their stress incontinence. Urge<br />

incontinence coexisted in 17/23 (74%) of patients pre-operatively.<br />

This was cured in 8/17 (47%) and improved in 8/17 (47%) and<br />

deteriorated in 1 patient. De-novo urge incontinence developed in<br />

3/23 (13%). Symptoms of prolapse coexisted pre-operatively in<br />

16 (74%) of patients and were cured or improved in 15/16 (94%)<br />

post operatively. De-novo symptoms of prolapse developed in 5<br />

(21%) of patients. No patients sought a repeat operation for<br />

incontinence, and 2 patients had vaginal hysterectomies for middle<br />

compartment prolapse 6 and 7 years after their original operation.<br />

Conclusions: Burch Colposuspension still remains the “Gold<br />

Standard” operation in terms of long term success for the<br />

management of stress incontinence. This series although small<br />

demonstrates a the considerable success of the laparoscopic<br />

approach to this operation. We report an overall subject success<br />

rate of 87% eight years post operatively.<br />

Author address: K. Johnston, G. Cario, M. Carlton, D. Rosen,<br />

D. Chou. Sydney’s Women Endosurgery Centre (SWEC), St George Private<br />

Hospital,Sydney, New South Wales, Australia<br />

Objective: To assess the results of laparovaginal repair of<br />

anterior vaginal prolapse in terms of durability of repair and<br />

perioperative morbidity<br />

Method: Prospective study of 274 women with anterior<br />

compartment prolapse who underwent laparoscopic paravaginal<br />

repair bilaterally. 20/84 women with a residual central defect<br />

subsequently underwent a graft-reinforced anterior colporrhapy<br />

(mean interval 14 months). All women are assessed with the<br />

pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) system before and<br />

after surgery.<br />

Results: Major complications occurred in 15 (out of 274)<br />

women. 76% prolapse cure was achieved by laparoscopic repair<br />

alone but increased to 82% by adding the vaginal repair.<br />

Conclusion: An overall prolapse cure of 82% was achieved with<br />

the laparoscopic paravaginal repair and graft-reinforced anterior<br />

colporrhapy when indicated. This procedure was also associated<br />

with low perioperative morbidity.<br />

Quality of life study – Pelvic floor dysfunction<br />

Free Communications - Poster<br />

Cook J, Behnia-Willison F, Seman E, O’Shea RT<br />

Background: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a general term<br />

that describes conditions which adversely affect the female urinary<br />

and faecal continence mechanisms, together with genital prolapse.<br />

It is not uncommon for several pelvic floor disorders to coexist in<br />

the same woman or to develop sequentially over time. Disorders of<br />

the pelvic floor rarely result in severe morbidity or mortality.<br />

Rather, they affect the quality of a woman’s life and it has long<br />

been assumed that sexual function and satisfaction are<br />

compromised by these disorders.<br />

Hypothesis: Pelvic floor dysfunction adversely affects life in<br />

terms of bladder, bowel and sexual function.<br />

Method: Over a 12 month period, 61 women underwent<br />

laparoscopic Pelvic Floor Repair (PFR). Four questionnaires were<br />

administered pre-operatively. These were the Pelvic Floor Distress<br />

Inventory (PFDI), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), Pelvic<br />

Organ Prolapse-Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire<br />

(PISQ) and the WHOQOL-BREF, which is a general health related<br />

50<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

POSTER EXHIBITION<br />

PROLAPSE<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

POSTER EXHIBITION<br />

UTERINE SURGERY<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

Inadvertent cystotomy at laparoscopic<br />

hysterectomy<br />

Free Communications - Poster<br />

Soo S, Hardas G, Merkur H<br />

Study objective: This study was undertaken to investigate the<br />

inadvertent cystotomy rates and outcomes associated with<br />

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. To compare this with other series in<br />

the literature and to identify risk-factors, site of injury, method of<br />

repair, post-operative course and long-term sequelae.<br />

Design: 616 patients who had Laparoscopic Hysterectomy were<br />

identified. The data was prospectively collected between 1999 and<br />

2006 and retrospectively analyzed. All cases complicated by an<br />

inadvertent cystotomy were documented and follow up was<br />

performed at 3to 6 months in all cases. Analysis is by intention<br />

to treat.<br />

Setting: Advanced gynecological endoscopy teaching hospitals.<br />

Patients: 616 patients undergoing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy<br />

with either Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy or Total<br />

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.<br />

Measurements and main results: Of the 616 patients who<br />

had laparoscopic hysterectomy, the inadvertent cystotomy rate<br />

was 1.46% (9/616) with no reported long term sequelae.<br />

Results & discussion: The rate of inadvertent cystotomy in<br />

this study is comparable to that in recent published data. Our<br />

results also compare well with those published on abdominal<br />

hysterectomy (1.5-2%). All injuries occurred at the bladder dome<br />

where repair is relatively simple with minimal risk of ureteric<br />

disruption. This contrasts with vaginal hysterectomy where bladder<br />

injury, although rare, may involve the trigone with a greater risk of<br />

ureteric disruption following repair. Further data and discussion of<br />

the management in each of the 9 cases of inadvertent cystotomy<br />

will be presented.<br />

Author address: Samuel Soo Endoscopic Gynaecological Surgery<br />

Fellow, George Hardas, Harry MerkurSydney West Advance<br />

Gynaecological Endoscopy Unit : Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery<br />

Unit : Sydney West Area Health Service<br />

Review of 100 cases of laparoscopic<br />

hysterectomy in patients with previous<br />

caesarean sections<br />

Free Communications - Poster<br />

Soo S, Merkur H, Herdas G<br />

Study objective: This study was undertaken to investigate the<br />

complication rates associated with Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in<br />

patients who have had caesarean section(s). To identify if there are<br />

specific complications that are higher in this group of patients<br />

and to compare these rates with patients who have not had<br />

Caesarean section(s).<br />

Design: 616 patients had Laparoscopic Hysterectomy of which<br />

100 patients have had one or more previous Caesarean section.<br />

The data was prospectively collected between 1999 and 2006 and<br />

retrospectively analyzed. All peri-operative complications were<br />

documented and follow up was performed at 4 to 8 weeks in all<br />

cases. Analysis is by intention to treat. Major complications<br />

include inadvertent cystotomy, ureteric injury, bowel injury,<br />

haemorrhage greater than 500mls.<br />

Setting: Advanced gynecological endoscopy teaching hospitals.<br />

Patients: 100 patients with one or more previous Caesarean<br />

Section undergoing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.<br />

Interventions: Laparoscopic Hysterectomy completed with<br />

either Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy or Total<br />

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.<br />

Measurements and main results: Of the 100 patients who<br />

had laparoscopic hysterectomy with previous Caesarean(s), the<br />

major complication rate was 14% (14/94) with a conversion to<br />

laparotomy rate of 7% (7/94).<br />

Results: A higher major complication rate of 14% and a<br />

significant higher rate of inadvertent cystotomy of 5% was<br />

observed in the group of patients undergoing Laparoscopic<br />

Hysterectomy with one or more previous Caesarean.<br />

Conclusions: This study suggest that there is a higher major<br />

complication rate when performing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in<br />

patients with previous Caesarean sections. This has important<br />

implications towards counseling and consenting in these patients<br />

for Laparoscopic hysterectomy. There is currently inadequate data<br />

to suggest whether a laparoscopic, laparotomy or vaginal<br />

approach is safest in these patients and a randomized controlled<br />

trial comparing the above is needed.<br />

Author address: Samuel Soo Endoscopic Gynaecological Surgery<br />

Fellow, Harry Merkur, George Hardas: Sydney West Advance<br />

Gynaecological Endoscopy Unit: Sydney West Advance Pelvic Surgery Unit:<br />

Sydney West Area Health Service<br />

52<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

POSTER EXHIBITION<br />

UTERINE SURGERY<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

POSTER EXHIBITION<br />

UTERINE SURGERY<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

Result: Operation time and amount of blood loss were<br />

significantly greater in the group with fibroid 80 g than in the<br />

group < 80 g (121.5 ± 58.9 min versus 79.1 ± 28.6 min P <<br />

0.001, and 346.3 ± 299.6 mL versus 123.0 ± 89.7 mL P <<br />

0.001, respectively). However, there was no difference in the<br />

length of hospital stay and overall incidence of operative<br />

complications between these two groups. None of the women had<br />

any major complications. Nevertheless, 11 minor complications<br />

were noted including two pelvic abscess formations requiring<br />

another laparoscopic treatment. There was no incidence of<br />

switching to laparatomy during the operation. Extreme intraoperative<br />

hemorrhage of more than 1000 mL occurred in eight<br />

patients; however, they had full recovery after blood transfusion.<br />

Rate of blood transfusion was significantly lower in the group with<br />

fibroid < 80 g (3.2% versus 22.1%, P < 0.001).<br />

hospital stay , intravenous fluid usage over 48 hrs or not and the<br />

complication . Is different schedule time affecting the performance<br />

of surgeon doing LAVH Is it associated with a surgeon’s<br />

pressure, exhaustion or fatigue Further study results and findings<br />

will be presented.<br />

Author address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, China<br />

Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan<br />

Conclusion: Despite the increased operation time and blood<br />

loss, LM can be safely performed for large uterine fibroid.<br />

However, high risk of blood transfusion in these patients has to be<br />

kept in mind.<br />

Key words: Laparoscopy; myomectomy; fibroid<br />

Author address: Chun-Chen Hsu, M.D. 1 ,Chin-Jung Wang, M.D. 2 ,<br />

Chyi-Long Lee, M.D. 2 ,and Yung-Kuei Soong, M.D. 2<br />

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Hwa Hospital;<br />

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic<br />

Endoscopy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center and Chang<br />

Gung University College of Medicine, Kwei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan<br />

Schedule effect and laparoscopic-assisted<br />

vaginal hysterectomy<br />

Free Communications - Poster<br />

Chang WC , Lin WC , Yeh LS , Hung YC<br />

Background: Ensuring patient safety in the operating room and<br />

maintaining quality of care are currently emphasized under the<br />

medical environment of cost containment. Is different schedule<br />

time a possible factor affecting the performance of a surgeon<br />

doing the procedure of LAVH Does it matter the quality of care<br />

Method: This was a retrospective study consisting of a sample<br />

of 218 patients who underwent LAVH in a medical center. They<br />

were divided into 3 groups according to the starting time of<br />

implementing the procedure of LAVH. The 3 different starting time<br />

were Am8:30~9:30, 11:30~13:30 and 15:00~17:00. The<br />

clinical outcomes were compared and analysed.<br />

Results and conclusion: The clinical outcomes of the 3 groups<br />

measured and compared were the operating time , the estimated<br />

blood loss , the Ht. shift , the flatus passage time , the length of<br />

54<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

POSTER EXHIBITION<br />

GENERAL<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

POSTER EXHIBITION<br />

GENERAL<br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

Measurement of the force required for<br />

trocar insertion during gynaecological<br />

laparoscopic surgery<br />

Free Communications - Poster<br />

Sahota DS, Ng PS, Yuen PM<br />

Objective: To measure the force required for trocar insertion<br />

during laparoscopic surgery using a single transducer made from<br />

piezo-resitive material.<br />

Study design: A 3cm circular transducer was designed and<br />

constructed from piezo-resistive material, which changes its<br />

impedance as force is exerted on its surface. The transducer was<br />

connected via an interface box to a personal computer to digitally<br />

record the pressure (Pressure = Force/Area) profile continuously<br />

during the trocar insertion. The transducer was positioned in the<br />

center of the operator's palm such that each flat surface was in<br />

contact with either the hand or the top of the trocar. Each study<br />

subject had three trocars inserted. A 10mm trocar was inserted<br />

at the umbilicus after the creation of the pneumoperitoneum with<br />

intra-abdominal pressure of 15mmHg. Two additional 5mm<br />

trocars, either pyramidal or conical tip, were inserted at the left<br />

and right side of the lower abdomen. The insertion of the trocars<br />

was performed by the same operator.<br />

Results: Recordings were successfully obtained from the first 45<br />

subjects. The mean peak pressure for the insertion of the<br />

subumbilical port was 9.3 pounds per square inch and 7.8 pounds<br />

per square inch in nulliparous and multiparous women respectively.<br />

The mean peak pressure for the insertion of conical tip trocar in the<br />

lower abdomen was 10.6 pounds per square inch and 7.7 pounds<br />

per square inch in nulliparous and multiparous women respectively.<br />

The mean peak pressure for the insertion of pyramidal tip trocars<br />

was 8.5 pounds per square inch and 7.4 pounds per square inch in<br />

nulliparous and multiparous women respectively.<br />

Conclusions: A model has been developed by which trocar<br />

insertion force can be objectively measured. Preliminary findings<br />

would suggest that different type and size of trocars require<br />

different insertion force. Moreover, higher insertion force are<br />

required for the insertion of trocars in nulliparous women.<br />

Author address: Sahota DS, Ng PS, Yuen PM. Department of<br />

Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Prince<br />

of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR<br />

Follow-up on an observational prospective<br />

study of a laparoscopic excisional approach<br />

in the treatment of pelvic pain associated<br />

with endometriosis<br />

Free Communications - Poster<br />

Johnston KM, Phung H, Cooper MJW, Reid GD<br />

Study Objective: To assess the clinical outcome of an excisional<br />

approach to endometriosis in the treatment of pain associated<br />

with pelvic endometriosis.<br />

Design: Observational prospective clinical study.<br />

Settings: Tertiary advanced laparoscopic referral centres: Prince<br />

Alfred, Liverpool, St Lukes and St Vincents Hospitals, Sydney, New<br />

South Wales, Australia.<br />

Patients: Review of 112 patients with pain (dysmenorrhoea,<br />

deep dyspareunia, dyschezia, mid cycle, thigh and back pain) who<br />

underwent excision of mild, moderate and severe pelvic<br />

endometriosis. Endometriosis was excised in all patients using<br />

high power density monopolar electrosurgery and adhesiolysis<br />

performed were necessary. All patients had endometriosis<br />

confirmed by biopsy. All operations were performed by two<br />

advanced laparoscopic surgeons with a special interest in<br />

endometriosis. Patients filled in a preoperative baseline subjective<br />

scoring questionnaire, this was repeated at 3, 6 and 12 months<br />

post operatively. Main outcome measured was the improvement of<br />

pain at 3, 6 and 12 months post-operation.<br />

Measurents and Main Results: At 3 months (n=81), 6<br />

months (n=66) and 12 months (n=52) all patients reported a<br />

statistically significant improvement in dysmenorrhoea. At 3<br />

months (n=43) and at 6 months (n=21) there was a statistically<br />

significant improvement of deep dyspareunia however by 12<br />

months (n=31) this improvement was no longer significant. At 3<br />

months (n=39), 6 months (n=30) and 12 months (n=33) all<br />

patients reported a statistically significant improvement of<br />

dyschezia. Mid cycle pain was significantly improved at 3 months<br />

(n=59), 6 months (n=54) and 12 months (n=44). Thigh pain was<br />

significantly improved at 6 months (n=42) and 12 months (n=29).<br />

Back pain was significantly improved by 3 months (n=70), but by 6<br />

months (n=62) this improvement was no longer significant. There<br />

were no intraoperative complications.<br />

Conclusions: Excision of endometriosis when performed by<br />

experienced surgeons is a safe, effective treatment for pelvic and<br />

referred pain for up to 12 months.<br />

Author address: Johnston KM, 1 Phung H, 2 Cooper MJW, 1 Reid GD. 3<br />

1 Sydney Womens Endosurgery Centre (SWEC) and 2 The Simpson Centre<br />

for Health Services Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia<br />

56<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


FREE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

POSTER EXHIBITION<br />

GENERAL<br />

THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


<strong>AGES</strong> HOSTS WORLD ENDOMETRIOSIS 2008<br />

Mark it in your DIARY NOW!<br />

Our vision:<br />

The energy of <strong>AGES</strong> in Surgery, Science and Patient<br />

Care in the 21st Century.<br />

Our theme:<br />

ART AND SCIENCE OF ENDOMETRIOSIS<br />

Clinical acumen, surgical flare and<br />

biomedical advances unite to engage<br />

endometriosis: do not miss this event!<br />

MELBOURNE AUSTRALIA<br />

11-14 MARCH 2008<br />

10 TH<br />

WORLD CONGRESS<br />

ON ENDOMETRIOSIS<br />

Artwork: Fiona Hall born Australia 1953 | Paradisus Terrestris Entitled: Miwulngini (Ngan’gikurunggurr) / Nelumbo nucifera / lotus (1996) | aluminium and tin 24.6 x 12.1 x 3.6 cm | Purchased through The Art Foundation of<br />

Victoria with the assistance of the Rudy Komon Fund, Governor, 1997 | National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne. | Fiona Hall is a leading Australian contemporary artist with a formidable career spanning three decades.<br />

ART & SCIENCE<br />

OF ENDOMETRIOSIS<br />

WCE 2008<br />

<strong>AGES</strong> President:<br />

Dr Rob O’Shea<br />

Chairman:<br />

Prof. David Healy<br />

Organiser:<br />

Mrs Michele Bender<br />

Platinum Sponsor<br />

World<br />

Endometriosis<br />

Society<br />

Australian<br />

Gynaecological<br />

Endoscopy<br />

Society


THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


MEMBERSHIP OF <strong>AGES</strong><br />

>>>>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF <strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY<br />

MEMBERSHIP FORM<br />

YOUR DETAILS:<br />

PAYMENT DETAILS<br />

TITLE<br />

FIRST NAME<br />

COMPANY<br />

ADDRESS<br />

SURNAME<br />

Payment by cheque<br />

Please send membership form and cheque made payable to ‘<strong>AGES</strong>’<br />

to:<br />

<strong>AGES</strong> Secretariat<br />

Conference Connection<br />

Phone: +61 2 9967 2928<br />

Fax: +61 2 9967 2627<br />

Mobile: +61 411 110 464<br />

E-mail:<br />

Mail:<br />

conferences@ages.com.au<br />

282 Edinburgh Road<br />

CASTLECRAG NSW 2068 AUSTRALIA<br />

CITY STATE POSTCODE<br />

Payment by credit card<br />

(Visa or Mastercard only)<br />

COUNTRY<br />

PHONE<br />

MOBILE<br />

FACSIMILE<br />

E-MAIL<br />

Card Number<br />

Expiry Date<br />

Cardholder Name<br />

PROPOSER<br />

SECONDER<br />

Signature<br />

Description<br />

Date<br />

Membership subscription to the Australian Gynaecological<br />

Endoscopy Society for period:<br />

1 January 2006 to 31 December 2006<br />

Please tick the appropriate membership<br />

Fellow $308.00 Overseas Fellow $280.00<br />

Registrar $176.00 Overseas Registrar $160.00<br />

Preferred website password:<br />

(up to 8 alphanumeric characters)<br />

60<br />

>>>>>>>> THE LIMITS OF<br />

<strong>ENDOSCOPIC</strong> SURGERY


MEMBERSHIP OF <strong>AGES</strong><br />

more than endoscopic surgery<br />

<strong>AGES</strong> at its scientific meetings considers all aspects of gynaecological<br />

surgery. The successful <strong>AGES</strong> Pelvic Floor Group has provided a<br />

benchmark forum for gynaecologists predominantly interested in vaginal<br />

and reconstructive surgery.<br />

keep informed<br />

Through its conferences, forums and publications, the Australian<br />

Gynaecological Endoscopy Society (<strong>AGES</strong>) constantly updates members’<br />

knowledge and expertise.<br />

save money<br />

As a member of the Society, you will receive discounts on fees for <strong>AGES</strong><br />

Scientific Meetings as well as receiving the American Association of<br />

Gynecologic Laparoscopists Journal and <strong>AGES</strong>’ newsletter, SCOPE, free<br />

of charge. The AAGL Journal is normally available at US$185 [in excess<br />

of AU$250*] annually.<br />

*Based on exchange rates at time of printing.<br />

do research<br />

$300,000 is available to <strong>AGES</strong> members over three years from 2005<br />

for research into Gynaecological Surgery and the improvement of<br />

women’s health.<br />

earn PR&CRM points<br />

At <strong>AGES</strong> Scientific Meetings, delegates earn PR&CRM points, in addition<br />

to CPD points.<br />

better education<br />

One of the ongoing principal roles of <strong>AGES</strong> will be in education.<br />

The <strong>AGES</strong> Education Subcommittee has been extremely active in helping<br />

the College to improve laparoscopic surgical training.<br />

objectives<br />

• To encourage high standards of Gynaecological Surgery<br />

• To provide a forum for discussion and innovation in all aspects of<br />

Gynaecological Surgery<br />

• To organise scientific meetings for the exchange of knowledge<br />

and expertise<br />

• To provide a network of experienced Gynaecological Endoscopic<br />

Surgeons to optimise patient care and facilitate liaison with other<br />

health professionals<br />

• To encourage scientific research and publications on<br />

Gynaecological and Endoscopic Surgery<br />

• To acknowledge individuals who have made outstanding<br />

contributions to the field of Gynaecological Endoscopy<br />

• To provide opportunities for training in Gynaecological Endoscopy<br />

by organising workshops and training courses<br />

membership benefits<br />

• Discounted registration fees at all <strong>AGES</strong> Scientific Meetings<br />

• Free subscription to the American Association of Gynecological<br />

Laparoscopists’ Journal, a dedicated and highly respected<br />

endoscopic journal<br />

• Free <strong>AGES</strong> newsletter, SCOPE, published three times annually<br />

• Member access to <strong>AGES</strong> website (www.ages.com.au)<br />

• Free listing in the Membership Directory of the <strong>AGES</strong> website<br />

• Scholarships are awarded to <strong>AGES</strong> members to enhance<br />

their skills<br />

• Dissemination of clinical updates on a regular basis<br />

• Eligibility to apply for <strong>AGES</strong> Research Grants<br />

• Eligibility to earn PR&CRM & CPD points at <strong>AGES</strong> Scientific Meetings<br />

<strong>AGES</strong> Clinical Research Fund<br />

<strong>AGES</strong> also supports research into Endoscopic and Gynaecological<br />

Surgery. A Clinical Research Fund has been established by <strong>AGES</strong> as a<br />

result of a significant funding commitment from Stryker. <strong>AGES</strong> is also<br />

investing in this fund so that $300,000 is available to <strong>AGES</strong> members<br />

over three years from 2005 for research into Gynaecological Surgery<br />

and the improvement of women’s health.<br />

Annual Membership Fee:<br />

Fellows $308 including gst<br />

Trainee $176 including gst<br />

Overseas Residents<br />

Fellows<br />

AU$280<br />

Trainee<br />

AU$160<br />

Membership Application Forms are available from:<br />

www.ages.com.au<br />

or<br />

<strong>AGES</strong> Secretariat<br />

Conference Connection<br />

E-mail: conferences@ages.com.au<br />

Mail: 282 Edinburgh Road<br />

CASTLECRAG NSW 2068 AUSTRALIA


CONFERENCE INFORMATION AND CONDITIONS<br />

DEPOSITS AND FINAL PAYMENTS: All costs are<br />

payable in advance. If, for any reason, your entire<br />

payment has not been received by the due date,<br />

we reserve the right to treat your booking fee as<br />

cancelled and will apply the appropriate<br />

cancellation fee.<br />

CANCELLATION POLICY: Should you or a member of<br />

your party be forced to cancel, you should advise the<br />

Conference Organisers in writing. Single Meeting<br />

Registrations: The <strong>AGES</strong> cancellation policy for<br />

workshops and courses allows a cancellation fee of<br />

$100.00 of registration fees for cancellations<br />

received 8 weeks’ prior to the first day of the<br />

Meeting and of 50% of registration fees for<br />

cancellations 4 weeks’ prior to the Meeting. No<br />

refund will be made after this time. Multiple meeting<br />

registrants: No refunds apply.<br />

Hotels and other suppliers of services, depending on<br />

date of cancellation, may also impose cancellation<br />

charges. Accommodation payments will be forfeited<br />

if the room is not occupied on the requested checkin<br />

date. Please note that a claim for reimbursement<br />

of cancellation charges may fall within the terms of<br />

travel insurance you effect. <strong>AGES</strong> reserves the right<br />

to cancel any workshop or course if there are<br />

insufficient registrations.<br />

INSURANCE: Registration fees do not include<br />

insurance of any kind. Insurance is strongly<br />

recommended to cover: loss of payments as a result<br />

of cancellation of your participation in the<br />

Conference, or through cancellation of the<br />

Conference itself, loss of airfares for any reason,<br />

loss or damage to personal property, additional<br />

expenses and repatriation should travel<br />

arrangements need to be altered, medical expenses,<br />

or any other related losses.<br />

PRICING POLICY: It is impossible to predict<br />

increases to cost elements such as government<br />

taxes and other service provider tariffs. In the event<br />

of such fluctuations or increases affecting the price<br />

of the Conference tour, we reserve the right to<br />

adjust our tour prices as may be necessary at any<br />

time up to and including the day of departure, even<br />

though the balance payment may have been made. If<br />

we are forced to change your booking or any part of<br />

it for any reasons beyond our control, for instance, if<br />

an airline changes its schedule - we reserve the<br />

right to vary your itinerary and will give you, or cause<br />

to be given to you, prompt notice thereof.<br />

COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE: Insurance, telephone<br />

calls, laundry, food and beverage except as itemised<br />

in the brochure, items of a personal nature.<br />

TRAVEL AND ACCOMMODATION: <strong>AGES</strong> and<br />

Conference Connection are not itself carriers or<br />

hoteliers nor do we own aircraft, hotels, or coaches.<br />

The flights, coach journeys, other travel and hotel<br />

accommodation herein are provided by reputable<br />

carriers and hoteliers on their own conditions. It is<br />

important to note, therefore, that all bookings with<br />

the Conference Organisers are subject to the terms<br />

and conditions and limitations of liability imposed by<br />

hoteliers and other service providers whose services<br />

we utilise, some of which limit or exclude liability in<br />

respect of death, personal injury, delay and loss or<br />

damage to baggage.<br />

OUR RESPONSIBILITY: <strong>AGES</strong> and Conference<br />

Connection cannot accept any liability of whatever<br />

nature for the acts, omissions or default, whether<br />

negligent or otherwise of those airlines, coach<br />

operators, shipping companies, hoteliers, or<br />

other persons providing services in connection<br />

with your tour pursuant to a contract between<br />

themselves and yourself (which may be evidenced<br />

in writing by the issue of a ticket, voucher, coupon<br />

or the like) and over whom we have no direct and<br />

exclusive control.<br />

<strong>AGES</strong> and Conference Connection do not accept<br />

any liability in contract or in tort (actionable<br />

wrong) for any injury, damage, loss, delay,<br />

additional expense or inconvenience caused<br />

directly or indirectly by force majeure or other<br />

events which are beyond our control, or which are<br />

not preventable by reasonable diligence on our<br />

part including but not limited to war, civil<br />

disturbance, fire, floods, unusually severe weather,<br />

acts of God, act of Government or any authorities,<br />

accidents to or failure of machinery or equipment<br />

or industrial action (whether or not involving our<br />

employees and even though such action may be<br />

settled by acceding to the demands of a labour<br />

group. Please note that the prices quoted are<br />

subject to change without notice.<br />

PRIVACY ACT 1988, Corporations Act 2001:<br />

Collection, maintenance and disclosure of certain<br />

personal information are governed by legislation<br />

included in these Acts. Please note that your<br />

details may be disclosed to the parties mentioned<br />

in this brochure.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!