The Views of Rabbi Moses Feinstein, Rabbi Abraham Joshua ...
The Views of Rabbi Moses Feinstein, Rabbi Abraham Joshua ... The Views of Rabbi Moses Feinstein, Rabbi Abraham Joshua ...
ABSTRACT The Views of Rabbi Moses Feinstein, Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, and Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik on Interfaith Dialogue A thesis presented to the Near Eastern and Judaic Studies Department Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Waltham, Massachusetts By David Orenstein The present thesis will provide an overview of ecumenism as well as important information necessary for its proper historical contextualization; discuss the Second Vatican Council as well as elucidate the official documents associated with it; provide biographical sketches of Rabbis Moses Feinstein, Abraham Joshua Heschel, and Joseph B. Soloveitchik; explicate the positions on interfaith dialogue advocated by these rabbinic personalities; delineate where such positions converge and diverge; and assess the contemporary implications of these positions for the future of interfaith dialogue and interactions involving both Jews and Christians. ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Overview: Ecumenism 1 2 The Second Vatican Council/Nostra Aetate 9 3 Rabbi Moses Feinstein: Biographical Sketch 16 4 Rabbi Moses Feinstein on Interfaith Dialogue 20 5 Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik & Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel: Biographical Sketches 25 6 Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik on Interfaith Dialogue 28 7 Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel on Interfaith Dialogue 34 8 Convergences and Divergences 37 9 Contemporary Implications 41 Bibliography 46 iii
- Page 1: The Views of Rabbi Moses Feinstein,
- Page 5 and 6: any one denomination to pursue effe
- Page 7 and 8: traditions (‗culture groups‘):
- Page 9 and 10: Leaders, Protestant, Catholic, and
- Page 11 and 12: the national creed.‘‖ 46 Accord
- Page 13 and 14: elationship between the Catholic Ch
- Page 15 and 16: of individuals, such as Roncalli an
- Page 17 and 18: authoritarian regimes.‖ 82 In add
- Page 19 and 20: Rabbi Moses Feinstein: Biographical
- Page 21 and 22: was a Kohen.‖ 102 Through employi
- Page 23 and 24: Rabbi Moses Feinstein on Interfaith
- Page 25 and 26: on Christian-Jewish dialogue, feari
- Page 27 and 28: Joseph B. Soloveitchik, whose own p
- Page 29 and 30: descended from the Beis Halevi (the
- Page 31 and 32: Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik on Int
- Page 33 and 34: certain non-religious matters, shar
- Page 35 and 36: I and Adam II is also found in Solo
- Page 37 and 38: Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel on Int
- Page 39 and 40: not only given us rights, it has al
- Page 41 and 42: fratricide,‖ 201 asserting that,
- Page 43 and 44: also is not even an aspiration wort
- Page 45 and 46: theologically than, the tradition o
- Page 47 and 48: for Jews given that this religious
- Page 49 and 50: Bibliography Berenbaum, Michael, an
- Page 51: Sarna, Jonathan D. American Judaism
ABSTRACT<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Views</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rabbi</strong> <strong>Moses</strong> <strong>Feinstein</strong>, <strong>Rabbi</strong> <strong>Abraham</strong> <strong>Joshua</strong> Heschel, and <strong>Rabbi</strong> Joseph<br />
B. Soloveitchik on Interfaith Dialogue<br />
A thesis presented to the Near Eastern and Judaic Studies Department<br />
Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Arts and Sciences<br />
Brandeis University<br />
Waltham, Massachusetts<br />
By David Orenstein<br />
<strong>The</strong> present thesis will provide an overview <strong>of</strong> ecumenism as well as important<br />
information necessary for its proper historical contextualization; discuss the Second<br />
Vatican Council as well as elucidate the <strong>of</strong>ficial documents associated with it; provide<br />
biographical sketches <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rabbi</strong>s <strong>Moses</strong> <strong>Feinstein</strong>, <strong>Abraham</strong> <strong>Joshua</strong> Heschel, and Joseph<br />
B. Soloveitchik; explicate the positions on interfaith dialogue advocated by these rabbinic<br />
personalities; delineate where such positions converge and diverge; and assess the<br />
contemporary implications <strong>of</strong> these positions for the future <strong>of</strong> interfaith dialogue and<br />
interactions involving both Jews and Christians.<br />
ii