Minnesota Water Resources Conference - Water Resources Center ...
Minnesota Water Resources Conference - Water Resources Center ... Minnesota Water Resources Conference - Water Resources Center ...
BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Tuesday, Monday, October 27 23 Poster Session 4:45–5:45 Ditched Stream Restoration: Painter Creek, Minnetrista Tom Miller, Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc., tmiller@eorinc.com; Renae Clark, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District A stream restoration project was implemented in March of 2008 on Painter Creek in an effort to improve water quality in Jennings’s Bay, Lake Minnetonka. This restoration project was implemented after the wetland was identified as having a high phosphorus sorption potential. The main project components include: ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ creation of 2,500 LF of natural stream channel within a 58-acre ditched wetland, weir modification, sheet pile weir construction, bypass channel filling, native seeding and plantings, and reed canary grass management. The new channel was seeded and planted in spring of 2008 and will be allowed one full year to establish before it is brought on-line. This presentation will highlight aspects of the design and construction, focusing on successes and lessons learned. Developing Aquatic Life Benchmarks for Pesticides Phil Monson, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, phil.monson@state.mn.us; Joe Zachman, Minnesota Department of Agriculture; Angela Preimesberger, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Gathering and assessing toxicological research data is essential for developing decision-making tools to assess the quality of Minnesota waters. This project examined the utility of pesticide aquatic life benchmarks developed using a range of data primarily from public agency, pesticide registrant, and open literature sources. Methods used in this effort were assessed for their effectiveness to develop benchmarks using limited data sets. Toxicological data for pesticides was assessed for quality assurance and examined for defensible outcomes by comparing benchmarks developed from the selected data sources. Data gaps, method refinements and policy considerations will be discussed. 47 Minnesota Water Resources Conference, October 27–28, 2008
Poster Session 4:45–5:45 BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Tuesday, Monday, October 27 23 Blue Thumb—Planting for Clean Water Dawn Pape, Rice Creek Watershed District, dpape@ricecreek.org; Angie Hong, Washington Conservation District; Elizabeth Storey, Capitol Region Watershed District This talk is geared for: MS4s and Cities working to achieve (or exceed!) their SWPPP requirements in Education and Outreach and Public Participation. and water resource educators looking to work with a team of 37 partners to achieve change across the state. The Blue Thumb—Planting for Clean Water program makes it easy for residents interested in doing their part to protect water quality to plan, purchase and plant native gardens, raingardens and shorelines with native plants. The Blue Thumb program was started by the Rice Creek Watershed District as an outreach program to meet water quality goals identified in their strategic plan and to help their cities meet their federal Clean Water Act mandates. Now Blue Thumb reaches beyond the Rice Creek Watershed District boundaries into the Twin Cities metro area and greater Minnesota. There are currently 37 Blue Thumb partners. Get involved with this award winning partnership has launched an extensive media campaign, held scores of workshops for residents, trained professional landscapers on lake shore restoration and raingardens, had representation at hundreds of fairs and events, created an incredible raingarden guide and have built a partnership of 36 member organizations. Creating a Database of Empirical Watershed Characteristics for Atlases of Minnesota’s Water Resources Sustainability Heidi Peterson, University of Minnesota, pete6495@umn.edu; John Nieber, University of Minnesota; Roman Kanivetsky, University of Minnesota; David Mulla, University of Minnesota; Francisco Lahoud, University of Minnesota; Boris Shmagin, South Dakota State University Creating a watershed characteristic database is the first and most significant step in the analysis of spatiotemporal distributions of Minnesota’s water balance components. The database spatially associates hydrologic data (annual discharge, monthly proportion, and yield) with topographical, soil and vadose zone, ecological and hydrogeological conditions and properties. USGS stream flow data for 129 gauging stations located within Minnesota was manipulated to display within ArcGIS. The boundaries for the corresponding drainage areas (watersheds) were delineated using ArcHydro. Characteristics of the 129 watersheds (drainage areas 100-10,000 square miles) were summarized to create a matrix database (1947-1971 (79 watersheds), 1955-1979 (93), and 1976-2006 (74)). Statistical exploratory techniques can be used with this database to transform initial matrices of watershed characteristics into linear components and residual matrices, thereby establishing watershed interconnections. To account for Minnesota’s future developments in water sustainability, the watershed characteristics database can be upgraded to include monitoring the surface and ground water regimes. Minnesota Water Resources Conference, October 27–28, 20078 48
- Page 1 and 2: Final Program and Book of Abstracts
- Page 3 and 4: 2008 Water Resources Planning Commi
- Page 5 and 6: Program at a Glance Tuesday, Octobe
- Page 7 and 8: Program Schedule - Monday, October
- Page 9 and 10: Program Schedule - Tuesday, October
- Page 11 and 12: Program Schedule - Tuesday, October
- Page 13 and 14: Developing Aquatic Life Benchmarks
- Page 15 and 16: Minnesota Water Resources Conferenc
- Page 17 and 18: BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Monday, October 2
- Page 19 and 20: Concurrent Sessions I 10:00-11:30 B
- Page 21 and 22: Concurrent Sessions I 10:00-11:30 B
- Page 23 and 24: Concurrent Sessions I 10:00-11:30 T
- Page 25 and 26: Luncheon Presentation 12:15-1:00 Gr
- Page 27 and 28: Concurrent Sessions II 1:15-2:45 Tr
- Page 29 and 30: BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Tuesday, Monday,
- Page 31 and 32: Concurrent Sessions III 3:15-4:45 T
- Page 33 and 34: Concurrent Sessions III 3:15-4:45 T
- Page 35 and 36: Concurrent Sessions III 3:15-4:45 T
- Page 37 and 38: Poster Session 4:45-5:45 BOOK OF AB
- Page 39 and 40: Poster Session 4:45-5:45 BOOK OF AB
- Page 41 and 42: Poster Session 4:45-5:45 BOOK OF AB
- Page 43 and 44: Poster Session 4:45-5:45 BOOK OF AB
- Page 45 and 46: Poster Session 4:45-5:45 BOOK OF AB
- Page 47: Poster Session 4:45-5:45 BOOK OF AB
- Page 51 and 52: Poster Session 4:45-5:45 Developmen
- Page 53 and 54: Poster Session 4:45-5:45 Tower Harb
- Page 55 and 56: Poster Session 4:45-5:45 BOOK OF AB
- Page 57 and 58: BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Monday, October 2
- Page 59 and 60: Plenary Session 8:10-9:30 The SE Mi
- Page 61 and 62: Concurrent Sessions IV 10:00-11:30
- Page 63 and 64: Concurrent Sessions IV 10:00-11:30
- Page 65 and 66: Concurrent Sessions IV 10:00-11:30
- Page 67 and 68: Concurrent Sessions IV 10:00-11:30
- Page 69 and 70: Concurrent Sessions V 1:15-2:45 Tra
- Page 71 and 72: Concurrent Sessions V 1:15-2:45 Tra
- Page 73 and 74: Concurrent Sessions V 1:15-2:45 Tra
- Page 75 and 76: Concurrent Sessions V 1:15-2:45 BOO
- Page 77 and 78: Concurrent Sessions VI 3:00-4:30 Tr
- Page 79 and 80: Concurrent Sessions VI 3:00-4:30 Tr
- Page 81 and 82: Concurrent Sessions VI 3:00-4:30 Tr
- Page 83 and 84: BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Wednesday, Tuesda
- Page 85 and 86: BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Index of First Au
- Page 87 and 88: BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Index of First Au
- Page 89: BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Minnesota Water R
Poster Session 4:45–5:45<br />
BOOK OF ABSTRACTS<br />
Tuesday, Monday, October 27 23<br />
Blue Thumb—Planting for Clean <strong>Water</strong><br />
Dawn Pape, Rice Creek <strong>Water</strong>shed District, dpape@ricecreek.org; Angie Hong, Washington Conservation District; Elizabeth<br />
Storey, Capitol Region <strong>Water</strong>shed District<br />
This talk is geared for: MS4s and Cities working to achieve (or exceed!) their SWPPP requirements in Education<br />
and Outreach and Public Participation. and water resource educators looking to work with a team of 37<br />
partners to achieve change across the state.<br />
The Blue Thumb—Planting for Clean <strong>Water</strong> program makes it easy for residents interested in doing their part to<br />
protect water quality to plan, purchase and plant native gardens, raingardens and shorelines with native plants.<br />
The Blue Thumb program was started by the Rice Creek <strong>Water</strong>shed District as an outreach program to meet<br />
water quality goals identified in their strategic plan and to help their cities meet their federal Clean <strong>Water</strong> Act<br />
mandates. Now Blue Thumb reaches beyond the Rice Creek <strong>Water</strong>shed District boundaries into the Twin Cities<br />
metro area and greater <strong>Minnesota</strong>. There are currently 37 Blue Thumb partners.<br />
Get involved with this award winning partnership has launched an extensive media campaign, held scores<br />
of workshops for residents, trained professional landscapers on lake shore restoration and raingardens,<br />
had representation at hundreds of fairs and events, created an incredible raingarden guide and have built a<br />
partnership of 36 member organizations.<br />
Creating a Database of Empirical <strong>Water</strong>shed Characteristics for Atlases of <strong>Minnesota</strong>’s <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Resources</strong><br />
Sustainability<br />
Heidi Peterson, University of <strong>Minnesota</strong>, pete6495@umn.edu; John Nieber, University of <strong>Minnesota</strong>; Roman Kanivetsky,<br />
University of <strong>Minnesota</strong>; David Mulla, University of <strong>Minnesota</strong>; Francisco Lahoud, University of <strong>Minnesota</strong>; Boris Shmagin,<br />
South Dakota State University<br />
Creating a watershed characteristic database is the first and most significant step in the analysis of spatiotemporal<br />
distributions of <strong>Minnesota</strong>’s water balance components. The database spatially associates hydrologic<br />
data (annual discharge, monthly proportion, and yield) with topographical, soil and vadose zone, ecological<br />
and hydrogeological conditions and properties. USGS stream flow data for 129 gauging stations located within<br />
<strong>Minnesota</strong> was manipulated to display within ArcGIS. The boundaries for the corresponding drainage areas<br />
(watersheds) were delineated using ArcHydro. Characteristics of the 129 watersheds (drainage areas 100-10,000<br />
square miles) were summarized to create a matrix database (1947-1971 (79 watersheds), 1955-1979 (93), and<br />
1976-2006 (74)). Statistical exploratory techniques can be used with this database to transform initial matrices<br />
of watershed characteristics into linear components and residual matrices, thereby establishing watershed<br />
interconnections. To account for <strong>Minnesota</strong>’s future developments in water sustainability, the watershed<br />
characteristics database can be upgraded to include monitoring the surface and ground water regimes.<br />
<strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> <strong>Conference</strong>, October 27–28, 20078 48