13.01.2015 Views

Minnesota Water Resources Conference - Water Resources Center ...

Minnesota Water Resources Conference - Water Resources Center ...

Minnesota Water Resources Conference - Water Resources Center ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BOOK OF ABSTRACTS<br />

Tuesday, Monday, October 27 23<br />

Poster Session 4:45–5:45<br />

Ditched Stream Restoration: Painter Creek, Minnetrista<br />

Tom Miller, Emmons & Olivier <strong>Resources</strong>, Inc., tmiller@eorinc.com; Renae Clark, Minnehaha Creek <strong>Water</strong>shed District<br />

A stream restoration project was implemented in March of 2008 on Painter Creek in an effort to improve water<br />

quality in Jennings’s Bay, Lake Minnetonka. This restoration project was implemented after the wetland was<br />

identified as having a high phosphorus sorption potential. The main project components include:<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

creation of 2,500 LF of natural stream channel within a 58-acre ditched wetland,<br />

weir modification,<br />

sheet pile weir construction,<br />

bypass channel filling,<br />

native seeding and plantings,<br />

and reed canary grass management.<br />

The new channel was seeded and planted in spring of 2008 and will be allowed one full year to establish before<br />

it is brought on-line. This presentation will highlight aspects of the design and construction, focusing on<br />

successes and lessons learned.<br />

Developing Aquatic Life Benchmarks for Pesticides<br />

Phil Monson, <strong>Minnesota</strong> Pollution Control Agency, phil.monson@state.mn.us; Joe Zachman, <strong>Minnesota</strong> Department of<br />

Agriculture; Angela Preimesberger, <strong>Minnesota</strong> Pollution Control Agency<br />

Gathering and assessing toxicological research data is essential for developing decision-making tools to<br />

assess the quality of <strong>Minnesota</strong> waters. This project examined the utility of pesticide aquatic life benchmarks<br />

developed using a range of data primarily from public agency, pesticide registrant, and open literature sources.<br />

Methods used in this effort were assessed for their effectiveness to develop benchmarks using limited data sets.<br />

Toxicological data for pesticides was assessed for quality assurance and examined for defensible outcomes by<br />

comparing benchmarks developed from the selected data sources. Data gaps, method refinements and policy<br />

considerations will be discussed.<br />

47 <strong>Minnesota</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> <strong>Conference</strong>, October 27–28, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!