12.01.2015 Views

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TABULATING DATA 465<br />

Box 22.4<br />

Student-related factors<br />

Q11: Student-related factors<br />

1-3: P1<br />

4-6: P6<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Students were shy and were afraid of losing face when they made mistakes in front of the class.<br />

Students basically had no interest in learning anything, especially a foreign language.<br />

Students had too many subjects to learn, andlearningEnglishwastoobo<strong>ok</strong>ish.<br />

There were too many other distractions such as surfing the Internet or going out with friends.<br />

Chapter 22<br />

7: F3 Students could not relate learning English to other thingstheylearnedatschool,sotheyhadno<br />

interest.<br />

Students’ language learning ability was poor and they feared learning English.<br />

Students were allowed to repeat programmes, so they could become lazy and indifferent.<br />

8: F3 Students spent too much time surfing the Internet.<br />

Students put more time into science rather than language subjects.<br />

9: F3 Students’ foundation was weak.<br />

10-12: F5 Students lacked enthusiasm and ‘proper’learningattitudes.<br />

Students had poor time management.<br />

Students were afraid of losing face when they made mistakes in front of the class. They were shy as<br />

well.<br />

Students had no direction in their learning and they had no plan for their future. Therefore, they did<br />

not learn well, especially a foreign language.<br />

Students had many opportunities to enter universities, despite having a low standard of English.<br />

in their learning and had limited incentive to learn<br />

English well, as universities required only a low<br />

standard of English.<br />

Comment: there was a great variety of comments<br />

here. There were degrees of agreement: the<br />

teachers of the younger primary children agreed<br />

with each other; the teachers of the older primary<br />

children agreed with each other; and the teachers<br />

of the older secondary children agreed with each<br />

other. The teachers of the younger secondary<br />

children raised different points from each other.<br />

However, the four groups of teachers (younger<br />

primary, older primary, younger secondary and<br />

older secondary) raised different points from each<br />

other.<br />

For an example of the layout of tabulated<br />

word-based data and supporting analysis see the<br />

accompanying web site (http://www.routledge.<br />

com/textbo<strong>ok</strong>s/9780415368780 – Chapter 22, file<br />

22.1.doc).<br />

Summary of the interview data<br />

The issues that emerge from the interview data<br />

are striking in several ways. What characterizes<br />

the data is the widespread agreement of the<br />

respondents on the issues. For example:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

There was absolute unanimity in the responses<br />

to questions 9, 12.<br />

There was very considerable, though not<br />

absolute, unanimity on question 11.<br />

In addition to the unanimity already observed,<br />

there was additional unanimity among the<br />

primary teachers in respect of question 11.<br />

In addition to the considerable, though not<br />

absolute, unanimity already observed, there<br />

was much unanimity among the primary<br />

teachers concerning question 6.<br />

Such a degree of unanimity gives considerable<br />

power to the results, even though, because<br />

of the sampling used, they cannot be said

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!