RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

12.01.2015 Views

STRUCTURED OBSERVATION 399 Box 18.1 Astructuredobservationschedule Student to student / / / / Student to students / / Student to teacher / / / / Students to teacher / / / / / Teacher to student / / Teacher to students / / / Student to self √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Task in hand √ √ √ √ √ Previous task Future task √ √ √ √ Non-task Chapter 18 / = participants in the conversation √ = nature of the conversation Each column represents a thirty-second time interval, i.e. the movement from left to right represents the chronology of the sequence, and the researcher has to enter data in the appropriate cell of the matrix every thirty seconds (see below: instantaneous sampling). Because there are so many categories that have to be scanned at speed (every thirty seconds), the researcher will need to practise completing the schedule until he or she becomes proficient and consistent in entering data (i.e. that the observed behaviours, settings etc. are entered into the same categories consistently), achieving reliability. This can be done either through practising with video material or through practising in a live situation with participants who will not subsequently be included in the research. If there is to be more than one researcher then it may be necessary to provide training sessions so that the team of researchers proficiently, efficiently and consistently enter the same sort of data in the same categories, i.e. that there is inter-rater reliability. The researcher will need to decide what entry is to be made in the appropriate category, for example: a tick ( √ ), a forward slash (/), a backward slash (\), a numeral (1, 2, 3 etc.), a letter (a, b, c etc.), a tally mark (|). Whatever code or set of codes is used, it must be understood by all the researchers (if there is a team) and must be simple and quick to enter (i.e. symbols rather than words). Bearing in mind that every thirty seconds one or more entries must be made in each column, the researcher will need to become proficient in fast and accurate data entry of the appropriate codes. 1 The need to pilot a structured observation schedule, as in the example, cannot be overemphasized. Categories must be mutually exclusive and must be comprehensive. The researcher, then, will need to decide the foci of the observation (e.g. people as well as events) the frequency of the observations (e.g. every thirty seconds, every minute, every two minutes) the length of the observation period (e.g. one hour, twenty minutes) what counts as evidence (e.g. how a behaviour is defined and operationalized) the nature of the entry (the coding system). The criterion of ‘fitness for purpose’ is used for making decisions on these four matters. Structured observation will take much time in preparation but the analysis of the data should be rapid as the categories for analysis will have been built into the

400 OBSERVATION schedule itself. So, for example, if close, detailed scrutiny is required then the time intervals will be very short, and if less detail is required then the intervals may be longer. Dyer (1995: 181–4) suggests that structured observation must address several key principles: The choice of the environment, such that there will be opportunities for the behaviour to be observed to be actually occurring – the availability and frequency of the behaviour of interest to the observer: a key feature if unusual or special behaviour is sought. The need for clear and unambiguous measures, particularly if a latent characteristic or construct is being operationalized. A manageable number of variables: a sufficient number for validity to be demonstrated, yet not so many as to render data entry unreliable. Overt or covert observation. Continuous, time-series or random observation. The different categories of behaviour to be observed. The number of people to be observed. The number of variables on which data must be gathered. The kind of observation schedule to be used. Dyer (1995: 186) provides a checklist for planning a structured observation (Box 18.2). There are five principal ways of entering data onto a structured observation schedule: event sampling, instantaneous sampling, interval recording, rating scales and duration recording. Event sampling Event sampling, also known as a sign system, requires a tally mark to be entered against each statement each time it is observed, for example (see http://www.routledge.com/textbooks/ 9780415368780 – Chapter 18, file 18.4.ppt): teacher shouts at child ///// child shouts at teacher /// parent shouts at teacher // teacher shouts at parent // The researcher will need to devise statements that yield the data that answer the research questions. This method is useful for finding out the frequencies or incidence of observed situations or behaviours, so that comparisons can be made; we can tell, for example, that the teacher does most shouting and that the parent shouts least of all. However, while these data enable us to chart the incidence of observed situations or behaviours, the difficulty with them is that we are unable to determine the chronological order in which they occurred. For example, two different stories could be told from these data if the sequence of events were known. If the data were presented in achronology,onestorycouldbeseenasfollows, where the numbers 1–7 are the different periods over time (e.g. every thirty seconds): 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 teacher shouts at child / / / / / child shouts at teacher / / / parent shouts at teacher / / teacher shouts at parent / / Imagine the scene: a parent and child arrive late for school one morning and the child slips into the classroom; an event quickly occurs which prompts the child to shout at the teacher, the exasperated teacher is very cross when thus provoked by the child; the teacher shouts at the child, who then brings in the parent (who has not yet left the premises); the parent shouts at the teacher for unreasonable behaviour and the teacher shouts back at the child. It seems in this version that the teacher shouts only when provoked by the child or parent. If the same number of tally marks were distributed in a different order, a very different story might emerge, for example: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 teacher shouts at child / / / / / child shouts at teacher / / / parent shouts at teacher / / teacher shouts at parent / / In this scene it is the teacher who is the instigator of the shouting, shouting at the child and then at the parent; the child and the parent

STRUCTURED OBSERVATION 399<br />

Box 18.1<br />

Astructuredobservationschedule<br />

Student to student / / / /<br />

Student to students / /<br />

Student to teacher / / / /<br />

Students to teacher / / / / /<br />

Teacher to student / /<br />

Teacher to students / / /<br />

Student to self<br />

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √<br />

Task in hand<br />

√ √ √ √ √<br />

Previous task<br />

Future task<br />

√ √ √ √<br />

Non-task<br />

Chapter 18<br />

/ = participants in the conversation<br />

√ = nature of the conversation<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Each column represents a thirty-second time<br />

interval, i.e. the movement from left to right<br />

represents the chronology of the sequence,<br />

and the researcher has to enter data in the<br />

appropriate cell of the matrix every thirty<br />

seconds (see below: instantaneous sampling).<br />

Because there are so many categories that<br />

have to be scanned at speed (every thirty<br />

seconds), the researcher will need to practise<br />

completing the schedule until he or she<br />

becomes proficient and consistent in entering<br />

data (i.e. that the observed behaviours, settings<br />

etc. are entered into the same categories<br />

consistently), achieving reliability. This can<br />

be done either through practising with video<br />

material or through practising in a live<br />

situation with participants who will not<br />

subsequently be included in the research. If<br />

there is to be more than one researcher then it<br />

may be necessary to provide training sessions<br />

so that the team of researchers proficiently,<br />

efficiently and consistently enter the same sort<br />

of data in the same categories, i.e. that there is<br />

inter-rater reliability.<br />

The researcher will need to decide what entry<br />

is to be made in the appropriate category,<br />

for example: a tick ( √ ), a forward slash (/),<br />

a backward slash (\), a numeral (1, 2, 3<br />

etc.), a letter (a, b, c etc.), a tally mark (|).<br />

Whatever code or set of codes is used, it must<br />

be understood by all the researchers (if there<br />

is a team) and must be simple and quick to<br />

enter (i.e. symbols rather than words). Bearing<br />

in mind that every thirty seconds one or more<br />

entries must be made in each column, the<br />

researcher will need to become proficient in<br />

fast and accurate data entry of the appropriate<br />

codes. 1<br />

The need to pilot a structured observation<br />

schedule, as in the example, cannot be<br />

overemphasized. Categories must be mutually<br />

exclusive and must be comprehensive. The<br />

researcher, then, will need to decide<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

the foci of the observation (e.g. people as well<br />

as events)<br />

the frequency of the observations (e.g. every<br />

thirty seconds, every minute, every two<br />

minutes)<br />

the length of the observation period (e.g. one<br />

hour, twenty minutes)<br />

what counts as evidence (e.g. how a behaviour<br />

is defined and operationalized)<br />

the nature of the entry (the coding system).<br />

The criterion of ‘fitness for purpose’ is used for<br />

making decisions on these four matters. Structured<br />

observation will take much time in preparation<br />

but the analysis of the data should be rapid as the<br />

categories for analysis will have been built into the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!