12.01.2015 Views

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

15 Questionnaires<br />

Introduction<br />

The field of questionnaire design is vast. This<br />

chapter provides a straightforward introduction<br />

to its key elements, indicating the main issues<br />

to be addressed, some important problematical<br />

considerations and how they can be resolved.<br />

The chapter follows a sequence in designing a<br />

questionnaire that, it is hoped, will be useful for<br />

researchers. The serial order is:<br />

ethical issues<br />

approaching the planning of a questionnaire<br />

operationalizing the questionnaire<br />

structured, semi-structured and unstructured<br />

questionnaires<br />

types of questionnaire items<br />

closed and open questions compared<br />

scales of data<br />

the dangers of assuming knowledge or<br />

viewpoints<br />

dichotomous questions<br />

multiple choice questions<br />

rank ordering<br />

rating scales<br />

constant sum questions<br />

ratio data questions<br />

open-ended questions<br />

matrix questions<br />

contingency questions, filters and branches<br />

asking sensitive questions<br />

avoiding pitfalls in question writing<br />

sequencing the questions<br />

questionnaires containing few verbal items<br />

the layout of the questionnaire<br />

covering letters or sheets and follow-up letters<br />

piloting the questionnaire<br />

practical considerations in questionnaire<br />

design<br />

<br />

<br />

administering questionnaires<br />

self-administered questionnaires<br />

postal questionnaires<br />

processing questionnaire data.<br />

It is suggested that researchers may find it useful<br />

to work through these issues in sequence, though,<br />

clearly, a degree of recursion is desirable.<br />

The questionnaire is a widely used and useful<br />

instrument for collecting survey information,<br />

providing structured, often numerical data,<br />

being able to be administered without the<br />

presence of the researcher, and often being<br />

comparatively straightforward to analyse (Wilson<br />

and McLean 1994). These attractions have to be<br />

counterbalanced by the time taken to develop,<br />

pilot and refine the questionnaire, by the possible<br />

unsophistication and limited scope of the data<br />

that are collected, and from the likely limited<br />

flexibility of response (though, as Wilson and<br />

McLean (1994: 3) observe, this can frequently<br />

be an attraction). The researcher will have to<br />

judge the appropriateness of using a questionnaire<br />

for data collection, and, if so, what kind of<br />

questionnaire it should be.<br />

Ethical issues<br />

The questionnaire will always be an intrusion into<br />

the life of the respondent, be it in terms of time<br />

taken to complete the instrument, the level of<br />

threat or sensitivity of the questions, or the possible<br />

invasion of privacy. Questionnaire respondents are<br />

not passive data providers for researchers; they are<br />

subjects not objects of research. There are several<br />

sequiturs that flow from this.<br />

Respondents cannot be coerced into completing<br />

aquestionnaire.Theymightbestronglyencouraged,<br />

but the decision whether to become involved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!