RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

12.01.2015 Views

Acknowledgements Our thanks are due to the following publishers and authors for permission to include materials in the text: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education,formaterialfrom Best, J. W. (1970) Research in Education. Blackwell Publishers, for material from Dyer, C. (1995) Beginning Research in Psychology; Robson, C. (1993) Real World Research; Robson, C. (2002) Real World Research (second edition). British Psychological Society, for material from Adams-Webber, J. R. (1970) Elicited versus provided constructs in repertory grid technique: areview,British Journal of Medical Psychology, 43, 349–54. Reproduced with permission from the British Journal of Medical Psychology © The British Psychological Society. Campbell, D. T. and Stanley, J. C. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Copyright © 1963 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Continuum Books, formaterialfromWalford,G. (2001) Doing Qualitative Educational Research, pp. 30, 31, 36, 137. Deakin University Press, Deakin, Australia,forwords from Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (1981) The Action Research Planner, andKemmis,S. and McTaggart, R. (1992) The Action Research Planner (third edition) 8 and 21–8. Elsevier, formaterialreprintedfromInternational Journal of Educational Research, vol. 18(3), Edwards, D. Concepts, memory and the organisation of pedagogic discourse, pp. 205–25, copyright © 1993, with permission from Elsevier; Social Method and Social Life, M.Brenner (ed.), article by J. Brown and J. Sime: A methodology for accounts, p. 163, copyright © 1981, with permission from Elsevier. Hughes, J. (1976), for material from Sociological Analysis: Methods of Discovery,NelsonThornes, p. 34. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, for material from Murphy, J., John, M. and Brown, H. (eds) (1984) Dialogues and Debates in Social Psychology. London:LawrenceErlbaum Associates. McAleese, R. and Hamilton, D. (eds) (1978) Understanding Classroom Life.Slough:National Foundation for Educational Research. Multilingual Matters Ltd,Clevedon,forfiguresfrom Parsons, E., Chalkley, B. and Jones, A. (1996) The role of Geographic Information Systems in the study of parental choice and secondary school catchments, Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 23–34; for words from Stronach, I. and Morris, B (1994) Polemical notes on educational evaluation in an age of ‘policy hysteria’, Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(1), 5–19. Patton, M. Q. (1980) Qualitative Evaluation Methods, p. 206, copyright © Sage Publications Inc., reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc. Pearson Education Ltd,formaterialfromHarris,N., Pearce, P. and Johnstone, S. (1992) The Legal Context of Teaching. Penguin Group UK, for material from Armistead, N. (1974) Reconstructing Social Psychology. Prentice-Hall, for material from Garfinkel, H. (1974) Studies in Ethnomethodology; Smith, R. W. (1978) Strategies in Social Research. Princeton University Press, for material from Kierkegaard, S. (1974) Concluding Unscientific Postscript. Reips, U.-D. (2002a) Internet-based psychological experimenting: five dos and don’ts. Social Science Computer Review, 20(3),241–9;(2002b) Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology,49(4),243–56.

xviii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Springer,forHycner,R.H.(1985)Someguidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data, Human Studies, 8,279–303,withkind permission of Springer Science and Business Media. Stanford University Press, for material from Sears, R., Maccoby, E. and Levin, H. (1976) Patterns of Child Rearing (originally published 1957). Taylor & Francis, forBrenner,M.andMarsh,P. (eds) (1978) The Social Contexts of Method; Burgess, R. (ed.) (1993) Educational Research for Policy and Practice, pp. 119 and 135; Burgess, R. (ed.) (1985) Issues in Educational Research, pp.116–28and244–7;Burgess,R. (ed.) (1989) The Ethics of Educational Research, p. 194; Cuff, E. G. and Payne, G. (1979) Perspectives in Sociology, p.4;Hammersley,M. and Atkinson, P. (1983) Ethnography: Principles and Practice, pp. 18, 19, 76; Hitchcock,G. and Hughes, D. (1995) Research and the Teacher (second edition), pp. 20–2, 41; Kincheloe, J. (2003) Teachers as Researchers: Qualitative Inquiry as a Path to Empowerment (second edition), pp. 138–9; McCormick, J. and Solman, R. (1992) Teachers’ attributions of responsibility for occupational stress and satisfaction: an organisational perspective, Educational Studies, 18(92),201–22;McNiff,J. (2002) Action Research: Principles and Practice (second edition), pp. 85–91; Medawar, P. (1972) The Hope of Progress;Oldroyd,G.(1986) The Arch of Knowledge: An Introductory Study of the History of the Philosophy and Methodology of Science; Plummer, K. (1983) Documents of Life: An Introduction to the Problems and Literature of aHumanisticMethod; Rex, J. (1974) Approaches to Sociology; Simons,H.andUsher,R.(2000) Situated Ethics in Educational Research, pp. 1–2; Walford, G. (1994) Researching the Powerful in Education; Zuber-Skerritt,O.(1996)New Directions in Action Research, p.99;Winter,R. (1982) Dilemma analysis: a contribution to methodology for action research, Cambridge Journal of Education,12(3),161–74. University of Chicago Press, forbriefquotations from Whyte, W. F. (1993) Street Corner Society, pp. 292, 301, 303; Merton, K. and Kendall, P. L. (1946) The focused interview. American Journal of Sociology, 51, 541–57.

xviii<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

Springer,forHycner,R.H.(1985)Someguidelines<br />

for the phenomenological analysis of interview<br />

data, Human Studies, 8,279–303,withkind<br />

permission of Springer Science and Business<br />

Media.<br />

Stanford University Press, for material from<br />

Sears, R., Maccoby, E. and Levin, H. (1976)<br />

Patterns of Child Rearing (originally published<br />

1957).<br />

Taylor & Francis, forBrenner,M.andMarsh,P.<br />

(eds) (1978) The Social Contexts of Method;<br />

Burgess, R. (ed.) (1993) Educational Research<br />

for Policy and Practice, pp. 119 and 135;<br />

Burgess, R. (ed.) (1985) Issues in Educational<br />

Research, pp.116–28and244–7;Burgess,R.<br />

(ed.) (1989) The Ethics of Educational Research,<br />

p. 194; Cuff, E. G. and Payne, G. (1979)<br />

Perspectives in Sociology, p.4;Hammersley,M.<br />

and Atkinson, P. (1983) Ethnography: Principles<br />

and Practice, pp. 18, 19, 76; Hitchcock,G.<br />

and Hughes, D. (1995) Research and the<br />

Teacher (second edition), pp. 20–2, 41;<br />

Kincheloe, J. (2003) Teachers as Researchers:<br />

Qualitative Inquiry as a Path to Empowerment<br />

(second edition), pp. 138–9; McCormick, J.<br />

and Solman, R. (1992) Teachers’ attributions<br />

of responsibility for occupational stress and<br />

satisfaction: an organisational perspective,<br />

Educational Studies, 18(92),201–22;McNiff,J.<br />

(2002) Action Research: Principles and Practice<br />

(second edition), pp. 85–91; Medawar, P.<br />

(1972) The Hope of Progress;Oldroyd,G.(1986)<br />

The Arch of Knowledge: An Introductory Study of<br />

the History of the Philosophy and Methodology of<br />

Science; Plummer, K. (1983) Documents of Life:<br />

An Introduction to the Problems and Literature of<br />

aHumanisticMethod; Rex, J. (1974) Approaches<br />

to Sociology; Simons,H.andUsher,R.(2000)<br />

Situated Ethics in Educational Research, pp. 1–2;<br />

Walford, G. (1994) Researching the Powerful<br />

in Education; Zuber-Skerritt,O.(1996)New<br />

Directions in Action Research, p.99;Winter,R.<br />

(1982) Dilemma analysis: a contribution to<br />

methodology for action research, Cambridge<br />

Journal of Education,12(3),161–74.<br />

University of Chicago Press, forbriefquotations<br />

from Whyte, W. F. (1993) Street Corner Society,<br />

pp. 292, 301, 303; Merton, K. and Kendall,<br />

P. L. (1946) The focused interview. American<br />

Journal of Sociology, 51, 541–57.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!