Aerosol retrievals from METEOSAT-8 - CM SAF

Aerosol retrievals from METEOSAT-8 - CM SAF Aerosol retrievals from METEOSAT-8 - CM SAF

12.01.2015 Views

SAF on Climate Monitoring Visiting Scientists Report Doc. No: 1.0 Issue : 1.0 Date : 4 October 2006 Fig.15: Temporal variation of the AOT at 670nm derived from AERONET and MSG for the 12th and 14 th of July over Blida (Near Alger - Algeria) In Fig. 16 we present the comparison between the MSG/SEVIRI and the MODIS aerosol product. The two instruments capture the main patterns of the aerosol field but quantitative comparison is at the moment difficult since we do not retrieve the AOT at the same wavelength. The background AOT seems to agree well and large dust outbreak over North of Algeria and the Mediterranean Sea is seen by the two instruments. There is a good land/ocean continuity of the aerosol front passing over Spain and South of France for MSG and it is not so clear for MODIS. However some discrepancies occur for cloud covered regions, for example in the centre of France where high AOT are retrieved from MSG and MODIS observes mainly clouds instead of aerosols. There is agreement between the two instruments over England where very high AOT are found. This emphasizes one more time the fact that our cloud mask still has to be improved. Finally these results are obtained with lots and sometimes strong assumptions but they are really promising, especially because changes in aerosol amount over some locations are also seen by MSG. Better agreements should be obtained using exact radiative transfer calculations and filters on the number of pixel used for the mean calculation, threshold on the standard deviation and the proximity of clouds. - 30 -

SAF on Climate Monitoring Visiting Scientists Report Doc. No: 1.0 Issue : 1.0 Date : 4 October 2006 (a) (b) (c) Figure 16: Comparison of AOT derived from MSG and MODIS on 14 th of July 2005 around 10:45 UTC. (a) MSG AOT in channel 1, the colour scale is ranging from 0 to 0.7; (b) MODIS AOT over land and ocean at 550 nm, the colour scale is ranging from 0 to 0.8; (c) cloud fraction detected by MODIS 6.1.6 Assumptions we made to accelerate development of the algorithm and calculations In the framework of this three months “visiting scientist” activity on the feasibility of aerosols - 31 -

<strong>SAF</strong> on Climate Monitoring Visiting Scientists Report Doc. No: 1.0<br />

Issue : 1.0<br />

Date : 4 October 2006<br />

Fig.15: Temporal variation of the AOT at 670nm derived <strong>from</strong> AERONET and MSG for the 12th<br />

and 14 th of July over Blida (Near Alger - Algeria)<br />

In Fig. 16 we present the comparison between the MSG/SEVIRI and the MODIS aerosol product.<br />

The two instruments capture the main patterns of the aerosol field but quantitative comparison is at<br />

the moment difficult since we do not retrieve the AOT at the same wavelength. The background<br />

AOT seems to agree well and large dust outbreak over North of Algeria and the Mediterranean Sea<br />

is seen by the two instruments. There is a good land/ocean continuity of the aerosol front passing<br />

over Spain and South of France for MSG and it is not so clear for MODIS. However some<br />

discrepancies occur for cloud covered regions, for example in the centre of France where high AOT<br />

are retrieved <strong>from</strong> MSG and MODIS observes mainly clouds instead of aerosols. There is<br />

agreement between the two instruments over England where very high AOT are found. This<br />

emphasizes one more time the fact that our cloud mask still has to be improved.<br />

Finally these results are obtained with lots and sometimes strong assumptions but they are really<br />

promising, especially because changes in aerosol amount over some locations are also seen by<br />

MSG. Better agreements should be obtained using exact radiative transfer calculations and filters on<br />

the number of pixel used for the mean calculation, threshold on the standard deviation and the<br />

proximity of clouds.<br />

- 30 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!