12.01.2015 Views

Jose Serna Fertility preservation.ppt

Jose Serna Fertility preservation.ppt

Jose Serna Fertility preservation.ppt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FERTILITY PRESERVATION<br />

José SERNA, MD, PhD<br />

Director IVI Zaragoza, Spain


Introduction<br />

o<br />

It is estimated that 1/1,000<br />

women between 20 and 30 survive<br />

cancer, frequently after gonadotoxic treatments (CT, RT,…).<br />

o 42% of young women after CT &RT<br />

develop aPOF. 30-90%<br />

men will have seminal changes (Blummenfeld).<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

1out<br />

of 52 women have amalignant<br />

tumour before 39 yo<br />

In the US there are 50,000000 new cases per year in people in their<br />

reproductive age.<br />

Each year in the US, around 4% of young women receive<br />

treatment with CT &RT<br />

with sterilizing effect.


Introduction<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Thanks to the oncologic therapy improvement in the lasts<br />

decades, there is aspectacular<br />

increase in cure rates of some<br />

hematologic cancer and other solid tumours.<br />

Nowadays it is believed that 70% boy and girls with cancer will<br />

survive.<br />

There is aincreasing<br />

concern about the Quality of Life due to the<br />

increase in survival rates after an oncologic treatment.


Introduction<br />

o<br />

The more the survival and cure rate increase, the more the<br />

treatment consequences are taken into account.<br />

o<br />

Ovarian function and fertility maintenance are considered one of<br />

the major concerns among patients overcoming the disease.<br />

These facts influence in Quality of Life and Self-esteem.<br />

“Cancer-free but Sterile”<br />

Oosterhuis et al. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008;50:85 -89.


Epidemiology<br />

2007 Estimated US Cancer Cases*<br />

Prostate 29%<br />

Men<br />

766,860<br />

Women<br />

678,060<br />

26% Breast<br />

Lung & bronchus 15%<br />

15% Lung & bronchus<br />

Colon & rectum 10%<br />

11%Colon & rectum<br />

Urinary bladder 7%<br />

6% Uterine corpus<br />

Non-Hodgkin<br />

4%<br />

lymphoma<br />

4% Non-Hodgkin<br />

lymphoma<br />

Melanoma of skin 4%<br />

4% Melanoma of skin<br />

Kidney 4%<br />

4% Thyroid<br />

Leukemia 3%<br />

3% Ovary<br />

Oral cavity 3%<br />

3% Kidney<br />

Pancreas 2%<br />

3% Leukemia<br />

All Other Sites 19%<br />

21% All Other Sites<br />

( Higher frequency in reproductive age)<br />

*Excludes basal and squamous cell skin cancers and in situ carcinomas except urinary bladder.<br />

Source: American Cancer Society, 2007.


Epidemiology<br />

Lifetime Probability of Developing Cancer, by Site.<br />

Site<br />

Risk<br />

All sites † 1 in 3<br />

Breast 1 in 8<br />

Lung & bronchus 1 in 16<br />

Colon & rectum 1 in 19<br />

Uterine corpus 1 in 40<br />

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 1 in 55<br />

Ovary 1 in 69<br />

Melanoma 1 in 73<br />

Pancreas 1 in 79<br />

Urinary bladder ‡ 1 in 87<br />

Uterine cervix 1 in 138<br />

Women, US.<br />

2001-2003*<br />

* For those free of cancer at beginning of age interval. Based on cancer cases diagnosed during 2001 to 2003.<br />

† All Sites exclude basal and squamous cell skin cancers and in situ cancers except urinary bladder.<br />

‡ Includes invasive and in situ cancer cases<br />

Source: DevCan: Probability of Developing or Dying of Cancer Software, Version 6.1.1 Statistical Research and<br />

Applications Branch, NCI, 2006. http://srab.cancer.gov/devcan


Epidemiology<br />

Five-year Relative Survival (%)* during three time<br />

periods by Cancer Site<br />

Site 1975-7777 1984-8686 1996-2002<br />

All sites 50 53 66<br />

Breast (female) 75 79 89<br />

Colon 51 59 65<br />

Leukemia 35 42 49<br />

Lung and bronchus 13 13 16<br />

Melanoma 82 86 92<br />

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 48 53 63<br />

Ovary 37 40 45<br />

Pancreas 2 3 5<br />

Prostate 69 76 100<br />

Rectum 49 57 66<br />

Urinary bladder 73 78 82<br />

†<br />

*5-year relative survival rates based on follow up of patients through 2003.<br />

†Recent changes in classification of ovarian cancer have affected 1996-2002 survival rates.<br />

Source: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, 1975-2003, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences,<br />

National Cancer Institute, 2006.


Breast Cancer<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

The more frequent tumour in reproductive age is Breast Cancer<br />

accounting 1/3 of the cancers in young women.<br />

More than 15% of Breast Cancers appears in women younger<br />

than 40 (approx. 8,600<br />

new cases/year) and 600 in younger than<br />

30.<br />

The majority of these patients will be treated with CT including<br />

gonadotoxic (CPA) that may generate POF and Sterility.


Gonadotoxic effect<br />

• Age<br />

• Initial state of the gonad<br />

• Cancer type<br />

• Treatment used<br />

- Association of various drugs<br />

- Combined CT % RT<br />

• Doses and number of cycles


Age<br />

Incidence of induced amenorrhoea following CT regarding woman age, in<br />

423 premenopausal women treated with 6 CEF cycles<br />

(cyclophosphamide, epirubicin y 5-fluoruracile).


Gonadotoxic effect<br />

initial gonad condition:<br />

Diseases with impact on ovarian function<br />

• Childhood cancer<br />

• Gynaecological cancer (breast, cervix)<br />

• Previous pelvic radiotherapy<br />

• Benign ovarian diseases<br />

• Prophylactic oophorectomy in inherited mutations<br />

• Autoimmune diseases (lupus, glomerulonephritis)<br />

• Autologous or heterologous hematopoietic precursor<br />

transplantation


Gonadotoxic effect<br />

POF Incidence cancer survivors<br />

Cancer type:<br />

- 1/6 survivor of childhood cancer present POF<br />

- 32% adults surviving Hodgkin<br />

- 44% adults surviving AML<br />

- 50% adults surviving Breast Cancer<br />

- 80% adults surviving BMT<br />

The type of cancer affecting more female fertility is lymphoma<br />

followed by breast cancer.<br />

The following by frequency and/or relevance are: leukaemias,<br />

colorectal cancer, ovary, cervix, bone and thyroid.


Gonadotoxic effect<br />

Chemotherapy<br />

Drugs:<br />

Not following all-or-nothing law<br />

• Drug type: : most toxic agents are alquilants (cyclophosphamide)<br />

acting in an independent cell cycle fashion<br />

• Accumulated dose<br />

• Ages: : around 40% women 40<br />

• CT Mechanism of Action: : few known, but granulose cells seems to<br />

be the main target<br />

• Pathology: : total absence total or very low number of follicles,<br />

inactive, with fibrosis and without signs of follicular maturation


Gonadotoxic effect<br />

Chemotherapy<br />

Agents:<br />

HIGH RISK<br />

INTERMEDIATE<br />

RISK<br />

LOW RISK<br />

Cyclophosphamide<br />

Chlorambucil<br />

Melphalan<br />

Mustine<br />

Cysplatin<br />

Adriamycin<br />

Doxorrubicin<br />

Methothrexate<br />

5-Fluoruracil<br />

Vincristin<br />

Actinomycin D<br />

Bleomycin


Gonadotoxic effect<br />

Antimetabolites<br />

- RT & CT induce an<br />

irreversible destruction of<br />

germ cells leading to a<br />

premature ovarian failure<br />

Alquilants<br />

- Moreover: gonadal<br />

hormones lose,<br />

mutagenesis in germ<br />

cells and/or teratogen<br />

effects<br />

CT leads to primary damage in primordial<br />

follicles


Gonadotoxic effect<br />

Radiotherapy<br />

- Dose received: in humans dose reducing follicular population to half is 2 Gy<br />

- Age<br />

- Irradiation field: probability of POF increases if corporal irradiation<br />

- May have effects on other structures<br />

RT doses and ovarian toxicity, according to age<br />

Dose<br />

Effect<br />

60 no<br />

60-150<br />

>40: possible<br />

250-500500 15-40: 50% sterile<br />

500-800<br />

15-40: 75% sterile<br />

>800 100% sterile<br />

Wallace, 2005


Ovarian injury assessment<br />

Clínica Clinical<br />

- Amenorrhea, irregular cycles<br />

Ecográfica Echography<br />

- Antral follicle count<br />

Analítica Biochemistry<br />

- FSH and estradiol<br />

- Inhibin B<br />

-Antimüllerian hormone (AMH)


Results<br />

• Even with the recovery of ovarian activity, oocyte quality<br />

will be suboptimal<br />

• Higher abortion rates<br />

• Higher IUGR and premature delivery rates in women who<br />

suffered cancer in childhood<br />

European Journal of Cancer<br />

• Systemic treatment (alquilants agents) affects ovary but<br />

not endometrium<br />

• RT has a dose-dependent effect on the ovaries,<br />

endometrium and HPG axis


Pregnancy after Breast Cancer<br />

• Breast Cancer is a hormone-sensitive tumor<br />

• Fear to possible recurrences during pregnancy<br />

• A multidisciplinary team is required to determine the optimal<br />

time to get pregnant and the appropriate strategies<br />

• The time-lapse between cancer diagnosis and pregnancy<br />

varies within each particular case<br />

• Several studies did not find increase incidence of neoplasia<br />

recurrence following pregnancy


Pregnancy after Breast Cancer<br />

Prognosis<br />

• Several studies did not show<br />

increases in mortality after pregnancy<br />

in patients properly treated<br />

• Moreover some found a decrease in<br />

the risk.<br />

• There is a slight increase in<br />

spontaneous abortion in patients who<br />

received CT compared with general<br />

population


Modalities for<br />

<strong>Fertility</strong> Preservation<br />

- Oophoropexy<br />

- Trachelectomy<br />

SURGERY<br />

- Good<br />

MEDICAL<br />

choice CT & RT<br />

- Protective agents<br />

- Embryo<br />

- Oocyte<br />

- Ovarian CRYO Tissue<br />

- (in vitro Maturation)


Ovarian Transposition<br />

(Oophoropexia)<br />

Objective:<br />

Move ovaries away from irradiation field to avoid direct exposition to<br />

radiotherapy<br />

• Laparoscopy or laparotomy<br />

• They can be fixed in the upper paracolic gutters or behind<br />

uterus<br />

• Gonadal protection in 60% of the cases<br />

• Ovarian function <strong>preservation</strong> in 83-88% 88% of the cases<br />

• Complications: vascular lesions, Fallopian tube infarct, cyst<br />

formation


GnRH agonist<br />

Ø FSH/LH<br />

Pituitary<br />

Pituitary<br />

GnRH<br />

agonist<br />

receptor<br />

GnRH<br />

-GnRH agonist may prevent<br />

follicles from reaching the toxic CT<br />

threshold by decreasing mitotic<br />

activity in granulose cells<br />

• It is not clearly established the<br />

benefits of GnRH agonists<br />

• Its use has to be restricted to<br />

controlled clinical assays<br />

Receptor down-regulation<br />

desensibilization<br />

Blumenfeld et al. Fertil Steril 2008;89:166–73


<strong>Fertility</strong> Preservation in People Treated for Cancer<br />

American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline<br />

Triage of <strong>Fertility</strong> Preservation Referrals<br />

Assessment of risk for infertility<br />

Communication with patient<br />

Patient at risk for treatment-induced infertility<br />

Patient interested in fertility <strong>preservation</strong> options<br />

Refer to specialist with expertise in fertility <strong>preservation</strong> method<br />

Eligible for proven fertility <strong>preservation</strong> method<br />

Male:<br />

Sperm cryo<strong>preservation</strong><br />

Female:<br />

Embryo cryo<strong>preservation</strong><br />

Conservative gynecologic surgery<br />

oophoropexy<br />

©American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006<br />

Clinical Trial of investigational<br />

fertility <strong>preservation</strong> technique<br />

Cryo<strong>preservation</strong> of testicular or<br />

ovarian tissue or oocytes<br />

Ovarian suppression<br />

http://www.asco.org/guidelines/fertility


Modalities for<br />

<strong>Fertility</strong> Preservation<br />

- Oophoropexy<br />

- Trachelectomy<br />

SURGERY<br />

- Good<br />

MEDICAL<br />

choice CT & RT<br />

- Protective agents<br />

- Embryo<br />

- Oocyte<br />

- Ovarian CRYO Tissue<br />

- (in vitro Maturation)<br />

COH


Ovarian Stimulation<br />

Cryo<strong>preservation</strong>


Letrozole<br />

• Aromatase Inhibitor, 3 rd generation.<br />

• Highly selective<br />

• Decreases E 2 levels in 90%<br />

• Tamoxifen alternative in Breast Cancer<br />

• Recently used for Ovulation Induction, alone<br />

or with FSH<br />

• 5 mg/day more effective than 2,5 mg/day


Tamoxifen vs Letrozole in FIV patients with<br />

Breast Cancer<br />

E 2<br />

hCG<br />

Days<br />

Tamoxifen<br />

Tamox 5 60 mg/d 10<br />

7.8 ± 0.5<br />

Tamox-FSH<br />

FSH 150 IU<br />

Tamox 5 60 mg/d 10<br />

8.9 ± 0.8<br />

Letroz-FSH<br />

FSH 150 IU<br />

Letrozole 5 5 mg/d 10<br />

Letrozole<br />

9.1 ± 0.5<br />

0 4 8 12<br />

Cycle Days<br />

Oktay et al, J Clin Oncol 2005 Jul 1;23(19):4347-53.


Ovarian Stimulation Protocol<br />

with Letrozole<br />

FSH 150 UI<br />

MENS<br />

Letrozole 5 5 mg/d 10<br />

1 2 4 8 12<br />

Letrozole<br />

- GnRH antagonist with follicles ≥14 mm.<br />

- hCG when largest follicles reach 19-21 mm.<br />

- Day+3: E2>250 pg/ml, start Letrozole until E2


Letrozole vs agonist Long Protocol<br />

Table-2. Comparison of various characteristics between letrozole+FSH and control groups.<br />

Letrozole+FSH a<br />

Control b<br />

P-value c<br />

mean ± standard error<br />

mean ± standard error<br />

Age at IVF 36.1 ± 0.5 36.9 ± 0.5 0.69<br />

Baseline FSH 7.6 ± 0.5 4.3 ± 0.2


Letrozole vs. control groups<br />

P=0.05<br />

1<br />

% Maturity<br />

n=2 n=12<br />

17<br />

20<br />

21<br />

0<br />

hCG>17 mm<br />

hCG>18 mm<br />

0.53 ± 0.18 vs. 0.80 ± 0.05<br />

Mature/ Total Oocytes<br />

Fertilization<br />

Oktay et al, JCEM 2006<br />

17<br />

20<br />

21


Controversies Letrozole<br />

• 4.7 vs 1.8% major malformations<br />

• 150 NB after Letrozole vs 36.000 NB, in an NON-TERTIARY hospital<br />

• Laryngomalacia, craneosynostosis, sacral fusion, aortic stenosis (2), cystic<br />

lynphangioma, hepatocellular carcinoma.<br />

• Only slightly increased Chromosomal Abnormalities.<br />

ASRM 2005 abstract<br />

• 911 NB after Letrozole or Clomiphene stimulation<br />

• Similar malformation rates: 2,4% (L) vs 3% (CC).<br />

• Less incidence of hart malformation (0,2% vs 1,8%, p=0,02).<br />

Tulandi-Casper. Fertil Steril, June 2006.<br />

• 2.56% (L) vs 3.10% (CC) major malformation (p>0.05).<br />

Padte K et al. Serono Symposia on Regulation of Follicle Development and its Clinical Implications. May 2006.


Controversies Letrozole<br />

• Half-life: 48h<br />

- Drug out of the body before<br />

fertilization.<br />

• Absence of evidence of<br />

oocyte/embryo damage in mice<br />

• Cryopreserved embryos are not<br />

exposed to the drug<br />

Novartis:<br />

The drug “should not be used in<br />

women who may become<br />

pregnant, during pregnancy<br />

and/or while breast-feeding,<br />

because there is a potential risk<br />

of harm to the mother and the<br />

fetus, including risk of fetal<br />

malformations,”


Utilization of IVM Further Increases<br />

the Yield of Oocytes & Embryos in<br />

Letrozole Cycles<br />

% of cryopreserved embryo/oocytes<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Before IVM<br />

After IVM<br />

Before IVM<br />

After IVM<br />

Embryo or oocyte yield increase 44.7±11.2 % (p


Oocyte in vitro Maturation<br />

Pros<br />

-Simple and short time<br />

-Low cost<br />

-Low incidence of side-effects<br />

Cons<br />

- Less successful rates<br />

- Difficult uptake<br />

- Still experimental


<strong>Fertility</strong> Preservation in People Treated for Cancer<br />

American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline<br />

<strong>Fertility</strong> Preservation Options in<br />

Females (cont’ d)<br />

• Embryo Cryo<strong>preservation</strong><br />

– Requires ~2 weeks of ovarian stimulation w/daily injections of FSH from<br />

the onset of menses.<br />

– A delay of 2-6 weeks in chemotherapy initiation may be required if<br />

reproductive specialists do not see women early in their menstrual<br />

cycle.<br />

– This approach may be associated with high out-of-pocket costs for most<br />

women.<br />

– Long-term follow up with a larger number of patients is needed to<br />

evaluate the safety and efficacy of this approach.<br />

– For women with hormone-sensitive tumors, alternative hormonal<br />

stimulation approaches such as letrozole or tamoxifen have been<br />

developed to theoretically reduce the potential risk of estrogen<br />

exposure.<br />

http://www.asco.org/guidelines/fertility<br />

©American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006


<strong>Fertility</strong> Preservation in People Treated for Cancer<br />

American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline<br />

<strong>Fertility</strong> Preservation Options in<br />

Females (cont’ d)<br />

• Recommendation (Embryo Cryo<strong>preservation</strong>):<br />

–Embryo cryo<strong>preservation</strong> is considered an<br />

established fertility <strong>preservation</strong> method as it has<br />

routinely been used for storing surplus embryos<br />

after in vitro fertilization for infertility treatment.<br />

http://www.asco.org/guidelines/fertility<br />

©American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006


Oocyte Vitrification<br />

Cryotop Method


Vitrified oocytes maintain intact their potential to reach blastocyst


Perinatal outcome from Vitrified vs. Fresh donated oocytes.<br />

Paired cohorts study.<br />

Singleton<br />

Vitrified<br />

Singleton<br />

Fresh<br />

Multiple<br />

vitrified<br />

Multiple<br />

Fresh<br />

Nº Deliveries 212 234 99 92<br />

Nº New born 212 234 199 183<br />

Nº Live birth 211 233 197 183<br />

Mean maternal age at delivering 40.6 ± 4.9 40.8 ± 4.8 40.8 ± 3.4 40.4 ± 4.5<br />

Mean gestational age (weeks) 39.0 ± 1.9 38.6 ± 1.9 36.7 ± 2.8 36.1 ± 2.2<br />

No. of deliveries at


Modalities for<br />

<strong>Fertility</strong> Preservation<br />

• Recommendation (Oocyte Cryo<strong>preservation</strong>):<br />

–Cryo<strong>preservation</strong> of unfertilized oocytes is another option<br />

for fertility <strong>preservation</strong> particularly in patients for whom:<br />

•A partner is unavailable, or<br />

•Religious or ethical objections conflict with embryo<br />

freezing.<br />

- Embryo<br />

- Oocyte<br />

- Ovarian Tissue<br />

- (in vitro Maturation)<br />

COH


Modalities for<br />

<strong>Fertility</strong> Preservation<br />

CRYO<br />

- Embryo<br />

- Oocyte<br />

- Ovarian Tissue<br />

- (in vitro Maturation)<br />

COH


<strong>Fertility</strong> Preservation and Cancer<br />

OOCYTE<br />

CRYOPRESERVATION<br />

OVARIAN CORTEX<br />

CRYOPRESERVATION<br />

Advantages:<br />

-Demonstrated results<br />

-Success Rate similar to fresh<br />

oocytes<br />

-Established technique<br />

Advantages:<br />

-Unlimited cycles<br />

-Maintenance Hormone<br />

function<br />

Restrictions:<br />

-Limited IVF cycles<br />

-Does not guarantee pregnancy<br />

-May delay CT<br />

-Need ovarian stimulation<br />

Restrictions:<br />

-Isolated cases<br />

-Need tech optimization<br />

-Harboring cancer cells<br />

-Need surgery


<strong>Fertility</strong> Preservation in Cancer Patients<br />

1 st choice<br />

OOCYTE<br />

CRYOPRESERVATION<br />

OVARIAN CORTEX<br />

CRYOPRESERVATION<br />

-Women willing to conceive<br />

-Oncologist consultation<br />

and approval<br />

-Does not exclude ovarian<br />

cortex removal<br />

Concerns:<br />

-Cross-contamination<br />

-Girls<br />

-Contraindication for<br />

ovarian stimulation<br />

-Oncologist disapprove<br />

stimulation<br />

-No time for ovarian<br />

stimulation<br />

Concerns:<br />

-Leukaemia<br />

-Cross-contamination


Ovarıan Cortex Cryopreservatıon<br />

• Still experimental<br />

• Animals and Humans<br />

spontaneous<br />

pregnancies<br />

• Ovarian cortex is fully<br />

functional


Ovarian tissue cryo<strong>preservation</strong><br />

Our protocol<br />

Ovarian cortex retrieval (generally by laparoscopy) and ulterior processing


Ovarian cortex cryo<strong>preservation</strong><br />

Our protocol<br />

• Reimplantation over ovarian medulla when disease-free have<br />

been proved<br />

Limitations<br />

• Avoid massive follicle loss associated with transplantation<br />

isquemia:<br />

• Surgical approaches<br />

• Antiox. and angiogenic agents<br />

• Define biological hazard markers before reimplantation


IVI Program for Female<br />

<strong>Fertility</strong> Preservation<br />

Cancer diagnosis<br />

Ovarian tissue freezing<br />

Ovarian stimulation<br />

Egg vitrification<br />

3 weeks


<strong>Fertility</strong> Preservation in People Treated for Cancer<br />

American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline<br />

http://www.asco.org/guidelines/fertility


“No childless women<br />

surviving cancer”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!