12.01.2015 Views

in the united states district court for the - Hoosier Racing Tire

in the united states district court for the - Hoosier Racing Tire

in the united states district court for the - Hoosier Racing Tire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case 2:07-cv-01294-TFM Document 263 Filed 09/15/2009 Page 16 of 34<br />

In October 2007, after <strong>the</strong> fil<strong>in</strong>g of this lawsuit, DMS sent a RFP to seven tire<br />

manufacturers, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Goodyear, <strong>Hoosier</strong>, and STA, request<strong>in</strong>g proposals <strong>for</strong> a one year<br />

contract to be <strong>the</strong> exclusive supplier <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> UMP DIRTcar Late Model series. Of <strong>the</strong> seven<br />

companies who were sent a RFP, only three - Goodyear, STA, and <strong>Hoosier</strong> - responded with<br />

proposals. STA’s proposal advocated “non-exclusivity;” <strong>the</strong> <strong>Hoosier</strong> and Goodyear bids each<br />

advocated exclusivity. DMS did not select STA’s proposal, but ra<strong>the</strong>r awarded <strong>Hoosier</strong> with an<br />

exclusive tire contract <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> UMP DIRTcar Late Model series <strong>for</strong> a three year rac<strong>in</strong>g period,<br />

2008, 2009, and 2010.<br />

In October 2008, DMS sent a RFP to seven companies request<strong>in</strong>g proposals <strong>for</strong> a<br />

contract to be <strong>the</strong> exclusive tire supplier <strong>for</strong> DIRTcar Modified (NE) rac<strong>in</strong>g. Of <strong>the</strong> seven<br />

companies who were sent a RFP, only three - Goodyear, <strong>Hoosier</strong>, and STA, responded with<br />

proposals. Goodyear and <strong>Hoosier</strong> each submitted proposals that were responsive <strong>in</strong> that <strong>the</strong><br />

proposals submitted by Goodyear and <strong>Hoosier</strong> addressed each of <strong>the</strong> material bus<strong>in</strong>ess terms <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> RFP. In contrast, DMS deemed STA’s proposal as non-responsive because it contemplated<br />

a non-exclusive relationship although <strong>the</strong> RFP called <strong>for</strong> a proposal of an exclusive<br />

arrangement.<br />

DMS determ<strong>in</strong>ed that STA would not be selected as <strong>the</strong> exclusive tire supplier <strong>for</strong><br />

DIRTcar Modified (NE) rac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2008, 2009, and 2010 rac<strong>in</strong>g seasons. As between<br />

Goodyear and <strong>Hoosier</strong>, DMS ultimately determ<strong>in</strong>ed that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Hoosier</strong> proposal best fit DMS’s<br />

goals and objectives, and awarded <strong>the</strong> contract to <strong>Hoosier</strong> <strong>for</strong> DIRTcar Modified (NE) rac<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2008, 2009, and 2010 rac<strong>in</strong>g seasons.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!