Building Renewal & Deferred Maintenance - Arizona State University
Building Renewal & Deferred Maintenance - Arizona State University
Building Renewal & Deferred Maintenance - Arizona State University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Building</strong> <strong>Renewal</strong> & <strong>Deferred</strong> <strong>Maintenance</strong><br />
Overview<br />
The buildings and infrastructure within the <strong>Arizona</strong> <strong>University</strong> System are in a constant state of<br />
deterioration reflecting the wear and decline associated with their age and intensive use. Roofs start to<br />
leak as they age, floors look worn, and HVAC systems become inefficient. These building components<br />
must be updated through a process referred to as "<strong>Building</strong> <strong>Renewal</strong>". When compromised<br />
components are not updated, they become candidates for “<strong>Deferred</strong> <strong>Maintenance</strong>”.<br />
When building performance and integrity are not high priorities, deferred maintenance costs increase<br />
dramatically. Failure to fund building renewal turns into deferred maintenance expense. Systems still<br />
need to be replaced, but it becomes more costly, and continued deferral increases the need for even<br />
more costly emergency repairs. This leads to the deterioration of the capital assets and ultimately<br />
lessens the quality of facilities available for teaching and research.<br />
<strong>Building</strong> <strong>Renewal</strong><br />
ABOR defines <strong>Building</strong> <strong>Renewal</strong> to include major activities that involve the repair or reworking of a<br />
building and the supporting infrastructure that will result in maintaining a building's expected useful life.<br />
Each university in the system calculates every building’s renewal needs based on the Sherman Dergis<br />
Model and compiles those needs in the annual Capital Improvement Plan and <strong>State</strong> Operating Budget<br />
Request sent to the Governor's Office, as required by law (ARS §41-793).<br />
The <strong>University</strong> System <strong>Building</strong> <strong>Renewal</strong> Request for FY2012 is $90,136,900.<br />
Sherman-Dergis Model for <strong>Building</strong> <strong>Renewal</strong><br />
The Joint Committee on Capital Review approved the use of a modified Sherman-Dergis Model for<br />
calculating the <strong>Building</strong> <strong>Renewal</strong> request at each university. The formula takes into consideration each<br />
building’s age, replacement value, and expected life in the following configuration:<br />
<strong>Building</strong> <strong>Renewal</strong> Request = (Replacement Value x .667) x (Age/1275)<br />
The formula reflects the current year building value by updating the original construction cost by using a<br />
national building cost index. In addition, the formula recognizes that older buildings require more capital<br />
funding than newer buildings and that building renewal should cost less than building replacement.<br />
Unfortunately, the formula does not consider increased deferred maintenance expense resulting from<br />
less that 100% funding of <strong>Building</strong> <strong>Renewal</strong> requests in previous years.<br />
<strong>Deferred</strong> <strong>Maintenance</strong><br />
ABOR defines <strong>Deferred</strong> <strong>Maintenance</strong> as deficiencies in a facility’s condition where deterioration and/or<br />
life safety concerns are evident, and affect the proper function and use of a facility.<br />
<strong>State</strong> law requires that all buildings be inspected every four years, and the next phase will be<br />
accomplished using a computer model due to budget restrictions. The computer model takes previous<br />
inspection information, subtracts known improvements, and adjusts remaining costs for escalation and<br />
wear out.<br />
Based on previous inspections and current computer modeling, the <strong>Arizona</strong> <strong>University</strong> System’s<br />
Estimated End of Year <strong>Deferred</strong> <strong>Maintenance</strong> for FY2012 is $627,962,800.<br />
Stimulus Plan for Economic and Educational Development (SPEED)<br />
The SPEED legislation, originally passed in 2008, provides financing supported by lottery and university<br />
resources for new construction, deferred maintenance and building renewal. Anticipated SPEED<br />
expenditures are included in the Estimated End of Year <strong>Deferred</strong> <strong>Maintenance</strong>. While some SPEED<br />
projects will address deferred maintenance and building renewal, SPEED financing does not eliminate<br />
the need for state supported building renewal funding.
Funding History<br />
Each year the <strong>University</strong> System submits a <strong>Building</strong> <strong>Renewal</strong> request representing the funds necessary<br />
to restore and maintain the buildings on campus in a satisfactory condition. Over the last twenty-five<br />
years, the <strong>State</strong> Legislature has funded only 16.9% of the System’s <strong>Building</strong> <strong>Renewal</strong> request which<br />
represents a net shortfall of $816,405,600.<br />
Fiscal<br />
Year<br />
<strong>Building</strong><br />
<strong>Renewal</strong><br />
Formula<br />
<strong>State</strong><br />
Appropriation<br />
Difference from<br />
Formula<br />
Percent<br />
of<br />
Formula<br />
1987* 11,456,600 5,727,500 5,729,100 50.0%<br />
1988 12,579,600 8,689,000 3,890,600 69.1%<br />
1989 13,838,400 5,187,700 8,650,700 37.5%<br />
1990 13,630,400 6,815,200 6,815,200 50.0%<br />
1991 14,599,800 3,000,000 11,599,800 20.5%<br />
1992 16,174,900 1,614,700 14,560,200 10.0%<br />
1993 17,742,200 5,459,300 12,282,900 30.8%<br />
1994 18,435,200 3,051,700 15,383,500 16.6%<br />
1995 21,254,900 12,402,400 8,852,500 58.4%<br />
1996 21,385,900 19,247,300 2,138,600 90.0%<br />
1997 27,680,000 11,482,000 16,198,000 41.5%<br />
1998 29,558,000 14,779,100 14,778,900 50.0%<br />
1999 32,031,700 32,031,700 0 100.0%<br />
2000 34,892,300 8,128,100 26,764,200 23.3%<br />
2001 37,598,500 8,804,600 28,793,900 23.4%<br />
2002 42,296,800 0 42,296,800 0.0%<br />
2003 45,642,800 0 45,642,800 0.0%<br />
2004 52,079,200 0 52,079,200 0.0%<br />
2005 55,918,700 0 55,918,700 0.0%<br />
2006 58,961,500 0 58,961,500 0.0%<br />
2007 70,188,900 20,000,000 50,188,900 28.5%<br />
2008 71,534,300 0 71,534,300 0.0%<br />
2009 82,862,900 0 82,862,900 0.0%<br />
2010 91,525,300 0 91,525,300 0.0%<br />
2011 88,957,100 0 88,957,100 0.0%<br />
Totals 982,825,900 166,420,300 816,405,600 16.9%<br />
* A mid-year budget cut reduced the funding from 100% to 50%.<br />
<strong>Building</strong> Inventory Summary<br />
The <strong>Arizona</strong> <strong>University</strong> System includes 1,670 facilities, comprised of 37,185,928 gross square feet,<br />
with a replacement value of $9,139,759,102.<br />
Institution<br />
Total<br />
Number of<br />
Facilities<br />
Gross<br />
Square<br />
Footage<br />
Estimated<br />
Replacement Value<br />
ASU 976 17,246,209 $3,948,050,760<br />
NAU 108 5,730,334 $1,279,032,973<br />
UA 653 14,613,455 $4,425,435,055<br />
SYSTEM TOTAL 1,737 37,589,998 $9,652,518,788