SECCM Assessment Plan - Roger Williams University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 3.9 RWU Computer Science Program Educational Objectives Objectives – Three to Five Years After Graduation, We Expect Our Graduates To: 1. Apply disciplinary knowledge and skill to analyze, design, implement, and test solutions to applied problems individually and in diverse teams. Present solutions using the variety of media that best promotes understanding. 2. Continue to grow intellectually and professionally in the computing sciences and appreciate the continuous pursuit of knowledge in other areas of interest. 3. Use knowledge and draw on experiences relevant to current and emerging needs in computing sciences and recognize the social, ethical, and cultural impact of technology in a global setting 4. Serve as an exemplar and ambassador of the RWU Computer Science program, strengthening its tradition of excellence, by becoming active in professional societies and organizations and by volunteering within your community. These objectives are consistent with the goals of the <strong>University</strong>. Table 3.10, Alignment and Mapping of the Computer Science Program Objectives to the RWU Mission, Core Values and Goals, illustrates the connection of the Computer Science program objectives to the <strong>University</strong>. Table 3.10 Alignment and Mapping of the Computer Science Program Objectives to the RWU Mission, Core Values and Goals • = Weak Relationship • = Moderate Relationship • = Strong Relationship RWU Core Values, Goals, and Computer Science Program Objectives CS Program Objectives 1 2 3 4 RWU Mission • • • • RWU Core Values RWU Educational Goals Love of learning as an intrinsic value • • • • Preparation for careers and future study • • • • Collaboration of students and faculty in research • • • • Commitment to community service • • • • Appreciation of global perspectives • • • • Communicate clearly in a variety of formats • • • • Appreciate the ability of the humanities to stir the soul • • • • Advocate effectively through civil discourse • • • • Acquire new information and perspectives through traditional research techniques and the use of information technology Contribute productively in team projects through leadership and cooperative efforts Understand how different cultures, philosophies and historical experiences affect the perspectives of others • • • • • • • • • • • • 53
Computer Science Program Outcomes Computer science program outcomes correspond to the knowledge, skills and behavior that are we expect our graduates to possess at the time of their graduation. These outcomes are established and periodically updated based on constituency input. The outcomes for the computer science program are: a. demonstrated capabilities in abstraction, algorithm analysis, computer theory computer organization and programming language concepts b. an ability to draw from progressively more complex design-build-test experiences in solving new problems in individual and team settings c. an ability to apply quantitative math-science-engineering knowledge relevant to specific problems d. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning e. an understanding of the impact of CS technologies in applied settings (e.g. cultural, social, ethical) f. an appreciation of the complexities of designing and implementing a software solution that meets customer requirements g. an ability to use suitable writing and speaking skills as part of analyzing, designing, implementing, testing and fielding solutions These program outcomes are related to the educational objectives as presented in Table 3.11. Table 3.11 Computer Science Program Educational Objectives linked to Computer Science Program Outcomes • = Weak Relationship • = Moderate Relationship • = Strong Relationship a – g Outcomes a. demonstrated capabilities in abstraction, algorithm analysis, computer theory, computer organization and programming language concepts b. an ability to draw from progressively more complex design-buildtest experiences in solving new problems in individual and team settings c. an ability to apply quantitative math-science-engineering knowledge relevant to specific problems d. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning e. an understanding of the impact of CS technologies in applied settings (e.g. cultural, social, ethical) f. an appreciation of the complexities of designing and implementing a software solution that meets customer requirements g. an ability to use suitable writing and speaking skills as part of analyzing, designing, implementing, testing and fielding solutions Objectives 1 2 3 4 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 54
Page 1 and 2:
School of Engineering, Computing an
Page 3 and 4:
Section 4 - Assessment Plan for the
Page 5 and 6: Correlation of SECCM’s Goals and
Page 7 and 8: Figure 1.1 Assessment Plan Interrel
Page 9 and 10: Program Educational Objectives and
Page 11 and 12: Table 1.2 Instruments and Materials
Page 13 and 14: • Course Assessment Report One of
Page 15 and 16: • Student enrollment trends • F
Page 18 and 19: Section 2 Assessment Plan for the E
Page 20 and 21: The Engineering program was origina
Page 22 and 23: 6. Core Education Courses These cou
Page 24 and 25: Table 2.7 RWU Engineering Program E
Page 26 and 27: Relationship between Engineering Cu
Page 28 and 29: Seminar Business elective Engineeri
Page 30 and 31: Bloom’s taxonomy and derived from
Page 33 and 34: Table 2.12 Course Mapping to Expect
Page 35 and 36: Outcome Courses ENGR 300 Mechanics
Page 37 and 38: Outcome Courses ENGR 424 Digital Si
Page 39 and 40: Outcome Courses CORE 103 Human Beha
Page 41 and 42: Metric Goals for Each a-k Engineeri
Page 43 and 44: Table 2.15 Outcome “c” Metrics
Page 45 and 46: Table 2.18 Outcome “f” Metrics
Page 47 and 48: Table 2.20 Outcome “h” Metrics
Page 49 and 50: Table 2.23 Outcome “k” Metrics
Page 51 and 52: Table 3.1 General Program Breakdown
Page 53 and 54: Table 3.5 Concepts of Programming L
Page 55: Senior Capstone Sequence The hallma
Page 59 and 60: Table 3.12 Sample of Outcomes Works
Page 61 and 62: Table 3.12b Sample of Outcomes Work
Page 63 and 64: Table 3.12e Sample of Outcomes Work
Page 65 and 66: Table 3.12g Sample of Outcomes Work
Page 67 and 68: Metric Goals for Each a-g Computer
Page 69 and 70: Table 2.16 Outcome “d” Metrics
Page 71 and 72: Table 2.19 Outcome “g” Metrics
Page 73 and 74: Table 4.1 General Education Courses
Page 75 and 76: Table 4.5 Construction Course Numbe
Page 77 and 78: Table 4.8 Alignment and Mapping of
Page 79 and 80: Table 4.9 Construction Management P
Page 81 and 82: Table 4.13 Outcome “b” Metrics
Page 83 and 84: Table 4.17 Outcome “f” Metrics
Page 85 and 86: Table 4.20 Outcome “i” Metrics
Page 88 and 89: Engineering Senior Exit Survey Scho
Page 90: Programs/Services/Individuals Extre
Page 93 and 94: 5. Were there any activities, progr
Page 96 and 97: Construction Management Senior Exit
Page 98: 7. What would you say is the greate
Page 101 and 102: SECCM Course Assessment Report Cont
Page 103 and 104: Student assessments of course objec
Page 105 and 106: e. Average Time Data ENGR 330 Time
Page 107 and 108:
d. Development of a written assessm
Page 109 and 110:
computers imaged the same as those
Page 114 and 115:
18. How long did it take you to fin
Page 116 and 117:
ROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF
Page 118 and 119:
ENGR 490 Skills Inventory School of
Page 120 and 121:
School of Engineering, Computing, a
Page 122 and 123:
Student ___________________________
Page 124 and 125:
Student ___________________________
show all

SECCM Assessment Plan - Roger Williams University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?