SECCM Assessment Plan - Roger Williams University
SECCM Assessment Plan - Roger Williams University SECCM Assessment Plan - Roger Williams University
Table 2.22 Outcome “j” Metrics Outcome j: a knowledge of contemporary issues Metrics Associated with Outcome j: 1. All engineering students will be exposed to contemporary issues in through the Multidisciplinary Core Education component as well as the Senior Multidisciplinary Core course 2. At least 20% of engineering courses will address this outcome. Where Measured Course Binders Course Binders Course Assessment Report 3. At least 85% of graduating seniors will rate their proficiency in knowledge of contemporary issues at a score of 1 or 2 on a five point scale where 1 means proficiency developed and 5 means proficiency not developed. 4. All engineering students will be exposed to contemporary issues through the Senior Seminar class. 5. All engineering students will participate in the Feinstein Service Learning Requirement of at least 5 hours in the surrounding community. Student Exit Survey Course Binders Transcript Review 45
Table 2.23 Outcome “k” Metrics Outcome k: an ability to use the techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice Metrics Associated with Outcome k: 1. All students will successfully demonstrate their ability to use the techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice through the year-long senior capstone project. 2. All students participating in the senior design projects will be favorably rated by external mentors and clients. 3. At least 80% of graduating seniors will rate their proficiency in the ability to use modern engineering tools at a score of 1 or 2 on a five point scale where 1 means proficiency developed and 5 means proficiency not developed. 4. At least 75% of engineering classes address this outcome. Where Measured Course Assessment Report Course Student Survey Senior Design and Construction Showcase Senior Design and Construction Showcase Graduate Employers Professional Advisory Board Meetings Student Exit Survey Course Binders Course Assessment Report 46
- Page 1 and 2: School of Engineering, Computing an
- Page 3 and 4: Section 4 - Assessment Plan for the
- Page 5 and 6: Correlation of SECCM’s Goals and
- Page 7 and 8: Figure 1.1 Assessment Plan Interrel
- Page 9 and 10: Program Educational Objectives and
- Page 11 and 12: Table 1.2 Instruments and Materials
- Page 13 and 14: • Course Assessment Report One of
- Page 15 and 16: • Student enrollment trends • F
- Page 18 and 19: Section 2 Assessment Plan for the E
- Page 20 and 21: The Engineering program was origina
- Page 22 and 23: 6. Core Education Courses These cou
- Page 24 and 25: Table 2.7 RWU Engineering Program E
- Page 26 and 27: Relationship between Engineering Cu
- Page 28 and 29: Seminar Business elective Engineeri
- Page 30 and 31: Bloom’s taxonomy and derived from
- Page 33 and 34: Table 2.12 Course Mapping to Expect
- Page 35 and 36: Outcome Courses ENGR 300 Mechanics
- Page 37 and 38: Outcome Courses ENGR 424 Digital Si
- Page 39 and 40: Outcome Courses CORE 103 Human Beha
- Page 41 and 42: Metric Goals for Each a-k Engineeri
- Page 43 and 44: Table 2.15 Outcome “c” Metrics
- Page 45 and 46: Table 2.18 Outcome “f” Metrics
- Page 47: Table 2.20 Outcome “h” Metrics
- Page 51 and 52: Table 3.1 General Program Breakdown
- Page 53 and 54: Table 3.5 Concepts of Programming L
- Page 55 and 56: Senior Capstone Sequence The hallma
- Page 57 and 58: Computer Science Program Outcomes C
- Page 59 and 60: Table 3.12 Sample of Outcomes Works
- Page 61 and 62: Table 3.12b Sample of Outcomes Work
- Page 63 and 64: Table 3.12e Sample of Outcomes Work
- Page 65 and 66: Table 3.12g Sample of Outcomes Work
- Page 67 and 68: Metric Goals for Each a-g Computer
- Page 69 and 70: Table 2.16 Outcome “d” Metrics
- Page 71 and 72: Table 2.19 Outcome “g” Metrics
- Page 73 and 74: Table 4.1 General Education Courses
- Page 75 and 76: Table 4.5 Construction Course Numbe
- Page 77 and 78: Table 4.8 Alignment and Mapping of
- Page 79 and 80: Table 4.9 Construction Management P
- Page 81 and 82: Table 4.13 Outcome “b” Metrics
- Page 83 and 84: Table 4.17 Outcome “f” Metrics
- Page 85 and 86: Table 4.20 Outcome “i” Metrics
- Page 88 and 89: Engineering Senior Exit Survey Scho
- Page 90: Programs/Services/Individuals Extre
- Page 93 and 94: 5. Were there any activities, progr
- Page 96 and 97: Construction Management Senior Exit
Table 2.23 Outcome “k” Metrics<br />
Outcome k: an ability to use the techniques, skills and modern engineering<br />
tools necessary for engineering practice<br />
Metrics Associated with Outcome k:<br />
1. All students will successfully demonstrate their ability to use<br />
the techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for<br />
engineering practice through the year-long senior capstone<br />
project.<br />
2. All students participating in the senior design projects will be<br />
favorably rated by external mentors and clients.<br />
3. At least 80% of graduating seniors will rate their proficiency in<br />
the ability to use modern engineering tools at a score of 1 or 2 on<br />
a five point scale where 1 means proficiency developed and 5<br />
means proficiency not developed.<br />
4. At least 75% of engineering classes address this outcome.<br />
Where Measured<br />
Course <strong>Assessment</strong> Report<br />
Course Student Survey<br />
Senior Design and<br />
Construction Showcase<br />
Senior Design and<br />
Construction Showcase<br />
Graduate Employers<br />
Professional Advisory<br />
Board Meetings<br />
Student Exit Survey<br />
Course Binders<br />
Course <strong>Assessment</strong> Report<br />
46
Change language